The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group* (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · Cited by 3,824
Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track Surgery
Kehlet, H., & Wilmore, D. W. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31817f2c1a · Cited by 1,819
Fearon, K. C. H., Ljungqvist, O., Von Meyenfeldt, M., Revhaug, A., Dejong, C. H. C., Lassen, K., Nygren, J., Hausel, J., Soop, M., Andersen, J., et al. (2005) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002 · Cited by 1,693
Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery
Kehlet, H., & Dahl, J. B. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14966-5 · Cited by 1,446
Dimick, J. B., Chen, S. L., Taheri, P. A., Henderson, W. G., Khuri, S. F., & Campbell, D. A. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.276 · Cited by 933
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery
Güenaga, K. F., Matos, D., & Wille-Jørgensen, P. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001544.pub4 · Cited by 914
A Rational Approach to Perioperative Fluid Management
Chappell, D., Jacob, M., Hofmann-Kiefer, K., Conzen, P., & Rehm, M. (2008) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181863117 · Cited by 909
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
(2019) · Frontiers Research Topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-88945-957-5 · Cited by 849
Cited by
Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient handover in surgery: A systematic review
Pucher, P. H., Johnston, M. J., Aggarwal, R., Arora, S., & Darzi, A. (2015) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.017 · Cited by 100
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown
Bhama, A. R., Batool, F., Collins, S. D., Ferraro, J., & Cleary, R. K. (2017) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3567-y · Cited by 31
Prehabilitation in perioperative care
Moorthy, K., & Wynter-Blyth, V (2017) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10516 · Cited by 27
Agri, F., Hahnloser, D., Demartines, N., & Hübner, M. (2020) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.14998 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Behrns, K. E.
- Venue
- Yearbook of Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 2012
- Pages
- 278-279
- ISSN
- 0090-3671 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313711602
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001
- The paper
- Behrns, K. E. (2012). Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Yearbook of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ysur.2011.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.