Cited by 158Reproductive System and PregnancyBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Recurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17

Open access
Regan, Lesley, Rai, Rajendra, Saravelos, Sotirios, Li, Tin‐Chiu, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists·2023·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Key recommendations: In this guideline, recurrent miscarriage has been defined as three or more first trimester miscarriages. However, clinicians are encouraged to use their clinical discretion to recommend extensive evaluation after two first trimester miscarriages, if there is a suspicion that the miscarriages are of pathological and not of sporadic nature. Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered testing for acquired thrombophilia, particularly for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, prior to pregnancy. [Grade C] Women with second trimester miscarriage may be offered testing for Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation and protein S deficiency, ideally within a research context. [Grade C] Inherited thrombophilias have a weak association with recurrent miscarriage. Routine testing for protein C, antithrombin deficiency and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation is not recommended. [Grade C] Cytogenetic analysis should be offered on pregnancy tissue of the third and subsequent miscarriage(s) and in any second trimester miscarriage. [Grade D] Parental peripheral blood karyotyping should be offered for couples in whom testing of pregnancy tissue reports an unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormality [Grade D] or there is unsuccessful or no pregnancy tissue available for testing. [GPP] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered assessment for congenital uterine anomalies, ideally with 3D ultrasound. [Grade B] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered thyroid function tests and assessment for thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should not be routinely offered immunological screening (such as HLA, cytokine and natural killer cell tests), infection screening or sperm DNA testing outside a research context. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be advised to maintain a BMI between 19 and 25 kg/m 2 , smoking cessation, limit alcohol consumption and limit caffeine to less than 200 mg/day. [Grade D] For women diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome, aspirin and heparin should be offered from a positive test until at least 34 weeks of gestation, following discussion of potential benefits versus risks. [Grade B] Aspirin and/or heparin should not be given to women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. [Grade B] There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT‐A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk. [Grade C] Resection of a uterine septum should be considered for women with recurrent first or second trimester miscarriage, ideally within an appropriate audit or research context. [Grade C] Thyroxine supplementation is not routinely recommended for euthyroid women with TPO who have a history of miscarriage. [Grade A] Progestogen supplementation should be considered in women with recurrent miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy (for example 400 mg micronised vaginal progesterone twice daily at the time of bleeding until 16 weeks of gestation). [Grade B] Women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage should be offered supportive care, ideally in the setting of a dedicated recurrent miscarriage clinic. [Grade C]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.17515

Cites

229 of 229 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

71 of 279 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In the 2018 Cochrane meta-analysis, subgroup analysis showed a significantly more pronounced effect in women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.

    “with subgroup analysis showing a significantly more pronounced effect in women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.196”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [196] 196. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiol- ogy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD003511. source

      In “Trials with placebo controls,” the review reports no evidence of a difference between the prior-miscarriage subgroups (interaction test P = 0.15). Although the estimated reduction was larger in the three-or-more group, the review does not find that the difference was statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.94)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    A systematic review reported miscarriage rates of 11.3%, 17.0%, 28.0%, 39.6%, 47.2% and 63.9% for women with no, one, two or three, four, five and six previous miscarriages respectively.

    “A systematic review has reported the miscarriage rates to be 11.3%, 17.0%, 28.0%, 39.6%, 47.2% and 63.9% for women with no, one, two or three, four, five and six previous miscarriages respectively.19”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] 19. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Brosens JJ, Quenby S, Stephenson MD, Sierra S, et al. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscar- riage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):167-76. source

      The Discussion’s “Target populations for progesterone therapy” section says miscarriage risk rises with the number of previous miscarriages, and its Figure 8 caption describes a systematic review of miscarriage outcomes by number of prior losses. The text available in our copy does not give the six quoted percentages, so their values and correspondence to the stated groups cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Primary versus secondary recurrent miscarriage did not result in a significantly different future prognosis.

    “In two studies, primary versus secondary (those with a previous live birth) recurrent miscarriage did not result in a significantly different future prognosis.20,21”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] 20. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2868-71. source
    • cites [21] 21. Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in un- explained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):387-9. source
  • Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis reported increased miscarriage rates for men aged over 40 years, although far less pronounced than the effect of increased maternal age.

    “A meta-analysis has also reported increased miscarriage rates for men aged over 40 years, although far less pronounced when compared with the effect of increased maternal age.18”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, Lashley EELO. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(5):650-69. source
  • Premisecitation

    Compared with white Europeans, the odds of a sporadic miscarriage were increased in Black African and Black Caribbean women.

    “A large observational study found that compared with white Europeans, the odds of a sporadic miscarriage were increased in Black African and Black Caribbean women.22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] 22. Oliver-Williams CT, Steer PJ. Racial variation in the number of spon- taneous abortions before a first successful pregnancy, and effects on subsequent pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(3):207-12. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • May combine two claims. 66
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The age-related risk of miscarriage is: 12-19 years, 13%; 20-24 years, 11%; 25-29 years, 12%; 30-34 years, 15%; 35-39 years, 25%; 40-44 years, 51%; and 45 or more years, 93%.

