The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Abstract
Background Midwives are primary providers of care for childbearing women around the world. However, there is a lack of synthesised information to establish whether there are differences in morbidity and mortality, effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes between midwife-led continuity models and other models of care. Objectives To compare midwife-led continuity models of care with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria All published and unpublished trials in which pregnant women are randomly allocated to midwife-led continuity models of care or other models of care during pregnancy and birth. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. Main results We included 15 trials involving 17,674 women. We assessed the quality of the trial evidence for all primary outcomes (i.e., regional analgesia (epidural/spinal), caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth (forceps/vacuum), spontaneous vaginal birth, intact perineum, preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) and overall fetal loss and neonatal death (fetal loss was assessed by gestation using 24 weeks as the cut-off for viability in many countries) using the GRADE methodology: All primary outcomes were graded as of high quality.For the primary o…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies conducted in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian countries have shown high satisfaction levels in women who were monitored in this way. 4,7”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The planning, coordination and delivery of women ' s health care by a midwife through pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum care according to the woman-centred care model has a favourable impact on obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared to other models of care. 4”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“These data underscore the bene fi cial effects of perinatal care provided by the midwife on satisfaction in various cultural and linguistic contexts. 4,15”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In terms of perinatal morbidity, no signi fi cant difference was recorded between the two types of care, which matches the results of past studies 4 and con fi rms the safety of CSC follow-up.”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In terms of perinatal morbidity, no signi fi cant difference was recorded between the two types of care, which matches the results of past studies 4 and con fi rms the safety of CSC follow-up.”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Several studies show that women who have experienced relational continuity models of care are more likely to be satis fi ed with their care than women who have experienced other types of care (Huber and Sandall, 2009; Aune et al., 2012; Sandall et al., 2015).”
From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Sandall et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth
HODNETT, E. D. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000062 · Cited by 73
RetractedHoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review
Haggerty, J. L., Reid, R. J., Freeman, G. K., Starfield, B. H., Adair, C. E., & McKendry, R. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 · Cited by 2,374
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A. H., & Devane, D. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub3 · Cited by 1,264
Self-citationBirthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d7400 · Cited by 833
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical Review
Saultz, J. W. (2005) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.285 · Cited by 638
Midwife‐led versus other models of care for childbearing women
Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub2 · Cited by 621
Self-citationDefining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Saultz, J. W. (2003) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.23 · Cited by 588
Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety
Cook, R. I. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791 · Cited by 575
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review
Saultz, J. W. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.91 · Cited by 514
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Begley, 2011, Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 85, 10.1186/1471-2393-11-85 · DOI
- Flint, 1988, Know your midwife, Nursing Times, 84, 28
- Flint, 1987, The 'Know your Midwife' Report
- Kenny, 1994, Final Report. Westmead Hospital Team Midwifery Project Evaluation
- Flood, 2012, Serious adverse event monitoring in a RCT of caseload midwifery (COSMOS), Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 113
- McLachlan, 2011, A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Maternal and infant outcomes, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47, 33
- McLachlan, 2012, A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Women's satisfaction with care, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 41
