Recurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17
Open accessAbstract
Key recommendations: In this guideline, recurrent miscarriage has been defined as three or more first trimester miscarriages. However, clinicians are encouraged to use their clinical discretion to recommend extensive evaluation after two first trimester miscarriages, if there is a suspicion that the miscarriages are of pathological and not of sporadic nature. Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered testing for acquired thrombophilia, particularly for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies, prior to pregnancy. [Grade C] Women with second trimester miscarriage may be offered testing for Factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation and protein S deficiency, ideally within a research context. [Grade C] Inherited thrombophilias have a weak association with recurrent miscarriage. Routine testing for protein C, antithrombin deficiency and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation is not recommended. [Grade C] Cytogenetic analysis should be offered on pregnancy tissue of the third and subsequent miscarriage(s) and in any second trimester miscarriage. [Grade D] Parental peripheral blood karyotyping should be offered for couples in whom testing of pregnancy tissue reports an unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormality [Grade D] or there is unsuccessful or no pregnancy tissue available for testing. [GPP] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered assessment for congenital uterine anomalies, ideally with 3D ultrasound. [Grade B] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be offered thyroid function tests and assessment for thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should not be routinely offered immunological screening (such as HLA, cytokine and natural killer cell tests), infection screening or sperm DNA testing outside a research context. [Grade C] Women with recurrent miscarriage should be advised to maintain a BMI between 19 and 25 kg/m 2 , smoking cessation, limit alcohol consumption and limit caffeine to less than 200 mg/day. [Grade D] For women diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome, aspirin and heparin should be offered from a positive test until at least 34 weeks of gestation, following discussion of potential benefits versus risks. [Grade B] Aspirin and/or heparin should not be given to women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. [Grade B] There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT‐A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk. [Grade C] Resection of a uterine septum should be considered for women with recurrent first or second trimester miscarriage, ideally within an appropriate audit or research context. [Grade C] Thyroxine supplementation is not routinely recommended for euthyroid women with TPO who have a history of miscarriage. [Grade A] Progestogen supplementation should be considered in women with recurrent miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy (for example 400 mg micronised vaginal progesterone twice daily at the time of bleeding until 16 weeks of gestation). [Grade B] Women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage should be offered supportive care, ideally in the setting of a dedicated recurrent miscarriage clinic. [Grade C]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
71 of 279 cited sources checked · 33 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the 2018 Cochrane meta-analysis, subgroup analysis showed a significantly more pronounced effect in women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.
“with subgroup analysis showing a significantly more pronounced effect in women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.196”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] 196. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiol- ogy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD003511. source
In “Trials with placebo controls,” the review reports no evidence of a difference between the prior-miscarriage subgroups (interaction test P = 0.15). Although the estimated reduction was larger in the three-or-more group, the review does not find that the difference was statistically significant. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A systematic review reported miscarriage rates of 11.3%, 17.0%, 28.0%, 39.6%, 47.2% and 63.9% for women with no, one, two or three, four, five and six previous miscarriages respectively.
“A systematic review has reported the miscarriage rates to be 11.3%, 17.0%, 28.0%, 39.6%, 47.2% and 63.9% for women with no, one, two or three, four, five and six previous miscarriages respectively.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Brosens JJ, Quenby S, Stephenson MD, Sierra S, et al. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscar- riage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):167-76. source
The Discussion’s “Target populations for progesterone therapy” section says miscarriage risk rises with the number of previous miscarriages, and its Figure 8 caption describes a systematic review of miscarriage outcomes by number of prior losses. The text available in our copy does not give the six quoted percentages, so their values and correspondence to the stated groups cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Primary versus secondary recurrent miscarriage did not result in a significantly different future prognosis.
“In two studies, primary versus secondary (those with a previous live birth) recurrent miscarriage did not result in a significantly different future prognosis.20,21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2868-71. source
- cites [21] 21. Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in un- explained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):387-9. source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis reported increased miscarriage rates for men aged over 40 years, although far less pronounced than the effect of increased maternal age.
“A meta-analysis has also reported increased miscarriage rates for men aged over 40 years, although far less pronounced when compared with the effect of increased maternal age.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] 18. du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, Lashley EELO. Advanced paternal age is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(5):650-69. source
- Premisecitation
Compared with white Europeans, the odds of a sporadic miscarriage were increased in Black African and Black Caribbean women.
“A large observational study found that compared with white Europeans, the odds of a sporadic miscarriage were increased in Black African and Black Caribbean women.22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Oliver-Williams CT, Steer PJ. Racial variation in the number of spon- taneous abortions before a first successful pregnancy, and effects on subsequent pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(3):207-12. source
- Premisecitation
In the meta-analysis of Ng et al. (2021), women with a BMI below 19 and above 25 kg/m2 were at higher odds of recurrent miscarriage.
“In the meta-analysis of Ng et al. (2021) women with a BMI below 19 and above 25 kg/m 2 were at higher odds of recurrent miscarriage.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] 31. Ng KYB, Cherian G, Kermack AJ, Bailey S, Macklon N, Sunkara SK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of female lifestyle factors and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7081. source
The Results (Underweight; Overweight and obesity, page not available) report higher odds of recurrent pregnancy loss in the general population for underweight women and women with BMI >25 kg/m². The paper does not give a BMI <19 cutoff for the pooled underweight finding, so that precise threshold is unsupported. It also finds no increased odds of a further miscarriage among underweight women who already have recurrent pregnancy loss. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Preliminary studies do not suggest an additional value or sensitivity in diagnosis associated with the use of clinical assays of other aPL.
“preliminary studies do not suggest an additional value or sensitivity in diagnosis associated with their use.40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] 40. Tebo AE, Jaskowski TD, Hill HR, Branch DW. Clinical relevance of multiple antibody specificity testing in anti-phospholipid syndrome and recurrent pregnancy loss. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;154(3):332-8. source
The Discussion says routine testing of the non-recommended aPL assays lacks clinical utility and that their overall combined sensitivity was not significantly higher than standard tests. The Results, however, report significantly higher sensitivity for these assays in the recurrent pregnancy loss group, although this came with lower specificity. The unqualified claim of no additional sensitivity therefore overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There is some evidence for an association between increased caffeine intake and sporadic miscarriage.
“Similarly, there is some evidence for an association between increased caffeine intake and sporadic miscarriage.27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] 27. Chen LW, Wu Y, Neelakantan N, Chong MF, Pan A, van Dam RM. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and risk of pregnancy loss: a categorical and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(7):1233-44. source
The Conclusions (p. 10) associate higher maternal caffeine intake with greater pregnancy-loss risk, and the Results (p. 7) say the conclusion remained the same after excluding studies involving stillbirth. The paper does not distinguish sporadic from recurrent miscarriage, so it supports the association with miscarriage generally but not that specific qualifier. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Approximately 50% of sporadic miscarriages are a result of fetal chromosome anomalies (pooled prevalence 49.7%; 95% CI 34.9-64.6%).
“A review reported that approximately 50% of sporadic miscarriages are a result of fetal chromosome anomalies (pooled prevalence 49.7%; 95% CI 34.9-64.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source
The Results (Subject features and general findings; page unavailable) report genetic abnormalities in 55.3% (224/405) of the miscarriage samples, broadly supporting the ‘approximately 50%’ statement. This is a study of its own samples, not a review reporting a pooled prevalence; our copy does not report 49.7% or the stated 95% confidence interval. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Miscarriages following assisted reproductive treatment have rates of cytogenetic anomalies similar to sporadic miscarriages (56.8% versus 53.6%; OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73).
“A study has shown that miscarriages following assisted reproductive treatment have rates of cytogenetic anomalies similar to sporadic miscarriages (56.8% versus 53.6%; OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73).52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source
The Results (Genetic findings in subgroups) find no significant difference between assisted-reproduction and natural-conception samples, with an adjusted OR of 1.110 (95% CI 0.713–1.726). But the claim reverses the rates: 56.8% is for natural conception and 53.6% for assisted reproduction. The paper calls the comparator natural conception, not sporadic miscarriage. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Among fetal chromosome anomalies in sporadic miscarriage, in descending order of frequency were trisomy (51.9%), polyploidy (18.8%), monosomy (15.2%), structural anomalies (6.5%), and others (7.6%).
“Among those with anomalies, in descending order of frequency were: trisomy (51.9%); polyploidy (18.8%); monosomy (15.2%); structural anomalies (6.5%); and others (7.6%).52”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source
The Results, ‘Subject features and general findings’ (page unavailable), support trisomies as prominent among the abnormalities, but do not report the claimed distribution. They report 224 abnormal samples, including 77.2% single aneuploidies and 7.1% CNVs; Table 2 lists 13 straightforward triploidies, not polyploidy at 18.8%. The cited paper therefore does not support the five percentages attributed to it for sporadic miscarriage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage was not significantly increased in women with didelphys (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.63-4.59) and unicornuate uteri (RR 2.27, 95% CI 0.64-7.96) versus normal controls.
“The risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage was not significantly increased in women with didelphys (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.63-4.59;four studies) and unicornuate uteri (RR 2.27, 95% CI 0.64-7.96;four studies) versus normal controls.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source
- Premisecitation
In a large meta-analysis of a general obstetric population, no increase in risk of miscarriage was found in women with myomas (11.5% versus 8.0%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80-1.52).
“In a large meta-analysis of a general obstetric population, including 1394 women with myomas and 20 435 without, no increase in risk of miscarriage was found (11.5% versus 8.0%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80-1.52).67”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] 67. Sundermann AC, Velez Edwards DR, Bray MJ, Jones SH, Latham SM, Hartmann KE. Leiomyomas in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1065-72. source
- Premisecitation
The commonest congenital uterine anomalies across all populations appear to be canalisation defects (septate) followed by unification defects (bicornuate and unicornuate).
“The commonest anomalies across all populations appear to be the canalisation defects (i.e. the septate variety) followed by the unification defects (i.e. the bicornuate and unicornuate variety).61”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] 61. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anom- alies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761-71. source
The Conclusion says canalization defects are the most common anomaly in the high-risk groups, but the arcuate uterus is most prevalent in the unselected population. The Discussion (Distribution of congenital uterine anomalies) also includes uterus didelphys among unification defects. Thus, the claimed ranking does not hold across all populations. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In a population with recurrent miscarriage, the overall rate of subsequent miscarriage (first or second trimester) remained significantly increased 1.13 (1.06-1.22) compared with women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
“the overall rate of subsequent miscarriage (first or second trimester) remained significantly increased 1.13 (1.06-1.22)compared with women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source
Table 2 reports a significantly increased combined first- and second-trimester miscarriage risk in women with congenital uterine anomalies who had experienced recurrent miscarriages (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.22). The study descriptions list comparison groups with recurrent miscarriage and a normal uterus, but do not establish that all comparison cases were unexplained. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage was not significantly increased in women with arcuate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.72), didelphys (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.45-2.86) and unicornuate uteri (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83-2.28) versus normal controls.
“a meta-analysis has shown that the risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage was not significantly increased in women with arcuate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.72;six studies), didelphys (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.45-2.86;four studies) and unicornuate uteri (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.83-2.28;five studies) versus normal controls.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source
- Premisecitation
Causes of second trimester miscarriage appear to overlap with the causes of first trimester miscarriage on one end of the spectrum and causes of preterm birth on the other end.
“Causes of second trimester miscarriage appear to overlap with the causes of first trimester miscarriage on one end of the spectrum and causes of preterm birth on the other end of the spectrum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] 75. Sneider K, Christiansen OB, Sundtoft IB, Langhoff-Roos J. Recurrence of second trimester miscarriage and extreme preterm delivery at 16-27 weeks of gestation with a focus on cervical insuf- ficiency and prophylactic cerclage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(12):1383-90. source
- Premisecitation
Women with intrauterine adhesions and endometrial thickness less than 5 mm have higher sporadic miscarriage rates versus women with endometrial thickness of more than 5 mm (50% versus 8.3%; P < 0.001).