    “risk of miscarriage to be: 12-19 years, 13%; 20-24 years, 11%; 25-29 years, 12%; 30-34 years, 15%; 35-39 years, 25%; 40-44 years, 51%; and 45 or more years, 93%. 3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708-12. source

      The Spontaneous abortion section gives all seven age-group estimates, and the cited percentages are accurate when rounded. But the paper presents them as estimates under the assumption that only 80% of women with abortions in recognised pregnancies were hospitalised; the citing sentence omits that condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of sporadic miscarriage increases with age and may affect between 10% and 50% of women aged 20 to 45 years.

    “Its incidence increases with age and may affect between 10% and 50% of women aged 20 to 45 years respectively.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708-12. source

      The Abstract and Spontaneous abortion section support an increase in miscarriage risk with maternal age. They do not support the stated 10%–50% range across ages 20–45: the Abstract reports 8.9% at ages 20–24 and 74.7% at age 45 or older. The study reports risk per pregnancy, not the percentage of women affected; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A number of small studies have assessed dietary variables such as selenium, vitamin D and vitamin B12 specifically in the population with recurrent miscarriage, although no definitive or clinically altering conclusions can be drawn.

    “A number of small studies have assessed dietary variables such as selenium, 33,34 vitamin D 35 and vitamin B12 36 specifically in the population with recurrent miscarriage, although no definitive or clinically altering conclusions can be drawn.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [33] 33. Al-Kunani AS, Knight R, Haswell SJ, Thompson JW, Lindow SW. The selenium status of women with a history of recurrent miscar- riage. BJOG. 2001;108(10):1094-7. source
    • cites [34] 34. Thomas VV, Knight R, Haswell SJ, Lindow SW, van der Spuy ZM. Maternal hair selenium levels as a possible long-term nutritional indicator of recurrent pregnancy loss. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:40. source
    • cites [35] 35. Ota K, Dambaeva S, Han AR, Beaman K, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak- Kim J. Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for recurrent preg- nancy losses by increasing cellular immunity and autoimmunity. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):208-19. source
    • cites [36] 36. Creus M, Deulofeu R, Penarrubia J, Carmona F, Balasch J. Plasma homocysteine and vitamin B12 serum levels, red blood cell folate concentrations, C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation and risk of recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study in Spain. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(3):693-9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a study by Franssen et al., parents with a balanced structural chromosome abnormality had a higher chance of a subsequent miscarriage compared with control couples (49% versus 30%; P < 0.01), although overall chances of having a healthy child were similar (83% versus 84%).

    “In a study by Franssen et al., 49 although overall the chances of parents with a balanced structural chromosome abnormality having a healthy child was found to be 83%, which was similar to the control couples (84%), the former had a higher chance of a subsequent miscarriage compared with the latter group (49% versus 30%; P < 0.01)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is a low risk of parents with balanced translocations having a pregnancy with an unbalanced karyotype surviving into the second trimester (0.8%) or a disabled child born with an unbalanced chromosome abnormality (0.02%).

    “Studies, however, have reported a low risk of parents with balanced translocations having a pregnancy with an unbalanced karyotype surviving into the second trimester (0.8%) or a disabled child born with an unbalanced chromosome abnormality (0.02%).49,50”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source

      The Implications section (page unavailable) reports a low risk in carrier couples after recurrent miscarriage: 0.4% of pregnancies had an unbalanced karyotype detected prenatally and were terminated, and 0.4% resulted in severely handicapped children being born. Together these total 0.8%, but the paper does not describe that figure as the risk of survival into the second trimester; it reports 0.4%, not 0.02%, for affected children born. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [50] 50. Barber JC, Cockwell AE, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG. 2010;117(7):885-8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Miscarriage rates for parents with reciprocal translocations, inversions, Robertsonian translocations, and other types of chromosomal anomalies have been shown to be 54%, 49%, 34% and 27% respectively.

    “miscarriage rates for parents with reciprocal translocations, inversions, Robertsonian translocations, and other types of chromosomal anomalies have been shown to be 54%, 49%, 34% and 27% respectively.49”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chromosome anomalies of the pregnancy are the commonest cause of both sporadic miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage.

    “Chromosome anomalies of the pregnancy are the commonest cause of both sporadic miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source

      The Background calls chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo or fetus “one of the major” causes of miscarriage. It does not say they are the commonest cause, or establish that ranking separately for sporadic and recurrent miscarriage. The Discussion describes miscarriage as multifactorial and reports no difference in genetic-abnormality rates across groups with different adverse-pregnancy histories. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with arcuate (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06-3.69), septate (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.51-5.77) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.56-5.41) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage versus controls.

    “However, women with arcuate (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06-3.69;five studies), septate (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.51-5.77;five studies) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.56-5.41;four studies) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage versus controls.62”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source

      The Second-trimester spontaneous abortion section reports exactly the three relative risks, confidence intervals and study counts cited, with statistically significant increases versus controls. It measures spontaneous abortion, however, not specifically sporadic miscarriage; Table 2 includes a subgroup of women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with septate (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39-5.06) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.05-5.13) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage versus normal controls.