- Hartz, 2012, Does caseload midwifery reduce caesarean section operation rates: The m@ngo trial, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 27
- Cheyne, 1996, Midwife managed care: results of a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women, Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, 1, 129
- Shields, 1996, Women's satisfaction and continuity of care with midwife managed care, Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, 1, 320
- Bernitz, 2012, Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on birth care level? A randomised controlled trial, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 91, 45
- Klein, 1984, Care in a birth room vs a conventional setting: a controlled trial, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 131, 1461
- Vries, 2001, Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care and Midwifery in North America and Northern Europe
- Flint, 1987, The 'Know your Midwife' Report
- Freeman, 2007, Continuity of Care 2006: What Have We Learned Since 2000 and What are Policy Imperatives Now? Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO)
- McCourt, 2006, Working with women: developing continuity in practice, 141
- 2001, The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2014
- Sandall, 2001, Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice: Final Report
- Schunemann, 2009, GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 103, 391
- Young, 1997, The costs to the NHS of maternity care: midwife-managed vs shared, British Journal of Midwifery, 5, 465, 10.12968/bjom.1997.5.8.465 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 521
Inpatient opioid use after vaginal delivery
Badreldin, N., Grobman, W. A., & Yee, L. M. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.039 · Cited by 33
Women’s satisfaction with midwife-led continuity of care: an observational study in Palestine
Mortensen, B. M., Diep, L. M., Lukasse, M., Lieng, M., Dwekat, I. M. M., Elias, D., & Fosse, E. T. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030324 · Cited by 33
West, R., Gamble, J. A., Kelly, J., Milne, T., Duffy, E., & Sidebotham, M. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.003 · Cited by 33
Midwives’ role in the provision of maternal and childhood immunisation information
Frawley, J., McKenzie, K., Cummins, A. M., Sinclair, L., Wardle, J., & Hall, H. G. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.02.006 · Cited by 32
Hinton, L., Dakin, F., Kuberska, K., Boydell, N., Willars, J., Draycott, T. J., Winter, C., McManus, R. J., Chappell, L. C., Chakrabarti, S., et al. (2022) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014329 · Cited by 32
McRae, D. N., Muhajarine, N., Stoll, K. H., Mayhew, M., Vedam, S., Mpofu, D., & Janssen, P. A. (2016) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.01.007 · Cited by 32
A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is experienced by couples in Denmark
Jepsen, I., Mark, E., Foureur, M., Nøhr, E. A., & Sørensen, E. E. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.09.003 · Cited by 32
Dawson, K., Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., & Newton, M. S. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.132 · Cited by 31
Embedding continuity of care experiences: An innovation in midwifery education
Gray, J., Taylor, J., & Newton, M. S. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.014 · Cited by 31
Gao, L., Lu, H. S., Leap, N., & Homer, C. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.007 · Cited by 31
Hildingsson, I., Karlström, A., Haines, H. M., & Johansson, M. (2015) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2015.11.002 · Cited by 31
Hussein, S. A. A. A., Dahlen, H. G., Ogunsiji, O., & Schmied, V. A. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03034-3 · Cited by 30
Cummins, A., Baird, K., Melov, S. J., Melhem, L., Hilsabeck, C., Hook, M., Elhindi, J., & Pasupathy, D. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.08.002 · Cited by 29
Autonomous and dependent–The dichotomy of birth: A feminist analysis of birth plans in Sweden
Westergren, A., Edin, K. E., Walsh, D. J., & Christianson, M. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.008 · Cited by 29
Watkins, V. J., Nagle, C., Yates, K., McAuliffe, M., Brown, L., Byrne, M., & Waters, A. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.001 · Cited by 29
Hailemeskel, S., Alemu, K., Christensson, K., Tesfahun, E., & Lindgren, H. E. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.08.008 · Cited by 28
Blaylock, R., Trickey, H., Sanders, J., & Murphy, C. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103433 · Cited by 28
Midwives’ interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a scoping review
do Souto, S. P. A., da Silva, R. C. G., Prata, A. P., Guerra, M. J., Couto, C., & de Albuquerque, R. S. (2022) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-21-00382 · Cited by 28
Stoll, K. H., Titoria, R., Turner, M., Jones, A., & Butska, L. (2023) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.220453 · Cited by 28