“Small cohort studies have, however, suggested that women with intrauterine adhesions and endometrial thickness less than 5 mm have higher sporadic miscarriage rates versus women with endometrial thickness of more than 5 mm (50% versus 8.3%; P < 0.001).74”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] 74. Baradwan S, Shafi D, Baradwan A, Bashir MS, Al-Jaroudi D. The effect of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcome in patients with Asherman's syndrome post-hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Int J Womens Health. 2018;10:77-82. source
The Results report miscarriages in 50% of pregnancies in group A versus 8.3% in group B (P<0.001). The Subjects and methods define group A as endometrial thickness ≤5 mm, not <5 mm, and the Results do not classify the miscarriages as sporadic. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
With newer molecular techniques a further 5-7% submicroscopic variants may also be detected.
“It is worth noting that with newer molecular techniques a further 5-7% submicroscopic variants may also be detected.52,54”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source
The Background (page unavailable) says chromosomal microarray analysis can detect submicroscopic copy-number variants and reports an additional 5.7–13% yield in karyotypically normal products of conception. That supports the possibility of further detection, but the cited range is not 5–7% and applies specifically to those specimens. The paper’s own 7.1% figure is a share of abnormal findings, not an additional detection rate for all specimens. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] 54. van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012; 1822(12):1951-9. source
- Premisecitation
All the latest classifications on uterine anomalies (ESHRE/ESGE, CUME and ASRM) consider the arcuate uterus to be a normal variant with no clinical implications.
“all the latest classifications on uterine anomalies (ESHRE/ European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy [ESGE], Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts [CUME] and ASRM) consider the arcuate uterus to be a normal variant with no clinical implications”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [64] 64. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio SA, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classifica- tion of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032-44. source
In “Definitions: uterine main classes and sub-classes,” the paper includes some small fundal indentations in the normal-uterus class U0. But it also places minor cavity deformities in U1c, and “Consensus development” says the clinical value of this variant needs further research—not that it has no clinical implications. This ESHRE/ESGE paper does not establish what CUME and ASRM classify. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [65] 65. Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitao VM, et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between nor- mal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):101-9. source
- cites [66] 66. Pfeifer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein J, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, Rackow BW, et al. ASRM mullerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1238-52. source
- Premisecitation
Cervical insufficiency, along with infection and congenital uterine anomalies, appear to be main contributors of second trimester miscarriage.
“Cervical insufficiency, along with infection and congenital uterine anomalies appear to be main contributors of second trimester miscarriage.75”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] 75. Sneider K, Christiansen OB, Sundtoft IB, Langhoff-Roos J. Recurrence of second trimester miscarriage and extreme preterm delivery at 16-27 weeks of gestation with a focus on cervical insuf- ficiency and prophylactic cerclage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(12):1383-90. source
The Introduction (page unavailable) lists cervical insufficiency, congenital uterine anomalies and infection as conditions that may be associated with second-trimester miscarriage. It also lists fetal and placental anomalies and says the cause remains unexplained in at least 50% of cases; it does not establish the three named conditions as the main contributors. The Discussion (page unavailable) further describes infection’s causal role as inconclusive. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A small randomised controlled trial of 48 women with recurrent miscarriage and hyperprolactinaemia showed significant differences in live birth between bromocriptine and no bromocriptine (85.7% versus 52.4% respectively, P < 0.05).
“A small randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 48 women with recurrent miscarriage and hyperprolactinaemia were randomised into bromocriptine versus no bromocriptine, showing significant differences in live birth (85.7% versus 52.4% respectively, P < 0.05).94”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] 94. Hirahara F, Andoh N, Sawai K, Hirabuki T, Uemura T, Minaguchi H. Hyperprolactinemic recurrent miscarriage and results of random- ized bromocriptine treatment trials. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(2):246-52. source
The Selection of Subjects section reports that 48 women were randomized, but only 24 had hyperprolactinemia; the other 24 had occult hyperprolactinemia. The Randomized Bromocriptine Treatment Trials section reports the cited live-birth rates and P < .05, but those rates are among the 21 women who conceived in each group, not all 48 randomized women. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The incidence of subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH more than 2.5 mIU/l) has been reported to be raised in a small observational study of women with recurrent miscarriage.
“the incidence of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) (on this occasion defined as TSH more than 2.5 mIU/l) has been reported to be raised in a small observational study of women with recurrent miscarriage, 85”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] 85. Bernardi LA, Cohen RN, Stephenson MD. Impact of subclinical hy- pothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1326-31. source
- Premisecitation
The presence of thyroid antibodies is associated with an increased risk of recurrent miscarriage.
“Two systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported that the presence of thyroid antibodies was associated with an increased risk of recurrent miscarriage.87,88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [87] 87. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, van Wely M, van der Post JA, Goddijn M, et al. Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):605-19. source
- cites [88] 88. Thangaratinam S, Tan A, Knox E, Kilby MD, Franklyn J, Coomarasamy A. Association between thyroid autoantibodies and miscarriage and preterm birth: meta-analysis of evidence. BMJ. 2011;342:d2616. source
- Premisecitation
Data from a meta-analysis on sporadic miscarriages suggests an association between subclinical hypothyroidism and miscarriage.
“while data from a meta-analysis on sporadic miscarriages also suggests an association.86”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] 86. Zhang Y, Wang H, Pan X, Teng W, Shan Z. Patients with subclinical hypothyroidism before 20 weeks of pregnancy have a higher risk of miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2017;12(4):e0175708. source
The Results (section 2; page not provided) report a significant association between untreated subclinical hypothyroidism and miscarriage (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.59–2.27). The inclusion criteria define miscarriage as the outcome but do not restrict it to sporadic rather than recurrent miscarriage, so the ‘sporadic’ qualifier is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The presence of bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancy has been reported as a risk factor for miscarriage and preterm birth.
“The presence of bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancy has been reported as a risk factor for miscarriage and preterm birth.112”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] 112. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson J. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994;308(6924):295-8. source
The Abstract reports that bacterial vaginosis detected early in pregnancy was associated with preterm delivery and late miscarriage. However, the relevant analysis included women recruited before 16 weeks, rather than isolating the first trimester, and assessed late miscarriage (16–24 weeks), not miscarriage generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A high quality meta-analysis of RCTs showed that the only treatment or treatment combination that led to a significant increase in the live birth rate in women with recurrent miscarriage and APS was aspirin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion.
“A high quality meta-analysis of RCTs assessed pregnancy outcomes for women with recurrent miscarriage and APS who were treated with aspirin, steroids, intravenous globulin and heparin.It showed that the only treatment or treatment combination that lead to a significant increase in the live birth rate was aspirin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion.163”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] 163. Empson M, Lassere M, Craig J, Scott J. Prevention of recurrent mis- carriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus antico- agulant. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(2):CD002859, 2012. source
The Main results and Heparin sections report that, among the interventions examined, only unfractionated heparin combined with aspirin significantly reduced pregnancy loss compared with aspirin alone, supporting the live-birth finding. However, the paper does not describe UFH as an infusion, and its Main results say the quality of the included trials was not high. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Systematic screening and subsequent treatment for bacterial vaginosis in women with low-risk pregnancies showed no evidence of risk reduction of late miscarriage or spontaneous very preterm birth.
“The PREMEVA multicentre double-blind RCT of 84 530 pregnant women screened for bacterial vaginosis.Systematic screening and subsequent treatment for bacterial vaginosis in women with low-risk pregnancies showed no evidence of risk reduction of late miscarriage or spontaneous very preterm birth.152”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] 152. Subtil D, Brabant G, Tilloy E, Devos P, Canis F, Fruchart A, et al. Early clindamycin for bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy (PREMEVA): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10160):2171-9. source
- Premisecitation
A 2015 Bayesian network meta-analysis confirmed the findings on aspirin and UFH for recurrent miscarriage and APS.
“A 2015 Bayesian network meta-analysis also confirmed the above findings.165”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [165] 165. Zhang T, Ye X, Zhu T, Xiao X, Liu Y, Wei X, et al. Antithrombotic Treatment for Recurrent Miscarriage: Bayesian Network Meta- Analysis and Systematic Review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(45): e1732. source
- Premisecitation
Studies on sporadic miscarriage have shown associations with smoking, alcohol and caffeine.
“Studies on sporadic miscarriage have shown associations with smoking, 25,158 alcohol 26,159 and caffeine.27,160,161”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 7 sources checked- cites [25] 25. Nielsen A, Hannibal CG, Lindekilde BE, Tolstrup J, Frederiksen K, Munk C, et al. Maternal smoking predicts the risk of spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(9):1057-65. source
- cites [158] 158. Mishra GD, Dobson AJ, Schofield MJ. Cigarette smoking, men- strual symptoms and miscarriage among young women. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000;24(4):413-20. source
- cites [26] 26. Kesmodel U, Wisborg K, Olsen SF, Henriksen TB, Secher NJ. Moderate alcohol intake in pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(1):87-92. source
- cites [159] 159. Harlap S, Shiono PH. Alcohol, smoking, and incidence of spon- taneous abortions in the first and second trimester. Lancet. 1980;2(8187):173-6. source
- cites [27] 27. Chen LW, Wu Y, Neelakantan N, Chong MF, Pan A, van Dam RM. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy and risk of pregnancy loss: a categorical and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(7):1233-44. source
- cites [160] 160. Weng X, Odouli R, Li DK. Maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(3):279:e1-8. source
- cites [161] 161. Tolstrup JS, Kjaer SK, Munk C, Madsen LB, Ottesen B, Bergholt T, et al. Does caffeine and alcohol intake before pregnancy pre- dict the occurrence of spontaneous abortion? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2704-10. source
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses have reported a significant association between thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies, thyroid dysfunction and recurrent miscarriage.
“Meta-analyses have reported a significant association between TPO antibodies, thyroid dysfunction and recurrent miscarriage.87,88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [87] 87. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, van Wely M, van der Post JA, Goddijn M, et al. Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):605-19. source
- cites [88] 88. Thangaratinam S, Tan A, Knox E, Kilby MD, Franklyn J, Coomarasamy A. Association between thyroid autoantibodies and miscarriage and preterm birth: meta-analysis of evidence. BMJ. 2011;342:d2616. source
The Results (Thyroid autoantibodies and miscarriage; page not available) report a significant overall association, and all included studies tested for TPO antibodies. But the recurrent-miscarriage subgroup did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06). The Discussion (Association of thyroid autoantibodies with adverse pregnancy outcomes; page not available) describes the finding in women with normal thyroid function, so it does not establish the claimed association with thyroid dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Prospective observational studies have suggested a higher subsequent miscarriage rate in women with recurrent miscarriage and untreated chronic endometritis versus no endometritis or treated endometritis.
“Prospective observational studies have suggested a higher subsequent miscarriage rate in women with recurrent miscarriage and untreated chronic endometritis versus no endometritis or treated endometritis, 153,154 however welldesigned prospective RCTs are lacking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [153] 153. McQueen DB, Perfetto CO, Hazard FK, Lathi RB. Pregnancy out- comes in women with chronic endometritis and recurrent preg- nancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):927-31. source
- cites [154] 154. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R, Pinto V, Marinaccio M, Indraccolo U, et al. Chronic endometritis due to common bacteria is prev- alent in women with recurrent miscarriage as confirmed by im- proved pregnancy outcome after antibiotic treatment. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(5):640-7. source
The Results (page not specified) report more successful pregnancies after antibiotics when chronic endometritis resolved than when it persisted, supporting an association with better reproductive outcomes. But the Abstract describes a retrospective analysis, and the Results compare treated women whose endometritis resolved or persisted—not untreated women or women without endometritis. They do not establish the claimed higher subsequent miscarriage rate. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There are no adverse fetal outcomes reported in the meta-analysis of RCTs of low dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnancy.