    “However, women with septate (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39-5.06;six studies) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.05-5.13;four studies) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage versus normal controls.62”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source

      The First-trimester spontaneous abortion section reports the cited RRs and confidence intervals for septated and bicornuate uteri versus controls. It does not identify those estimates as specific to sporadic miscarriages; its population subgroup analysis also includes women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. The restriction to sporadic miscarriage is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of congenital uterine anomalies is 5.5% (95% CI 3.5-8.5%) in unselected women, 8.0% (95% CI 5.3-12%) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI 8.9-20.0%) in women with recurrent miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI 18.3-32.8) in women with infertility and miscarriage.

    “A systematic review and meta-analysis has estimated the prevalence to be 5.5% (95% CI 3.5-8.5%) in unselected women, 8.0% (95% CI 5.3-12%) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI 8.9-20.0%) in women with recurrent miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI 18.3-32.8)in women with infertility and miscarriage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [61] 61. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anom- alies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761-71. source

      The Results (‘All uterine anomalies’; page unavailable) give all four prevalence estimates and confidence intervals as quoted. However, the 13.3% estimate is for women with a history of miscarriage, not specifically recurrent miscarriage. The Discussion (‘Women with miscarriage’; page unavailable) says studies varied in the number of prior miscarriages, although most investigated women with two or more. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The significance of increased peripheral NK cells remains debatable, as they do not appear to reflect the levels in the endometrium, show intracycle, hormonal and ethnic variability, and appear not to predict subsequent miscarriage in a population of women with recurrent miscarriage.

    “However, the significance of increased peripheral NK cells remains debatable, 101 as they do not appear to reflect the levels in the endometrium, 102 show an intracycle, hormonal and ethnic variability, 103 and appear not to predict subsequent miscarriage in a population of women with recurrent miscarriage.104”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [101] 101. Vomstein K, Feil K, Strobel L, Aulitzky A, Hofer-Tollinger S, Kuon RJ, et al. Immunological Risk Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guidelines Versus Current State of the Art. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):869. source
    • cites [102] 102. Laird SM, Mariee N, Wei L, Li TC. Measurements of CD56+ cells in peripheral blood and endometrium by f low cytome- try and immunohistochemical staining in situ. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1331-7. source
    • cites [103] 103. Wang Q, Li TC, Wu YP, Cocksedge KA, Fu YS, Kong QY, et al. Reappraisal of peripheral NK cells in women with recurrent mis- carriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(6):814-9. source
    • cites [104] 104. Katano K, Suzuki S, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N, Kitaori T, Sugiura- Ogasawara M. Peripheral natural killer cell activity as a predic- tor of recurrent pregnancy loss: a large cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1629-34. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A previous cervical cone biopsy or an ultrasonographically short cervix appear to significantly predispose to second trimester miscarriage.

    “a previous cervical cone biopsy 78 or an ultrasonographically short cervix 79 appear to significantly predispose to second trimester miscarriage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [78] 78. Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Mitra A, Kalliala I, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treat- ment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633. source

      The citation is attached to the previous-cone-biopsy part of the sentence, not the short-cervix part. The Methods (Inclusion criteria and outcomes; page unavailable) say the review assessed pregnancies progressing beyond 24 weeks, and the Results (Maternal outcomes; page unavailable) report increased preterm birth after cervical treatment. Neither establishes a significant increase in second-trimester miscarriage; searches for “second trimester” and “miscarriage” found no such result in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [79] 79. Gilner J, Biggio J. Management of Short Cervix during Pregnancy: A Review. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(3):245-52. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with diabetes who have high haemoglobin A1c levels in the first trimester are at risk of miscarriage and fetal malformation.

    “Women with diabetes who have high haemoglobin A1c levels in the first trimester are at risk of miscarriage and fetal malformation.80”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] 80. Hanson U, Persson B, Thunell S. Relationship between haemoglo- bin A1C in early type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic pregnancy and the occurrence of spontaneous abortion and fetal malformation in Sweden. Diabetologia. 1990;33(2):100-4. source

      The Abstract and the section ‘HbA1c in relation to occurrence of spontaneous abortion or malformation’ associate very elevated early-pregnancy HbA1c (at least 10.1%) with both outcomes. The study examined women with Type 1 diabetes, so it does not establish the claim for women with diabetes generally or for any level described simply as ‘high.’ (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The prevalence of insulin resistance and abnormal glucose tolerance test appears to be increased in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.

    “The prevalence of insulin resistance 91 and abnormal glucose tolerance test 92 appears to be increased in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [91] 91. Craig LB, Ke RW, Kutteh WH. Increased prevalence of insulin re- sistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(3):487-90. source
    • cites [92] 92. Zolghadri J, Tavana Z, Kazerooni T, Soveid M, Taghieh M. Relationship between abnormal glucose tolerance test and history of previous recurrent miscarriages, and beneficial effect of met- formin in these patients: a prospective clinical study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):727-30. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the same case-control trial, the time to pregnancy was similar in both groups, but they reported a reduction in miscarriage rates with PGD and a significant financial burden of US$7956 per patient.

