The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Abstract
Background Midwives are primary providers of care for childbearing women around the world. However, there is a lack of synthesised information to establish whether there are differences in morbidity and mortality, effectiveness and psychosocial outcomes between midwife-led continuity models and other models of care. Objectives To compare midwife-led continuity models of care with other models of care for childbearing women and their infants. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria All published and unpublished trials in which pregnant women are randomly allocated to midwife-led continuity models of care or other models of care during pregnancy and birth. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. Main results We included 15 trials involving 17,674 women. We assessed the quality of the trial evidence for all primary outcomes (i.e., regional analgesia (epidural/spinal), caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth (forceps/vacuum), spontaneous vaginal birth, intact perineum, preterm birth (less than 37 weeks) and overall fetal loss and neonatal death (fetal loss was assessed by gestation using 24 weeks as the cut-off for viability in many countries) using the GRADE methodology: All primary outcomes were graded as of high quality.For the primary o…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies conducted in Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian countries have shown high satisfaction levels in women who were monitored in this way. 4,7”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“The planning, coordination and delivery of women ' s health care by a midwife through pregnancy, intrapartum and postpartum care according to the woman-centred care model has a favourable impact on obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared to other models of care. 4”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“These data underscore the bene fi cial effects of perinatal care provided by the midwife on satisfaction in various cultural and linguistic contexts. 4,15”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In terms of perinatal morbidity, no signi fi cant difference was recorded between the two types of care, which matches the results of past studies 4 and con fi rms the safety of CSC follow-up.”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“In terms of perinatal morbidity, no signi fi cant difference was recorded between the two types of care, which matches the results of past studies 4 and con fi rms the safety of CSC follow-up.”
From Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Several studies show that women who have experienced relational continuity models of care are more likely to be satis fi ed with their care than women who have experienced other types of care (Huber and Sandall, 2009; Aune et al., 2012; Sandall et al., 2015).”
From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Sandall et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth
HODNETT, E. D. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000062 · Cited by 73
RetractedHoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review
Haggerty, J. L., Reid, R. J., Freeman, G. K., Starfield, B. H., Adair, C. E., & McKendry, R. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 · Cited by 2,374
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A. H., & Devane, D. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub3 · Cited by 1,264
Self-citationBirthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d7400 · Cited by 833
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical Review
Saultz, J. W. (2005) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.285 · Cited by 638
Midwife‐led versus other models of care for childbearing women
Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004667.pub2 · Cited by 621
Self-citationDefining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Saultz, J. W. (2003) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.23 · Cited by 588
Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety
Cook, R. I. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.791 · Cited by 575
Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical Review
Saultz, J. W. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.91 · Cited by 514
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Begley, 2011, Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: a randomised trial, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 85, 10.1186/1471-2393-11-85 · DOI
- Flint, 1988, Know your midwife, Nursing Times, 84, 28
- Flint, 1987, The 'Know your Midwife' Report
- Kenny, 1994, Final Report. Westmead Hospital Team Midwifery Project Evaluation
- Flood, 2012, Serious adverse event monitoring in a RCT of caseload midwifery (COSMOS), Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 113
- McLachlan, 2011, A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Maternal and infant outcomes, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 47, 33
- McLachlan, 2012, A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery for women at low risk of medical complications (COSMOS): Women's satisfaction with care, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 41
- Hartz, 2012, Does caseload midwifery reduce caesarean section operation rates: The m@ngo trial, Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 48, 27
