Cited by 108Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia

Open access
Van Leeuwen, Ellen, Petrovic, Mirko, van Driel, Mieke L, De Sutter, An IM, Vander Stichele, Robert, Declercq, Tom, Christiaens, Thierry·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic agents are often used to treat neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in people with dementia although there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of their long-term use for this indication and concern that they may cause harm, including higher mortality. When behavioural strategies have failed and treatment with antipsychotic drugs is instituted, regular attempts to withdraw them have been recommended in guidelines. Physicians, nurses and families of older people with dementia may be reluctant to stop antipsychotics, fearing deterioration of NPS.This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2013. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether withdrawal of antipsychotic agents is successful in older people with dementia and NPS in primary care or nursing home settings, to list the different strategies for withdrawal of antipsychotic agents in older participants with dementia and NPS, and to measure the effects of withdrawal of antipsychotic agents on participants' behaviour and assess safety. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (ALOIS), theCochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, clinical trials registries and grey literature sources up to 11 January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised, controlled trials comparing an antipsychotic withdrawal strategy to continuation of antipsychotics in people with dementia who had been treated with an antipsychotic drug for at least three months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We rated the quality of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies involving 632 participants. One new trial (19 participants) was added for this update.One trial was conducted in a community setting, eight in nursing homes and one in both settings. Different types of antipsychotics at varying doses were discontinued in the studies. Both abrupt and gradual withdrawal schedules were used. Reported data were predominantly from studies at low or unclear risk of bias.We included nine trials with 575 randomised participants that used a proxy outcome for overall success of antipsychotic withdrawal. Pooling data was not possible due to heterogeneity of outcome measures used. Based on assessment of seven studies, discontinuation may make little or no difference to whether or not participants complete the study (low-quality evidence).Two trials included only participants with psychosis, agitation or aggression who had responded to antipsychotic treatment. In these two trials, stopping antipsychotics was associated with a higher risk of leaving the study early due to symptomatic relapse or a shorter time to symptomatic relapse.We found low-quality evidence that discontinuation may make little or no difference to overall NPS, measured using various scales (7 trials, 519 participants). There was some evidence from subgroup analyses in two trials that discontinuation may reduce agitation for participants with less severe NPS at baseline, but may be associated with a worsening of NPS in participants with more severe NPS at baseline.None of the studies assessed withdrawal symptoms. Adverse effects of antipsychotics (such as falls) were not systematically assessed. Low-quality evidence showed that discontinuation may have little or no effect on adverse events (5 trials, 381 participants), quality of life (2 trials, 119 participants), or cognitive function (5 trials, 365 participants).There were insufficient data to determine whether discontinuation of antipsychotics has any effect on mortality (very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low-quality evidence that antipsychotics may be successfully discontinued in older people with dementia and NPS who have been taking antipsychotics for at least three months, and that discontinuation may have little or no important effect on behavioural and psychological symptoms. This is consistent with the observation that most behavioural complications of dementia are intermittent and often do not persist for longer than three months. Discontinuation may have little or no effect on overall cognitive function. Discontinuation may make no difference to adverse events and quality of life. Based on the trials in this review, we are uncertain whether discontinuation of antipsychotics leads to a decrease in mortality.People with psychosis, aggression or agitation who responded well to long-term antipsychotic drug use, or those with more severe NPS at baseline, may benefit behaviourally from continuation of antipsychotics. Discontinuation may reduce agitation for people with mild NPS at baseline. However, these conclusions are based on few studies or small subgroups and further evidence of benefits and harms associated with withdrawal of antipsychotic is required in people with dementia and

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd007726.pub3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TIME study led to reduced agitation at 8 weeks (NPI −1.1, 95% CI −0.1 to −2.1; CMAI −4.7, −0.6 to −8.8) and at 12 weeks (NPI −1.6, −0.6 to −2.7; CMAI −5.9, −1.7 to −10.1).