“There are no adverse fetal outcomes reported in the metaanalysis of RCTs of low dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnancy.169”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [169] source
The Authors’ conclusions (in the Background passage; page unavailable) report fewer fetal or neonatal deaths and fewer small-for-gestational-age babies with low-dose aspirin. The review also reports no clear increase in neonatal bleeding, but it does report and assess adverse fetal outcomes rather than finding that none occurred. The claim is supported if it means no increased fetal harm was identified, but its unqualified wording overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Aspirin plus unfractionated heparin significantly reduced the miscarriage rate by 54% compared with aspirin alone (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.71).
“This treatment combination significantly reduced the miscarriage rate by 54% (aspirin plus UFH versus aspirin alone RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.71).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] 163. Empson M, Lassere M, Craig J, Scott J. Prevention of recurrent mis- carriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus antico- agulant. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005(2):CD002859, 2012. source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of prospectively collected data in a recurrent miscarriage population has shown an association between BMI and subsequent miscarriage.
“A meta-analysis of prospectively collected data in a recurrent miscarriage has shown an association between BMI and subsequent miscarriage.31,157”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] 31. Ng KYB, Cherian G, Kermack AJ, Bailey S, Macklon N, Sunkara SK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of female lifestyle factors and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7081. source
The Results (Overweight and obesity; page unavailable) report a meta-analysis finding higher odds of a further miscarriage among women with recurrent pregnancy loss and BMI > 25 or > 30. The paper describes the included studies as observational but does not establish that the data were prospectively collected. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [157] 157. Metwally M, Saravelos SH, Ledger WL, Li TC. Body mass index and risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):290-5. source
- Premisecitation
There were insufficient data to perform a subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, TPO antibodies and SCH in the TABLET study.
“However, there were insufficient data to perform a subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, TPO antibodies and SCH.192”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [192] 192. Dhillon-Smith RK, Middleton LJ, Sunner KK, Cheed V, Baker K, Farrell- Carver S, et al. Levothyroxine in Women with Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies before Conception. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(14):1316-25. source
Statistical Analysis (p. 5) describes separate subgroup analyses by number of previous miscarriages and baseline thyrotropin concentration. Neither that passage nor the Outcomes table (p. 9) says there were insufficient data for a combined subgroup of women with recurrent miscarriage, TPO antibodies, and subclinical hypothyroidism; searches for that subgroup and for subclinical hypothyroidism found no such statement. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A case-control trial involving 89 couples who underwent genetic counselling demonstrated similar cumulative live birth rates between those attempting natural conception (67.6%) and those undergoing IVF/ICSI and PGD (65.4%).
“A case-control trial involving 89 couples who underwent genetic counselling (of which 52 elected to attempt natural conception and 37 chose to undergo IVF/ICSI and PGD) demonstrated similar cumulative live birth rates (67.6% and 65.4%, respectively) between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] 182. Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takeda S. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation. PloS one. 2015;10(6):e0129958. 183. 104. Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, Alfaraj S, AbdelHafez FF, Abdellah AH, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to struc- tural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677-85. source
The Abstract (Methods and Findings) confirms that 52 patients chose natural conception and 37 chose PGD after genetic counseling. Table 4 in the Results reports similar cumulative live birth rates, but the citing sentence reverses them: 67.6% was for PGD and 65.4% for natural conception. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The RCTs included in the meta-analyses of progestogen supplementation differ.
“Caution should be exercised when interpreting the results of these meta-analyses due to differences in the RCTs included in the analyses.199,200”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [199] source
The Discussion (p. 7) describes methodological differences among trials pooled in a Cochrane analysis: only two of four used a placebo. It does not compare the sets of RCTs included in different meta-analyses, so it does not establish the stated reason for caution about those analyses. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [200] 200. Kumar A, Begum N, Prasad S, Aggarwal S, Sharma S. Oral dydro- gesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1357-63 e3. source
- Premisecitation
In the updated meta-analysis, subgroup analysis did not show significant differences between women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.
“A subgroup analysis on this occasion did not show significant differences between women with three or more versus two or more prior miscarriages.198”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [198] 198. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiol- ogy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;11:CD003511. 199. 105. Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, Seed PT, Small R, Quenby S, et al. A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2141-8. source
- Premisecitation
A 2018 Cochrane meta-analysis reported that progestogen supplementation compared with placebo/controls reduces the number of miscarriages (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92; 11 trials, 2359 women; moderate-quality evidence).
“A meta-analysis of the Cochrane collaboration in 2018 reported a reduction in the number of miscarriages for women given progestogen supplementation compared with placebo/ controls (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.92,11 trials, 2359 women, moderate-quality evidence)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] 196. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiol- ogy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD003511. source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Another observational trial has shown miscarriage rates to be similar in hypothyroid women receiving thyroxine and euthyroid women with TPO antibodies receiving thyroxine.
“Another observational trial has shown miscarriage rates to be similar in hypothyroid women receiving thyroxine and euthyroid women with TPO antibodies receiving thyroxine.194”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] 194. Lata K, Dutta P, Sridhar S, Rohilla M, Srinivasan A, Prashad GR, et al. Thyroid autoimmunity and obstetric outcomes in women with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study. Endocr Connect. 2013;2(2):118-24. source
- Premisecitation
The updated meta-analysis concluded that there may still be a reduction in the number of miscarriages for women given progestogen supplementation compared with placebo/controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-1.00; ten trials, 1684 women; moderate-quality evidence).
“The updated meta-analysis concluded that there may still be a reduction in the number of miscarriages for women given progestogen supplementation compared with placebo/controls (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-1.00,ten trials, 1684 women, moderate-quality evidence)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [198] 198. Haas DM, Hathaway TJ, Ramsey PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiol- ogy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;11:CD003511. 199. 105. Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, Seed PT, Small R, Quenby S, et al. A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2141-8. source
- Premisecitation
Extrapolated data from the Cochrane review of women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction did not find a significant reduction in miscarriage rates compared with expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47-5.00; P = 0.47, 94 women; very low quality evidence).
“However, extrapolated data from the Cochrane review of women undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction did not find a significant reduction in miscarriage rates compared with expectant management (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.47-5.00;P = 0.47, 94 women; very lowquality evidence).190”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [190] 190. Bosteels J, van Wessel S, Weyers S, Broekmans FJ, D'Hooghe TM, Bongers MY, et al. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associ- ated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12:CD009461. source
The review’s “Adverse events: miscarriage” section reports the stated odds ratio, confidence interval, P value and sample size, and finds insufficient evidence of a difference from expectant management. Its “Quality of the evidence” section grades the myomectomy trial as very low quality. However, the reported comparison concerns women with otherwise unexplained subfertility and a submucous fibroid; the review does not describe these 94 women as undergoing myomectomy prior to assisted reproduction. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
One RCT found that hysteroscopic septum resection did not improve the reproductive outcomes of women with a septate uterus.
“The trial found that hysteroscopic septum resection did not improve the reproductive outcomes of women with a septate uterus.186”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] 186. Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, Jansen FW, et al. Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open- label randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(5):1260-7. source
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses have shown no significant benefit of immunotherapy (e.g., paternal cell immunisation, third-party donor leucocytes, trophoblast membranes, IVIg) over placebo in preventing further miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
“A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the use of various forms of immunotherapy, including paternal cell immunisation, third-party donor leucocytes, trophoblast membranes and IVIg, in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage provides no significant beneficial effect over placebo in preventing further miscarriage.203”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [203] 203. Wong LF, Porter TF, Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent mis- carriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(10):CD000112. source
- Premisecitation
The prognosis for a successful future pregnancy with supportive care alone in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage is in the region of 75%.
“These women and their partners can be reassured that the prognosis for a successful future pregnancy with supportive care alone is in the region of 75%.20,21”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2868-71. source
- cites [21] 21. Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in un- explained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):387-9. source
- Premisecitation
Several observational studies have suggested that attendance at a dedicated early pregnancy clinic has a beneficial effect on pregnancy outcomes.
“However, data from several non-randomised studies have suggested that attendance at a dedicated early pregnancy clinic has a beneficial effect, 20,21,208,209”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2868-71. source
- cites [21] 21. Clifford K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in un- explained recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):387-9. source
- cites [208] 208. Liddell HS, Pattison NS, Zanderigo A. Recurrent miscarriage-- outcome after supportive care in early pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;31(4):320-2, Recurrent Miscarriage -Outcome After Supportive Care in Early Pregnancy. source
- Premisecitation
RCTs and meta-analyses in the IVF/ICSI context have failed to show a reduction in miscarriage rates with endometrial scratch/injury.
“although to date RCTs and meta-analyses in this patient group have failed to show a reduction in miscarriage rates.205,206”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [205] 205. Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins W Endometrial injury in women undergo- ing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD009517. source
- cites [206] 206. Lensen S, Osavlyuk D, Armstrong S, Stadelmann C, Hennes A, Napier E, et al. A Randomized Trial of Endometrial Scratching be- fore In Vitro Fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):325-34. source
- Premisecitation
An association of miscarriage with anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicide has been shown.
“as an association of miscarriage with anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicide has been shown.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] 11. Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID, Papadopoulou A, Dhillon-Smith RK, Al-Memar M, Brewin J, et al. Sporadic miscarriage: evidence to pro- vide effective care. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1668-74. source
The Summary (p. 3) describes miscarriage’s psychological impact and says diagnostic delays can increase anxiety. A cited study’s title in the references (p. 23) mentions posttraumatic stress and depression following miscarriage, but this paper’s retrieved passages do not report those associations as findings or address suicide. The full four-outcome claim is therefore not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A review and critical evaluation of the PROMISE and PRISM trials concluded that women with a history of miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy may benefit from progesterone.
“A review and critical evaluation of the PROMISE and PRISM trials concluded that women with a history of miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy may benefit from the use of progesterone.19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Brosens JJ, Quenby S, Stephenson MD, Sierra S, et al. Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscar- riage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):167-76. source
- Premisecitation
Unlike sporadic miscarriage, recurrent miscarriage tends to occur even if the fetus has no chromosomal anomalies.
“iii) unlike sporadic miscarriage, recurrent miscarriage tends to occur even if the fetus has no chromosomal anomalies.5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535): 601-11. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Recurrent miscarriage is a distinct clinical entity rather than just three incidental sporadic miscarriages occurring by chance.
“Several features suggest that recurrent miscarriage is a distinct clinical entity rather than just three incidental sporadic miscarriages occurring by chance:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535): 601-11. source
- Premisecitation
Sporadic miscarriage is often the result of random fetal chromosomal anomalies.
“Sporadic miscarriage (occurring most commonly in the first trimester) is often the result of random fetal chromosomal anomalies.1,2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Greenwold N, Jauniaux E. Collection of villous tissue under ultra- sound guidance to improve the cytogenetic study of early pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):452-6. source
- cites [2] 2. Saravelos SH, Li TC. Unexplained recurrent miscarriage: how can we explain it? Hum Reprod. 2012;27(7):1882-6. source
- Premisecitation
A woman's risk of miscarriage is directly related to the outcomes of previous pregnancies.
“i) a woman's risk of miscarriage is directly related to the outcomes of previous pregnancies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535): 601-11. source
- Premisecitation
The average observed incidence of recurrent miscarriage is higher than what would be expected by chance alone.
“ii) the average observed incidence of recurrent miscarriage is higher than what would be expected by chance alone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535): 601-11. source
- Premisecitation
The greatest determinant of the incidence of recurrent miscarriage is age.
“Overall, the greatest determinant of the incidence of recurrent miscarriage is age, 7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Saravelos SH, Regan L. Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):157-66. source
- Premisecitation
The number of previous miscarriages affects the chance of a live birth across all age groups.
“while the number of previous miscarriages affects the chance of a live birth across all age groups.8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] 8. Kolte AM, Westergaard D, Lidegaard O, Brunak S, Nielsen HS. Chance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(4):1065-73. source
- Premisecitation
An observational database study found an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester for women consuming five or more alcoholic drinks/week (approximately 10 units/week).