- Cheyne, 1996, Midwife managed care: results of a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women, Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, 1, 129
- Shields, 1996, Women's satisfaction and continuity of care with midwife managed care, Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, 1, 320
- Bernitz, 2012, Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on birth care level? A randomised controlled trial, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 91, 45
- Klein, 1984, Care in a birth room vs a conventional setting: a controlled trial, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 131, 1461
- Vries, 2001, Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care and Midwifery in North America and Northern Europe
- Flint, 1987, The 'Know your Midwife' Report
- Freeman, 2007, Continuity of Care 2006: What Have We Learned Since 2000 and What are Policy Imperatives Now? Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO)
- McCourt, 2006, Working with women: developing continuity in practice, 141
- 2001, The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan) 2014
- Sandall, 2001, Evaluation of the Albany Midwifery Practice: Final Report
- Schunemann, 2009, GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 103, 391
- Young, 1997, The costs to the NHS of maternity care: midwife-managed vs shared, British Journal of Midwifery, 5, 465, 10.12968/bjom.1997.5.8.465 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 521
Hailemeskel, S., Alemu, K., Christensson, K., Tesfahun, E., & Lindgren, H. E. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.01.005 · Cited by 16
Nolan, S. J., Baird, K. M., & McInnes, R. J. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105497 · Cited by 16
Dahlen, H. G. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.011 · Cited by 16
Woodward, R., Mazure, E. S., Belden, C. M., Denslow, S. A., Fromewick, J., Dixon, S., Gist, W., & Sullivan, M. H. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103573 · Cited by 16
Nove, A., Bazirete, O., Hughes, K., Turkmani, S., Callander, E. J., Scarf, V. L., Forrester, M., Mandke, S., Pairman, S., & Homer, C. (2023) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2023.103717 · Cited by 16
Butler, M., Hutton, E. K., & McNiven, P. (2015) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.019 · Cited by 16
Donnolley, N. R., Chambers, G. M., Butler-Henderson, K. A., CHAPMAN, M. G., & Sullivan, E. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.01.005 · Cited by 16
Management of late-term pregnancy in midwifery- and obstetrician-led care
Kortekaas, J. C., Bruinsma, A., Keulen, J. K. J., Vandenbussche, F. P. H. A., van Dillen, J., & de Miranda, E. (2019) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2294-7 · Cited by 16
Why ARRIVE should not thrive in Australia
Davies-Tuck, M. L., Wallace, E. M., & Homer, C. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.168 · Cited by 16
Clinical outcomes for women who had continuity of care experiences with midwifery students
Tickle, N., Gamble, J., & Creedy, D. K. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.004 · Cited by 15
Zhu, W., Zhu, C., Min, H., Li, L., Wang, X., Wu, J., Zhu, X., & Gu, C. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082527 · Cited by 15
Talbot, H., Peters, S., Furber, C., & Smith, D. M. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.01.002 · Cited by 15
Papanicolas, I. N., Berenson, R. A., Sawaya, T., & Skopec, L. (2024) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105154 · Cited by 15
Quality of intra-partum care at a university hospital in Nepal: A prospective cross-sectional survey
Cederfeldt, J., Carlsson, J., Begley, C., & Berg, M. (2015) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2015.11.004 · Cited by 15
Benefits of caseload midwifery to prevent fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: A discussion paper
Reid, N., Gamble, J. A., Creedy, D. K., & Finlay‐jones, A. L. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.03.002 · Cited by 15
Evidence-based labor management: before labor (Part 1)
Berghella, V., & Mascio, D. D. (2019) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100080 · Cited by 15
Medway, P., Sweet, L. P., & Müller, A. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.001 · Cited by 15
Kuipers, Y., van Beeck, E., van den Berg, L., & Dijkhuizen, M. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.002 · Cited by 15
Aung, W., Saw, L., & Sweet, L. P. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.04.009 · Cited by 20
Meeting the Challenge of Perinatal Care in Rural Communities
Barton, A. J., & Anderson, J. L. (2021) · The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1097/jpn.0000000000000562 · Cited by 15
Every Mother Counts: listening to mothers to transform maternity care
Baumont, M. S., Dekker, C. S., Blecker, N. R., Burns, C. T., & Strauss, N. E. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.306 · Cited by 15
Alliman, J., Bauer, K., & Williams, T. (2022) · The Journal of Perinatal Education · doi:10.1891/jpe-2021-0024 · Cited by 15
Madeley, A., Earle, S., & O’Dell, L. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103532 · Cited by 15
Screening for recommended antenatal risk factors: How long does it take?
Waller, A. E., Bryant, J., Cameron, E. C., Galal, M., Symonds, I., & Sanson‐Fisher, R. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.01.005 · Cited by 15
Woman centred care: Has the definition been morphing of late?
