Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Diarrhoeal diseases are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, especially among young children in low-income countries, and are associated with exposure to human excreta. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions to improve the disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoeal diseases. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published in The Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT); and Chinese-language databases available under the Wan Fang portal, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI-CAJ). We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings, and contacted researchers and organizations working in the field, as well as checking references from identified studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, quasi-randomized, and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected, comparing interventions aimed at improving the disposal of human excreta to reduce direct or indirect human contact with no such intervention. Cluster (eg at the level of household or community) controlled trials were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We determined study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality in accordance with the methods prescribed by the protocol. We described the results and summarized the information in tables. Due to substantial heterogeneity among the studies in terms of study design and type of intervention, no pooled effects were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies from six countries covering over 33,400 children and adults in rural, urban, and school settings met the review's inclusion criteria. In all studies the intervention was allocated at the community level. While the studies reported a wide range of effects, 11 of the 13 studies found the intervention was protective against diarrhoea. Differences in study populations and settings, in baseline sanitation levels, water, and hygiene practices, in types of interventions, study methodologies, compliance and coverage levels, and in case definitions and outcome surveillance limit the comparability of results of the studies included in this review. The validity of most individual study results are further compromised by the non-random allocation of the intervention among study clusters, an insufficient number of clusters, the lack of adjustment for clustering, unclear loss to follow-up, potential for reporting bias and other methodological shortcomings. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides some evidence that interventions to improve excreta disposal are effective in preventing diarrhoeal disease. However, this conclusion is based primarily on the consistency of the evidence of beneficial effects. The quality of the evidence is generally poor and does not allow for quantification of any such effect. The wide range of estimates of the effects of the intervention may be due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the studies, as well as to other important differences, including exposure levels, types of interventions, and different degrees of observer and respondent bias. Rigorous studies in multiple settings are needed to clarify the potential effectiveness of excreta disposal on diarrhoea.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are several reviews (not limited to slum settings) that support our review findings that interventions including water and sanitation improvements could increase both health and socio‐economic wellbeing.
“There are several reviews (not limited to slum settings) that support our review findings that interventions including water and sanitation improvements could increase both health and socio‐economic wellbeing.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Clasen 2010
The Discussion and Authors’ Conclusions (page not specified) say that excreta-disposal interventions, sometimes combined with water improvements, may help prevent diarrhoea, although the evidence is limited and generally poor. The review does not establish improvements in socio-economic wellbeing, so it supports the health portion of the claim but not that additional outcome. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSeveral systematic reviews have evaluated the impact of water and sanitation interventions on health outcomes, but these have not focused on the complex setting of slums and do not cover the range of slum upgrading interventions beyond water and sanitation.
“Whilst several systematic reviews have evaluated the impact of water and sanitation interventions on health outcomes (Clasen 2006; Clasen 2010; Waddington 2009), these have not focused on the complex setting of slums and do not cover the range of slum upgrading interventions that exist beyond water and sanitation.”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Clasen 2010
Systematic reviews report reductions in rates of diarrhoeal diseases following excreta disposal.
“and excreta disposal (Clasen 2010).”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Clasen 2010
The reports reveal reductions in diarrhoeal diseases following improved water supply and excreta disposal.
“The reports reveal reductions in diarrhoeal diseases following improved water supply (Clasen 2006; Waddington 2009) and excreta disposal (Clasen 2010).”
From Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes (2013) · cites this paper as Clasen 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 190
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- and education on mortality rates of children under five years of age [Impacto de los servicios de salud, el saneamiento y las alfabetizacion en la mortalidad de menores de cinco anos]. Salud Pública de México 1999;41(5):368-75.
- Henry 1981 {published data only} Henry FJ. Environmental sanitation, infection and nutritional status of infants in rural St Lucia, West Indies. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1981;75(4):507-13.
- Koopman 1978 {published data only} Koopman JS. Diarrhea and school toilet hygiene in Cali, Colombia. American Journal of Epidemiology 1978;107(5): 412-20.