“An observational database study found an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester for women consuming five or more alcoholic drinks/week (approximately 10 units/week).26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. Kesmodel U, Wisborg K, Olsen SF, Henriksen TB, Secher NJ. Moderate alcohol intake in pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(1):87-92. source
- Premisenone given
The lack of laboratory standardisation of clinical assays of other aPL may lead to confusion and overdiagnosis of APS.
“In addition, the lack of laboratory standardisation of these clinical assays may lead to confusion and overdiagnosis of APS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The magnitude of the association between inherited thrombophilias and fetal loss varies according to the type of thrombophilia, timing of fetal loss, maternal ethnicity and maternal age.
“Meta-analyses of pooled data suggest that the magnitude of the association between inherited thrombophilias and fetal loss varies according to the type of thrombophilia, timing of fetal loss, maternal ethnicity and maternal age.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [42] 42. Gao H, Tao FB. Prothrombin G20210A mutation is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis up- date. Thromb Res. 2015;135(2):339-46. source
- Premisecitation
The association between environmental risk factors (such as air pollution and household chemicals) and pregnancy loss is based mainly on women with sporadic rather than recurrent miscarriage.
“The association between environmental risk factors (such as air pollution and household chemicals) and pregnancy loss is based mainly on women with sporadic rather than recurrent miscarriage.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. Gaskins AJ, Hart JE, Chavarro JE, Missmer SA, Rich-Edwards JW, Laden F, et al. Air pollution exposure and risk of sponta- neous abortion in the Nurses' Health Study II. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(9):1809-17. source
- Premisecitation
Observational studies have reported that obesity increases the risk of sporadic miscarriage.
“Observational studies have reported that obesity increases the risk of sporadic miscarriage.[28][29][30]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] 28. Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case- control study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1644-6. source
- cites [29] 29. Metwally M, Ledger WL, Li TC. Does high body mass index increase the risk of miscarriage after spontaneous and assisted conception? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):714-26. source
- cites [30] 30. Metwally M, Saravelos SH, Ledger WL, Li TC. Body mass index and risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):290-5. source
- Premisecitation
Observational studies have not demonstrated an association between consanguinity and recurrent miscarriage.
“Observational studies have not demonstrated an association between consanguinity and recurrent miscarriage.23,24”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] 23. Gowri V, Udayakumar AM, Bsiso W, Al Farsi Y, Rao K. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity in Omani couples. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(10):1167-9. source
- cites [24] 24. Saad FA, Jauniaux E. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consan- guinity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;5(2):167-70. source
- Premisenone given
Inherited thrombophilias have a weak association with recurrent miscarriage.
“Inherited thrombophilias have a weak association with recurrent miscarriage.”
- Also stated in: § Inherited thrombophilias · plain
“There is a weak association with recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Inherited thrombophilias · plain
- Premisecitation
Smoking has been shown to increase the risk of sporadic miscarriage.
“Smoking has been shown to increase the risk of sporadic miscarriage.25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] 25. Nielsen A, Hannibal CG, Lindekilde BE, Tolstrup J, Frederiksen K, Munk C, et al. Maternal smoking predicts the risk of spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(9):1057-65. source
- Premisecitation
IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies were found to have the second strongest association with recurrent miscarriage, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% CI 2.26-5.65) and 5.61 (95% CI 1.26-25.03) respectively.
“IgG and IgM aCL antibodies were found to have the second strongest association with recurrent miscarriage, with odds ratios of 3.57 (95% CI 2.26-5.65)and 5.61 (95% CI 1.26-25.03)respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Opatrny L, David M, Kahn SR, Shrier I, Rey E. Association be- tween antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent fetal loss in women without autoimmune disease: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2214-21.
- Premisecitation
There is a stronger and more consistent association between second trimester miscarriages and inherited thrombophilias.
“It is generally recognised that there is a stronger and more consistent association between second trimester miscarriages and inherited thrombophilias.41,42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [42] 42. Gao H, Tao FB. Prothrombin G20210A mutation is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis up- date. Thromb Res. 2015;135(2):339-46. source
- Premisecitation
Factor V Leiden appears to be associated with first and particularly second trimester recurrent miscarriages.
“Factor V Leiden appears to be associated with first and particularly second trimester recurrent miscarriages.41,43”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [43] 43. Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, Bienstock J, Varga E, Scott JA. Can Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A testing in women with recurrent pregnancy loss result in improved pregnancy out- comes?: Results from a targeted evidence-based review. Genet Med. 2012;14(1):39-50. source
- Premisecitation
Lupus anticoagulant was found to have the strongest association with recurrent miscarriage (OR 7.79; 95% CI 2.30-26.45).
“Lupus anticoagulant was found to have the strongest association with recurrent miscarriage (OR 7.79; 95% CI 2.30-26.45).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Opatrny L, David M, Kahn SR, Shrier I, Rey E. Association be- tween antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent fetal loss in women without autoimmune disease: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2214-21.
- Premisecitation
Prothrombin gene mutation is associated with recurrent miscarriage.
“Prothrombin gene mutation is associated with recurrent miscarriage.[41][42][43]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [42] 42. Gao H, Tao FB. Prothrombin G20210A mutation is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis up- date. Thromb Res. 2015;135(2):339-46. source
- cites [43] 43. Bradley LA, Palomaki GE, Bienstock J, Varga E, Scott JA. Can Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A testing in women with recurrent pregnancy loss result in improved pregnancy out- comes?: Results from a targeted evidence-based review. Genet Med. 2012;14(1):39-50. source
- Premisecitation
Protein C deficiency has not shown a consistent association with recurrent miscarriage.
“Protein C deficiency has not shown a consistent association with recurrent miscarriage.41,44”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [44] 44. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):913-6. source
- Premisecitation
In a recurrent miscarriage population, women with submucosal and intramural/subserosal myomas had a higher proportion of second trimester miscarriages compared with women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (21.7% and 17.6% versus 8.0% respectively; P < 0.01).
“women with submucosal and intramural/subserosal myomas were found to have a higher proportion of second trimester miscarriages compared with women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (21.7% and 17.6% versus 8.0% respectively; P < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
- Premisecitation
A large prospective study by Prior et al. (2018), using 3D ultrasound solely to diagnose the arcuate uterus, reported similar clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between arcuate and normal uteri.
“a large prospective study by Prior et al. (2018), using gold standard 3D ultrasound solely to diagnose the arcuate uterus (in contrast to the varying diagnostic modalities included in the studies of the meta-analysis), reported similar clinical pregnancy and live birth rates between arcuate and normal uteri.63”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] 63. Prior M, Richardson A, Asif S, Polanski L, Parris-Larkin M, Chandler J, et al. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):110-7. source
- Premisecitation
Embryoscopic studies have shown a further 18% of fetuses with missed miscarriages and a normal karyotype to have morphological defects.
“When examining missed miscarriages with a normal karyotype, embryoscopic studies have also shown a further 18% of fetuses to have morphological defects, 56”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] 56. Philipp T, Philipp K, Reiner A, Beer F, Kalousek DK. Embryoscopic and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed preg- nancies. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(8):1724-32. source
- Premisecitation
Newer studies using microarray techniques have been reporting even higher number of cytogenetic anomalies in women with sporadic miscarriages of up to 59.4% (1106/2389).
“This may be reflected by the fact that newer studies using microarray techniques have been reporting even higher number of cytogenetic anomalies in women with sporadic miscarriages of up to 59.4% (1106/2389).55”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] 55. Levy B, Sigurjonsson S, Pettersen B, Maisenbacher MK, Hall MP, Demko Z, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analy- sis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):202-9. source
- Premisecitation
Investigations have been reported to reveal a diagnosis in only approximately 50% of cases in dedicated clinics.
“Although investigations have been reported to reveal a diagnosis in only approximately 50% of cases in dedicated clinics, 76”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] 76. McNamee KM, Dawood F, Farquharson RG. Mid-trimester preg- nancy loss. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):87-102. source
- Premisecitation
A finding of an aneuploid embryo confers an improved prognosis in the subsequent pregnancy.
“Equally, a finding of an aneuploid embryo has been found to confer an improved prognosis in the subsequent pregnancy.58,59”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [58] 58. Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, Daniely M, Mashiach S, Barkai G. Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(4):678-82. source
- cites [59] 59. Suzumori N, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Genetic Factors as a Cause of Miscarriage. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(29):3431-7. source
- The authors state this as an assumption: The women are age adjusted when comparing prognosis after aneuploid versus euploid miscarriage.
- Premisecitation
Polycystic ovarian morphology, elevated serum luteinising hormone levels or elevated serum testosterone levels do not appear to predict an increased risk of future pregnancy loss among ovulatory women with a history of recurrent miscarriage who conceive spontaneously.
“Polycystic ovarian morphology, elevated serum luteinising hormone levels or elevated serum testosterone levels do not appear to predict an increased risk of future pregnancy loss among ovulatory women with a history of recurrent miscarriage who conceive spontaneously.90”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] 90. Rai R, Backos M, Rushworth F, Regan L. Polycystic ovaries and re- current miscarriage--a reappraisal. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(3):612-5, Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage-a reappraisal. 14710528, 0, Downloaded from https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17515, Wiley Online Library on [04/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License source
- Premisecitation
The incidence of diabetes mellitus and thyroid dysfunction in women who suffer recurrent miscarriage appears similar to that reported in the general population.
“The incidence of diabetes mellitus and thyroid dysfunction in women who suffer recurrent miscarriage appears similar to that reported in the general population.83,84”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [83] 83. Bussen S, Sutterlin M, Steck T. Endocrine abnormalities during the follicular phase in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):18-20. source
- cites [84] 84. Li TC, Spuijbroek MD, Tuckerman E, Anstie B, Loxley M, Laird S. Endocrinological and endometrial factors in recurrent miscarriage. BJOG. 2000;107(12):1471-9. source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis in 2008 concluded that the available data are not consistent with more than modest associations between cytokine polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage.
“A meta-analysis in 2008 concluded that the available data are not consistent with more than modest associations between cytokine polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] 99. Su D, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang J, Jiao B, Wang G, et al. Association of interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms with recurrent mis- carriage: a meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;76(2):172-80. source
- Premisecitation
Another study reported marginally lower prolactin levels in women with recurrent miscarriage who experienced a live birth versus those who miscarried.
“while another study reported marginally lower prolactin levels in women with recurrent miscarriage who experienced a live birth versus those who miscarried.93”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] 93. Li W, Ma N, Laird SM, Ledger WL, Li TC. The relationship be- tween serum prolactin concentration and pregnancy outcome in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Journal of obstet- rics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2013;33(3):285-8. source
- Premisecitation
An elevated free androgen index appears to be a prognostic factor for a subsequent miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage.
“An elevated free androgen index appears to be a prognostic factor for a subsequent miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage.89”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] 89. Cocksedge KA, Li TC, Saravelos SH, Metwally M. A reappraisal of the role of polycystic ovary syndrome in recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(1):151-60. source
- Premisecitation
An imbalance in Th1/Th2 cytokines has been implicated in adverse pregnancy outcomes including recurrent miscarriage.
“An imbalance in Th1/Th2 cytokines has been implicated in adverse pregnancy outcomes including recurrent miscarriage.97”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [97] 97. Wegmann TG, Lin H, Guilbert L, Mosmann TR. Bidirectional cy- tokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol Today. 1993;14(7):353-6. source
- Premisecitation
Another study found no correlation between the presence of a luteal phase defect (midluteal progesterone less than 10 ng/ml) and the chance of subsequent miscarriage in 197 women with recurrent miscarriage.
“whereas another study found no correlation between the presence of a luteal phase defect (midluteal progesterone less than 10 ng/ml) and the chance of subsequent miscarriage in 197 women with recurrent miscarriage.95”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] 95. Ogasawara M, Kajiura S, Katano K, Aoyama T, Aoki K. Are serum progesterone levels predictive of recurrent miscarriage in future pregnancies? Fertil Steril. 1997;68(5):806-9. source
- Premisecitation
Research into the role of cytokines in recurrent miscarriage is hampered by fluctuating levels, discordance between blood and endometrial levels and laboratory variability in measurement.