Rigg, E., & Dahlen, H. G. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.013 · Cited by 15
Listening to larger bodied women: Time for a new approach to maternity care
Griffiths, A., Kingsley, S., Mason, Z., Tome, R., Tomkinson, M., & Jenkinson, B. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.07.001 · Cited by 14
Yeshitila, Y. G., Gold, L. H., Abimanyi-Ochom, J., Riggs, E., Tolossa, T., & Le, H. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117250 · Cited by 14
Institutionalizing Reflexivity for Sustainability: Two Cases in Health Care
Schuitmaker‐Warnaar, T. J., Gunn, C. J., Regeer, B. J., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132111712 · Cited by 14
Dube, M., Gao, Y., Steel, M., Bromley, A., Ireland, S., & Kildea, S. V. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.10.004 · Cited by 14
Providing rural and remote rural midwifery care: an 'expensive hobby'
Crowther, S. (2016) · New Zealand College of Midwives · doi:10.12784/nzcomjnl52.2016.4.26-34 · Cited by 14
Unsettling moods in rural midwifery practice
Crowther, S., Smythe, E., & Spence, D. G. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.019 · Cited by 14
Wiggins, M., Sawtell, M., Wiseman, O., McCourt, C., Greenberg, L., Hunter, R. M., Eldridge, S. M., Haora, P. J., Kaur, I., & Harden, A. (2018) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-018-0361-x · Cited by 14
Holmlund, S., Làn, P. T., Edvardsson, K., Ntaganira, J., Graner, S., Small, R. E., & Mogren, I. (2020) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100508 · Cited by 14
Trajectories of obstetric nurses in the care of planned home childbirth: oral history
Santos, L. M., da Mata, J. A. L., Vaccari, A., & Sanfelice, C. F. D. O. (2020) · Revista gaúcha de enfermagem · doi:10.1590/1983-1447.2021.20200191 · Cited by 14
Turner, S., Crowther, S., & Lau, A. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.010 · Cited by 15
Midwifery workplace culture in Sydney, Australia
Catling, C., Rossiter, C., Cummins, A. M., & McIntyre, E. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.001 · Cited by 14
Opdam, F., van Dillen, J., de Vries, M., & Hollander, M. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182111627 · Cited by 14
Navigating midwifery solidarity: A feminist participatory action research framework
Buchanan, K., Newnham, E. C., Geraghty, S., & Whitehead, L. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.06.004 · Cited by 14
White, H., le May, A., & Cluett, E. R. (2016) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12229 · Cited by 14
Māori and Pasifika perceptions of their local maternity care in Logan, Australia
Cruickshank, A. H., Lilley, T. S., Radcliffe, B. C., Nosa, V. H., & Fenwick, J. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.164 · Cited by 14
Blomgren, J., Gabrielsson, S., Erlandsson, K., Wagoro, M. C. A., Namutebi, M., Chimala, E., & Lindgren, H. (2023) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2023.103734 · Cited by 13
McLachlan, H., Newton, M. S., McLardie-Hore, F. E., McCalman, P., & Forster, D. A. (2023) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102093 · Cited by 13
Tendência da taxa de cesariana no Brasil por grupo de classificação de Robson, 2014-2020
Pereira, V. B., dos Reis, S. N., Araújo, F. G., Amorim, T., Martins, E. F., & Felisbino-Mendes, M. S. (2024) · Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0099 · Cited by 13
Buendicho, A.-L., & Allen, K. R. (2024) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104267 · Cited by 13
Weisband, Y. L., Gallo, M. F., Klebanoff, M. A., Shoben, A. B., & Norris, A. H. (2017) · Women s Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2017.07.004 · Cited by 14
Allen, J., Jenkinson, B., Tracy, S., Hartz, D. L., Tracy, M. B., & Kildea, S. V. (2020) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102751 · Cited by 16
Dado, M., Smith, V. A., & Barry, P. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103278 · Cited by 13
Homer, C., Davis, D. L., Mollart, L. J., Turkmani, S., Smith, R., Bullard, M., Leiser, B., & Foureur, M. J. (2021) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2021.05.010 · Cited by 13
Brigante, L., Coxon, K., Turienzo, C. F., & Sandall, J. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.01.003 · Cited by 13
Self-citationRajwar, E., Pundir, P., Parsekar, S. S., Anupama, D. S., D’Souza, S. R. B., Nayak, B. S., Noronha, J. A., D’Souza, P., & Oliver, S. R. (2023) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czad008 · Cited by 18
Borrelli, S., Fumagalli, S., Colciago, E., Downey, J., Spiby, H., & Nespoli, A. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.06.006 · Cited by 13
