Cited by 24Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Prevalence and persistent use of psychotropic drugs in older adults receiving domiciliary care at baseline

Open access
Lornstad, Marie Turmo, Aarøen, Marte, Bergh, Sverre, Benth, Jūratė Šaltytė, Helvik, Anne-Sofie·2019·BMC Geriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use of psychotropic drugs in older adults receiving domiciliary care. The first aim was to describe the prevalence and persistency of use of psychotropic drugs in older adults (≥ 70 years) with and without dementia receiving domiciliary care. Furthermore, the second aim was to explore factors associated with persistent drug use at two consecutive time-points. Lastly, we aimed to examine if use of psychotropic drugs changed after admission to a nursing home. METHODS: In total, 1001 community-dwelling older adults receiving domiciliary care at inclusion participated in the study. Information about psychotropic drug use was collected at baseline, after 18 months and after 36 months. The participants' cognitive function, neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and physical health were assessed at the same assessments. Participants were evaluated for dementia based on all gathered information. Formal level of care (domiciliary care or in a nursing home) was registered at the follow-up assessments. RESULTS: Prevalence and persistent use of psychotropic drugs in older adults receiving domiciliary care was high. Participants with dementia more often used antipsychotics and antidepressants than participants without dementia. The majority of the participants using antipsychotic drugs used traditional antipsychotics. Younger age was associated with higher odds for persistent use of antipsychotics and antidepressants, and lower odds for persistent use of sedatives. Severity of NPS was associated with persistent use of antidepressants. The odds for use of antipsychotics and antidepressants were higher in those admitted to a nursing home as compared to the community-dwelling participants at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence and persistency of use of psychotropic drugs. The prevalence of use of traditional antipsychotics was surprisingly high, which is alarming. Monitoring the effect and adverse effects of psychotropic drugs is an important part of the treatment, and discontinuation should be considered when possible due to the odds for severe adverse effects of such drugs in people with dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12877-019-1126-y

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite guidelines, some psychotropics are used far longer than recommended or without appropriate, documented reasons.

    “Despite this, some psychotropics are used far longer than recommended or without appropriate, documented reasons [29–31].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Persistent use of psychotropic drugs; page unavailable) report high persistent use, and the Discussion (Use of antipsychotics; page unavailable) says antipsychotics should be used only briefly in people with dementia yet were often used at consecutive assessments. The paper does not establish that prescriptions lacked appropriate, documented reasons. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lornstad, M. T., Aarøen, M., Bergh, S., Benth, J. Š., & Helvik, A.-S.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Lornstad, Marie Turmo
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
119-119
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946407398
Cited by
24
References
76
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Norwegian Directorate of Health (None)
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust (None)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychotropic drugs, older adults, home care, dementia, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, sedatives, neuropsychiatric symptoms, nursing home admission, treatment persistence, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nursing Homes, Psychotropic Drugs, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review