“However, research into the role of cytokines in recurrent miscarriage is hampered by a number of factors including fluctuating levels, discordance between blood and endometrial levels and laboratory variability in measurement.98”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] 98. Wang NF, Kolte AM, Larsen EC, Nielsen HS, Christiansen OB. Immunologic Abnormalities, Treatments, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: What Is Real and What Is Not? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(3):509-23. source
- Premisecitation
One study reported an increased level of prolactin in women with recurrent miscarriage versus controls.
“One study reported an increased level of prolactin in women with recurrent miscarriage versus controls, 83”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] 83. Bussen S, Sutterlin M, Steck T. Endocrine abnormalities during the follicular phase in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):18-20. source
- Premisecitation
One study found a higher incidence of a luteal phase defect (midluteal progesterone less than 30 nmol/l) in women with recurrent miscarriage versus fertile controls (27% versus 11%).
“One study found a higher incidence of a luteal phase defect (midluteal progesterone less than 30 nmol/l) in women with recurrent miscarriage versus fertile controls (27% versus 11%), 84”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] 84. Li TC, Spuijbroek MD, Tuckerman E, Anstie B, Loxley M, Laird S. Endocrinological and endometrial factors in recurrent miscarriage. BJOG. 2000;107(12):1471-9. source
- Premisecitation
The data are more consistent for an association between abnormal sperm DNA parameters (sperm DNA fragmentation, nuclear chromatin decondensation, and sperm aneuploidy) and miscarriage.
“The data are more consistent with regard to the association between abnormal sperm DNA parameters such as sperm DNA fragmentation, nuclear chromatin decondensation, and sperm aneuploidy and miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
When used in combination with routine investigations into recurrent miscarriage, cytogenetic analysis of the pregnancy tissue has been shown to provide a diagnosis in over 90% of couples.
“Other than the prognostic advantages, when used in combination with routine investigations into recurrent miscarriage, cytogenetic analysis of the pregnancy tissue have shown to provide a diagnosis in over 90% of couples.137”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] 137. Popescu F, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH. Recurrent pregnancy loss eval- uation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(4):579-87. source
- Premisecitation
Systematic review and meta-analyses have not found a persistent association between recurrent and/or second trimester miscarriage and protein C deficiency, antithrombin deficiency and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation.
“Systematic review and meta-analyses have not found a persistent association between recurrent and/or second trimester miscarriage and protein C deficiency, antithrombin deficiency and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation and therefore do not recommend testing.41,47,136”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [47] 47. Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med. 2013;15(2):153-6. source
- cites [136] 136. Pritchard AM, Hendrix PW, Paidas MJ. Hereditary Thrombophilia and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;59(3): 487-97. source
- Premisecitation
The evidence for an association between bacterial vaginosis and first trimester miscarriage is inconsistent.
“However, the evidence for an association with first trimester miscarriage is inconsistent.114,115”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [114] 114. Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD. Influence of bacterial vagi- nosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study. BMJ. 1999;319(7204):220-3. source
- cites [115] 115. van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1809-15. source
- Premisecitation
In detection of lupus anticoagulant, the dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) test together with a platelet neutralisation procedure is more sensitive and specific than either the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or the kaolin clotting time (KCT) tests.
“In detection of lupus anticoagulant, the dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) test together with a platelet neutralisation procedure is more sensitive and specific than either the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or the kaolin clotting time (KCT) tests.133”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] 133. Rai RS, Regan L, Clifford K, Pickering W, Dave M, Mackie I, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and beta 2-glycoprotein-I in 500 women with recurrent miscarriage: results of a comprehensive screening approach. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(8):2001-5. source
- Premisecitation
When comparing different criteria for the diagnosis of the septate uterus, the incidence changes according to criteria used, with the highest incidences in descending order being from the ESHRE-ESGE to the CUME and ASRM classifications.
“When comparing different criteria for the diagnosis of the septate uterus it is clear that the incidence changes according to criteria used, 147 with the highest incidences in descending order being from the ESHRE-ESGE to the CUME and ASRM classifications.65”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [147] 147. Ouyang Y, Yi Y, Gong F, Lin G, Li X. ESHRE-ESGE versus ASRM classification in the diagnosis of septate uterus: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(4):845-50. source
- cites [65] 65. Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitao VM, et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between nor- mal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):101-9. source
- Premisecitation
Several studies reported that uterine NK cell density in the endometrium around the time of implantation was increased.
“Several studies reported that uterine NK cell density in the endometrium around the time of implantation was increased.[105][106][107]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [105] 105. Clifford K, Flanagan AM, Regan L. Endometrial CD56+ natural killer cells in women with recurrent miscarriage: a histomorpho- metric study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2727-30. source
- cites [106] 106. Tuckerman E, Laird SM, Prakash A, Li TC. Prognostic value of the measurement of uterine natural killer cells in the endo- metrium of women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2208-13. 107. 100. Quenby S, Bates M, Doig T, Brewster J, Lewis-Jones DI, Johnson PM, et al. Pre-implantation endometrial leukocytes in women with re- current miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2386-91. source
- cites [107] source
- Premisecitation
A range of organisms, including ureaplasma/mycoplasma, bacterial vaginosis-associated organisms, and Chlamydia trachomatis, have been implicated in first and second trimester miscarriage.
“A whole range of organisms have been implicated in first and second trimester miscarriage, including ureaplasma/ mycoplasma, organisms causing bacterial vaginosis and chlamydia trachomatis.110”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] 110. Check JH. A practical approach to the prevention of miscarriage. Part 4--role of infection. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):252-5.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Using morphometric analysis to measure plasma cell count, a study found that the incidence of chronic endometritis in women with recurrent miscarriage was 10.8%, twice higher than that of fertile women (5.0%).
“Using morphometric analysis to measure plasma cell count, a study found that the incidence of chronic endometritis in women with recurrent miscarriage was 10.8%, twice higher than that of fertile women (5.0%).117”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [117] 117. Liu Y, Chen X, Huang J, Wang CC, Yu MY, Laird S, et al. Comparison of the prevalence of chronic endometritis as determined by means of different diagnostic methods in women with and without repro- ductive failure. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(5):832-9. source
- Premisenone given
Limited studies are available evaluating interventions that may affect sperm DNA fragmentation such as lifestyle modification, treatment of infections, control of diabetes, treatment of varicocele, antioxidant therapy, and sperm selection.
“To date, however, limited studies are available evaluating interventions that may affect sperm DNA fragmentation such as lifestyle modification (smoking cessation, weight loss/exercise, reduction in pollutant exposure), treatment of infections, control of diabetes, treatment of varicocele, antioxidant therapy, sperm selection and others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The rates of anti-sperm antibodies have not been consistently shown to be increased in women and men with recurrent miscarriage.
“The rates of anti-sperm antibodies have not been consistently shown to be increased in women and men with recurrent miscarriage, with some studies showing a higher incidence, 124 while others have not.125”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [124] 124. Motak-Pochrzest H, Malinowski A. The occurrence of immuno- logical disturbances in patients with recurrent miscarriage (RM) of unknown etiology. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(7):701-7.
- cites [125] 125. Al-Hussein K, Al-Mukhalafi Z, Bertilsson PA, Jaroudi K, Shoukri M, Hollander J. Value of flow cytometric assay for the detection of antisperm antibodies in women with a history of recurrent abor- tion. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002;47(1):31-7. source
- Premisecitation
The prognostic value of uterine NK cell measurement remains unconfirmed.
“Nevertheless, the prognostic value of uterine NK cell measurement remains unconfirmed.106”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] 106. Tuckerman E, Laird SM, Prakash A, Li TC. Prognostic value of the measurement of uterine natural killer cells in the endo- metrium of women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2208-13. 107. 100. Quenby S, Bates M, Doig T, Brewster J, Lewis-Jones DI, Johnson PM, et al. Pre-implantation endometrial leukocytes in women with re- current miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2386-91. source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis in 2014 showed no significant difference in uterine NK cell density between women with recurrent miscarriage and controls (SMD 0.40; 95% CI 1.24-2.04; P = 0.63).
“A meta-analysis in 2014 showed no significant difference between women with recurrent miscarriage and controls (SMD 0.40; 95% CI 1.24-2.04;P = 0.63) 100”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] 100. Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):429-38. source
- Premisecitation
A systematic review and international consensus has reported that the most accurate methodologies for diagnosing congenital uterine anomalies in descending order of overall accuracy are: 3D ultrasound (97.6%, 95% CI 94.3-100), saline-infusion ultrasound (96.5%, 95% CI 93.4-99.5), hysterosalpingography (86.9%, 95% CI 79.8-94.0) and 2D ultrasound (86.6%, 95% CI 81.3-91.8).
“A systematic review and international consensus has reported that the most accurate methodologies for diagnosing congenital uterine anomalies in descending order of overall accuracy are: 3D ultrasound (97.6%, 95% CI 94.3-100), saline-infusion ultrasound (96.5%, 95% CI 93.4-99.5),hysterosalpingography (86.9%, 95% CI 79.8-94.0)and 2D ultrasound (86.6%, 95% CI 81.3-91.8).140”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [140] 140. Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio SA, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE con- sensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(1):2-7. source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis showed a statistically significant increase in second trimester miscarriages with bacterial vaginosis (OR 6.32, 95% CI 3.65-10.94).
“A meta-analysis showed a statistically significant increase in second trimester miscarriages (OR 6.32, 95% CI 3.65-10.94).113”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] 113. Leitich H, Kiss H. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and interme- diate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(3):375-90. source
- Premisecitation
Comparative studies have shown MRI to be at least similar in accuracy compared with 3D ultrasound when expert examiners are used.
“There were no studies reporting on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a screening tool, however comparative studies have shown MRI to be at least similar in accuracy compared with 3D ultrasound when expert examiners are used (i.e. a radiologist with an interest/expertise in gynaecological imaging).141”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] 141. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Ubeda B, Rodriguez I, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anom- alies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of con- genital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(5):616-22. source
- Premisecitation
The finding of lower sperm parameters in men with recurrent miscarriage has not been reproduced in other studies.
“However, this has not been reproduced in other studies.122,123”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [122] 122. Bhattacharya SM. Association of various sperm parameters with unexplained repeated early pregnancy loss--which is most import- ant? Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(2):391-5. source
- cites [123] 123. Hill JA, Abbott AF, Politch JA. Sperm morphology and recurrent abortion. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(4):776-8. source
- Premisecitation
Screening women (and their male partners if applicable) for parental chromosome rearrangements does not appear to be cost-effective.
“Although screening women (and their male partners if applicable) for parental chromosome rearrangements does not appear to be cost-effective, 50 peripheral blood karyotyping of both parents should be offered in cases where the pregnancy tissue report an unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] 50. Barber JC, Cockwell AE, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG. 2010;117(7):885-8. source
- Premisereasoning
Toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex (TORCH) and listeria infections do not fulfil the criteria for an infective agent implicated in recurrent miscarriage.
“Toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex (TORCH) and listeria infections do not fulfil these criteria and therefore routine TORCH screening should not be undertaken.111”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] 111. Regan L, Jivraj S, editors. Infection and pregnancy loss. London: RCOG Press; 2001. source
- Rests on an assumption: For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.
- Premisecitation
The detection of antiphospholipid antibodies is subject to considerable inter-laboratory variation.
“The detection of aPL is subject to considerable inter-laboratory variation.134”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] 134. Robert JM, Macara LM, Chalmers EA, Smith GC. Inter-assay varia- tion in antiphospholipid antibody testing. BJOG. 2002;109(3):348-9. source
- Premisecitation
There were no studies reporting on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a screening tool for congenital uterine anomalies.