Denison, F. C., MacGregor, H., Stirrat, L., Stevenson, K., Norman, J. E., & Reynolds, R. M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015218 · Cited by 13
Koto, P., Fahey, J., Meier, D. M., LeDrew, M., & Loring, S. (2019) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.008 · Cited by 13
Aderoba, A. K., & Adu‐Bonsaffoh, K. (2022) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2022.07.005 · Cited by 12
Model of care matters: An integrative review
Cutajar, L., Dahlen, H. G., Auwers, A. L., Vir, S., Berberovic, B., Jedrzejewski, T., & Burns, E. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.007 · Cited by 12
Achieving international consensus on the concept of woman-centred care: A Delphi study
Brady, S., Bogossian, F. E., & GIBBONS, K. S. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.06.001 · Cited by 12
Roe, Y. L., Allen, J., Haora, P. J., Hickey, S. D., Briggs, M., Wilkes, L., Nelson, C., Watego, K., Coddington, R., Ireland, S., et al. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.007 · Cited by 12
Vermeulen, J., Swinnen, E., D’haenens, F., Buyl, R., & Beeckman, K. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.002 · Cited by 12
Isaline, G., Marie-Christine, C., Rudy, V. T., Daelemans, C., & Englert, Y. (2019) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2019.05.004 · Cited by 12
Neely, E., Raven, B., Dixon, L., Bartle, C., & Timu-Parata, C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17249355 · Cited by 12
Antenatal care policy in high-income countries with a universal health system: A scoping review
Gonçalves, A. S., Ferreira, I. M., Pestana‐Santos, M., McCourt, C., & Prata, A. P. (2022) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100717 · Cited by 12
Millennial midwifery: Online connectivity in midwifery education
Geraghty, S., Bromley, A., Bull, A., Dube, M., & Turner, C. (2019) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2019.07.008 · Cited by 12
Uncovered and disrespected. A qualitative study of Jordanian women’s experience of privacy in birth
Hussein, S. A. A. A., Dahlen, H. G., Ogunsiji, O., & Schmied, V. A. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.10.006 · Cited by 12
The future of midwife-led continuity of care: Call for a dialogue
Kuipers, Y. (2024) · Dialogues in Health · doi:10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100170 · Cited by 11
Green, J. E., Ang, N., Harris‐Roxas, B., Baird, K. M., Roth, H., & Henry, A. (2025) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101852 · Cited by 11
Jolles, D. R., Montgomery, T. M., Breman, R. B., George, E., Craddock, J., Sanders, S., Niemcyzk, N., Stapleton, S. R., Bauer, K., & Wright, J. (2022) · The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1097/jpn.0000000000000647 · Cited by 11
de Wolff, M. G., Johansen, M., Ersbøll, A. S., Rosthøj, S., Brunsgaard, A., Midtgaard, J., Tabor, A., & Hegaard, H. K. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3405-5 · Cited by 11
Self-harm risk in pregnancy: recurrent-event survival analysis using UK primary care data
Hope, H. F., Pierce, M., Osam, C. S., Morgan, C., John, A. M., & Abel, K. M. (2022) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2022.31 · Cited by 11
Implementing midwifery units in a European country: Situational analysis of an Italian case study
Batinelli, L., McCourt, C., Bonciani, M., & Rocca‐Ihenacho, L. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103534 · Cited by 11
Getting evidence into practice – Managing hares and tortoises
Homer, C. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.10.006 · Cited by 11
Moncrieff, G., Martin, C. J. H., Norris, G., & MacVicar, S. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.09.009 · Cited by 10
Implementation of normal childbirth guidelines among midwives: Adherence and influencing factors
Zhao, Y., Lu, H. S., Lu, J., & Wang, B. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.005 · Cited by 10
Nabirye, R. C., Mbalinda, S. N., Epuitai, J., Nawagi, F., Namyalo, S., Nove, A., Bazirete, O., Hughes, K., Lopes, S. C., Turkmani, S., et al. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101612 · Cited by 10
Haddrill, R., Jones, G. L., Anumba, D. O. C., & Mitchell, C. A. (2017) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.017 · Cited by 10
Gu, C., Wang, X., Li, L., Ding, Y. H., & Qian, X. (2020) · Global Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.glohj.2020.08.001 · Cited by 10
Lorentzen, I. P., Andersen, C. S., Jensen, H. S., Fogsgaard, A., Foureur, M. J., Lauszus, F. F., & Nohr, E. A. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100336 · Cited by 10
Abdullah, P., Gallant, S., Saghi, N., Macpherson, A., & Tamim, H. (2017) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1350-4 · Cited by 10
When can obstetric risk be predicted?
