Benzodiazepines for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illnesses
Abstract
Catatonia is a debilitating disorder of movement and volition associated with schizophrenia and some other mental illnesses. People with catatonia are more likely to require hospitalisation and highly supervised care than those without the disorder. They also have an increased risk of secondary complications such as pneumonia, malnutrition and dehydration. The mainstay of treatment has been drug therapies and electroconvulsive therapy.To compare the effects of benzodiazepines with other drugs, placebo or electroconvulsive therapy for catatonia in people with schizophrenia or other similar serious mental illnesses (SMIs).We updated our previous search (28 February 2007) by searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (9 November 2016; 6 February 2019). This register is compiled by systematic searches of major resources (including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and registries of clinical trials) and their monthly updates, handsearches, grey literature, and conference proceedings, with no language, date, document type, or publication status limitations for inclusion of records into the register. We also manually searched reference lists from studies selected by the search.All controlled clinical trials that randomised people who have schizophrenia or other similar SMI and experiencing catatonia to receive benzodiazepines or another relevant treatment. We included studies that met our inclusion criteria and reported usable data. We excluded those not meeting our inclusion criteria or those not reporting usable data. We contacted authors when we required further information; and if we received no response, we put those studies aside as 'awaiting assessment'.Review authors extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis using a fixed-effect model. We completed a 'Risk of bias' assessment for the included study and generated a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.The searches found 130 citations, from which we could identify 22 possibly relevant studies. From these, we could only include one study. This study had a relatively small sample size of 17 participants who received lorazepam or oxazepam and were drug free for one week before the trial started. The only usable data reported by this study were clinically important change in symptoms of catatonia measured as 50% improvement on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). There was no difference in the numbers of participants showing a clinically important change in their catatonic symptoms (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.16; participants = 17; studies = 1; very low quality evidence).No data were reported for other important outcomes of hospital stay, clinically important change in satisfaction with care, global state, adverse effects or general functioningWe did find a few studies meeting our inclusion criteria but they reported no usable data. We had to exclude these. Although poorly reported, these studies do illustrate that relevant studies have been undertaken - they are not impossible to design and conduct.Analysis of the results from this review, which was a head-to-head comparison of two benzodiazepine monotherapies, does not show a clear difference in effect. No data were available for benzodiazepines compared to placebo or standard care. The lack of usable data and very low quality of data available makes it impossible to draw firm conclusions and further studies with a high-quality methodology and reporting are required in order to determine more definitively the outcomes associated with benzodiazepine use in the clinical management of catatonia in persons with schizophrenia and other SMI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One study found a withdrawal rate of approximately 40% in those using BZDs for six or more months with abrupt cessation of long-acting BZDs.
“One study found a withdrawal rate of approximately 40% in those using for six or more months with abrupt cessation of long-acting BZDs [10].”
From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
BZDs are the mainstay of treatment for catatonia.
“The drug class is the mainstay of treatment for catatonia, which is characterized by postural rigidity, immobility, purposeless activity, and disturbances in one’s consciousness [10].”
From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Factors determining rate and severity of BZD withdrawal are duration of use, elimination half-life, daily dosage, rate of taper, and potency of the BZD.
“Several factors determine the rate and severity of withdrawal from the hypnotic. These are (1) the duration of use, (2) elimination half-life (short- or long-acting), (3) daily dosage, (4) rate of the taper and (5) the potency of the BZD itself [10].”
From Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results
Furukawa, T. A., Barbui, C., Cipriani, A., Brambilla, P., & Watanabe, N. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006 · Cited by 1,568 · see citing works
Statistics Notes: Detecting skewness from summary information: Table 1
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1200 · Cited by 1,278 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[MEDLINE: 2371367; PsycINFO 79-28483] Additional references Altman 1996 Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information.”
BackgroundInfluentialMarshall, M., Lockwood, A., Bradley, C., Adams, C., Joy, C., & Fenton, M. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.176.3.249 · Cited by 870 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[PUBMED: 15982856] Marshall 2000 Marshall M, Lockwood A, Bradley C, Adams C, Joy C, Fenton M. Unpublished rating scales: a major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior
Divine, G. W., Brown, J. T., & Frazier, L. M. (1992) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02599201 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials
Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1301 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Attrition in randomized controlled clinical trials: methodological issues in psychopharmacology
Leon, A. C., Mallinckrodt, C. H., Chuang-Stein, C., Archibald, D. G., Archer, G. E., & Chartier, K. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.020 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benzodiazepines: Uses, Dangers, and Clinical Considerations
Edinoff, A. N., Nix, C. A., Hollier, J., Sagrera, C. E., Delacroix, B. M., Abubakar, T., Cornett, E. M., Kaye, A. M., & Kaye, A. D. (2021) · Neurology International · doi:10.3390/neurolint13040059 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
“The drug class is the mainstay of treatment for catatonia, which is characterized by postural rigidity, immobility, purposeless activity, and disturbances in one’s consciousness [10].”
BackgroundInfluentialLorazepam in catatonia – Past, present and future of a clinical success story
Hirjak, D., Fricchione, G., Wolf, R. C., & Northoff, G. (2024) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2023.02.015 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zaman, H., Gibson, R. C., & Walcott, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Bradford (GB)
- University of the West Indies System (JM)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-05
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W4255057328
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- catatonia, benzodiazepines, schizophrenia, severe mental illness, lorazepam, oxazepam, electroconvulsive therapy, catatonia treatment, symptom improvement, risk of bias, study quality, visual analogue scale, hospitalization, secondary complications, pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review