The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening has traditionally been based on cervical cytology. Given the aetiological relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical carcinogenesis, HPV testing has been proposed as an alternative screening test. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of HPV testing for detecting histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) of grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+), including adenocarcinoma in situ, in women participating in primary cervical cancer screening; and how it compares to the accuracy of cytological testing (liquid-based and conventional) at various thresholds. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of articles in MEDLINE and Embase (1992 to November 2015) containing quantitative data and handsearched the reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included comparative test accuracy studies if all women received both HPV testing and cervical cytology followed by verification of the disease status with the reference standard, if positive for at least one screening test. The studies had to include women participating in a cervical cancer screening programme who were not being followed up for previous cytological abnormalities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We completed a 2 x 2 table with the number of true positives (TP), false positives (FP), true negatives (TN), and false negatives for each screening test (HPV test and cytology) used in each study. We calculated the absolute and relative sensitivities and the specificities of the tests for the detection of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ at various thresholds and computed sensitivity (TP/(TP + TN) and specificity (TN/ (TN + FP) for each test separately. Relative sensitivity and specificity of one test compared to another test were defined as sensitivity of test-1 over sensitivity of test-2 and specificity of test-1 over specificity of test-2, respectively. To assess bias in the studies, we used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic test Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. We used a bivariate random-effects model for computing pooled accuracy estimates. This model takes into account the within- and between-study variability and the intrinsic correlation between sensitivity and specificity. MAIN RESULTS: We included a total of 40 studies in the review, with more than 140,000 women aged between 20 and 70 years old. Many studies were at low risk of bias. There were a sufficient number of included studies with adequate methodology to perform the following test comparisons: hybrid capture 2 (HC2) (1 pg/mL threshold) versus conventional cytology (CC) (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)+ and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL)+ thresholds) or liquid-based cytology (LBC) (ASCUS+ and LSIL+ thresholds), other high-risk HPV tests versus conventional cytology (ASCUS+ and LSIL+ thresholds) or LBC (ASCUS+ and LSIL+ thresholds). For CIN 2+, pooled sensitivity estimates for HC2, CC and LBC (ASCUS+) were 89.9%, 62.5% and 72.9%, respectively, and pooled specificity estimates were 89.9%, 96.6%, and 90.3%, respectively. The results did not differ by age of women (less than or greater than 30 years old), or in studies with verification bias. Accuracy of HC2 was, however, greater in European countries compared to other countries. The results for the sensitivity of the tests were heterogeneous ranging from 52% to 94% for LBC, and 61% to 100% for HC2. Overall, the quality of the evidence for the sensitivity of the tests was moderate, and high for the specificity.The relative sensitivity of HC2 versus CC for CIN 2+ was 1.52 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.86) and the relative specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96), and versus LBC for CIN 2+ was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.10 to 1.26) and the relative specificity 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.97). The relative sensitivity of HC2 versus CC for CIN 3+ was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.91) and the relative specificity 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.97). The relative sensitivity of HC2 versus LBC for CIN 3+ was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.28) and the relative specificity 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.97). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whilst HPV tests are less likely to miss cases of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+, these tests do lead to more unnecessary referrals. However, a negative HPV test is more reassuring than a negative cytological test, as the cytological test has a greater chance of being falsely negative, which could lead to delays in receiving the appropriate treatment. Evidence from prospective longitudinal studies is needed to establish the relative clinical implications of these tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Third, a proportion of screened women with cervical precancer and cancer show false negative Pap tests.18 19”
From Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses (2018) · cites this paper as [19]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“HPV-based cervical cancer screening is widely used and has superior sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with cytology screening tests [7].”
From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Whiting, P., Rutjes, A. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., & Kleijnen, J. (2003) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-3-25 · Cited by 3,592
The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer
Bosch, F. X., Lorincz, A. T., Munoz, N., Meijer, C. J. L. M., & Shah, K. V. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.55.4.244 · Cited by 3,587
Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369
Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease.
