The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive surgery has been accepted for a variety of disorders, laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is performed by few. Concern about oncological radicality and long term outcome has limited the adoption of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVES: To determine long-term outcome after laparoscopically-assisted versus open surgery for non-metastasised colorectal cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane library, EMBASE, Pub med and Cancer Lit were searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing laparoscopically-assisted and open surgery for non-metastasised colorectal cancer were included. Studies that did not report any long-term outcomes were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed the studies and extracted data. RevMan 4.2 was used for statistical analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three randomised clinical trials (RCT) comparing laparoscopically-assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer were identified. Twelve of these trials, involving 3346 patients, reported long-term outcome and were included in the current analysis. No significant differences in the occurrence of incisional hernia, reoperations for incisional hernia or reoperations for adhesions were found between laparoscopically assisted and open surgery (2 RCT, 474 pts, 7.9% vs 10.9%;P = 0.32 and 2 RCT, 474 pts, 4.0% vs 2.8%; P = 0.42 and 1 RCT, 391 pts, 1.1% vs 2.5%;P = 0.30, respectively). Rates of recurrence at the site of the primary tumor were similar (colon cancer: 4 RCT, 938 pts, 5.2% vs 5.6%; OR (fixed) 0.84 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.52)(P = 0.57); rectal cancer: 4 RCT, 714 pts, 7.2% vs 7.7%; OR (fixed) 0.81 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.43) (P = 0.46). No differences in the occurrence of port-site/wound recurrences were observed (P=0.16). Similar cancer-related mortality was found after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery ( colon cancer: 5 RCT, 1575 pts, 14.6% vs 16.4%; OR (fixed) 0.80 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.06) (P=0.15); rectal cancer: 3 RCT, 578 pts, 9.2% vs 10.0%; OR (fixed) 0.66 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.19) (P=0.16). Four studies were included in the meta-analyses on hazard ratios for tumour recurrence in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. No significant difference in recurrence rate was observed between laparoscopic and open surgery (hazard ratio for tumour recurrence in the laparoscopic group 0.92; 95% CI 0.76-1.13). No significant difference in tumour recurrence between laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer was observed (hazard ratio for tumour recurrence in the laparoscopic group 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.08). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of carcinoma of the colon is associated with a long term outcome no different from that of open colectomy. Further studies are required to determine whether the incidence of incisional hernias and adhesions is affected by method of approach. Laparoscopic surgery for cancer of the upper rectum is feasible, but more randomised trials need to be conducted to assess long term outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Parmar, M. K. B., Torri, V., & Stewart, L. (1998) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2815::aid-sim110>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 4,802
A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer
(2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032651 · Cited by 3,395
Guillou, P. J., Quirke, P., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Jayne, D. G., Smith, A. M., Heath, R. M., & Brown, J. M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66545-2 · Cited by 3,064
Lacy, A. M., García-Valdecasas, J. C., Delgado, S., Castells, A., Taurá, P., Piqué, J. M., & Visa, J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09290-5 · Cited by 2,441
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
(2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70221-7 · Cited by 2,316
Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286 · Cited by 2,256
A prospective randomized trial
(1995) · Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons) · doi:10.4030/jjcs1979.20.2_191 · Cited by 1,619
Jayne, D. G., Guillou, P. J., Thorpe, H., Quirke, P., Copeland, J., Smith, A. M. H., Heath, R. M., & Brown, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.7758 · Cited by 1,497
Cited by
Brenner, H., Kloor, M., & Pox, C. P. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61649-9 · Cited by 2,762
Gustafsson, U. O., Scott, M. J., Hubner, M., Nygren, J., Demartines, N., Francis, N., Rockall, T. A., Young‐Fadok, T. M., Hill, A. G., Soop, M., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y · Cited by 2,119
Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G. A., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 · Cited by 555
Exploiting the critical perioperative period to improve long-term cancer outcomes
Horowitz, M., Neeman, E., Sharon, E., & Ben-Eliyahu, S. (2015) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.224 · Cited by 487
Behrns, K. E. (2012) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhry, E., Schwenk, W., Gaupset, R., Romild, U., & Bonjer, H. J.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Volume
- 2012
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- CD003432-CD003432
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1525587965
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd003432.pub2
- The paper
- Kuhry, E., Schwenk, W., Gaupset, R., Romild, U., & Bonjer, H. J. (2008). Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003432.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.