“There were no studies reporting on the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a screening tool, however comparative studies have shown MRI to be at least similar in accuracy compared with 3D ultrasound when expert examiners are used (i.e. a radiologist with an interest/expertise in gynaecological imaging).141”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] 141. Graupera B, Pascual MA, Hereter L, Browne JL, Ubeda B, Rodriguez I, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Mullerian duct anom- alies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of con- genital anomalies of the female genital tract. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(5):616-22. source
- Premisecitation
Meta-analyses of women with recurrent miscarriage combining women with and without thrombophilia have not shown any improvement in reproductive outcomes when using aspirin and/or heparin versus placebo.
“Meta-analyses of women with recurrent miscarriage combining women with and without thrombophilia have not shown any improvement in reproductive outcomes when using aspirin and/or heparin versus placebo.176”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] 176. de Jong PG, Kaandorp S, Di Nisio M, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD004734. source
- Premisecitation
There is a lack of evidence to support routine treatment for women with Factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation to reduce the incidence of recurrent miscarriage or second trimester loss.
“There is a lack of evidence to support routine treatment for women with Factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation to reduce the incidence of recurrent miscarriage or second trimester loss.2-C Subgroup metaanalysis of RCTs do not show a consistent benefit of treatment in women with inherited thrombophilia, however the subgroups were underpowered for firm conclusions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
There appears to be an association between sperm DNA fragmentation and miscarriage.
“Although there appears to be an association between sperm DNA fragmentation and miscarriage, there are yet to be any prospective trials demonstrating improved outcomes with intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
The meta-analysis did not show a significant reduction in miscarriage rates in the aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) group.
“The meta-analysis did not show a significant reduction in miscarriage rates in aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) group, but commented that further investigation is required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
There is a lack of studies demonstrating a clear link between acquired uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.
“Although there is a lack of studies demonstrating a clear link between acquired uterine anomalies and recurrent miscarriage, these can be opportunistically diagnosed during the assessment for congenital uterine anomalies and treated accordingly on an individual basis (e.g. if there is associated symptomatology).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Two prospective studies have shown that the loss in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine associated with low-dose long-term heparin therapy is similar to that which occurs normally during pregnancy.
“Two prospective studies have shown, however, that the loss in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine associated with low-dose long-term heparin therapy is similar to that which occurs normally during pregnancy.171,172”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [171] 171. Backos M, Rai R, Thomas E, Murphy M, Dore C, Regan L. Bone density changes in pregnant women treated with heparin: a pro- spective, longitudinal study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2876-80. source
- cites [172] 172. Carlin AJ, Farquharson RG, Quenby SM, Topping J, Fraser WD. Prospective observational study of bone mineral density during pregnancy: low molecular weight heparin versus control. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(5):1211-4. source
- Premisecitation
There is a lack of consistent association between infection testing, associated treatment, and recurrent miscarriage.
“There is a lack of consistent association between infection testing, associated treatment, and recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Meta-analyses have demonstrated that treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) with aspirin and heparin confers a significant benefit.
“Metaanalyses have demonstrated that treatment of APS with aspirin and heparin confers a significant benefit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Well-designed prospective RCTs are lacking for the treatment of chronic endometritis in women with recurrent miscarriage.
“Prospective observational studies have suggested a higher subsequent miscarriage rate in women with recurrent miscarriage and untreated chronic endometritis versus no endometritis or treated endometritis, 153,154 however welldesigned prospective RCTs are lacking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
There is a lack of consistent association between various immunological tests and recurrent miscarriage.
“There is a lack of consistent association between various immunological tests and recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
There are yet to be any prospective trials demonstrating improved outcomes with intervention for sperm DNA fragmentation in couples with recurrent miscarriage.
“Although there appears to be an association between sperm DNA fragmentation and miscarriage, there are yet to be any prospective trials demonstrating improved outcomes with intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Pregnancies associated with APS treated with aspirin and heparin remain at high risk of complications during all three trimesters.
“Pregnancies associated with APS treated with aspirin and heparin remain at high risk of complications during all three trimesters.174,175”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [174] 174. Backos M, Rai R, Baxter N, Chilcott IT, Cohen H, Regan L. Pregnancy complications in women with recurrent miscarriage associated with antiphospholipid antibodies treated with low dose aspirin and heparin. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(2):102-7. source
- cites [175] 175. Branch DW, Silver RM, Blackwell JL, Reading JC, Scott JR. Outcome of treated pregnancies in women with antiphospholipid syndrome: an update of the Utah experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(4):614-20.
- Premisecitation
A 2020 meta-analysis reported improvements in live birth with both UFH and LMWH in combination with aspirin.
“In addition, a 2020 metaanalysis reported improvements in live birth with both UFH and LMWH in combination with aspirin.168”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168] 168. Liu X, Qiu Y, Yu ED, Xiang S, Meng R, Niu KF, et al. Comparison of therapeutic interventions for recurrent pregnancy loss in association with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020;83(4):e13219. 169. 102. Duley L, Henderson-Smart DJ, Meher S, King JF. Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD004659. 170. 103. Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J, Turner DC, Levine MN, Burrows R. Risks to the fetus of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 1989;61(2):197-203. source
- Premisecitation
Two prospective studies and one RCT reported no difference in efficacy and safety between UFH or LMWH when combined with aspirin in the treatment of women with recurrent miscarriage associated with aPL.
“Two prospective studies and one RCT, however, reported no difference in efficacy and safety between UFH or LMWH when combined with aspirin in the treatment of women with recurrent miscarriage associated with aPL.166,167”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [166] 166. Noble LS, Kutteh WH, Lashey N, Franklin RD, Herrada J. Antiphospholipid antibodies associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: prospective, multicenter, controlled pilot study comparing treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfraction- ated heparin. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):684-90. 167. 101. Stephenson MD, Ballem PJ, Tsang P, Purkiss S, Ensworth S, Houlihan E, et al. Treatment of antiphospholipid antibody syn- drome (APS) in pregnancy: a randomized pilot trial comparing low molecular weight heparin to unfractionated heparin. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):729-34. source
- cites [167] source
- Premisenone given
There are no studies assessing the dietary intake of certain foods, antioxidants, vitamins, supplements and others in the recurrent miscarriage population.
“There are no studies assessing the dietary intake of certain foods, antioxidants, vitamins, supplements and others in the recurrent miscarriage population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The findings on associations between smoking, alcohol and caffeine and sporadic miscarriage can be extrapolated to populations of women and people with recurrent miscarriage.
“These findings can be extrapolated on to populations of women and people with recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
There is a lack of prospective data to determine which classification for septate uterus would lead to the most favourable reproductive outcomes (i.e. increase in live birth rate).
“Although there are concerns of potential over-diagnosis and treatment of septate uteri by using the ESHRE-ESGE classification, there are still a lack of prospective data to determine the use of which classification would lead to the most favourable reproductive outcomes (i.e. increase in live birth rate).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Knowing thyroid peroxidase antibody status allows for the stratification of women and people who will require thyroid function monitoring during pregnancy.
“Although the presence of TPO antibodies in euthyroid women may not warrant treatment, knowing the antibody status allows for the stratification of women and people who will require thyroid function monitoring during pregnancy.149”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149] 149. Dhillon-Smith RK, Boelaert K, Jeve YB, Maheshwari A. Coomarasamy A; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Antithyroid Autoantibodies in Women with Subfertility or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Scientific Impact Paper No. 70 June 2022. BJOG. 2022 Nov;129(12):e75-88. source
- Premisecitation
Two further meta-analyses showed similar reduction in recurrent miscarriage for the aspirin and UFH group (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.48).
“Two further meta-analyses showed similar reduction in recurrent miscarriage for the aspirin and UFH group (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.48).164”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164] 164. Ziakas PD, Pavlou M, Voulgarelis M. Heparin treatment in anti- phospholipid syndrome with recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1256-62. source
- Premisecitation
The inclusion of saline infusion with the 3D ultrasound assessment may be particularly useful for the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions if these are suspected based on the clinical history.
“The inclusion of saline infusion with the 3D ultrasound assessment may be particularly useful for the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions if these are suspected based on the clinical history (e.g.prior surgical management of miscarriage with subsequent oligomenorrhoea).148”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] 148. Amin TN, Saridogan E, Jurkovic D. Ultrasound and intrauterine adhesions: a novel structured approach to diagnosis and manage- ment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(2):131-9. source
- Premisecitation
The TABLET study, in which euthyroid women with TPO and a history of miscarriage were randomised to thyroxine or placebo, found no difference in live birth outcome.
“The 'TABLET' study, in which euthyroid women with TPO and a history of miscarriage were randomised to thyroxine or placebo, found no difference in live birth outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
There were insufficient data to perform a subgroup analysis for women with recurrent miscarriage in the TABLET study.
“There were insufficient data to perform a subgroup analysis for women with recurrent miscarriage but the ongoing 'T4-Life' study (RCT) will examine this group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Live birth rates are similar following natural conception and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in couples with chromosomal rearrangements.
“Live birth rates are similar following natural conception and PGD, and therefore PGD should not be routinely offered in this situation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Meta-analyses have reported a possible benefit from progestogen supplementation.
“Meta-analyses have reported a possible benefit from progestogen supplementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a later RCT, subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage with and without thrombophilia did not demonstrate a significant difference in live birth rate when comparing enoxaparin alone, enoxaparin/aspirin combined, and aspirin alone.
“In a later RCT, subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage with and without thrombophilia did not demonstrate a significant difference in live birth rate when comparing enoxaparin alone, enoxaparin/aspirin combined, and aspirin alone.179”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] 179. Visser J, Ulander VM, Helmerhorst FM, Lampinen K, Morin- Papunen L, Bloemenkamp KW, et al. Thromboprophylaxis for recurrent miscarriage in women with or without thrombophilia. HABENOX: a randomised multicentre trial. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105(2):295-301. source
- Premisecitation
The TABLET study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing live birth rates among euthyroid women with TPO antibodies and a history of miscarriage treated with levothyroxine versus placebo, found no difference between the two groups, including subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage.
“The TABLET study, which was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing live birth rates among euthyroid women with TPO antibodies and a history of miscarriage, treated with levothyroxine versus placebo, found no difference between the two groups, including subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The group of women with thrombophilias would have been underpowered in these analyses because the investigators concluded that because of the lack of data, such an analysis was not possible.
“Unfortunately, although the investigators planned to compare the thrombophilia versus no thrombophilia groups, they concluded that because of the lack of data, such an analysis was not possible.This means that the group of women with thrombophilias would have been underpowered in these analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
One prospective randomised trial demonstrated the efficacy of LMWH for the treatment of women with a history of a single late miscarriage after 10 weeks of gestation who have the Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation or have protein S deficiency.
“One prospective randomised trial demonstrated the efficacy of LMWH for the treatment of women with a history of a single late miscarriage after 10 weeks of gestation who have the Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation or have protein S deficiency.The live birth rate in women treated with enoxaparin was 86% compared with 29% in women taking low dose aspirin alone (OR 15.5, 95% CI 7-34).178”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [178] 178. Gris JC, Mercier E, Quere I, Lavigne-Lissalde G, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Hoffet M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus low-dose aspirin in women with one fetal loss and a constitutional thrombo- philic disorder. Blood. 2004;103(10):3695-9. source
- Premisenone given
There are no published RCTs assessing the effectiveness and possible complications of hysteroscopic septum resection dedicated to women and people with recurrent miscarriage.
“There are no published RCTs assessing the effectiveness and possible complications of hysteroscopic septum resection dedicated to women and people with recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The only other RCT attempting to address hysteroscopic septum resection was stopped prematurely because of poor recruitment after recruiting only six patients.
“This may reflect the difficulty in recruiting patients to such a trial, as the only other RCT attempting to address this topic was stopped prematurely because of poor recruitment after recruiting only six patients (ISRCTN2896).188”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188] 188. Rikken JFW, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Reply: Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(9):2627-8.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
“There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk.2-C Observational studies have not demonstrated improved outcomes to date, both in terms of live birth rate and time to pregnancy interval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Data from one retrospective analysis in a recurrent miscarriage population with no control group suggests a potential benefit from the resection of submucosal myomas.
