Buprenorphine for the management of opioid withdrawal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Managed withdrawal is a necessary step prior to drug-free treatment or as the end point of substitution treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions involving the use of buprenorphine to manage opioid withdrawal, for withdrawal signs and symptoms, completion of withdrawal and adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2008), EMBASE (January 1985 to 2008 Week 31), PsycINFO (1967 to 7 August 2008) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of interventions involving the use of buprenorphine to modify the signs and symptoms of withdrawal in participants who were primarily opioid dependent. Comparison interventions involved reducing doses of methadone, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists, symptomatic medications or placebo, or different buprenorphine-based regimes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author assessed studies for inclusion and methodological quality, and undertook data extraction. Inclusion decisions and the overall process was confirmed by consultation between all authors. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two studies involving 1736 participants were included. The major comparisons were with methadone (5 studies) and clonidine or lofexidine (12 studies). Five studies compared different rates of buprenorphine dose reduction.Severity of withdrawal is similar for withdrawal managed with buprenorphine and withdrawal managed with methadone, but withdrawal symptoms may resolve more quickly with buprenorphine. It appears that completion of withdrawal treatment may be more likely with buprenorphine relative to methadone (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.49, P = 0.18) but more studies are required to confirm this.Relative to clonidine or lofexidine, buprenorphine is more effective in ameliorating the symptoms of withdrawal, patients treated with buprenorphine stay in treatment for longer (SMD 0.92, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.27, P < 0.001), and are more likely to complete withdrawal treatment (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.06, P < 0.001). At the same time there is no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects, but drop-out due to adverse effects may be more likely with clonidine. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine is more effective than clonidine or lofexidine for the management of opioid withdrawal. Buprenorphine may offer some advantages over methadone, at least in inpatient settings, in terms of quicker resolution of withdrawal symptoms and possibly slightly higher rates of completion of withdrawal.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Buprenorphine use is linked to lower opioid-related death rates.
“A partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, buprenorphine effectively treats opioid withdrawal symptoms and is associated with reduced opioid-related mortality.4,5”
From Oral Health Risks of Transmucosal Buprenorphine: Commentary on Tuan et al. and Zheng et al. (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence
Mattick, R. P., Kimber, J., Breen, C., & Davoli, M. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002207.pub3 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Are detoxification programmes effective?
Mattick, R. P., & Hall, W. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90215-9 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Veilleux, J. C., Colvin, P. J., Anderson, J., York, C., & Heinz, A. J. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.006 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Lingford-Hughes, A., Welch, S., Peters, L., Nutt, D., & With expert reviewers (in alphabetical order): Ball D, B. N. (2012) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881112444324 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
The effectiveness of compulsory drug treatment: A systematic review
Werb, D., Kamarulzaman, A., Meacham, M. C., Rafful, C., Fischer, B., Strathdee, S. A., & Wood, E. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.005 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Schottenfeld, R. S., Chawarski, M. C., & Mazlan, M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60954-x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Dunn, K. E., Sigmon, S. C., Strain, E. C., Heil, S. H., & Higgins, S. T. (2011) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.05.033 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“Recent preliminary evidence has confirmed an advantage of buprenorphine over methadone in detoxification settings (Gowing et al., 2009).”
BackgroundOral Health Risks of Transmucosal Buprenorphine: Commentary on Tuan et al. and Zheng et al.
Black, A. C., & Becker, W. C. (2025) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000001452 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gowing, L., Ali, R., & White, J. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2009-07-08
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- CD002025-CD002025
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170418945
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2017-02-21)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- buprenorphine, opioid withdrawal, opioid use disorder, methadone, clonidine, lofexidine, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, withdrawal symptoms, treatment completion, adverse effects, dose reduction, substitution treatment, drug-free treatment, treatment retention, relapse, treatment discontinuation, harm reduction
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Buprenorphine, Clonidine, Humans, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review