    “The time to pregnancy was similar in both groups, however they reported a reduction in miscarriage rates with PGD and of course a significant financial burden of US$7956 per patient.182”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [182] 182. Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takeda S. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation. PloS one. 2015;10(6):e0129958. 183. 104. Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, Alfaraj S, AbdelHafez FF, Abdellah AH, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to struc- tural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677-85. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The cohort study of Bernardi et al. (2013) in women with two or more miscarriages found no statistically significant difference in the subsequent live birth rate when comparing women with SCH versus euthyroid women, or treated and untreated women with SCH.

    “However, in terms of studies in the recurrent miscarriage population, the cohort study of Bernardi et al. (2013) in women with two or more miscarriages, found no statistically significant difference in the subsequent live birth rate when comparing women with SCH versus euthyroid women, or treated and untreated women with SCH.85”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] 85. Bernardi LA, Cohen RN, Stephenson MD. Impact of subclinical hy- pothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1326-31. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The RCT of hysteroscopic septum resection had limitations including broad inclusion criteria and low number of subjects recruited (n = 80), despite long duration and multiple participating sites.

    “These include the broad inclusion criteria and the low number of subjects recruited (n = 80), despite the long duration of the trial (almost 8 years) and multiple participating sites (10 centres).187”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [187] 187. Adewole AA, Kalu E, Okohue JE, Alabi CO, Ola B. Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(9):2626-7. source

      In “Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data” (page unavailable), the authors criticize the broad inclusion of patients and the small sample of 80. They describe recruitment as taking about 10 years, rather than almost 8, and identify the trial as multicentre without specifying 10 centres. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A systematic review of non-RCTs found the live birth rates to be similar between expectant management groups and PGT-A groups, with a trend for lower miscarriage rates in the latter.

    “A systematic review of non-RCTs found the live birth rates to be similar between expectant management groups and PGT-A groups, with a trend for lower miscarriage rates in the latter.However, it is worth noting that all studies performed embryo biopsy on day 3 of development.184”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [184] 184. Musters AM, Repping S, Korevaar JC, Mastenbroek S, Limpens J, van der Veen F, et al. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation ge- netic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evi- dence. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2153-7 e3. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of second trimester miscarriage is approximately 1%, and random fetal chromosomal anomalies are significantly lower in such cases.

    “A similar incidence of approximately 1% is also the case for women experiencing a second trimester miscarriage, where random fetal chromosomal anomalies are significantly lower.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] 6. Wyatt PR, Owolabi T, Meier C, Huang T. Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):240-6. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recurrent miscarriage has traditionally been defined as three or more miscarriages and affects approximately 1% of women.

    “By contrast, recurrent miscarriage has traditionally been defined as three or more miscarriages affecting approximately only 1% of women.4,5”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 1990;336(8716):673-5. source
    • cites [5] 5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535): 601-11. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies showed a trend towards a positive association with recurrent miscarriage, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.69-6.53).

    “Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies showed a trend towards a positive association, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.69-6.53)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] 39. Opatrny L, David M, Kahn SR, Shrier I, Rey E. Association be- tween antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent fetal loss in women without autoimmune disease: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2214-21.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MTHFR mutation (heterozygous and homozygous) has been found to have a significant association with recurrent miscarriage in one meta-analysis from China, but other meta-analyses did not find an association and advise against testing for this mutation.

    “Methylenetatrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation (heterozygous and homozygous) has been found to have a significant association with recurrent miscarriage in one meta-analysis from China.46 However other metaanalyses did not find an association and advise against testing for this mutation.41,47”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [46] 46. Chen H, Yang X, Lu M. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(2):283-90. source
    • cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
    • cites [47] 47. Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med. 2013;15(2):153-6. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of aneuploidy in recurrent miscarriage was found to be approximately 40% (40.4%; 95% CI 25.2-55.7%), suggesting that non-genetic factors may play a more important role in recurrent miscarriage.

    “The incidence of aneuploidy in recurrent miscarriage was found to be approximately 40% (40.4%; 95% CI 25.2-55.7%),suggesting that non-genetic factors may play a more important role in recurrent miscarriage.53”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] 53. Zhang T, Sun Y, Chen Z, Li T. Traditional and molecular chromo- somal abnormality analysis of products of conception in sponta- neous and recurrent miscarriage. BJOG. 2018;125(4):414-20. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Protein S deficiency has not demonstrated a consistent association with recurrent first trimester miscarriage, but has shown an association with second trimester.

    “Protein S deficiency has not demonstrated a consistent association with recurrent first trimester miscarriage, but has shown an association with second trimester.41,44,45”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
    • cites [44] 44. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):913-6. source
    • cites [45] 45. Alfirevic Z, Roberts D, Martlew V. How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy out- come? A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101(1):6-14. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of parental chromosomal rearrangements appears to be associated with recurrent miscarriage, with a translocation present in 2.2% of parents after one miscarriage, 4.8% after two miscarriages, and 5.7% after three miscarriages.