- Kumar 1968 {published data only} Kumar P, Singh R, Sehgal BS. Fly control and diarrheal morbidity in a rural community in U.P. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences 1968:285-91.
- Lou 1990 {published data only} Lou H, Liu M-X, Song S-M, Li Q-M, Zhang W-P, Xu G- X, et al. [Effectiveness evaluation and cost-effectiveness estimate for diarrhea control by environmental improvement in rural area]. Henan Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine] 1989;1989:25-9.
- Makoni 2004 {published data only} Makoni FS, Ndamba J, Mbati PA, Manase G. Impact of waste disposal on health of a poor urban community in Zimbambwe. East African Medical Journal 2004;81(8): 422-6.
- Meddings 2004 {published data only} Meddings DR, Ronald LA, Marion S, Pinera JF, Oppliger A. Cost effectiveness of a latrine revision programme in Kabul, Afghanistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004;82(4):281-8.
- Moore 1965 {published data only} Moore HA, de la Cruz E, Vargas-Mendez O. Diarreal disease studies in Costa Rica. IV. The influence of sanitation upon the prevalence of intestinal infection and diarrheal disease. American Journal of Epidemiology 1965;82(2):162-184.
- Nanan 2003 {published data only} Nanan D, White F, Azam I, Afsar H, Hozhari S. Evaluation of a water, sanitation, and hygiene education intervention on diarrhoea in northern Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003;81(3):160-5.
- Pickering 1985 {published data only} Pickering H. Social and environmental factors associated with diarrhoea and growth in young children: child health in urban Africa. Social Science and Medicine 1985;21(2): 121-7.
- Pokhrel 2004 {published data only} Pokhrel D, Viraraghavan T. Diarrhoeal diseases in Nepal vis-à-vis water supply and sanitation status. Journal of Water and Health 2004;2(2):71-81.
- Rego 2005 {published data only} Rego RF, Moraes LRS, Dourado I. Diarrhoea and garbage disposal in Salvador, Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005;99(1):48-54.
- Van Zil 1966 {published data only} Van Zijl WJ. Studies on diarrhoeal diseases in seven countries by the WHO Diarrhoeal Diseases Advisory Team. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1966;35:249-61.
- Xiao 1995 {published data only} Xiao S-S, Lin L-Y, Shi X-Q, Lin C-S, Chen K-C. [A discussion on the control measures of diarrhoeal diseases in rural villages of eastern Fujian]. Zhongguo Gong Gong Wei Sheng [China Journal of Public Health] 1995;11:257.
- Xiao 1997 {published data only} Xiao S, Lin C, Chen K. [Evaluation of effectiveness of comprehensive control for diarrhea diseases in rural areas of East Fujian and analysis of its cost-benefit]. [Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi] Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 1997;31(1):40-1.
- Shanghai Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi [Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine] 1995;7(9):388-91.
- Barreto ML, Genser B, Strina A, Teixeira MG, Assis AM, Rego RF, et al. Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort studies. Lancet 2007;370(9599): 1622-8.
- Bartram J. New water forum will repeat old message. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003;81(3):158.
- Bennett S, Parpia T, Hayes R, Cousens S. Methods for the analysis of incidence rates in cluster randomized trials. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31(4):839-46.
- Blum D, Feachem RG. Measuring the impact of water supply and sanitation investments on diarrhoeal diseases: problems in methodology. International Journal of Epidemiology 1983;12(3):357-65.
- Authors
- Clasen, T. F., Bostoen, K., Schmidt, W.-P., Boisson, S., Fung, I. C.-H., Jenkins, M. W., Scott, B., Sugden, S., & Cairncross, S.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-16
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- CD007180-CD007180
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6532559
- OpenAlex
- W2117678428
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Keywords
- diarrhea prevention, sanitation interventions, diarrhoeal diseases, child health, community-level interventions, hygiene practices, water supply, low-income countries, school sanitation, rural sanitation, hygiene education, latrine use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Diarrhea, Feces, Humans, Sanitation, Waste Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review