Cited by 78Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOral Health Pathology and Treatment

Interventions for tobacco cessation delivered by dental professionals

Open access
Holliday, Richard, Hong, Bosun, McColl, Elaine, Livingstone-Banks, Jonathan, Preshaw, Philip M·2021·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental professionals are well placed to help their patients stop using tobacco products. Large proportions of the population visit the dentist regularly. In addition, the adverse effects of tobacco use on oral health provide a context that dental professionals can use to motivate a quit attempt. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, adverse events and oral health effects of tobacco cessation interventions offered by dental professionals. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register up to February 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials assessing tobacco cessation interventions conducted by dental professionals in the dental practice or community setting, with at least six months of follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: statistic. We summarised secondary outcomes narratively. MAIN RESULTS: = 83%; three studies, n = 1020; very low-certainty evidence). Only one study reported adverse events or oral health outcomes, making it difficult to draw any conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-certainty evidence that quit rates increase when dental professionals offer behavioural support to promote tobacco cessation. There is moderate-certainty evidence that tobacco abstinence rates increase in cigarette smokers if dental professionals offer behavioural support combined with pharmacotherapy. Further evidence is required to be certain of the size of the benefit and whether adding pharmacological interventions is more effective than behavioural support alone. Future studies should use biochemical validation of abstinence so as to preclude the risk of detection bias. There is insufficient evidence on whether these interventions lead to adverse effects, but no reasons to suspect that these effects would be specific to interventions delivered by dental professionals. There was insufficient evidence that interventions affected oral health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd005084.pub4

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holliday, R., Hong, B., McColl, E., Livingstone-Banks, J., & Preshaw, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Birmingham Dental Hospital (GB)
  • Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-19
Volume
2021
Issue
2
Pages
CD005084-CD005084
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W3132434298
Cited by
78
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
  • University of Dundee
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2018-01-006, NIHR129780)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
  • Universiti Malaya
  • Socialstyrelsen
  • Evidence Synthesis Programme
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
tobacco cessation, dental professionals, dental practice, behavioral support, pharmacotherapy, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation, quit rates, smoking abstinence, oral health, adverse events
MeSH terms
Counseling, Dentists, Humans, Oral Health, Schools, Tobacco, Smokeless, Universities, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Use Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review