    “The incidence of parental chromosomal rearrangements appears to be associated with recurrent miscarriage, with one large database study estimating that a translocation is present in 2.2% of parents after one miscarriage, 4.8% after two miscarriages, and 5.7% after three miscarriages.48”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] 48. De Braekeleer M, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experi- encing repeated pregnancy losses. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(5):519-28. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Antithrombin deficiency is the rarer yet most thrombogenic mutation; the EPCOT study found only a possible association with sporadic miscarriage while a subsequent meta-analysis did not.

    “Antithrombin deficiency is the rarer yet most thrombogenic mutation; however, the European prospective cohort study on thrombophilia (EPCOT) found only a possible association with sporadic miscarriage 44 while a subsequent meta-analysis did not.41”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] 44. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):913-6. source
    • cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with intramural/subserosal myomas did not undergo surgery and experienced similar live birth rate compared with the unexplained recurrent miscarriage group in the subsequent pregnancy.

    “In the same study, women with intramural/subserosal myomas did not undergo surgery and experienced similar live birth rate compared with the unexplained recurrent miscarriage group in the subsequent pregnancy.70”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The higher the number of euploid miscarriages, the higher the chance of a subsequent miscarriage, presumably owing to a higher chance of a persistent maternal pathology rather than a sporadic aneuploidy.

    “Studies have shown that the higher the number of euploid miscarriages, the higher the chance of a subsequent miscarriage, 57 presumably owing to the higher chance of a persistent maternal pathology rather than a sporadic aneuploidy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] 57. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):300-4. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with submucosal myomas undergoing resection had a significant reduction in second trimester miscarriage rates (21.7% to 0%; P < 0.01), although there was a lack of a case-control group.

    “Women with submucosal myomas undergoing resection had a significant reduction in second trimester miscarriage rates (21.7% to 0%; P < 0.01), although there was a lack of a case-control group to compare what the outcome would have been if women with submucosal myomas had not undergone resection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The incidence of intrauterine adhesions increases with the number of previous miscarriages experienced (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-3.00) and the number of previous dilatation and curettage procedures (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.35-3.12).

    “A systematic review and meta-analysis has demonstrated that the incidence of intrauterine adhesions increases with the number of previous miscarriages experienced (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-3.00;seven studies) and the number of previous dilatation and curettage procedures (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.35-3.12;seven studies).73”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] 73. Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Opmeer BC, Brolmann HA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk fac- tors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):262-78. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Well-controlled diabetes mellitus is not a risk factor for recurrent miscarriage, nor is treated thyroid dysfunction.

    “However, well-controlled diabetes mellitus is not a risk factor for recurrent miscarriage, nor is treated thyroid dysfunction.81,82”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [81] 81. Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Van Allen M, Aarons JH, et al. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among nor- mal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose preg- nancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(25):1617-23. source
    • cites [82] 82. Abalovich M, Gutierrez S, Alcaraz G, Maccallini G, Garcia A, Levalle O. Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism complicating pregnancy. Thyroid. 2002;12(1):63-8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    More recent meta-analyses have shown an association between some cytokine gene promoter polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage but not for others.

    “More recent meta-analyses have shown an association between some cytokine gene promoter polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage but not for others.99”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [99] 99. Su D, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang J, Jiao B, Wang G, et al. Association of interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms with recurrent mis- carriage: a meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;76(2):172-80. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Women with recurrent miscarriage versus controls had higher peripheral NK cell percentages (SMD 1.36; 95% CI 0.04-2.69; P = 0.04) and higher peripheral NK cell numbers (SMD 0.81; 95% CI 0.47-1.16; P < 0.00001).

    “A meta-analysis of studies found that women with recurrent miscarriage versus controls had higher peripheral NK cell percentages (standardised mean difference [SMD] 1.36; 95% CI 0.04-2.69;P = 0.04) and higher peripheral NK cell numbers (SMD 0.81; 95% CI 0.47-1.16;P < 0.00001).100”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] 100. Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):429-38. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been linked to an increased risk of miscarriage but the exact mechanism remains unclear.

    “Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been linked to an increased risk of miscarriage but the exact mechanism remains unclear.89”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] 89. Cocksedge KA, Li TC, Saravelos SH, Metwally M. A reappraisal of the role of polycystic ovary syndrome in recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(1):151-60. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The authors of the HLA meta-analysis suggested that no consistent conclusions can be drawn since the observed ORs were relatively small and there was a high risk of selection and information bias present in the studies available.

    “However, although associations between specific HLA alleles and HLA sharing with recurrent miscarriage were identified, the authors suggested that no consistent conclusions can be drawn since the observed ORs were relatively small and there was a high risk of selection and information bias present in the studies available.96”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [96] 96. Meuleman T, Lashley LE, Dekkers OM, van Lith JM, Claas FH, Bloemenkamp KW. HLA associations and HLA sharing in recur- rent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Immunol. 2015;76(5):362-73. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chronic endometritis has been implicated in recurrent miscarriage, although the diagnostic criteria remain controversial.

    “Chronic endometritis has also been implicated in recurrent miscarriage, although the diagnostic criteria remain controversial.116”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [116] 116. Bouet PE, El Hachem H, Monceau E, Gariepy G, Kadoch IJ, Sylvestre C. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure: prevalence and role of office hysteroscopy and immunohistochemistry in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):106-10. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.

