Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain
Abstract
Background Paracetamol (acetaminophen) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the relief of mild and moderate pain arising from headache, musculoskeletal conditions and dysmenorrhoea. A prior Cochrane systematic review concluded that paracetamol is also effective for postoperative pain, but additional trials have since been published. This review sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paracetamol using current data, and to compare the findings with other analgesics evaluated in the same way. Objectives To assess the efficacy of single dose oral paracetamol for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2002), the trials register of the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care group (November 2002); MEDLINE (1966 to May 1996); PubMed (1996 to August 2001); EMBASE (1980 to 1996); the Oxford Pain Relief Database (1950 to 1994); and reference lists of articles in order to update an existing version of the review. Selection criteria Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of paracetamol for acute postoperative pain in adults. Data collection and analysis Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The area under the 'pain relief versus time' curve was used to derive the proportion of patients with paracetamol or placebo experiencing least 50% pain relief over four to six hours using validated equations. The number-needed-to-treat (N…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent meta-analysis concluded that single-dose oral paracetamol is effective for moderate to severe acute postoperative pain.
“A recent meta-analysis (15) concluded that single dose oral paracetamol is effective for the treatment of moderate to severe, acute postoperative pain.”
From Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug (2006) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Publication and related bias in meta-analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 · Cited by 2,282 · see citing works
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
Cook, R. J., & Sackett, D. L. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 · Cited by 1,885 · see citing works
Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research
L'ABBÉ, K. A., DETSKY, A. S., & O'ROURKE, K. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-224 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
FLOWER, R. J., & VANE, J. R. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/240410a0 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study
Tramèr, M. R., Reynolds, D. J. M., Moore, R. A., & McQuay, H. J. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.635 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanism of Action of Acetaminophen: Is There a Cyclooxygenase 3?
Botting, R. M. (2000) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/317520 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Paracetamol versus placebo: Effects on post-operative course
Skjelbred, P., & L�kken, P. (1979) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00563555 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Skoglund, L. A., Skjelbred, P., & Fyllingen, G. (1991) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.1991.tb02646.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The additive analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen,1000 mg, and codeine, 60 mg, in dental pain
Bentley, K. C., & Head, T. W. (1987) · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1987.211 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paracetamol: New Vistas of an Old Drug
Bertolini, A., Ferrari, A., Ottani, A., Guerzoni, S., Tacchi, R., & Leone, S. (2006) · CNS Drug Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1527-3458.2006.00250.x · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Acetaminophen: Old Drug, New Issues
Aminoshariae, A., & Khan, A. (2015) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.024 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Gaul, C., & Eschalier, A. (2018) · The Open Pain Journal · doi:10.2174/1876386301811010012 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barden, J., Edwards, J., Moore, A., & McQuay, H.
- Affiliations
- Churchill Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2004-01-26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD004602-CD004602
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1921015236
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2008-10-08)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
- Keywords
- paracetamol, postoperative pain, single-dose analgesia, analgesic efficacy, analgesic safety, adverse effects, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, number needed to treat, placebo comparison, adults, surgical pain management, analgesic comparison, dose-response relationship, analgesic potency
- MeSH terms
- Acetaminophen, Humans, Postoperative Pain, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review