(1968) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-69-5-1085_2 · Cited by 3,251
Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer
SCHIFFMAN, M. H., Castle, P. E., Jerónimo, J., Rodríguez, A. C., & Wacholder, S. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61416-0 · Cited by 3,135
The 2001 Bethesda System<SUBTITLE>Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology</SUBTITLE>
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104
Deeks, J. J., Macaskill, P., & Irwig, L. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016 · Cited by 2,910
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- McAdam, 2010, Evaluation of a cervical cancer screening program based on HPV testing and LLETZ excision in a low resource setting, PLoS ONE, 5, e13266, 10.1371/journal.pone.0013266 · DOI
- Castle, 2011, Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study, Lancet Oncology, 12, 880, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7 · DOI
- Chan, 1999, NASBA and other transcription-based amplification methods for research and diagnostic microbiology, Review Medical Microbiology, 10, 184
- International Agency for research on Cancer, 2005, Cervix Cancer Screening: IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, 10
- IARC working group on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 2007, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 90: Human Papilloma viruses
- Kjaer S Long term predictive value of HPV testing (the Danish prospective cohort study) 21st International Human Papillomavirus Conference Mexico City Abstract 339
- Luesley, 2004, NHSCSP Publication No. 20. Colposcopy and Programme Management. Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme
- Reitsma JB Rutjes AWS Whiting P Vlassov VV Leeflang MMG Deeks JJ Chapter 9: Assessing methodological quality. In: Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009 Available from: srdta.cochrane.org/
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 493
Zhang, L., Tian, P., Li, B., Xu, L., Qiu, L., Bi, Z., Chen, L., & Sui, L. (2024) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.70016 · Cited by 8
Isolated Non-16/18 High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Cervical Infection: Re-Evaluation After One Year
Vargas, S., Valente, M. P., de Almeida, M. M., Neves, J. S., & Calhaz–Jorge, C. (2019) · Acta Médica Portuguesa · doi:10.20344/amp.10183 · Cited by 8
Dong, D., Zhu, Y., Aili, Z., Chen, Z., & Ding, J. (2020) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104266 · Cited by 8
Okesiji, I. O., & Amosu, A. M. (2021) · International Journal of Public Health and Pharmacology · doi:10.52589/ijphp-vbj0ybpj · Cited by 8
Wormald, B. W., Rodríguez-Manzano, J., Moser, N., Pennisi, I., Ind, T. E. J., Vroobel, K. M., Attygalle, A. D., Georgiou, P., & deSouza, N. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.747614 · Cited by 8
Hillyar, C., Kanabar, S. S., Pufal, K. R., Lawson, A. W., Hee, J. L. S., Rallis, K. S., Nibber, A., & Sideris, M. C. (2022) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2022-0160 · Cited by 9
Kotani, K., Iwata, A., Kukimoto, I., Nishio, E., Mitani, T., Tsukamoto, T., Ichikawa, R., Nomura, H., & Fujii, T. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19722-3 · Cited by 8
Tekkeşin, N., Göktaş, Ş., Alkis, V., Koç, S., GÜRBÜZ, T., & Göktaş, P. (2022) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4347 · Cited by 8
Han, L., Chang, X., Song, P., Gao, L., Zhang, Y., An, L., & Shen, J. (2019) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2019.09.003 · Cited by 9
Long-term protection of HPV test in women at risk of cervical cancer
Ibáñez, R., Roura, E., Monfil, L., Rodríguez, A., Sardà, M., Crespo, N., Pascual, A. G., Martí, C. D., Fibla, M., Gutiérrez, C., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237988 · Cited by 8
Ali, M., Sinha, R., kumar, A., Karim, S., Irfan, M., Kumar, S., Sinha, S., Kumar, A., Ghosh, A., & Singh, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-68344-4 · Cited by 7
