Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPV) types is causally linked with the development of cervical precancer and cancer. HPV types 16 and 18 cause approximately 70% of cervical cancers worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the harms and protection of prophylactic human papillomaviruses (HPV) vaccines against cervical precancer and HPV16/18 infection in adolescent girls and women. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase (June 2017) for reports on effects from trials. We searched trial registries and company results' registers to identify unpublished data for mortality and serious adverse events. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety in females offered HPV vaccines with placebo (vaccine adjuvants or another control vaccine). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used Cochrane methodology and GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for protection against cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above [CIN2+], CIN grade 3 and above [CIN3+], and adenocarcinoma-in-situ [AIS]), and for harms. We distinguished between the effects of vaccines by participants' baseline HPV DNA status. The outcomes were precancer associated with vaccine HPV types and precancer irrespective of HPV type. Results are presented as risks in control and vaccination groups and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 trials (73,428 participants). Ten trials, with follow-up of 1.3 to 8 years, addressed protection against CIN/AIS. Vaccine safety was evaluated over a period of 6 months to 7 years in 23 studies. Studies were not large enough or of sufficient duration to evaluate cervical cancer outcomes. All but one of the trials was funded by the vaccine manufacturers. We judged most included trials to be at low risk of bias. Studies involved monovalent (N = 1), bivalent (N = 18), and quadrivalent vaccines (N = 7). Most women were under 26 years of age. Three trials recruited women aged 25 and over. We summarize the effects of vaccines in participants who had at least one immunisation.Efficacy endpoints by initial HPV DNA statushrHPV negativeHPV vaccines reduce CIN2+, CIN3+, AIS associated with HPV16/18 compared with placebo in adolescent girls and women aged 15 to 26. There is high-certainty evidence that vaccines lower CIN2+ from 164 to 2/10,000 (RR 0.01 (0 to 0.05)) and CIN3+ from 70 to 0/10,000 (RR 0.01 (0.00 to 0.10). There is moderate-certainty evidence that vaccines reduce the risk of AIS from 9 to 0/10,000 (RR 0.10 (0.01 to 0.82).HPV vaccines reduce the risk of any CIN2+ from 287 to 106/10,000 (RR 0.37 (0.25 to 0.55), high certainty) and probably reduce any AIS lesions from 10 to 0/10,000 (RR 0.1 (0.01 to 0.76), moderate certainty). The size of reduction in CIN3+ with vaccines differed between bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines (bivalent: RR 0.08 (0.03 to 0.23), high certainty; quadrivalent: RR 0.54 (0.36 to 0.82), moderate certainty). Data in older women were not available for this comparison.HPV16/18 negativeIn those aged 15 to 26 years, vaccines reduce CIN2+ associated with HPV16/18 from 113 to 6 /10,000 (RR 0.05 (0.03 to 0.10). In women 24 years or older the absolute and relative reduction in the risk of these lesions is smaller (from 45 to 14/10,000, (RR 0.30 (0.11 to 0.81), moderate certainty). HPV vaccines reduce the risk of CIN3+ and AIS associated with HPV16/18 in younger women (RR 0.05 (0.02 to 0.14), high certainty and RR 0.09 (0.01 to 0.72), moderate certainty, respectively). No trials in older women have measured these outcomes.Vaccines reduce any CIN2+ from 231 to 95/10,000, (RR 0.41 (0.32 to 0.52)) in younger women. No data are reported for more severe lesions.Regardless of HPV DNA statusIn younger women HPV vaccines reduce the risk of CIN2+ associated with HPV16/18 from 341 to 157/10,000 (RR 0.46 (0.37 to 0.57), high certainty). Similar reductions in risk were observed for CIN3+ associated with HPV16/18 (high certainty). The number of women with AIS associated with HPV16/18 is reduced from 14 to 5/10,000 with HPV vaccines (high certainty).HPV vaccines reduce any CIN2+ from 559 to 391/10,000 (RR 0.70 (0.58 to 0.85, high certainty) and any AIS from 17 to 5/10,000 (RR 0.32 (0.15 to 0.67), high certainty). The reduction in any CIN3+ differed by vaccine type (bivalent vaccine: RR 0.55 (0.43 to 0.71) and quadrivalent vaccine: RR 0.81 (0.69 to 0.96)).In women vaccinated at 24 to 45 years of age, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the risks of CIN2+ associated with HPV16/18 and any CIN2+ are similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated women (RR 0.74 (0.52 to 1.05) and RR 1.04 (0.83 to 1.30) respectively). No data are reported in this age group for CIN3+ or AIS.Adverse effectsThe risk of serious adverse events is similar between control and HPV vaccines in women of all ages (669 versus 656/10,000, RR 0.98 (0.92 to 1.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HPV vaccines have consistently been shown to be safe.