    “For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A retrospective audit of four UK centres over periods of 5-30 years reported that balanced translocations were found in 1.9% (406 out of 20 432) of parents with recurrent miscarriage, but only four unbalanced translocations were found after referral for prenatal diagnosis because of balanced parental translocation ascertained for recurrent miscarriage.

    “A retrospective audit of four UK centres over periods of 5-30 years, reported that balanced translocations were found in 1.9% (406 out of 20 432) of parents with recurrent miscarriage, but only four unbalanced translocations were found after referral for prenatal diagnosis because of balanced parental translocation ascertained for recurrent miscarriage.50”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] 50. Barber JC, Cockwell AE, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG. 2010;117(7):885-8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chen et al. established a control reference range from fertile women and found that women with recurrent miscarriage did have significant increase of uterine NK cell density in precisely timed endometrial specimens.

    “based on which Chen et al. established a control reference range from fertile women and found that women with recurrent miscarriage did have significant increase of uterine NK cell density in precisely timed endometrial specimens.109”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [109] 109. Chen X, Mariee N, Jiang L, Liu Y, Wang CC, Li TC, et al. Measurement of uterine natural killer cell percentage in the periim- plantation endometrium from fertile women and women with re- current reproductive failure: establishment of a reference range. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):680:e1-6. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment showed a significant increase in miscarriage where high sperm DNA damage was identified compared with those with low DNA damage (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.54-3.03, P < 0.00001), and this was confirmed in a meta-analysis 2 years later.

    “A meta-analysis in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment showed a significant increase in miscarriage where high sperm DNA damage was identified compared with those with low DNA damage (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.54-3.03,P < 0.00001).126”
    • Also stated in: § [Evidence level 2+] · plain
      “This was confirmed in a meta-analysis 2 years later.127”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [126] 126. Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, Rajkhowa M, Miller D, Lewis S, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(10):2908-17. source
    • cites [127] 127. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):998-1005 e8. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Retrospective studies have shown that blanket testing for parental karyotyping reveals an abnormality in less than 2%, while genetic analysis of pregnancy tissue may point towards the diagnosis.

    “Retrospective studies have shown that blanket testing for parental karyotyping reveals an abnormality in less than 2%, while genetic analysis of pregnancy tissue may point towards the diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Heparin does not cross the placenta and hence there is no potential to cause fetal haemorrhage or teratogenicity.

    “Heparin does not cross the placenta and hence there is no potential to cause fetal haemorrhage or teratogenicity.170”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [170] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LMWH is as safe as UFH with potential advantages during pregnancy, since they cause less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, can be administered once daily, and are associated with a lower risk of heparin-induced osteoporosis.

    “LMWH is as safe as UFH with potential advantages during pregnancy, since they cause less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, can be administered once daily, and are associated with a lower risk of heparin-induced osteoporosis.173”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [173] 173. Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C. Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood. 2005;106(2):401-7. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    There are concerns of potential over-diagnosis and treatment of septate uteri by using the ESHRE-ESGE classification.

    “Although there are concerns of potential over-diagnosis and treatment of septate uteri by using the ESHRE-ESGE classification, there are still a lack of prospective data to determine the use of which classification would lead to the most favourable reproductive outcomes (i.e. increase in live birth rate).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    UFH can be associated with maternal complications including bleeding, hypersensitivity reactions, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and when used long term, osteopenia and vertebral fractures.

    “UFH can, however, be associated with maternal complications including bleeding, hypersensitivity reactions, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and when used long term, osteopenia and vertebral fractures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analyses have shown that aspirin and/or heparin does not improve outcomes in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and may be associated with adverse effects.

    “Meta-analyses have shown it does not improve outcomes and may be associated with adverse effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Subgroup meta-analysis of RCTs do not show a consistent benefit of treatment in women with inherited thrombophilia, however the subgroups were underpowered for firm conclusions.

    “There is a lack of evidence to support routine treatment for women with Factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation to reduce the incidence of recurrent miscarriage or second trimester loss.2-C Subgroup metaanalysis of RCTs do not show a consistent benefit of treatment in women with inherited thrombophilia, however the subgroups were underpowered for firm conclusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis has shown that aspirin and/or LMWH does not increase the live birth rate in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and may be associated with adverse effects.

    “It should be noted that a meta-analysis has shown that aspirin and/or LMWH does not increase the live birth rate in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, may be associated with adverse effects and should therefore not be used.176”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [176] 176. de Jong PG, Kaandorp S, Di Nisio M, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD004734. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    No statistically significant differences were found in preterm birth (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66), neonatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.44-7.34), and fetal genital anomalies (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.22-12.62) in the same meta-analysis.

    “No statistically significant differences were found in the other secondary outcomes, including preterm birth (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66),neonatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.44-7.34),and fetal genital anomalies (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.22-12.62).195”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [195] 195. Saccone G, Schoen C, Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr, Berghella V. Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of preg- nancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):430-8 e3. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An intention to treat retrospective analysis involving 112 couples choosing PGT-A and 188 couples choosing expectant management found the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate to be similar between the two groups.

