Cited by 28Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatments

Benzodiazepines for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses

Zaman, Hadar, Gibson, Roger Carl, Walcott, Geoffrey·2019·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Catatonia is a debilitating disorder of movement and volition associated with schizophrenia and some other mental illnesses. People with catatonia are more likely to require hospitalisation and highly supervised care than those without the disorder. They also have an increased risk of secondary complications such as pneumonia, malnutrition and dehydration. The mainstay of treatment has been drug therapies and electroconvulsive therapy.To compare the effects of benzodiazepines with other drugs, placebo or electroconvulsive therapy for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other similar serious mental illnesses (SMIs).We updated our previous search (28 February 2007) by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (9 November 2016; 6 February 2019). This register is compiled by systematic searches of major resources (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and registries of clinical trials) and their monthly updates, handsearches, grey literature, and conference proceedings, with no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records into the register. We also manually searched reference lists from studies selected by the search.All controlled clinical trials that randomised people who have schizophrenia or other similar SMI and experiencing catatonia to receive benzodiazepines or another relevant treatment. We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported usable data. We excluded those not meeting our inclusion criteria or those not reporting usable data. We contacted authors when we required further information; and if we received no response, we put those studies aside as 'awaiting assessment'.Review authors extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis using a fixed-effect model. We completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment for the included study and generated a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.The searches found 130 citations, from which we could identify 22 possibly relevant studies. From these, we could only include one study. This study had a relatively small sample size of 17 participants who received lorazepam or oxazepam and were drug free for one week before the trial started. The only usable data reported by this study were clinically important change in symptoms of catatonia measured as 50% improvement on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). There was no difference in the numbers of participants showing a clinically important change in their catatonic symptoms (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.16; participants = 17; studies = 1; very low quality evidence).No data were reported for other important outcomes of hospital stay, clinically important change in satisfaction with care, global state, adverse effects or general functioningWe did find a few studies meeting our inclusion criteria but they reported no usable data. We had to exclude these. Although poorly reported, these studies do illustrate that relevant studies have been undertaken - they are not impossible to design and conduct.Analysis of the results from this review, which was a head-to-head comparison of two benzodiazepine monotherapies, does not show a clear difference in effect. No data were available for benzodiazepines compared to placebo or standard care. The lack of usable data and very low quality of data available makes it impossible to draw firm conclusions and further studies with a high-quality methodology and reporting are required in order to determine more definitively the outcomes associated with benzodiazepine use in the clinical management of catatonia in persons with schizophrenia and other SMI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006570.pub3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study found a withdrawal rate of approximately 40% in those using BZDs for six or more months with abrupt cessation of long-acting BZDs.

    “One study found a withdrawal rate of approximately 40% in those using for six or more months with abrupt cessation of long-acting BZDs [10].”

    From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

  • BZDs are the mainstay of treatment for catatonia.

    “The drug class is the mainstay of treatment for catatonia, which is characterized by postural rigidity, immobility, purposeless activity, and disturbances in one’s consciousness [10].”

    From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Factors determining rate and severity of BZD withdrawal are duration of use, elimination half-life, daily dosage, rate of taper, and potency of the BZD.

    “Several factors determine the rate and severity of withdrawal from the hypnotic. These are (1) the duration of use, (2) elimination half-life (short- or long-acting), (3) daily dosage, (4) rate of the taper and (5) the potency of the BZD itself [10].”

    From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaman, H., Gibson, R. C., & Walcott, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bradford (GB)
  • University of the West Indies System (JM)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-05
Volume
2019
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4255057328
Cited by
28
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
catatonia, benzodiazepines, schizophrenia, severe mental illness, lorazepam, oxazepam, electroconvulsive therapy, catatonia treatment, symptom improvement, risk of bias, study quality, visual analogue scale, hospitalization, secondary complications, pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, cost-effectiveness, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review