“The licensed prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines protect against infection with vaccine-targeted HPV types, precancerous lesions, and invasive cervical cancer, have demonstrated high efficacy for three-dose and two-dose schedules,3, 4 and have consistently been shown to be safe.5”
From Evidence-based impact projections of single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in India: a modelling study (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
The Description of the intervention (page unavailable) says L1 virus-like-particle HPV vaccines were well tolerated in phase I trials. That supports a limited safety finding, but the copy does not establish that licensed HPV vaccines have consistently been shown to be safe across studies or settings. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139 · see citing works
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817 · see citing works
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · see citing works
Solomon, D. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.16.2114 · Cited by 3,104 · see citing works
Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163 · see citing works
Ronco, G., Dillner, J., Elfström, K. M., Tunesi, S., Snijders, P. J. F., Arbyn, M., Kitchener, H., Segnan, N., Gilham, C., Giorgi-Rossi, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62218-7 · Cited by 1,810 · see citing works
Self-citationSurgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Paraskevaidis, E., Bryant, A., & Dickinson, H. O. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001318.pub3 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Self-citationUpdated tests for small-study effects in meta-analyses
Harbord, R. M., Harris, R. J., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2009) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0900900202 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Breitburd F, Kirnbauer R, Hubbert NL, Nonnenmacher B, Trin-Dinh-Desmarquet C, Orth G, et al. Immunization with viruslike particles from cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) can protect against experimental CRPV infection. Journal of Virology. 1995; 69(6): 3959-63. [PubMed: 7745754]
- Brown DR, Bryan JT, Schroeder JM, Robinson TS, Fife KH, Wheeler CM, et al. Neutralization of human papillomavirus type 11 (HPV-11) by serum from women vaccinated with yeast-derived HPV-11 L1 virus-like particles: correlation with competitive radioimmunoassay titer. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2001; 184(9):1183-6. [PubMed: 11598842]
- Castellsague X, Diaz M, De Sanjose S, Munoz N, Herrero R, Franceschi S, et al. Worldwide human papillomavirus etiology of cervical adenocarcinoma and its cofactors: implications for screening and prevention. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2006; 98(1460-2105 (Electronic), 5):303-15. [PubMed: 16507827]
- DerSimonian 1986 . DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986; 7:177-88. 177-188. [PubMed: 3802833]
- Eggertson L. Three provinces to study 2-dose HPV vaccine. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2007; 177(1488-2329 (Electronic), 5):444-5. [PubMed: 17724315]
- Evans TG, Bonnez W, Rose RC, Koenig S, Demeter L, Suzich JA, et al. A Phase 1 study of a recombinant viruslike particle vaccine against human papillomavirus type 11 in healthy adult volunteers. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2001; 183(0022-1899, 10):1485-93. [PubMed: 11319684]
- Frazer 2004 . Frazer IH. Prevention of cervical cancer through papillomavirus vaccination. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2004; 4:46-55.
- Galloway 2003 . Galloway DA. Papillomavirus vaccines in clinical trials. Lancet. 2003; 3:469-75. [PubMed: 12901889]
- Ghim S, Newsome J, Bell J, Sundberg JP, Schlegel R, Jenson AB. Spontaneously regressing oral papillomas induce systemic antibodies that neutralize canine oral papillomavirus. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2000; 68(3):147-51. [PubMed: 10816383]
- Harper DM. Currently approved prophylactic HPV vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines. 2009; 8(12):1663-79. [PubMed: 19943762]
- Harro CD, Pang Y-YS, Roden RB, Hildesheim A, Wang Z, Reynolds MJ, et al. Safety and immunogenicity trial in adult volunteers of a human papillomavirus 16 L1 Virus-Like particle vaccine. Journal of National Cancer Institute. 2001; 93(4):284-92.
- IARC 2004 . IARC Expert team cervical cancer screening. Day, N.; Hakama, M.; Arbyn, M. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 10. IARC Press; Lyon: 2005. Cervix Cancer Screening. IARC 2007 . IARC Monograph Working Group on Carcinogenesis. Coglinano, V.; Baan, R.; Straif, K.; Secretan, B.; El Ghissasi, F.; Zur Hausen, H., et al. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol 90: Human Papillomaviruses.
- Cogliano, V.; Baan, R.; Straif, K.; Grosse, Y.; Secretan, B.; El Ghissassi, F., editors. Vol. 90. IARC Press; Lyon: 2007. p. 1-670.
- Iftner T, Villa LL. Chapter 12: Human papillomavirus technologies. Journal of National Cancer Institute Monographs. 2003; 2003(31):80-8. Initiative 2009 . Initiative for Vaccine Research of the Department of Immunization VaB. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Background Paper. World Health Organization (WHO); Geneva: 2009. p. 1-249.
- Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, et al. A pooled analysis of continued prophylactic efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (Types 6/11/16/18) vaccine against high-grade cervical and external genital lesions. Cancer Prvention Research. 2009; 2(10):868-78.
- Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, Brown DR, Barr E, Alvarez FB. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 347:1645-51. [PubMed: 12444178]
- Koutsky 2006 . Koutsky LA, Harper DM. Chapter 13: Current findings from prophylactic HPV vaccine trials. Vaccine. 2006; 24(Suppl 3):114-21.
- Lacey CJ, Lowndes CM, Shah KV. Chapter 4: Burden and management of non- cancerous HPV-related conditions: HPV-6/11 disease. Vaccine. 2006; 24(0264-410X (Print), Suppl 3):35-41.
- McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW, et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncology. 2008; 9(5):425-34.
- Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Da Rosa MI, Bozzetti MC, Zanini RR. Efficacy of human papillomavirus vaccines: a systematic quantitative review. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2009; 19(7):1166-76. [PubMed: 19823051]
- Munoz N, Bosch FX, Castellsague X, Diaz M, De Sanjose S, Hammouda D, et al. Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? The international perspective. International Journal of Cancer. 2004; 111:278-85.
- Ostor 1993 . Ostor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. International Journal of Gynegological Pathology. 1993; 12(2):186-92.
- Pagliusi SR, Teresa Aguado M. Efficacy and other milestones for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. Vaccine. 2004; 23(0264-410X, 5):569-78. [PubMed: 15630792]
- Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta- analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine. 1998; 17(24): 2815-34. [PubMed: 9921604]
- Rambout L, Hopkins L, Hutton B, Fergusson D. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2007; 177(5):469-79. [PubMed: 17671238]
- Richart 1973 . Richart RM. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathology Annual. 1973; 8:301-23. [PubMed: 4583016]
- Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Marchesi F, Capocaccia R. EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995-1999. Results and commentary. European Journal of Cancer. 2009; 45(6):931-91. [PubMed: 19171476]
- Schiffman MA, Herrero R, Desalle R, Hildesheim A, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, et al. The carcinogenicity of human papillomavirus types reflects viral evolution. Virology. 2005; 337(0042-6822, 1):76-84. [PubMed: 15914222]
- Schiffman M, Clifford G, Buonaguro FM. Classification of weakly carcinogenic human papillomavirus types: addressing the limits of epidemiology at the borderline. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2009; 4(1):1-8. [PubMed: 19146683]
- Schneider A, Gissmann L. Cervical cancer. The potential role of human papillomavirus (HPV)-specific vaccines in prevention and treatment. American Journal of Cancer. 2003; 2:1-253.
- Sharp S. Meta-analysis regression. Statatistics Technical Bulletin. 1998; 7(42):148-55. MEDLINE: 11989.
- Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, Key CR. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study. Gynecologic Oncology. 2000; 78(2):97-105. [PubMed: 10926787]
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002; 287:2114-9. [PubMed: 11966386]
- Stanley MA. Human papillomavirus vaccines. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2006; 16(1052-9276 (Print), 3):139-49. [PubMed: 16710836]
- Szarewski 2010 . Szarewski A. HPV vaccine: Cervarix. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 2010; 10(3):477-87. [PubMed: 20132062]
- Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine. 1999; 18(20):2693-708. MEDLINE: 11967. [PubMed: 10521860]
- Winer RL, Lee SK, Hughes JP, Adam DE, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Genital human papillomavirus infection: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of female university students. Journal of Epidemiology. 2003; 157:218-26.
- Winer RL, Feng Q, Hughes JP, O'Reilly S, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA. Risk of female human papillomavirus acquisition associated with first male sex partner. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008; 197(0022-1899 (Print), 2):279-82. [PubMed: 18179386]
- Yang BH, Bray FI, Parkin DM, Sellors JW, Zhang Z-F. Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost. Internaional Journal of Cancer. 2004; 109:418-24. * Indicates the major publication for the study
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonjour, M., Charvat, H., Franco, E. L., Piñeros, M., Clifford, G. M., Bray, F., & Baussano, I. (2021) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00046-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Man, I., Georges, D., de Carvalho, T. M., Ray Saraswati, L., Bhandari, P., Kataria, I., Siddiqui, M., Muwonge, R., Lucas, E., Berkhof, J., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00543-5 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arbyn, M., Xu, L., Simoens, C., & Martin-Hirsch, P. P.
- Affiliations
- Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust; Gynaecological Oncology Unit; Sharoe Green Lane Fullwood Preston Lancashire UK PR2 9HT
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-09
- Volume
- 2020
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- CD009069-CD009069
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6494566
- OpenAlex
- W1928390952
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 10.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
- Keywords
- HPV vaccination, human papillomavirus, cervical cancer prevention, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, HPV 16/18, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, adverse events, quadrivalent vaccine, bivalent vaccine, monovalent vaccine, adolescent girls, women, cervical cancer mortality, cervical cancer incidence, cervical cancer screening
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Precancerous Conditions, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Vaccination, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review