“Data from one retrospective analysis in a recurrent miscarriage population with no control group suggests a potential benefit from the resection of submucosal myomas.70”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
- Premisecitation
The 2017 RCT by Ismail et al. was retracted because of concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of the study data.
“the 2017 RCT by Ismail et al. became the subject of an investigation by the Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine and was eventually retracted because of concerns raised regarding the accuracy and reliability of the study data.197”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197] 197. Statement of Retraction: Peri-conceptional progesterone treatment in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(6):1073:1073. source
- Premisecitation
Maternal age 25-29 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 1.06-1.09) for miscarriage.
“25-29 years 3,a OR 1.08 (1.06-1.09)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A significant proportion of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage may be healthy women with repeated sporadic miscarriages and no persisting pathology.
“although it has been recognised that a significant proportion of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage may be healthy women with repeated sporadic miscarriages and no persisting pathology.2,7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Maternal age ≥45 years is associated with an odds ratio of 30.38 (95% CI 25.66-35.97) for miscarriage.
“≥ 45 years 3,a OR 30.38 (25.66-35.97)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Paternal age 40-44 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.43) for miscarriage.
“40-44 years 18,a OR 1.23 (1.06-1.43)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 18,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Paternal age 35-39 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.15 (95% CI 0.92-1.43) for miscarriage.
“35-39 years 18,a OR 1.15 (0.92-1.43) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 18,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a questionnaire study, women with recurrent miscarriage preferred a plan with one doctor who shows understanding, takes them seriously, has knowledge of their obstetric history, listens to them, gives information about recurrent miscarriage, shows empathy, informs on progress and enquires about emotional needs.
“A questionnaire study in women with recurrent miscarriage reported that women preferred the following supportive care options for their next pregnancy: • A plan with one doctor who shows understanding, takes them seriously, has knowledge of their obstetric history, listens to them, gives information about recurrent miscarriage, shows empathy, informs on progress and enquires about emotional needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
- Premisecitation
Paternal age 30-34 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.04 (95% CI 0.90-1.21) for miscarriage.
“30-34 years 18,a OR 1.04 (0.90-1.21) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 18,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the PRISM trial, there were no significant differences in live births at more than 34 weeks between 400 mg micronised vaginal progesterone twice daily and placebo (relative rate 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07; P=0.08).
“The authors reported no significant differences in live births at more than 34 weeks (relative rate, 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.07;P = 0.08).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [202] 202. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Cheed V, Harb H, Middleton LJ, Gallos ID, et al. A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(19):1815-24. source
- Premisecitation
Maternal age 30-34 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.40 (95% CI 1.38-1.43) for miscarriage.
“30-34 years 3,a OR 1.40 (1.38-1.43)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a questionnaire study, if a miscarriage occurred, most women with recurrent miscarriage would prefer to talk to a medical or psychological professional afterwards.
“• If a miscarriage occurred, most women would prefer to talk to a medical or psychological professional afterwards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
- Premisecitation
Maternal age ≥40-44 years is associated with an odds ratio of 7.08 (95% CI 6.80-7.37) for miscarriage.
“≥ 40-44 years 3,a OR 7.08 (6.80-7.37)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Anti-TNF agents could potentially cause serious morbidity including lymphoma, granulomatous disease such as tuberculosis, demyelinating disease, congestive heart failure and syndromes similar to systemic lupus erythematosus.
“Further, anti-TNF agents could potentially cause serious morbidity including lymphoma, granulomatous disease such as tuberculosis, demyelinating disease, congestive heart failure and syndromes similar to systemic lupus erythematosus.204”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [204] 204. MedicinesComplete. British National Formulary (BNF) [https:// www.medic inesc omple te.com/ mc/bnf/current/]. Accessed 06 Apr 2023.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In the PRISM trial, subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage showed a significant improvement in live birth rate with progesterone (71.5% vs 57.4%; relative rate 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.51; P=0.007).
“However, on subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, a significant improvement in live birth rate was observed (71.5% versus 57.4%; relative rate, 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.51;P = 0.007).202”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [202] 202. Coomarasamy A, Devall AJ, Cheed V, Harb H, Middleton LJ, Gallos ID, et al. A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(19):1815-24. source
- Premisecitation
Maternal age 12-19 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.22 (95% CI 1.19-1.25) for miscarriage.
“Maternal age a 12-19 years 3,a OR 1.22 (1.19-1.25)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A Cochrane review found no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy with endometrial scratch/injury prior to intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.38-1.39; six RCTs, 174 participants; I2=0%).
“A Cochrane review assessing women undergoing endometrial scratch/injury prior to intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse found no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.38-1.39;six RCTs, 174 participants; I 2 statistic = 0%;).207”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [207] 207. Lensen SF, Manders M, Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Martins WP, Templer GE, Farquhar C. Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD011424. source
- Premisecitation
Maternal age 35-40 years is associated with an odds ratio of 2.52 (95% CI 2.46-2.57) for miscarriage.
“35-40 years 3,a OR 2.52 (2.46-2.57)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 3,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Paternal age ≥45 years is associated with an odds ratio of 1.43 (95% CI 1.13-1.81) for miscarriage.
“≥ 45 years 18,a OR 1.43 (1.13-1.81)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 18,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a questionnaire study, women with recurrent miscarriage preferred an ultrasound examination during symptoms, directly after a positive pregnancy test and every 2 weeks.
“• An ultrasound examination during symptoms, directly after a positive pregnancy test and every 2 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
- Premisecitation
High caffeine intake (350-699 mg/day) is associated with a relative risk of 1.40 (95% CI 1.16-1.68) for miscarriage.
“Caffeine high intake (350-699 mg/day) 27,a RR 1.40 (1.16-1.68)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 27,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Protein S deficiency is associated with an odds ratio of 14.72 (95% CI 0.99-218.1) for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).
“Protein S deficiency b OR *14.72 (0.99-218.1) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Previous euploid miscarriage is associated with an odds ratio of 2.62 (95% CI 1.29-5.32) for miscarriage.
“Previous euploid miscarriage 57,b OR 2.62 (1.29-5.32)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 57,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Having 1 previous miscarriage is associated with an odds ratio of 1.61 (95% CI 1.57-1.64) for miscarriage compared with none.
“1 19,a OR 1.61 (1.57-1.64)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 19,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Low caffeine intake (50-149 mg/day) is associated with a relative risk of 1.02 (95% CI 0.85-1.24) for miscarriage.
“Caffeine low intake (50-149 mg/day) 27,a RR 1.02 (0.85-1.24) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 27,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Black African race is associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI 1.12-1.29) for miscarriage compared with White European.
“Black African 22,a aOR 1.20 (1.12-1.29)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 22,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
BMI >25 kg/m2 is associated with an odds ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 1.06-1.38) for miscarriage.
“BMI > 25 kg/m 231,b OR 1.21 (1.06-1.38)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 31,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Prothrombin gene mutation is associated with an odds ratio of 1.81 (95% CI 1.26-2.60) for miscarriage.
“Prothrombin gene mutation b OR 1.81 (1.26-2.60)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Having 5 previous miscarriages is associated with an odds ratio of 7.02 (95% CI 6.11-8.08) for miscarriage compared with none.
“5 19,b OR 7.02 (6.11-8.08)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 19,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
IgG cardiolipin is associated with an odds ratio of 3.57 (95% CI 2.26-5.65) for miscarriage.
“IgG cardiolipin b OR 3.57 (2.26-5.65)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Having 4 previous miscarriages is associated with an odds ratio of 5.15 (95% CI 4.72-5.62) for miscarriage compared with none.
“4 19,b OR 5.15 (4.72-5.62)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 19,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Black Caribbean race is associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI 1.21-1.41) for miscarriage compared with White European.
“Black Caribbean 22,a aOR 1.31 (1.21-1.41)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 22,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Having 6 previous miscarriages is associated with an odds ratio of 13.84 (95% CI 11.00-17.41) for miscarriage compared with none.
“6 19,b OR 13.84 (11.00-17.41)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 19,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Moderate caffeine intake (150-349 mg/day) is associated with a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI 0.94-1.41) for miscarriage.
“Caffeine moderate intake (150-349 mg/day) 27,a RR 1.16 (0.94-1.41) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 27,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Congenital all anomalies are associated with a relative risk of 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.22) for miscarriage.
“All anomalies 62,b RR 1.13 (1.06-1.22)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Thyroid autoantibodies are associated with an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% CI 1.18-2.94) for miscarriage.
“Thyroid autoantibodies 88,b OR 1.86 (1.18-2.94)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 88,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Fibroids are associated with a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI 0.80-1.52) for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).
“Fibroids 67,a RR *1.16 (0.80-1.52) 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 67,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Parental chromosome rearrangements are associated with an odds ratio of 2.22 (95% CI 1.60-3.08) for miscarriage.
“Parental chromosome rearrangements 49,b OR 2.22 (1.60-3.08)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 49,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Sperm DNA fragmentation is associated with a relative risk of 2.28 (95% CI 1.55-3.35) for miscarriage.
“Sperm DNA fragmentation 127,a RR 2.28 (1.55-3.35)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 127,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Lupus anticoagulant is associated with an odds ratio of 7.79 (95% CI 2.30-26.4) for miscarriage.
“Lupus anticoagulant b OR 7.79 (2.30-26.4)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Smoking is associated with an odds ratio of 1.20 (95% CI 1.04-1.39) for miscarriage.
“Smoking 25,a OR 1.20 (1.04-1.39)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 25,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
BMI <19 kg/m2 is associated with an odds ratio of 1.2 (95% CI 1.12-1.28) for miscarriage.
“BMI < 19 kg/m 231,b OR 1.2 (1.12-1.28)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 31,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
IgM cardiolipin is associated with an odds ratio of 5.61 (95% CI 1.26-25.03) for miscarriage.
“IgM cardiolipin b OR 5.61 (1.26-25.03)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I is associated with an odds ratio of 2.12 (95% CI 0.69-6.53) for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).
“Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I b OR *2.12 (0.69-6.53) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Alcohol consumption is associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 2.0-6.8) for miscarriage.
“Alcohol 26,a aHR 3.7 (2.0-6.8)2+”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 26,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Having 2 or 3 previous miscarriages is associated with an odds ratio of 3.05 (95% CI 2.95-3.16) for miscarriage compared with none.
“2 or 3 19,b OR 3.05 (2.95-3.16)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 19,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
- May combine two claims. 66
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe age-related risk of miscarriage is: 12-19 years, 13%; 20-24 years, 11%; 25-29 years, 12%; 30-34 years, 15%; 35-39 years, 25%; 40-44 years, 51%; and 45 or more years, 93%.
“risk of miscarriage to be: 12-19 years, 13%; 20-24 years, 11%; 25-29 years, 12%; 30-34 years, 15%; 35-39 years, 25%; 40-44 years, 51%; and 45 or more years, 93%. 3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708-12. source
The Spontaneous abortion section gives all seven age-group estimates, and the cited percentages are accurate when rounded. But the paper presents them as estimates under the assumption that only 80% of women with abortions in recognised pregnancies were hospitalised; the citing sentence omits that condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of sporadic miscarriage increases with age and may affect between 10% and 50% of women aged 20 to 45 years.
“Its incidence increases with age and may affect between 10% and 50% of women aged 20 to 45 years respectively.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 3. Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ. 2000;320(7251):1708-12. source
The Abstract and Spontaneous abortion section support an increase in miscarriage risk with maternal age. They do not support the stated 10%–50% range across ages 20–45: the Abstract reports 8.9% at ages 20–24 and 74.7% at age 45 or older. The study reports risk per pregnancy, not the percentage of women affected; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA number of small studies have assessed dietary variables such as selenium, vitamin D and vitamin B12 specifically in the population with recurrent miscarriage, although no definitive or clinically altering conclusions can be drawn.
