Cited by 7Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

HPV DNA status and clinical history of patients are supplements for accurate reporting of the cytological Pap smear

Open access
Ali, Mohammad, Sinha, Reena, kumar, Amit, Karim, Shabana, Irfan, Mohammad, Kumar, Sachin, Sinha, Shweta, Kumar, Arun +2 more·2024·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The present study was aimed at showing the importance of HPV DNA status and the clinical history of the patients required by the cytologist for accurate reporting. A total of 1250 symptomatic women who attended the gynaecology outpatient department of the Mahavir Cancer Sansthan and Nalanda Medical College, Patna, for pap smear examinations were screened and recruited for the study. Due to highly clinical symptoms out of the negative with inflammatory smears reported, one hundred and ten patients were randomly advised for biopsy and HPV 16/18 DNA analysis by a gynaecologist to correlate negative smears included in the study. Pap smear reports revealed that 1178 (94.24%) were negative for intraepithelial lesions (NILM) with inflammatory smears, 23 (1.84%) smears showed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 12 (0.96%) smears showed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 37 (2.96%) smears showed an atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US). A biopsy of 110 out of 1178 (NILM) patients revealed that 15 (13.63%) women had cervical cancer, 29 women had CIN I, 17 women had CIN II + CIN III, 35 women had benign cervical changes, and 14 women had haemorrhages. On the other hand, HPV 16/18 DNA was detected as positive in 87 out of 110. The high positivity of HPV in biopsied cases where frank cervical cancer and at-risk cancer were also observed in the negative smear-screened patients reveals that the HPV status and clinical history of the patients will be quite helpful to the cytologist for accurate reporting, and suggests that a negative HPV DNA result may be a stronger predictor of cervical cancer risk than a negative Pap test.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-68344-4

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HPV DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology in detecting precancerous lesions and cervical cancers.

    “Numerous studies affirm that HPV DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology in detecting precancerous lesions and cervical cancers [21, 22, 23] and any HPV DNA test is better than none.”

    From Comparative analysis of SD biosensor standard™ M10 HPV and seegene anyplex™ II HPV HR for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus: a concordance study (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that HPV tests were significantly more sensitive than cytology for detecting CIN2+ lesions. The Results (page unavailable) found HPV 16/18 DNA in all 15 cervical cancer cases among women with negative inflammatory Pap smears, but do not establish comparative sensitivity for cervical cancer detection in a general screening population. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Anttila A., Arbyn M., De Vuyst H., Dillner J., Dillner L., Franceschi S., Patnik J., Ronco G., Segnan N. & Suinio E. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. 2nd ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: (2008). [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, M., Sinha, R., kumar, A., Karim, S., Irfan, M., Kumar, S., Sinha, S., Kumar, A., Ghosh, A., & Singh, M.
Affiliations
  • Mahavir Cancer Institute and Research Centre (IN)
  • Nalanda Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Corresponding author
Ali, Mohammad
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-07-30
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
17486-17486
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401119899
Cited by
7
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
HPV 16/18, cervical cancer screening, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cervical biopsy, medical history, cervical cancer risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, DNA, Viral, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Vaginal Smears, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Young Adult, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review