Castañeda, K. M., Vermeulen, K. M., van Asselt, A. D. I., Schuuring, E. M. D., Wisman, G. B. A., Greuter, M. J. W., & de Bock, G. H. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17040612 · Cited by 7
Incognito, G. G., Ronsini, C., Palmara, V. I., Romeo, P., Vizzielli, G., Restaino, S., Verde, M. L., Tommasi, O. D., Palumbo, M. A., & Cianci, S. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13060599 · Cited by 9
Zhou, Y., Liu, J., Chen, D., Pan, W., Lai, Y., Xiao, M., Shi, Z., Xin, X., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.70386 · Cited by 7
Giesbrecht, S. J., Krosta, S. J., Fox, R., Kolsun, K. P., Quill, Z., Gibbons, S., Sivro, A., Sandstrom, P. A., Mangat, C. S., & Becker, M. G. (2025) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00348-25 · Cited by 7
Adebamowo, C., Rossi, P. G., & Castle, P. E. (2025) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk-25-473702 · Cited by 13
Cullimore, V., Newhouse, R., Baker-Rand, H. L. A., Chu, K., Sundar, S. S., Crosbie, E. J., McWilliams, L., & Morrison, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/09691413251358626 · Cited by 7
Performance of Cervical Screening a Decade Following HPV Vaccination: The Costa Rica Vaccine Trial
Hu, S., Kreimer, A. R., Porras, C., Guillén, D., Alfaro, M., Darragh, T. M., Stoler, M. H., Villegas, L. F., Ocampo, R., Rodríguez, A. C., et al. (2022) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djac107 · Cited by 7
Liu, M., Lu, J., Zhi, Y., Ruan, Y., Cao, G., Xu, X., An, X., Gao, J., & Li, F. (2023) · Infectious Agents and Cancer · doi:10.1186/s13027-023-00498-8 · Cited by 7
A comprehensive review on the functional role of miRNA clusters in cervical cancer
Sriharikrishnaa, S., John, F. E., Bairy, M., Shetty, S., Suresh, P. S., & Kabekkodu, S. P. (2024) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2023-0244 · Cited by 7
Gao, Y., Zi, D., Liang, W., Qiu, F., Zheng, J., Xiao, X., Jiang, E., & Xu, Y. (2024) · Acta Cytologica · doi:10.1159/000538464 · Cited by 7
Pitfalls in Gynecological Cytology: Review of the Common and Less Frequent Entities in Pap Test
Vrdoljak‐Mozetič, D., Štemberger-Papić, S., Ostojić, D. V., Rubeša-Mihaljević, R., Klarić, M., & Eminović, S. (2024) · Acta Cytologica · doi:10.1159/000539637 · Cited by 7
Karamousouli, E., Sabale, U., Valente, S., Morosan, F., Heuser, M., Dodd, O., Riley, D., Heron, L., Calabrò, G. E., Αγοραστός, Θ., et al. (2024) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2024.2438759 · Cited by 7
Chiarini, A., Liu, D., Rassu, M., Armato, U., Eccher, C., & Prà, I. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00213 · Cited by 7
Ibáñez, R., Mareque, M., Granados, R., Andı́a, D., García‐Rojo, M., Quílez, J. C., & Oyagüez, I. (2021) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8 · Cited by 7
Chatzistamatiou, Κ., Tsertanidou, A., Moysiadis, T., Mouchtaropoulou, E., Pasentsis, K., Skenderi, A., Σταματόπουλος, Κ., & Αγοραστός, Θ. (2021) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.020 · Cited by 7
Caicedo‐Martínez, M., Fernández-Deaza, G. P., Ordóñez‐Reyes, C., Olejua, P. A., Nuche‐Berenguer, B., Mello, M. B., & Murillo, R. (2021) · International Journal of STD & AIDS · doi:10.1177/09564624211037498 · Cited by 7
Utility of p16/Ki67 double immunocytochemistry for detection of cervical adenocarcinoma
Ryu, A., Honma, K., Shingetsu, A., Tanada, S., Yamamoto, T., Nagata, S., Kamiura, S., Yamasaki, T., Ohue, M., & Matsuura, N. (2022) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.22631 · Cited by 7
Intra‐ and interlaboratory reproducibility of the RIATOL qPCR HPV genotyping assay
Dhillon, S. K., Chung, P. Y. J., Padalko, E. Y., Praet, M. M., Pereira, A. R., Redzic, N., Broeck, D. V., & Arbyn, M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29093 · Cited by 7
Self-citation14-type HPV mRNA test in triage of HPV DNA-positive postmenopausal women with normal cytology
Asciutto, K. C., Borgfeldt, C., & Forslund, O. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07498-6 · Cited by 7
