The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, women have been attended and supported by other women during labour. However, in recent decades in hospitals worldwide, continuous support during labour has become the exception rather than the routine. Concerns about the consequent dehumanization of women's birth experiences have led to calls for a return to continuous support by women for women during labour. OBJECTIVES: Primary: to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of continuous, one-to-one intrapartum support compared with usual care. Secondary: to determine whether the effects of continuous support are influenced by: (1) routine practices and policies in the birth environment that may affect a woman's autonomy, freedom of movement, and ability to cope with labour; (2) whether the caregiver is a member of the staff of the institution; and (3) whether the continuous support begins early or later in labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (30 January 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomized controlled trials comparing continuous support during labour with usual care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration Pregnancy and Childbirth Group were used. All authors participated in evaluation of methodological quality. Data extraction was undertaken independently by one author and a research assistant. Additional information was sought from the trial authors. Results are presented using relative risk for categorical data and weighted mean difference for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen trials involving 12,791 women are included. Primary comparison: Women who had continuous intrapartum support were less likely to have intrapartum analgesia, operative birth, or to report dissatisfaction with their childbirth experiences. Subgroup analyses: In general, continuous intrapartum support was associated with greater benefits when the provider was not a member of the hospital staff, when it began early in labour, and in settings in which epidural analgesia was not routinely available. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: All women should have support throughout labour and birth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163
Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review
Hodnett, E. D. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70189-0 · Cited by 967
Self-citation
Cited by
Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works
Campbell, O. M., & Graham, W. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69381-1 · Cited by 1,785
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003766.pub6 · Cited by 1,100
Self-citationLay health workers in primary and community health care
Lewin, S., Dick, J., Pond, P., Zwarenstein, M., Aja, G. N., van Wyk, B. E., Bosch-Capblanch, X., & Patrick, M. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004015.pub2 · Cited by 544
Continuous support for women during childbirth
Hodnett, E. D., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Sakala, C. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003766.pub5 · Cited by 389
Self-citationFactors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania
Mrisho, M., Schellenberg, J. A., Mushi, A. K., Obrist, B., Mshinda, H., Tanner, M., & Schellenberg, D. (2007) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01855.x · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodnett, E., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Sakala, C.
- Venue
- The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Protocol)
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2003-07-21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- CD003766-CD003766
- OpenAlex
- W4239260359
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous support for women during childbirth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd003766
- The paper
- Hodnett, E., Gates, S., Hofmeyr, G. J., & Sakala, C. (2003). Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Protocol). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.