    “This intervention led to reduced agitation at 8 weeks (NPI −1·1 points, 95% CI −0·1 to −2·1; CMAI −4·7 points, −0·6 to −8·8) and 12 weeks (NPI −1·6, −0·6 to −2·7; CMAI −5·9, −1·7 to −10·1).220”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [220]

    The review’s Effects of interventions and Pooled studies sections discuss antipsychotic withdrawal, but do not report the TIME intervention or the quoted agitation effects at 8 and 12 weeks. Searches for “TIME study,” CMAI, and the stated effect estimates found no matching results in our copy. Page numbers were not provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two new cluster RCTs of professionals delivering multicomponent, interdisciplinary interventions in care homes successfully reduced agitation.

    “Two new cluster RCTs of professionals delivering multicomponent, interdisciplinary, interventions in care homes successfully reduced agitation.”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [220]

    The Study setting section reports nursing-home participants, but the Interventions section describes trials comparing antipsychotic withdrawal with continuation. Searches for cluster RCTs and multicomponent, interdisciplinary interventions found no passage reporting two such care-home trials or their effects on agitation. Page numbers were not available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. levosulpiride.ti,ab. 70 Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued)
  2. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued) 93. placebo.ab. 94. drug therapy.fs. 95. randomly.ab. 96. trial.ab. 97. groups.ab. 98. or/90-97 99. (animals not (humans and animals)). sh. 100. 98 not 99 101. 89 and 100 102. (2009* or 2010* or 2011*).ed. 103. 101 and 102
  3. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued)
  4. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued) 54. 52 and 53 55. exp Dementia/ 56. exp Delirium/ 57. exp Huntingtons Disease/ 58. exp Kluver Bucy Syndrome/ 59. exp Wernickes Syndrome/ 60. exp Cognitive Impairment/ 61. dement*.mp. 62. alzheimer*.mp. 63. (lewy* adj2 bod*).mp. 64. deliri*.mp. 65. (chronic adj2 cerebrovascular).mp. 66. ("organic brain disease" or "organic brain syndrome").mp 67. "supranuclear palsy".mp. 68. ("normal pressure hydrocephalus" and "shunt*").mp. 69. "benign senescent forgetfulness".mp.
  5. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued)
  6. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued) 83. huntington*.mp. 84. binswanger*.mp. 85. korsako*.mp. 86. or/67-85 87. 66 and 86
  7. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued)
  8. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued)
  9. Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Continued) 10. deliri*.mp. 11. (chronic adj2 cerebrovascular).mp. 12. ("organic brain disease" or "organic brain syndrome").mp 13. "supranuclear palsy".mp. 14. ("normal pressure hydrocephalus" and "shunt*").mp. 15. "benign senescent forgetfulness".mp.
  10. "parkinson* disease dementia" or PDD or "parkinson* dementia").mp 24. or/1-23 25. amisulpiride.ti,ab. 26. Chlorpromazine/ 27. chlorpromazine.ti,ab. 28. Promazine/ 29. promazine.ti,ab. 30. Trifluoperazine/ 31. trifluoperazine.ti,ab. 32. Prochlorperazine/ 33. prochlorperazine.ti,ab. 34. or/25-33 35. 24 and 34 36. randomized.ab. 37. placebo.ab. 38. randomly.ab. 39. trial.ab. 40. groups.ab. 41. "control group".ab. 42. ("double-blind*" or "single-blind*").ti, ab. 43. exp Clinical Trials/ 44. or/36-43 45. 35 and 44 Total for supplementary searches 646 Total for pre-publication and supplementary search 1100 Total post first assess and de-duplication 33 96 Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia (Review) Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Leeuwen, E., Petrovic, M., van Driel, M. L., De Sutter, A. I., Vander Stichele, R., Declercq, T., & Christiaens, T.
Affiliations
  • Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
  • Department of Geriatrics; Ghent University Hospital; Ghent Belgium
  • Department of Public Health and Primary Care; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
  • Clinical Pharmacology Unit of the Department of Pharmacology; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
2022
Issue
4
Pages
CD007726-CD007726
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2805388957
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, dementia, neuropsychiatric symptoms, older adults, exit strategy, nursing homes, primary care, psychosis, agitation, aggression, behavioral strategies, antipsychotic safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review