Choi, C., Leung, K. S. M., & Wu, J. T. K. (2023) · Journal of Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e20 · Cited by 6
Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of Sample Adequacy in HPV DNA Testing
d’Avenia, M., Dell’Anno, F., Martinelli, M., Santomauro, L., Njoku, R. C., Mühr, L. S. A., Iacobellis, M., & Cocuzza, C. E. (2025) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.70482 · Cited by 6
SIP 7: Progress in Cervical Cancer Prevention in the UK (2025 Second Edition)
Ellis, L. B., Bowden, S. J., Lyons, D., & Kyrgiou, M. (2025) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.18262 · Cited by 6
van den Borst, E., Broeck, D. V., Sutter, P. D., Donders, G. G. G., Doyen, J., Tjalma, W. A. A., Weyers, S., Arbyn, M., Keer, S. V., & Latsuzbaia, A. (2025) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.08.018 · Cited by 6
Self-citationWang, Y., Wu, D., Gai, J., Cai, Y., Hua, K., Zhu, Z., & Xin, W. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-04378-3 · Cited by 6
Clinical Controversies in Cervical Cancer Screening
Buskwofie, A., CHAN, C., Kahn, R. M., & Holcomb, K. (2019) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000478 · Cited by 7
Sznurkowski, J. J., Bodnar, L., Szylberg, Ł., Żółciak‐Siwińska, A., Dańska-Bidzińska, A., Klasa-Mazurkiewicz, D., Rychlik, A., Kowalik, A., Streb, J., Bidziński, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13154351 · Cited by 6
Rose, S. B., McBain, L., Bell, R. A. R., Innes, C., Whaiti, S. T., Tino, A. B., & Sykes, P. H. (2024) · Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1071/hc24110 · Cited by 6
Shukla, S., Shukla, A. K., Ray, N., Upadhyay, A. M., Fahad, F. I., Dutta, S. D., Nagappan, A., & Mongre, R. K. (2025) · Onco · doi:10.3390/onco5020024 · Cited by 6
Interval cancer audit and disclosure in cervical screening programmes: An international survey
Fitzpatrick, P., Mooney, T., Byrne, H., Healy, O., Russell, N. E., & O’Reilly, S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/09691413211062344 · Cited by 6
Adamyan, L. V., Olina, A. A., Grigorian, I. E., & Asaturova, A. A. V. (2021) · Russian Journal of Human Reproduction · doi:10.17116/repro2021270610 · Cited by 6
Stefan, D. C., Dangou, J.-M., Barango, P., Dille, I., & Kapambwe, S. K. (2022) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2022.1454 · Cited by 6
Incorporating HPV 33 and cytology into HPV 16/18 screening may be feasible. A cross-sectional study
Tatar, B. (2022) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06876-8 · Cited by 6
Liu, Q., Chen, L., Yu, M., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Zheng, W., Niu, S., & Zhou, F. (2023) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.89715 · Cited by 6
Granados, R., Duarte, J. A., Luján-Rodríguez, D. R., Gutiérrez-Pecharromán, A., Solís, I., Molpeceres, L., Bajo, P., Palencia, E., & Martín, N. (2024) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.22895 · Cited by 6
Sakamoto, J., Saito, M., Zhang, S., Takakura, M., Takagi, H., & Sasagawa, T. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265996 · Cited by 6
HPV Cotesting of Unsatisfactory Papanicolaou Tests: Implications for Follow-up Intervals
Chen, F., Lin, L. H., Hindi, I., Sun, W. M., Shafizadeh, N., Szeto, O., Brandler, T. C., & Simsir, A. (2023) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqad026 · Cited by 6
Wood, B., Taljaard, M., El‐Khatib, Z., McFaul, S. M., Graham, I. D., & Little, J. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13258 · Cited by 6
Costa, A. F., Ribeiro, M. G. M., Onofre, A. S. C., & Onofre, F. B. D. M. (2020) · Diagnostic Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/dc.24683 · Cited by 7
Kim, M., Kim, J., Park, N. J.-Y., & Park, J. Y. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267836 · Cited by 5
“HPV-based cervical cancer screening is widely used and has superior sensitivity and negative predictive value compared with cytology screening tests [7].”
