Cited by 113Anesthesia and Pain ManagementPain Management and Opioid UseNausea and vomiting management

Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain

Barden, J, Edwards, J, Moore, A, McQuay, H·2004·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the relief of mild and moderate pain arising from headache, musculoskeletal conditions and dysmenorrhoea. A prior Cochrane systematic review concluded that paracetamol is also effective for postoperative pain, but additional trials have since been published. This review sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paracetamol using current data, and to compare the findings with other analgesics evaluated in the same way. Objectives To assess the efficacy of single dose oral paracetamol for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2002), the trials register of the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care group (November 2002); MEDLINE (1966 to May 1996); PubMed (1996 to August 2001); EMBASE (1980 to 1996); the Oxford Pain Relief Database (1950 to 1994); and reference lists of articles in order to update an existing version of the review. Selection criteria Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of paracetamol for acute postoperative pain in adults. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The area under the 'pain relief versus time' curve was used to derive the proportion of patients with paracetamol or placebo experiencing least 50% pain relief over four to six hours using validated equations. The number-needed-to-treat (N…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004602

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent meta-analysis concluded that single-dose oral paracetamol is effective for moderate to severe acute postoperative pain.

    “A recent meta-analysis (15) concluded that single dose oral paracetamol is effective for the treatment of moderate to severe, acute postoperative pain.”

    From Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug (2006) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barden, J., Edwards, J., Moore, A., & McQuay, H.
Affiliations
Churchill Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2004-01-26
Issue
1
Pages
CD004602-CD004602
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1921015236
Cited by
113
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
Keywords
paracetamol, postoperative pain, single-dose analgesia, analgesic efficacy, analgesic safety, adverse effects, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, number needed to treat, placebo comparison, adults, surgical pain management, analgesic comparison, dose-response relationship, analgesic potency
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Humans, Postoperative Pain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review