A methodological review of qualitative case study methodology in midwifery research
Atchan, M., Davis, D. L., & Foureur, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12946 · Cited by 28
Guerra‐Reyes, L., & Hamilton, L. J. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.06.004 · Cited by 28
O’Connor, M., Allen, J., Kelly, J., Gao, Y., & Kildea, S. V. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.10.013 · Cited by 28
Gidaszewski, B., Khajehei, M., Gibbs, E., & Chua, S. C. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.010 · Cited by 32
Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach
Wiklund, I. E., Malata, A. M., Cheung, N. F., & Cadée, F. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32325-0 · Cited by 28
Thompson, S., Nieuwenhuijze, M. J., Low, L. K., & Vries, R. G. D. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.010 · Cited by 28
Prussing, E., Browne, G., Dowse, E., Hartz, D., & Cummins, A. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.006 · Cited by 27
Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean
Xu, X. J., Lee, H. C., Lin, H., Lundsberg, L. S., Campbell, K. H., Lipkind, H. S., Pettker, C. M., & Illuzzi, J. L. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.034 · Cited by 27
Abayomi, J. C., Charnley, M., Cassidy, L. D., McCann, M. T., Jones, J., Wright, M., & Newson, L. (2019) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzz081 · Cited by 27
Brunton, R., Gosper, K., & Dryer, R. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.064 · Cited by 27
Cummins, A. M., Griew, K., Devonport, C., Ebbett, W., Catling, C., & Baird, K. M. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.03.006 · Cited by 27
Opinions of professionals about integrating midwife- and obstetrician-led care in The Netherlands
Perdok, H., Jans, S. M. P. J., Verhoeven, C. J. M., van Dillen, J., Batenburg, R. S., Mol, B. W., Schellevis, F., & de Jonge, A. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.011 · Cited by 27
Tuominen, M., Kaljonen, A., Ahonen, P., Mäkinen, J., & Rautava, P. T. (2016) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.2024 · Cited by 27
Symon, A., Pringle, J., Downe, S. M., Hundley, V. A., Lee, E., Lynn, F. A., McFadden, A., McNeill, J. A., Renfrew, M. J., Ross–Davie, M., et al. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1186-3 · Cited by 27
Hofmeyr, G. J., & Singata‐Madliki, M. (2020) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.012 · Cited by 26
Intrapartum midwifery care impact Swedish couple’s birth experiences — A cross-sectional study
Thies‐Lagergren, L., & Johansson, M. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.163 · Cited by 26
Hanson, C., Waiswa, P., Pembe, A. B., Sandall, J., & Schellenberg, J. (2020) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003748 · Cited by 26
Self-citationOptimising the continuity experiences of student midwives: an integrative review
Moncrieff, G., MacVicar, S., Norris, G., & Martin, C. J. H. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.007 · Cited by 25
Niles, P. M., Vedam, S., Stimpfel, A. W., & Squires, A. P. (2021) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12565 · Cited by 27
McInnes, R. J., Martin, C. J. H., & MacArthur, J. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.07.007 · Cited by 24
Martin, C. J. H., MacArthur, J., Martin, C. R., & McInnes, R. J. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.005 · Cited by 24
Hassanzadeh, R., Abbasalizadeh, F., Meedya, S., Mohammad‐Alizadeh‐Charandabi, S., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2021) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.103154 · Cited by 24
Midwifery participatory curriculum development: Transformation through active partnership
Sidebotham, M., Walters, C., Chipperfield, J., & Gamble, J. A. (2017) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.04.010 · Cited by 24
Midwifery continuity: The use of social media
McCarthy, R., Choucri, L., Ormandy, P., & Brettle, A. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.012 · Cited by 24
Kurz, E., Davis, D. L., & Browne, J. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.003 · Cited by 24
Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives’ perceptions
Baker, N., Gillman, L., & Coxon, K. (2020) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102690 · Cited by 23
Sink or Swim: Water Immersion for Labor and Birth in a Tertiary Maternity Unit in Australia
Plint, E., & Davis, D. C. (2016) · International Journal of Childbirth · doi:10.1891/2156-5287.6.4.206 · Cited by 23
Bradfield, Z., Hauck, Y. L., Kelly, M., & Duggan, R. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.014 · Cited by 23
Andrews, C. J., Ellwood, D. A., Middleton, P., Homer, C., Reinebrant, H. E., Donnolley, N. R., Boyle, F. M., Gordon, A., Nicholl, M., Morris, J. M., et al. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.001 · Cited by 23
Carter, J., Sidebotham, M., & Dietsch, E. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.03.013 · Cited by 23
Coddington, R., Catling, C., & Homer, C. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.08.001 · Cited by 23
