Cited by 967Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPregnancy-related medical research

Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review

Hodnett, Ellen D.·2002·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(02)70189-0

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis by Hodnett showed that women attended in these centers used fewer pharmacological methods for pain relief, oxytocin, and fewer episiotomies.

    “Ainda em relação à assistência prestada nos CPN, um estudo do tipo metanálise realizado por Hodnett 14 mostrou que mulheres atendidas nesses centros utilizaram em menor quantidade métodos farmacológicos para o alívio da dor, ocitocina, além de um menor número de episiotomias realizadas.”
  • Women with positive previous vaginal delivery experiences are more likely to choose vaginal delivery again, whereas negative experiences may steer them towards caesarean section.

    “Women with positive previous vaginal delivery experiences are more likely to choose this method again, whereas negative experiences may steer them towards caesarean section.22 23”

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodnett, E. D.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Hodnett, Ellen D.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
186
Issue
5
Pages
S160-S172
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982325404
Cited by
967
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 40
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
childbirth satisfaction, labor pain, analgesia, intrapartum interventions, caregiver support, caregiver-patient relationship, shared decision-making, self-expectations, childbirth experience
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Pain, Pregnancy, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review