Cited by 65Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementMenstrual Health and Disorders

Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis

Davis, Lucy-Jane, Kennedy, Stephen S, Moore, Jane, Prentice, Andrew·2007·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition which affects many women of reproductive age worldwide and is a major cause of pain and infertility. The modern oral contraceptive pill is widely used to treat pain occurring as a result of endometriosis, although the evidence for its efficacy is limited. Objectives To assess the effects of the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) in comparison to other treatments for painful symptoms of endometriosis in women of reproductive age. Search strategy We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2006); MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2006); EMBASE (1980 to September 2006); National Research Register; and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria All truly randomised controlled trials of the use of oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of women of reproductive age with symptoms ascribed to the diagnosis of endometriosis and made visually at surgical procedure were included. Data collection and analysis Study quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two review authors. One of the assessors was an expert in the content matter. We contacted study authors for additional information. Main results Only one study met the inclusion criteria, in which a total of 57 women were allocated to two groups to compare an OCP to a GnRH analogue. Methods of randomisatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001019.pub2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, L.-J., Kennedy, S. S., Moore, J., & Prentice, A.
Affiliations
  • Derriford Hospital (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Rosie Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-18
Issue
3
Pages
CD001019-CD001019
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4230900835
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, oral contraceptives, GnRH analogues, pain management, amenorrhea, infertility, women of reproductive age, treatment efficacy comparison, endometriosis surgery, menstrual disorders, subfertility, underpowered trials, trial quality assessment
MeSH terms
Contraceptives, Oral, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review