Factors influencing midwives’ use of an evidenced based Normal Birth Guideline
Toohill, J., Sidebotham, M., Gamble, J. A., Fenwick, J., & Creedy, D. K. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.008 · Cited by 23
Hauck, Y. L., Nathan, E., Ball, C., Hutchinson, M., Somerville, S., Hornbuckle, J., & Doherty, D. A. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.017 · Cited by 23
Gomes, M. A. D. S. M., Pereira, A. P. E., Bittencourt, S. D. D. A., Augusto, L. C. R., Filho, F. L., Lamy, Z. C., Magluta, C., & Moreira, M. E. L. (2021) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-81232021263.26032020 · Cited by 23
Matthews, R. P., Newton, M. S., Hyde, R. L., Shafiei, T., Llewelyn, F., & Forster, D. A. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11863-7 · Cited by 22
Epidurals during normal labour and birth — Midwives’ attitudes and experiences
Aune, I., Brøtmet, S., Grytskog, K. H., & Sperstad, E. B. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.001 · Cited by 22
Martín-Arribas, A., Escuriet, R., Borràs-Santos, A., Vila‐Candel, R., & González, C. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104129 · Cited by 22
Gao, Y., Roe, Y. L., Hickey, S. D., Chadha, A., Kruske, S., Nelson, C., Carson, A., Watego, K., Reynolds, M., Costello, J., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100722 · Cited by 22
Making the hidden seen: A narrative analysis of the experiences of Assumption of Care at birth
Marsh, C. A., Browne, J., Taylor, J., & Davis, D. L. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.04.009 · Cited by 22
Allen, J., Parratt, J., Rolfe, M. I., Hastie, C. R., Saxton, A., & Fahy, K. M. (2019) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2019.102535 · Cited by 22
‘It was horrible to watch, horrible to be a part of’: Midwives’ perspectives of obstetric violence
Collins, E., Burns, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101631 · Cited by 21
Unwarranted Variation in Utilization of Cesarean Birth Among Low‐Risk Childbearing Women
Jolles, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.12565 · Cited by 21
Conceptualising a model to guide nursing and midwifery in the community guided by an evidence review
Leahy‐Warren, P., Mulcahy, H., Benefield, L. E., Bradley, C., Coffey, A., Donohoe, A., Fitzgerald, S. M., Frawley, T., Healy, E., Healy, M., et al. (2017) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-017-0225-3 · Cited by 21
Improving the Experience of Care
Stapleton, S. R., Wright, J., & Jolles, D. R. (2020) · The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1097/jpn.0000000000000454 · Cited by 21
Women’s experience of receiving team-midwifery care in Japan: A qualitative descriptive study
Iida, M., Horiuchi, S., & Nagamori, K. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.020 · Cited by 21
McCalman, P., McLardie-Hore, F. E., Newton, M. S., McLachlan, H., & Forster, D. A. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.06.001 · Cited by 21
Fahlbeck, H., Johansson, M., Hildingsson, I., & Larsson, B. (2022) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100759 · Cited by 21
How Do Midwives View Their Professional Autonomy, Now and in Future?
Vermeulen, J., Fobelets, M., Fleming, V. E. M., Luyben, A. G., Stas, L., & Buyl, R. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11121800 · Cited by 21
Being a young midwifery student: A qualitative exploration
Fenwick, J., Cullen, D., Gamble, J. A., & Sidebotham, M. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.010 · Cited by 21
‘A match made in midwifery’: Women’s perceptions of student midwife partnerships
Jefford, E., Nolan, S. J., Sansone, H., & Provost, S. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.018 · Cited by 21
Nguyen, J. G.-L., Nanayakkara, S., & Holden, A. C. L. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17072246 · Cited by 21
Hanahoe, M. (2020) · European Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.18332/ejm/119164 · Cited by 21
“Whatsapping” the continuity of postpartum care in Switzerland: A socio-anthropological study
Perrenoud, P., Chautems, C., & Kaech, C. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.009 · Cited by 21
Narrowing the Gap? Describing women's outcomes in Midwifery Group Practice in remote Australia
Lack, M. B., Smith, R., Arundell, M., & Homer, C. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.03.003 · Cited by 20
Beulen, Y. H., Super, S., Rothoff, A., van der Laan, N. M., de Vries, J. H. M., Koelen, M. A., Feskens, E. J. M., & Wagemakers, A. (2021) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.103159 · Cited by 20
Vedam, S., Titoria, R., Niles, P. M., Stoll, K. H., Kumar, V., Baswal, D., Mayra, K., Kaur, I., & Hardtman, P. (2022) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czac032 · Cited by 22
Contextual factors influencing the implementation of midwifery-led care units in India
Bogren, M. U., Jha, P., Sharma, B., & Erlandsson, K. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.05.006 · Cited by 20
Mills, T. A., Roberts, S. A., Camacho, E. M., Heazell, A. E. P., Massey, R., Melvin, C., Newport, R., Smith, D. M., Storey, C., Taylor, W., et al. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04925-3 · Cited by 20