MethodAccuracy of Liferiver HarmoniaHPV and VenusHPV Assays on Urine and Vaginal Self‐Samples
Latsuzbaia, A., Keer, S. V., Broeck, D. V., Weyers, S., Donders, G. G. G., Sutter, P. D., Tjalma, W. A. A., Doyen, J., Vorsters, A., & Arbyn, M. (2025) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.70273 · Cited by 5
Self-citationGoulart, R. A., Nayar, R., Lorey, T. S., Joste, N. E., & Stoler, M. H. (2025) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.70006 · Cited by 5
Role of L1 HPV Protein Expression in the Cytological Diagnosis of Precancerous Cervical Lesions
Dobrovolskaya, D., Asaturova, A. V., Станиславовна, Б. А., Tregubova, A., Mogirevskaia, O. A., Джаруллаева, З. У., Davydova, Y., Palicelli, A., Bayramova, G. R., & Sukhikh, G. T. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14103376 · Cited by 5
Howard, M. F., Fyffe-Freil, R., Pierre, C. C., Maku, H. O., Costanzo, S. D., Lorey, T. S., & Greene, D. N. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00767-24 · Cited by 5
Adsul, P., de Cortina, S. H., Pramathesh, R., Jayakrishna, P., Srinivas, V., Nethan, S. T., Dhanasekaran, K., Hariprasad, R., & Madhivanan, P. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000570 · Cited by 5
Chen, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Liu, Q., Zhang, X.-F., Zhou, X., Zhang, J., Niu, S., & Zhou, F. (2023) · Diagnostic Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/dc.25229 · Cited by 5
Zhou, X., Lin, W., Qin, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Zheng, W., & Zhou, F. (2023) · Cancer Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/cncy.22780 · Cited by 5
Asensio-Puig, L., de Andrés-Pablo, Á., Khannous‐Lleiffe, O., Ibáñez, R., Acera, A., de Sanjosé, S., Gabaldón, T., Alemany, L., Bruni, L., & Pavón, M. Á. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25115736 · Cited by 5
Prétet, J., Baraquin, A., Chung, P. Y. J., Puget, L., Dhillon, S. K., Tkachenka, Y., Jacquot, K., Lepiller, Q., Broeck, D. V., & Arbyn, M. (2024) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29961 · Cited by 5
Self-citationHuman Papillomavirus Selected Properties and Related Cervical Cancer Prevention Issues
Balmagambetova, S. K., Tinelli, A., Mynbaev, O. A., Koyshybaev, A. K., Urazayev, O., Kereyeva, N. M., & Ismagulova, E. K. (2020) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612826666200422094205 · Cited by 5
Bao, H., Zhang, X., Bi, H., Zhao, Y., Fang, L., Wang, H., & Wang, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.816789 · Cited by 5
Neis, F., Holleczek, B., Henes, M., Juhasz-Böss, I., Wallwiener, D. R., & Neis, K.-J. (2022) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06747-2 · Cited by 5
Bao, H., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Bi, H., Cong, S., Fang, L., Wang, H., & Wang, L. (2022) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.14598 · Cited by 5
High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Detection via Cobas® 4800 and REBA HPV-ID® Assays
Liewchalermwong, S., Oranratanaphan, S., Termrungruanglert, W., Triratanachat, S., Tantbírójn, P., Kitkumthorn, N., Bhattarakosol, P., & Chaiwongkot, A. (2022) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v14122713 · Cited by 5
Chou, H., Yang, C., Chao, A., Lin, H., Lu, C., Ou, Y., Hsu, S., Shih, Y., Huang, H., Lin, C.-T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.29426 · Cited by 5