    “An intention to treat retrospective analysis involving 112 couples choosing PGT-A and 188 couples choosing expectant management found the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate to be similar between the two groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [185] 185. Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with re- current pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1668-74. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    There is a lack of consistently demonstrable benefit when progestogen supplementation is used routinely in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and there remains uncertainty about the optimal specific drug, route, timing and dose.

    “However, there is a lack of consistently demonstrable benefit when used routinely in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and there remains uncertainty about the optimal specific drug, route, timing and dose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Observational studies have not demonstrated improved outcomes with PGT-A to date, both in terms of live birth rate and time to pregnancy interval.

    “There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk.2-C Observational studies have not demonstrated improved outcomes to date, both in terms of live birth rate and time to pregnancy interval.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The PRISM trial reported no significant differences in live births in women presenting with bleeding in early pregnancy and receiving progesterone supplementation; however, in the subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, a significant improvement in live birth rate was observed.

    “The PRISM trial reported no significant differences in live births in women presenting with bleeding in early pregnancy and receiving progesterone supplementation; however, in the subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, a significant improvement in live birth rate was observed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A systematic review of non-RCTs reported similar live birth rates, time to conception rates and even miscarriage rates between natural conception and PGT-SR groups.

    “A systematic review of non-RCTs reported similar live birth rates, time to conception rates and even miscarriage rates between natural conception and PGT-SR groups.183”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [183] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The PROMISE trial, the largest multicentre RCT to date, which was adequately powered and with a very low risk of bias, showed that routine progesterone supplementation did not improve the outcome.

    “The PROMISE trial, the largest multicentre RCT to date, which was adequately powered and with a very low risk of bias, showed that routine progesterone supplementation did not improve the outcome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    There is limited evidence regarding both the association and treatment of acquired uterine anomalies in women and people with recurrent miscarriage.

    “There is limited evidence regarding both the association and treatment of acquired uterine anomalies in women and people with recurrent miscarriage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of ten RCTs of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage receiving progesterone versus placebo or no treatment showed a lower risk of miscarriage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97) and higher live birth rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.15).

    “A systematic review and meta-analysis of ten RCTs of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage receiving progesterone versus placebo or no treatment showed a lower risk of miscarriage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97)and higher live birth rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.15)respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [195] 195. Saccone G, Schoen C, Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr, Berghella V. Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of preg- nancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):430-8 e3. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the same retrospective analysis, the median time to pregnancy was 6.5 months in the PGT-A group and 3.0 months in the expectant management group.

    “The median time to pregnancy was 6.5 months in the PGT-A group and 3.0 months in the expectant management group.Although the study is limited by its retrospective non-randomised nature, the embryo biopsies were performed on day 5 of development, which better reflects routine practice today.185”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [185] 185. Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with re- current pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1668-74. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the trial by Kumar et al., a miscarriage rate of only 3.5% was observed in the control group, reflecting a potential selection bias.

    “Consequently, in their healthy control group a miscarriage rate of only 3.5% was observed, reflecting a potential selection bias.200”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [200] 200. Kumar A, Begum N, Prasad S, Aggarwal S, Sharma S. Oral dydro- gesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1357-63 e3. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Significant differences in miscarriage outcomes were observed in the Kumar et al. trial but not in the PROMISE trial.

    “Significant differences were observed in the former trial but not in the latter trial.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [200] 200. Kumar A, Begum N, Prasad S, Aggarwal S, Sharma S. Oral dydro- gesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1357-63 e3. source
    • cites [201] 201. Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, Seed PT, Small R, Quenby S, et al. PROMISE: first-trimester progesterone therapy in women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages -a ran- domised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicentre trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(41):1-92. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the questionnaire study, ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.

    “Ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.211”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a questionnaire study, the majority of women with recurrent miscarriage expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and a low preference for bereavement therapy.

    “• The majority of women expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and a low preference for bereavement therapy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bicornuate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 2.32 (95% CI 1.05-5.13) in the first trimester and 2.90 (95% CI 1.56-5.41) in the second trimester for miscarriage.

    “Bicornuate 62,a RR 1st trimester: 2.32 (1.05-5.13)2nd trimester: 2.90 (1.56-5.41)2++”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 62,a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Factor V Leiden is associated with an odds ratio of 2.01 (95% CI 1.13-3.58) in the first trimester and 7.83 (95% CI 2.83-21.67) in the second trimester for miscarriage.

    “Factor V Leiden b OR 1 st trimester: 2.01 (1.13-3.58) 2 nd trimester: 7.83 (2.83-21.67)2++”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unicornate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.38 (95% CI 0.83-2.28) in the first trimester and 2.27 (95% CI 0.64-7.96) in the second trimester for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).

    “Unicornate 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.38 (0.83-2.28) *2nd trimester: 2.27 (0.64-7.96) 2++”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 62,a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Didelphis uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.13 (95% CI 0.45-2.86) in the first trimester and 1.71 (95% CI 0.63-4.59) in the second trimester for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).