Ancel, J., Rault, E., Fernandez, M.-P., Huissoud, C., Savidan, A., Gaire, C., Dupont, C., & Rudigoz, R. C. (2018) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.006 · Cited by 9
Midwifery in Abu Dhabi: A descriptive survey of midwives
O’Connell, M. A., & Sosa, G. A. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.002 · Cited by 9
Levett, K. M., Salomons, E., Shenoy, P., Kaur, I., & Fernandez, E. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101819 · Cited by 9
Shahinfar, S., Abedi, P., Najafian, M., Abbaspoor, Z., Mohammadi, E., Alianmoghaddam, N., & Maraghi, E. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73751-8 · Cited by 9
Mwilike, B. E., Welsh, J., Nyamuryekung’e, K. K., Nyaruchary, A. J., Pembe, A. B., & Groß, M. M. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph21111446 · Cited by 9
‘A perfect fit’ – Swedish midwives’ interest in continuity models of midwifery care
Hildingsson, I., Fahlbeck, H., Larsson, B., & Johansson, M. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.04.014 · Cited by 9
McLardie-Hore, F. E., McLachlan, H., Forster, D. A., Holmlund, S., McCalman, P., & Newton, M. S. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.05.006 · Cited by 9
Purandare, R., Ådahl, K., Stillerman, M., Schytt, E., Tsekhmestruk, N., & Lindgren, H. (2024) · Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101000 · Cited by 9
Improving Research into Models of Maternity Care to Inform Decision Making
de Jonge, A., & Sandall, J. (2016) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002135 · Cited by 9
Self-citationWomen on the move: A search for preferred birth services
Pařízková, A., & Clausen, J. A. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.10.003 · Cited by 9
The practice reality of ward based midwifery care: An exploration of aspirations and restrictions
Lewis, L. N., Barnes, C., Roberts, L., McLeod, L. J., Elliott, A., & Hauck, Y. L. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.010 · Cited by 9
Aizawa, T. (2021) · Economics & Human Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101058 · Cited by 9
Hammond, A., Priddis, H. S., Ormsby, S., & Dahlen, H. G. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.02.008 · Cited by 9
Adelson, P. L., Fleet, J., & McKellar, L. V. (2022) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2022.03.004 · Cited by 9
Midwives’ and women’s views on digital midwifery care in Germany: Results from an online survey
Hertle, D., Wende, D., Schumacher, L., & Bauer, N. H. (2022) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103472 · Cited by 9
Gillen, P. A., Bamidele, O. O., & Healy, M. (2023) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.01.005 · Cited by 9
Romijn, A., Muijtjens, A. M. M., de Bruijne, M. C., Donkers, J. H. H. L. M., Wagner, C., de Groot, C. J. M., & Teunissen, P. W. (2016) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.006 · Cited by 11
Tertiary education regarding stillbirth for student midwives: The tears 4 SMS project
Warland, J., & Glover, P. (2018) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.018 · Cited by 9
Part-time positions in Caseload Midwifery Group Practice: Impact on satisfaction and quality of care
Vasilevski, V., Sweet, L. P., Smith, L., & Dell, M. (2020) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.11.001 · Cited by 9
Bradford, B. F., Cronin, R. S., Okesene-Gafa, K. A. M., Apaapa-Timu, T. H., Shashikumar, A., & Oyston, C. (2024) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2024.01.005 · Cited by 8
Alspaugh, A., Blumenfeld, J., Wright, L. V., Recalde, S., & Lindberg, L. (2024) · The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1097/jpn.0000000000000815 · Cited by 8
de Wolff, M. G., Ladekarl, M., Pagh, N. B., & Overgaard, C. (2025) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104301 · Cited by 8
Patterson, J., Foureur, M. J., & Skinner, J. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.014 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., & Devane, D.
- Affiliations
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2015-09-15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- CD004667-CD004667
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4232203714
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 5
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2016-04-28)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10145, 10/4001/02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- models of care, childbirth, midwifery, regional analgesia, epidural analgesia, caesarean birth, instrumental vaginal birth, preterm birth, fetal death, neonatal death, perineal trauma, normal delivery, maternal morbidity, psychosocial outcomes, maternal satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Amnion, Cesarean Section, Continuity of Patient Care, Episiotomy, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Midwifery, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Patient Satisfaction, Models, Organizational, Perinatal Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review