A validation study of the Australian Maternity Care Classification System
Donnolley, N. R., Chambers, G. M., Butler-Henderson, K. A., CHAPMAN, M. G., & Sullivan, E. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.161 · Cited by 20
Midwives transition to practice: Expectations and experiences
Griffiths, M., Fenwick, J., Carter, A. G., Sidebotham, M., & Gamble, J. A. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102641 · Cited by 20
Kuliukas, L. J., Bayes, S. J., Geraghty, S., Bradfield, Z., & Davison, C. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.005 · Cited by 19
Carter, J., Dietsch, E., & Sidebotham, M. (2020) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102859 · Cited by 19
Respectful maternity care in public health care facilities in Gujarat
Raval, H., Puwar, T. I., Vaghela, P. C., Mankiwala, M., Pandya, A., & Kotwani, P. (2021) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1934_20 · Cited by 19
Callander, E. J., Slavin, V., Gamble, J. A., Creedy, D. K., & Brittain, H. (2021) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab084 · Cited by 19
Lorentzen, I. P., Andersen, C. S., Jensen, H. S., Fogsgaard, A., Foureur, M. J., Lauszus, F. F., & Nohr, E. A. (2021) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology X · doi:10.1016/j.eurox.2021.100125 · Cited by 19
Schölin, L., Watson, J., Dyson, J., & Smith, L. A. (2021) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100628 · Cited by 19
Modelling the cost of place of birth: a pathway analysis
Scarf, V. L., Yu, S., Viney, R. C., Cheah, S. L., Dahlen, H. G., Sibbritt, D. W., Thornton, C. E., Tracy, S., & Homer, C. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06810-9 · Cited by 18
McNab, E., Martin, C. J. H., & Norris, G. (2022) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103460 · Cited by 18
Gregory, S., Caffrey, L., & Daly, D. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.003 · Cited by 18
Who owns the baby? A video ethnography of skin-to-skin contact after a caesarean section
Stevens, J., Schmied, V. A., Burns, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.02.005 · Cited by 18
Refusal of recommended maternity care: Time to make a pact with women?
Jenkinson, B., Kruske, S., & Kildea, S. V. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.03.006 · Cited by 18
Forster, D. A., McKay, H. A., Davey, M., Small, R. E., Cullinane, F., Newton, M. S., Powell, R. L., & McLachlan, H. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019 · Cited by 18
Goldkuhl, L., Gyllensten, H., Begley, C., Wijk, H., Nilsson, C., Lindahl, G., Ringqvist, A.-K., Uvnäs‐Moberg, K., & Berg, M. (2022) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100731 · Cited by 18
Midwifery students experience of continuity of care: A mixed methods study
Foster, W., Sweet, L., & Graham, K. (2021) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2021.102966 · Cited by 17
Steenland, M. W., Pace, L. E., & Cohen, J. L. (2022) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5688 · Cited by 17
Dube, M., Ireland, S., Bromley, A., Steel, M., Gao, Y., & Kildea, S. V. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.12.006 · Cited by 17
Continuity of care as central theme in perinatal care: A systematic review
BAART, A., Brunsveld‐Reinders, A. H., Pijnappel, L., HAAN, M. D., & Ginkel, J. M. D. M. (2024) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104273 · Cited by 17
A Trauma-informed Approach to Postpartum Care
White, A., Saxer, K., Raja, S., & HALL, S. L. (2022) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000730 · Cited by 17
Ramadan, M., Rukh-E-Qamar, H., Yang, S., & Vang, Z. M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287617 · Cited by 17
Lewis, L. N., Hauck, Y. L., Crichton, C., Pemberton, A., Spence, M., & Kelly, G. (2016) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.04.009 · Cited by 17
Rydahl, E., Juhl, M., Declercq, E. R., & Maimburg, R. D. (2020) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100571 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D.
- Affiliations
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2015-09-15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- CD004667-CD004667
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232203714
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 5
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2016-04-28)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10145, 10/4001/02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- models of care, childbirth, midwifery, regional analgesia, epidural analgesia, caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth, preterm birth, fetal death, neonatal death, perineal trauma, normal delivery, maternal morbidity, psychosocial outcomes, maternal satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Amnion, Cesarean Section, Continuity of Patient Care, Episiotomy, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Patient Satisfaction, Models, Organizational, Perinatal Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