Rose, S. B., McBain, L., Garrett, S. M., Bell, R. A. R., Innes, C., Whaiti, S. T., Tino, A. B., & Sykes, P. H. (2024) · Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.1071/hc24118 · Cited by 5
Lee, J., Ismail‐Pratt, I., Machalek, D. A., Kumarasamy, S., & Garland, S. M. (2024) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003768 · Cited by 5
Rodríguez, G., García, L., Beracochea, A. V., Alonso, R., Caserta, B., Pérez, N., Larrosa, D., Vero, M. J., Ardao, G., Santos, M. N., et al. (2019) · Revista Médica del Uruguay · doi:10.29193/rmu.35.4.3 · Cited by 5
Infections à papillomavirus humains et lésions associées
Lepiller, Q., Pépin‐Puget, L., Debernardi, A., & Prétet, J. (2021) · Journal de Pédiatrie et de Puériculture · doi:10.1016/j.jpp.2021.02.003 · Cited by 5
Association between PEG3 DNA methylation and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Bosire, C. N., Vidal, A. C., Smith, J. S., Jima, D. D., Huang, Z., Skaar, D. A., Valea, F. A., Bentley, R. C., Gradison, M., Yarnall, K. S. H., et al. (2021) · Infectious Agents and Cancer · doi:10.1186/s13027-021-00382-3 · Cited by 5
Henschke, N., Bergman, H., Villanueva, G., Loke, Y. K., Golder, S., Crosbie, E. J., Kyrgiou, M., Dwan, K. M., & Morrison, J. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015363 · Cited by 6
Bonás, M. K., Discacciati, M. G., Videira, H. M., Cavalcante, L. A., Teixeira, J. C., & Vale, D. B. (2022) · Women s Health Reports · doi:10.1089/whr.2022.0024 · Cited by 5
Cervical cancer elimination: what, how and WHO ?
Davies, J. C., Cao, J., Baker-Rand, H. L. A., Morrison, J., & Crosbie, E. J. (2025) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/tog.12984 · Cited by 4
Something old, something new: Cervical cytopathology in the new era
Tahboub, R., Sanchez-Ortiz, J., Lai, M., Clark, J. L., & Zou, T. (2024) · Human Pathology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.hpr.2024.300756 · Cited by 5
Prevention of gynecological cancers: cervical cancer screening in Turkey: a role model for the world
Akgör, U., Temiz, B. E., & Gultekin, M. (2024) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000998 · Cited by 4
Silva, N. N. T., Santos, A. C. D. S., Pereira, I. O. A., da Silva, G. N., & Lima, A. A. (2025) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-025-00790-w · Cited by 4
Detection of HPV Infection and the Current Status of Vaccine Research: A Review
Su, L., Peng, H., & He, X. (2023) · Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.31083/j.ceog5003048 · Cited by 4
Efficiency of CIN2+ Detection by Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone (TRH) Site-Specific Methylation
Chaiwongkot, A., Buranapraditkun, S., Oranratanaphan, S., Chuen‐Im, T., & Kitkumthorn, N. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15091802 · Cited by 4
Chung, P. Y. J., Dhillon, S. K., Cortoos, S., Hamerlinck, H., Pereira, R., Padalko, E. Y., Broeck, D. V., & Arbyn, M. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00332-24 · Cited by 4
Self-citationMonitoring mouse papillomavirus-associated cancer development using longitudinal Pap smear screening
Atkins, H., Uslu, A. A., Li, J. J., Shearer, D. A., Brendle, S. A., Han, C., Kozak, M., Lopez, P. G., Nayar, D., Balogh, K. K., et al. (2024) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01420-24 · Cited by 4
Inhibitory effect of Curcumin on a cervical cancer cell line via the RAS/RAF signaling pathway.
