Cited by 176Gynecological conditions and treatmentsReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and Contraception

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities

Open access
Bosteels, Jan, van Wessel, Steffi, Weyers, Steven, Broekmans, Frank J, D'Hooghe, Thomas M, Bongers, M Y, Mol, Ben Willem J·2018·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities (Review)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extrapolated data from the Cochrane review of women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction did not find a significant reduction in miscarriage rates compared with expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47-5.00; P = 0.47, 94 women; very low quality evidence).

    “However, extrapolated data from the Cochrane review of women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction did not find a significant reduction in miscarriage rates compared with expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47-5.00;P = 0.47, 94 women; very lowquality evidence).190”

    From Recurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17 (2023) · cites this paper as [190]

    The review’s “Adverse events: miscarriage” section reports the stated odds ratio, confidence interval, P value and sample size, and finds insufficient evidence of a difference from expectant management. Its “Quality of the evidence” section grades the myomectomy trial as very low quality. However, the reported comparison concerns women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and a submucous fibroid; the review does not describe these 94 women as undergoing myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, de Kruif JH, et al. The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol. BMC Women's Health 2018;18:163. DOI: 10.1186/ s12905-018-0637-6; PUBMED: 30290803 Additional references Andersen 2008 · DOI
  2. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP, Bhattacharya S, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction 2008; 23:756-71. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den014; PMID: 18281243 · DOI
  3. Bensdorp A, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ, Vanderkerchove P. Intra-uterine insemination for male subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360.pub4 Bettocchi 2004 · DOI
  4. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. Office hysteroscopy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2004;31:641-54. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ogc.2004.05.007; PMID: 15450325 · DOI
  5. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduction 2007;22(6):1506-12. DOI: 10.1093/ humrep/dem046; PMID: 17376819 · DOI
  6. Campo R, Van Belle Y, Rombauts L, Brosens I, Gordts S. Office mini-hysteroscopy. Human Reproduction Update 1999;5(1):73-81. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/5.1.73; PMID: 10333371 · DOI
  7. Lieng 2010b Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2010;89:992-1002. DOI: 10.3109/ 00016349.2010.493196; PMID: 20528202 · DOI
  8. Lucas ES, Salker MS, Brosens JJ. Uterine plasticity and reproductive fitness. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2013; 27:664-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.012 · DOI
  9. Marsh F, Kremer C, Duffy S. Delivering an effective outpatient service in gynaecology. A randomised controlled trial analysing the cost of outpatient versus daycase hysteroscopy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2004;111(3):243-8. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1471-0528.2004.00064; PMID: 14961886 · DOI
  10. Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD003857 Mollo 2009 · DOI
  11. Mollo A, de Franciscis P, Colacurci N, Cobellis L, Perino A, Venezia R, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility 2009;91:2628-31. DOI: 10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2008.04.011; PMID: 18571168 NICE 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. nice.org.uk/guidance/ cg156 20 February 2013. · DOI
  12. Pritts 2001 Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 2001;56 (8):483-91. [Accession number: 00006254-200108000- 00022; PMID: 11496160]
  13. Ray A, Shah A, Gudi A, Homburg R. Unexplained infertility: an update and review of practice. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012;24:591-602. DOI: 10.1016/ j.rbmo.2012.02.021 · DOI
  14. Shokeir T, Abdelshaheed M, El-Shafei M, Sherif L, Badawy A. Determinants of fertility and reproductive success after hysteroscopic septoplasty for women with unexplained primary infertility: a prospective analysis of 88 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2011;155:54-7. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ejogrb.2010.11.015; PMID: 21185112 · DOI
  15. Silberstein T, Saphier O, van Voorhis BJ, Plosker SM. Endometrial polyps in reproductive-age fertile and infertile women. Israel Medical Association Journal 2006;8:192-5. [PMID: 16599056]
  16. Singh M, Chaudhry P, Asselin E. Bridging endometrial receptivity and implantation; network of hormones, cytokines, and growth factors. Journal of Endocrinology 2011;210:5-14. DOI: 10.1530/JOE-10-0461; PMID: 21372150 · DOI
  17. Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Daguati R, Pasin R, De Giorgi O, Crosignani PG. Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. Human Reproduction Update 2007; 13:465-76. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm013; PMID: 17584819 · DOI
  18. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertility and Sterility 2008;89(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2007.09.069; PMID: 18155200 · DOI
  19. Toma evi T, Ban-Frange H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Po lep B, Vrta nik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2010;21(5):700-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.06.028; PMID: 20864409 · DOI
  20. Veltman-Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, Heineman MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001838.pub4 Wallach 1972 Wallach EE. The uterine factor in infertility. Fertility and Sterility 1972;23(2):138-58. [PMID: 4551503] · DOI
  21. Wamsteker K, De Block S. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: technique and documentation. Endoscopic Surgery for Gynecologists. London: Saunders, 1998:511-24.
  22. Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Iwasaki S, Kawamura T. Location of endometrial polyp and pregnancy rate in infertility patients. Fertility and Sterility 2008;90: 180-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.072; PMID: 17889854 · DOI
  23. Yu D, Li TC, Xia E, Huang X, Liu Y, Peng X. Factors affecting reproductive outcome of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for Asherman's syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 2008;89(3): 715-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.070; PMID: 17681324 · DOI
  24. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID, Simpson JL, van der Poel S. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertility and Sterility 2017;108(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2017.06.005; PMID: 28760517 References to other published versions of this review Bosteels 2010 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, van Herendael B, Gomel V, et al. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update 2010;16(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmp033; PMID: 19744944 · DOI
  26. Bosteels J, Kasius J, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D'Hooghe TM. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 1. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009461.pub2 * Indicates the major publication for the study #29 #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 OR #15 OR #16 OR #17 OR #18 OR #19 OR # OR #21 OR #22 OR #23 OR #24 OR #25 OR #26 OR #27 OR #28 12761 #30 #4 AND #29 623 placebo.tw. (193271) clinical trials as topic.sh. (183298) randomly.ab. (288659) trial.ti. (180948) (crossover or cross-over or cross over).tw. (76033) or/41-48 (1172279) exp animals/ not humans.sh. (4446637) 49 not 50 (1078473) 40 Randomized Controlled Trial/ (495134) 41 exp randomisation/ (77876) 42 Single Blind Procedure/ (31024) 43 Double Blind Procedure/ (145965) 44 Crossover Procedure/ (54970) 45 Placebo/ (309585) 46 Randomi?ed controlled trial$.tw. (179133) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosteels, J., van Wessel, S., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., D'Hooghe, T. M., Bongers, M. Y., & Mol, B. W. J.
Affiliations
  • Cochrane Belgium; Academic Centre for General Practice; Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok J bus 7001 Leuven Belgium 3000
  • Ghent University Hospital; Women’s Clinic; Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent Belgium 9000
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University Hospital Gasthuisberg; Leuven University Fertility Centre; Herestraat 49 Leuven Belgium 3000
  • Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-05
Volume
2018
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4245940288
Cited by
176
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
hysteroscopy, subfertility, uterine cavity abnormalities, infertility treatment, uterine anomalies, endometrial polyps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review