Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 654

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Bisson, J, Andrew, M·2005·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological interventions are widely used in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of randomised controlled trials of all psychological treatments except eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic searches of computerised databases, hand search of the Journal of Traumatic Stress, searches of reference lists, known websites and discussion fora, and personal communication with key workers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Types of studies - Any randomised controlled trial of a psychological treatment. Types of participants - Adults suffering from traumatic stress symptoms for three months or more. Types of interventions - Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy/exposure therapy (TFCBT); stress management (SM); other therapies (supportive therapy, non-directive counselling, psychodynamic therapy and hypnotherapy); group cognitive behavioural therapy (group CBT). Types of outcomes - Severity of clinician rated traumatic stress symptoms. Secondary measures included self-reported traumatic stress symptoms, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, adverse effects and dropouts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data was entered using the Review Management software. Quality assessments were performed. The data were analysed for summary effects using the RevMan 4.2 programme. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included in the review. With regards to reduction of clinician assessed PTSD symptoms TFCBT did significantly better than waitlist/usual care (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -1.36; 95% CI, -1.88 to -0.84; 13 studies; n = 609). There was no significant difference between TFCBT and SM (SMD = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.71 to 0.16; 6 studies; n = 239). TFCBT did significantly better than other therapies (SMD = -0.81; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.42; 3 studies; n = 120). Stress management did significantly better than waitlist/usual care (SMD = -1.14; 95% CI, -1.62 to -0.67; 3 studies; n = 86) and than other therapies (SMD = -1.22; 95% CI, -2.09 to -0.35; 1 study; n = 25). There was no significant difference between other therapies and waitlist/usual care control (SMD = -0.43; 95% CI, -0.90 to 0.04; 2 studies; n = 72). Group TFCBT was significantly better than waitlist/usual care (SMD = -0.72; 95% CI, -1.14 to -0.31). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was evidence that individual TFCBT, stress management and group TFCBT are effective in the treatment of PTSD. Other non-trauma focused psychological treatments did not reduce PTSD symptoms as significantly. There was some evidence that individual TFCBT is superior to stress management in the treatment of PTSD at between 2 and 5 months following treatment, and also that TFCBT was also more effective than other therapies. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether psychological treatment is harmful. There was some evidence of greater drop-out in active treatment groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003388.pub2

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Blanchard, 2003, A controlled evaluation of cognitive behaviorial therapy for posttraumatic stress in motor vehicle accident survivors, Behaviour Research & Therapy, 41, 79, 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00131-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Foa, 1991, Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral procedures and counseling, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 715, 10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.715 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Foa, 1991, Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral procedures and counseling, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 715, 10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.715 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Foa, 1999, A comparison of exposure therapy, stress inoculation training, and their combination for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder in female assault victims, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 194, 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.194 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Resick, 2002, A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 867, 10.1037/0022-006X.70.4.867 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Vaughan, 1994, A trial of eye movement desensitization compared to image habituation training and applied muscle relaxation in post-traumatic stress disorder, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 283, 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90036-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 654

Metadata

Authors
Bisson, J., & Andrew, M.
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2005-04-20
Issue
2
Pages
CD003388-CD003388
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1943678974
Cited by
654
References
59
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd003388.pub2
The paper
Bisson, J., & Andrew, M. (2005). Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003388.pub2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.