    “Didelphis 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.13 (0.45-2.86) *2nd trimester: 1.71 (0.63-4.59) 2++”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 62,a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Arcuate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.22 (95% CI 0.87-1.72) in the first trimester and 1.98 (95% CI 1.06-3.69) in the second trimester for miscarriage.

    “Arcuate 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.22 (0.87-1.72) 2nd trimester: 1.98 (1.06-3.69)2++”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 62,a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Septate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 2.65 (95% CI 1.39-5.06) in the first trimester and 2.95 (95% CI 1.51-5.77) in the second trimester for miscarriage.

    “Septate 62,a RR 1st trimester: 2.65 (1.39-5.06)2nd trimester: 2.95 (1.51-5.77)2++”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites 62,a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

68 of 68
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.

    “There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The women are age adjusted when comparing prognosis after aneuploid versus euploid miscarriage.

    “This is assuming that the women are age adjusted, as an older woman with an aneuploid loss may still have a worse prognosis compared with a younger woman with a euploid loss.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The mechanism linking inherited thrombophilias to recurrent miscarriage is thrombosis of the uteroplacental circulation.

    “with the presumed mechanism being thrombosis of the uteroplacental circulation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The true incidence of cervical insufficiency is unknown because the diagnosis is clinical.

    “The true incidence of cervical insufficiency remains unknown, since the diagnosis is clinical.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is currently no satisfactory objective test that can identify women with cervical insufficiency in the non-pregnant state.

    “There is currently no satisfactory objective test that can identify women with cervical insufficiency in the non-pregnant state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are no data specifically examining the effect of polyps on sporadic or recurrent miscarriage.

    “There are no data to our knowledge specifically examining the effect of polyps on sporadic or recurrent miscarriage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.

    “For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Immunotherapy is expensive and has potentially serious adverse effects including transfusion reaction, anaphylactic shock and hepatitis.

    “Moreover, immunotherapy is expensive and has potentially serious adverse effects including transfusion reaction, anaphylactic shock and hepatitis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are no published data on the use of anti-TNF agents to improve pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage.

    “There are no published data on the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents to improve pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a lack of studies examining relevant interventions for male factors.

    “There is a lack of studies examining relevant interventions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no evidence regarding women with recurrent miscarriage on endometrial scratch.

    “There is no evidence regarding women with recurrent miscarriage and therefore by extrapolation of the data above endometrial scratch should not be recommended for women and people with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The value of psychological support in improving pregnancy outcome has not been tested in the form of an RCT.

    “The value of psychological support in improving pregnancy outcome has not been tested in the form of an RCT.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A proportion of women will experience further miscarriage(s) following referral.

    “A proportion of women will experience further miscarriage(s) following referral.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A significant proportion of cases of recurrent miscarriage remain unexplained, despite detailed investigation.

    “A significant proportion of cases of recurrent miscarriage remain unexplained, despite detailed investigation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no evidence to recommend treatments for male factors.

    “There is no evidence to recommend treatments for male factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    To date, there is a paucity of studies available evaluating interventions that may improve the outcome of couples with recurrent miscarriage, in particular through reducing sperm DNA fragmentation, which has been implicated in miscarriage.

    “To date, there is a paucity of studies available evaluating interventions that may improve the outcome of couples with recurrent miscarriage, in particular through reducing sperm DNA fragmentation, which has been implicated in miscarriage.”
16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Chromosomal-anomaly percentage does not match its fraction

    Major

    The stated numerator and denominator give 46.3%, not 59.4%. This changes the reported anomaly rate used to support the comparison with earlier studies.

    Reported 59.4 · recomputed 46.295521

  • Balanced-translocation percentage does not match its count

    Minor

    The reported count is 1.99% of the stated total, which rounds to 2.0%, not 1.9%.

    Reported 1.9 · recomputed 1.987079

  • Conflicting accounts of the TABLET recurrent-miscarriage subgroup

    Minor

    One passage says there were insufficient data to analyse women with recurrent miscarriage as a subgroup; another says that subgroup analysis was performed and found no difference.

3 of 3

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251

    Major

    The cited work was retracted on 2023-02-28 (notice 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.001), before this paper was published (2023-06-19). Its authors could have known.

    Cited work 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251 · retracted 2023-02-28 · notice 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.001 · this paper published 2023-06-19

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527

    Info

    The cited work was retracted; the date of the notice is not on record.

    Cited work 10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527 · retraction date not known · this paper published 2023-06-19

2 of 2

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Regan L, 2001, Infection and pregnancy loss
  2. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.021 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Rikken JFW, 2021, Reply: Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data, Hum Reprod, 36, 2627

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regan, L., Rai, R., Saravelos, S., Li, T., & the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Affiliations
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (GB)
Corresponding author
Regan, Lesley
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-19
Volume
130
Issue
12
Pages
e9-e39
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W4381158089
Cited by
158
References
221
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 13
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
recurrent pregnancy loss, unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion, inherited thrombophilia, acquired thrombophilia, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein S deficiency, cytogenetic analysis, karyology, congenital uterine anomalies, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, aspirin, heparin, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy
MeSH terms
Abortion, Habitual, Aspirin, Female, Heparin, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Semen, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Thrombophilia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review