Cited by 98Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Oxygen for breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who do not qualify for home oxygen therapy

Open access
Ekström, Magnus, Ahmadi, Zainab, Bornefalk-Hermansson, Anna, Abernethy, Amy, Currow, David·2016·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breathlessness is a cardinal symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is given to improve survival time in people with COPD and severe chronic hypoxaemia at rest. The efficacy of oxygen therapy for breathlessness and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with COPD and mild or no hypoxaemia who do not meet the criteria for LTOT has not been established. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of oxygen versus air in mildly hypoxaemic or non-hypoxaemic patients with COPD in terms of (1) breathlessness; (2) HRQOL; (3) patient preference whether to continue therapy; and (4) oxygen-related adverse events. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase, to 12 July 2016, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We handsearched the reference lists of included articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: ) > 7.3 kPa) who were not already receiving LTOT. Two review authors independently assessed articles for inclusion in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently collected and analysed data. We assessed risk of bias by using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias tool'. We pooled effects recorded on different scales as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Lower SMDs indicated decreased breathlessness and reduced HRQOL. We performed subanalyses and sensitivity analyses and assessed the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: = 0%; low-quality evidence). Patient preference and adverse events could not be analysed owing to insufficient data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We are moderately confident that oxygen can relieve breathlessness when given during exercise to mildly hypoxaemic and non-hypoxaemic people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who would not otherwise qualify for home oxygen therapy. Most evidence pertains to acute effects during exercise tests, and no evidence indicates that oxygen decreases breathlessness in the daily life setting. Findings show that oxygen does not affect health-related quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006429.pub3

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxygen therapy does not improve breathlessness in patients with cancer, and its marginal benefit in COPD is of dubious clinical significance.

    “Oxygen therapy, although it reverses hypoxaemia, does not improve breathlessness in patients with cancer, and the marginal benefit seen in a meta-analysis of COPD patients is of dubious clinical significance.”

    From The Breathing, Thinking, Functioning clinical model: a proposal to facilitate evidence-based breathlessness management in chronic respiratory disease (2017) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (page not available in our copy) reports a modest reduction in COPD breathlessness during exercise and says its clinical importance is unclear; the Authors’ Conclusions likewise find no evidence of a clinically important benefit in daily life. The review does not establish the sentence’s separate claim that oxygen fails to improve breathlessness in patients with cancer. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekström, M., Ahmadi, Z., Bornefalk-Hermansson, A., Abernethy, A., & Currow, D.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Uppsala University; Department of Statistics; Uppsala Sweden
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-25
Volume
2017
Issue
8
Pages
CD006429-CD006429
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2552100944
Cited by
98
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term oxygen therapy, supplemental oxygen, dyspnea, health-related quality of life, physical activity, patient preferences, adverse events
MeSH terms
Dyspnea, Health Status, Home Care Services, Humans, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Quality of Life, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review