Ödemır, İ., Zaman, F., Baş, D. D., Sarı, U., Öztürk, Ş., & Tuncer, M. C. (2025) · PubMed · doi:10.14670/hh-18-797 · Cited by 4
Çubuk, F., Yıldız, M. Ç., Balcı, F., İrgin, A., Aşkın, S., Sağtaş, E., & Kaygusuz, S. (2025) · Virology Journal · doi:10.1186/s12985-024-02601-w · Cited by 4
Zhao, X., Hou, S., Hao, R., Zang, Y., & Song, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1566750 · Cited by 4
Inturrisi, F., Bogaards, J. A., Heideman, D. A. M., Meijer, C. J. L. M., & Berkhof, J. H. (2020) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1336 · Cited by 4
Yang, Z., Francisco, J., Reese, A. S., Spriggs, D. R., Im, H., & Castro, C. M. (2021) · Biophysics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0043089 · Cited by 5
Murillo, R., Gamboa, Ó., Hernandez-Suarez, G. A., González, M., Olejua, P. A., Molano, M., & Wiesner, C. (2021) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106801 · Cited by 4
Secondary prevention and treatment of cervical cancer - update from Poland
Poniewierza, P., Śniadecki, M., Brzeziński, M., Klasa-Mazurkiewicz, D., & Panek, G. M. (2022) · Nowotwory Journal of Oncology · doi:10.5603/njo.2022.0002 · Cited by 4
Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Survivorship
Maresso, K. C., Basen-Engquist, K. M., & Hawk, E. T. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-69584-8.00001-3 · Cited by 4
Rad, A. H. F., Sørbye, S. W., Brenn, T., Tiwari, S., Løchen, M., & Skjeldestad, F. E. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054119 · Cited by 4
Choi, B., Na, Y., Whang, M. Y., Yoon, S. M., Han, M.-R., Park, S.-W., Song, H., Hur, S. Y., & Choi, Y. J. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12196188 · Cited by 4
Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
Shiraz, A., Schiemer, R., Staley, H., Matsushita, T., Hasegawa, T., Bryant, A., Inoue, E., Egawa, N., & Gajjar, K. B. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd014502 · Cited by 5
Self-citationRose, S. B., McBain, L., Bell, R. A. R., Innes, C., Whaiti, S. T., Tino, A. B., & Sykes, P. H. (2024) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/ajo.13906 · Cited by 4
Hurtado-Salgado, E. M., Cárdenas, L. M. C., Salmerón, J., Luna‐Gordillo, R., Ortiz‐Panozo, E., Allen‐Leigh, B., Saavedra‐Lara, N., Franco, E. L., & Lazcano-Ponce, E. C. (2021) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.33905 · Cited by 4
‘Missing Adenocarcinomas’: Are They a Real Problem in Cervical Cancer Screening in Brazil?
Vale, D. B., Bragança, J. F., & Zeferino, L. C. (2019) · Revista Brasileira Ginecologia e Obstetrícia · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1698772 · Cited by 4
Challenges of False Positive and Negative Results in Cervical Cancer ScreeningPreprint
Grimes, D. R., Corry, E., Malagón, T., Ó’Riain, C., Franco, E. L., & Brennan, D. J. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.03.17.20037440 · Cited by 4
HPVsim: An agent-based model of HPV transmission and cervical cancerPreprint
Stuart, R. M., Cohen, J. A., Kerr, C. C., Mathur, P., Abeysuriya, R., Zimmermann, M. R., Rao, D. W., Boudreau, M. C., Lee, S., Yang, L., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.02.01.23285356 · Cited by 4
Richter, K. L., Snyman, L. C., Dreyer, G., der Merwe, F. H. V., Dreyer, G. J., Visser, C., & Botha, M. H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/09691413251317926 · Cited by 3
Saveliev, G. M., Ciuvică, A. I., Crețoiu, D., Varlas, V. N., Bălălău, C., Bălescu, I., Bacalbaşa, N., Bohîlțea, L. C., & Suciu, N. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15162066 · Cited by 3
Li, Z., Jia, X., Ren, X., Wu, B.-K., Chen, W., Feng, X., Wang, L., & Qiao, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1040285 · Cited by 3
Grimes, D. R. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078551 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Koliopoulos, G., Nyaga, V. N., Santesso, N., Bryant, A., Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Mustafa, R. A., Schünemann, H., Paraskevaidis, E., & Arbyn, M.
- Affiliations
- General-Maternity District Hospital Helena Venizelou (GR)
- Institut Scientifique de Santé Publique (BE)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust; Gynaecological Oncology Unit; Sharoe Green Lane Fullwood Preston Lancashire UK PR2 9HT
- University Hospital of Ioannina (GR)
- Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-10
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- CD008587-CD008587
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6483676
- OpenAlex
- W2171104009
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 145
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 16
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- European Commission (603019)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, HPV testing, cervical cytology, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, Hybrid Capture 2, HPV genotyping, liquid-based cytology, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, primary screening, test comparison, screening thresholds, bias assessment, QUADAS
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vaginal Smears, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review