“A number of small studies have assessed dietary variables such as selenium, 33,34 vitamin D 35 and vitamin B12 36 specifically in the population with recurrent miscarriage, although no definitive or clinically altering conclusions can be drawn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [33] 33. Al-Kunani AS, Knight R, Haswell SJ, Thompson JW, Lindow SW. The selenium status of women with a history of recurrent miscar- riage. BJOG. 2001;108(10):1094-7. source
- cites [34] 34. Thomas VV, Knight R, Haswell SJ, Lindow SW, van der Spuy ZM. Maternal hair selenium levels as a possible long-term nutritional indicator of recurrent pregnancy loss. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:40. source
- cites [35] 35. Ota K, Dambaeva S, Han AR, Beaman K, Gilman-Sachs A, Kwak- Kim J. Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for recurrent preg- nancy losses by increasing cellular immunity and autoimmunity. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):208-19. source
- cites [36] 36. Creus M, Deulofeu R, Penarrubia J, Carmona F, Balasch J. Plasma homocysteine and vitamin B12 serum levels, red blood cell folate concentrations, C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation and risk of recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study in Spain. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(3):693-9. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a study by Franssen et al., parents with a balanced structural chromosome abnormality had a higher chance of a subsequent miscarriage compared with control couples (49% versus 30%; P < 0.01), although overall chances of having a healthy child were similar (83% versus 84%).
“In a study by Franssen et al., 49 although overall the chances of parents with a balanced structural chromosome abnormality having a healthy child was found to be 83%, which was similar to the control couples (84%), the former had a higher chance of a subsequent miscarriage compared with the latter group (49% versus 30%; P < 0.01)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a low risk of parents with balanced translocations having a pregnancy with an unbalanced karyotype surviving into the second trimester (0.8%) or a disabled child born with an unbalanced chromosome abnormality (0.02%).
“Studies, however, have reported a low risk of parents with balanced translocations having a pregnancy with an unbalanced karyotype surviving into the second trimester (0.8%) or a disabled child born with an unbalanced chromosome abnormality (0.02%).49,50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source
The Implications section (page unavailable) reports a low risk in carrier couples after recurrent miscarriage: 0.4% of pregnancies had an unbalanced karyotype detected prenatally and were terminated, and 0.4% resulted in severely handicapped children being born. Together these total 0.8%, but the paper does not describe that figure as the risk of survival into the second trimester; it reports 0.4%, not 0.02%, for affected children born. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] 50. Barber JC, Cockwell AE, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG. 2010;117(7):885-8. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMiscarriage rates for parents with reciprocal translocations, inversions, Robertsonian translocations, and other types of chromosomal anomalies have been shown to be 54%, 49%, 34% and 27% respectively.
“miscarriage rates for parents with reciprocal translocations, inversions, Robertsonian translocations, and other types of chromosomal anomalies have been shown to be 54%, 49%, 34% and 27% respectively.49”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] 49. Franssen MT, Korevaar JC, van der Veen F, Leschot NJ, Bossuyt PM, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):759-63. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChromosome anomalies of the pregnancy are the commonest cause of both sporadic miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage.
“Chromosome anomalies of the pregnancy are the commonest cause of both sporadic miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] 52. Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang W, Wu X, Yang Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11:44. source
The Background calls chromosomal abnormalities of the embryo or fetus “one of the major” causes of miscarriage. It does not say they are the commonest cause, or establish that ranking separately for sporadic and recurrent miscarriage. The Discussion describes miscarriage as multifactorial and reports no difference in genetic-abnormality rates across groups with different adverse-pregnancy histories. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with arcuate (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06-3.69), septate (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.51-5.77) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.56-5.41) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage versus controls.
“However, women with arcuate (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.06-3.69;five studies), septate (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.51-5.77;five studies) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.56-5.41;four studies) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic second trimester miscarriage versus controls.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source
The Second-trimester spontaneous abortion section reports exactly the three relative risks, confidence intervals and study counts cited, with statistically significant increases versus controls. It measures spontaneous abortion, however, not specifically sporadic miscarriage; Table 2 includes a subgroup of women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with septate (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39-5.06) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.05-5.13) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage versus normal controls.
“However, women with septate (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.39-5.06;six studies) and bicornuate uteri (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.05-5.13;four studies) had a significantly increased risk of sporadic first trimester miscarriage versus normal controls.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, Gordts S, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anoma- lies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(6):665-83. source
The First-trimester spontaneous abortion section reports the cited RRs and confidence intervals for septated and bicornuate uteri versus controls. It does not identify those estimates as specific to sporadic miscarriages; its population subgroup analysis also includes women with recurrent spontaneous abortions. The restriction to sporadic miscarriage is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of congenital uterine anomalies is 5.5% (95% CI 3.5-8.5%) in unselected women, 8.0% (95% CI 5.3-12%) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI 8.9-20.0%) in women with recurrent miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI 18.3-32.8) in women with infertility and miscarriage.
“A systematic review and meta-analysis has estimated the prevalence to be 5.5% (95% CI 3.5-8.5%) in unselected women, 8.0% (95% CI 5.3-12%) in infertile women, 13.3% (95% CI 8.9-20.0%) in women with recurrent miscarriage and 24.5% (95% CI 18.3-32.8)in women with infertility and miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] 61. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anom- alies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761-71. source
The Results (‘All uterine anomalies’; page unavailable) give all four prevalence estimates and confidence intervals as quoted. However, the 13.3% estimate is for women with a history of miscarriage, not specifically recurrent miscarriage. The Discussion (‘Women with miscarriage’; page unavailable) says studies varied in the number of prior miscarriages, although most investigated women with two or more. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe significance of increased peripheral NK cells remains debatable, as they do not appear to reflect the levels in the endometrium, show intracycle, hormonal and ethnic variability, and appear not to predict subsequent miscarriage in a population of women with recurrent miscarriage.
“However, the significance of increased peripheral NK cells remains debatable, 101 as they do not appear to reflect the levels in the endometrium, 102 show an intracycle, hormonal and ethnic variability, 103 and appear not to predict subsequent miscarriage in a population of women with recurrent miscarriage.104”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [101] 101. Vomstein K, Feil K, Strobel L, Aulitzky A, Hofer-Tollinger S, Kuon RJ, et al. Immunological Risk Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guidelines Versus Current State of the Art. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):869. source
- cites [102] 102. Laird SM, Mariee N, Wei L, Li TC. Measurements of CD56+ cells in peripheral blood and endometrium by f low cytome- try and immunohistochemical staining in situ. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1331-7. source
- cites [103] 103. Wang Q, Li TC, Wu YP, Cocksedge KA, Fu YS, Kong QY, et al. Reappraisal of peripheral NK cells in women with recurrent mis- carriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(6):814-9. source
- cites [104] 104. Katano K, Suzuki S, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N, Kitaori T, Sugiura- Ogasawara M. Peripheral natural killer cell activity as a predic- tor of recurrent pregnancy loss: a large cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1629-34. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA previous cervical cone biopsy or an ultrasonographically short cervix appear to significantly predispose to second trimester miscarriage.
“a previous cervical cone biopsy 78 or an ultrasonographically short cervix 79 appear to significantly predispose to second trimester miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [78] 78. Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Mitra A, Kalliala I, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treat- ment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633. source
The citation is attached to the previous-cone-biopsy part of the sentence, not the short-cervix part. The Methods (Inclusion criteria and outcomes; page unavailable) say the review assessed pregnancies progressing beyond 24 weeks, and the Results (Maternal outcomes; page unavailable) report increased preterm birth after cervical treatment. Neither establishes a significant increase in second-trimester miscarriage; searches for “second trimester” and “miscarriage” found no such result in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [79] 79. Gilner J, Biggio J. Management of Short Cervix during Pregnancy: A Review. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(3):245-52. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with diabetes who have high haemoglobin A1c levels in the first trimester are at risk of miscarriage and fetal malformation.
“Women with diabetes who have high haemoglobin A1c levels in the first trimester are at risk of miscarriage and fetal malformation.80”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] 80. Hanson U, Persson B, Thunell S. Relationship between haemoglo- bin A1C in early type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic pregnancy and the occurrence of spontaneous abortion and fetal malformation in Sweden. Diabetologia. 1990;33(2):100-4. source
The Abstract and the section ‘HbA1c in relation to occurrence of spontaneous abortion or malformation’ associate very elevated early-pregnancy HbA1c (at least 10.1%) with both outcomes. The study examined women with Type 1 diabetes, so it does not establish the claim for women with diabetes generally or for any level described simply as ‘high.’ (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe prevalence of insulin resistance and abnormal glucose tolerance test appears to be increased in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.
“The prevalence of insulin resistance 91 and abnormal glucose tolerance test 92 appears to be increased in women with recurrent miscarriage compared with controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [91] 91. Craig LB, Ke RW, Kutteh WH. Increased prevalence of insulin re- sistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(3):487-90. source
- cites [92] 92. Zolghadri J, Tavana Z, Kazerooni T, Soveid M, Taghieh M. Relationship between abnormal glucose tolerance test and history of previous recurrent miscarriages, and beneficial effect of met- formin in these patients: a prospective clinical study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):727-30. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the same case-control trial, the time to pregnancy was similar in both groups, but they reported a reduction in miscarriage rates with PGD and a significant financial burden of US$7956 per patient.
“The time to pregnancy was similar in both groups, however they reported a reduction in miscarriage rates with PGD and of course a significant financial burden of US$7956 per patient.182”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] 182. Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takeda S. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Natural Conception: A Comparison of Live Birth Rates in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with Translocation. PloS one. 2015;10(6):e0129958. 183. 104. Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, Alfaraj S, AbdelHafez FF, Abdellah AH, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to struc- tural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677-85. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe cohort study of Bernardi et al. (2013) in women with two or more miscarriages found no statistically significant difference in the subsequent live birth rate when comparing women with SCH versus euthyroid women, or treated and untreated women with SCH.
“However, in terms of studies in the recurrent miscarriage population, the cohort study of Bernardi et al. (2013) in women with two or more miscarriages, found no statistically significant difference in the subsequent live birth rate when comparing women with SCH versus euthyroid women, or treated and untreated women with SCH.85”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] 85. Bernardi LA, Cohen RN, Stephenson MD. Impact of subclinical hy- pothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1326-31. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe RCT of hysteroscopic septum resection had limitations including broad inclusion criteria and low number of subjects recruited (n = 80), despite long duration and multiple participating sites.
“These include the broad inclusion criteria and the low number of subjects recruited (n = 80), despite the long duration of the trial (almost 8 years) and multiple participating sites (10 centres).187”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] 187. Adewole AA, Kalu E, Okohue JE, Alabi CO, Ola B. Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(9):2626-7. source
In “Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data” (page unavailable), the authors criticize the broad inclusion of patients and the small sample of 80. They describe recruitment as taking about 10 years, rather than almost 8, and identify the trial as multicentre without specifying 10 centres. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review of non-RCTs found the live birth rates to be similar between expectant management groups and PGT-A groups, with a trend for lower miscarriage rates in the latter.
“A systematic review of non-RCTs found the live birth rates to be similar between expectant management groups and PGT-A groups, with a trend for lower miscarriage rates in the latter.However, it is worth noting that all studies performed embryo biopsy on day 3 of development.184”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] 184. Musters AM, Repping S, Korevaar JC, Mastenbroek S, Limpens J, van der Veen F, et al. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation ge- netic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evi- dence. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2153-7 e3. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of second trimester miscarriage is approximately 1%, and random fetal chromosomal anomalies are significantly lower in such cases.
“A similar incidence of approximately 1% is also the case for women experiencing a second trimester miscarriage, where random fetal chromosomal anomalies are significantly lower.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] 6. Wyatt PR, Owolabi T, Meier C, Huang T. Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):240-6. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecurrent miscarriage has traditionally been defined as three or more miscarriages and affects approximately 1% of women.
“By contrast, recurrent miscarriage has traditionally been defined as three or more miscarriages affecting approximately only 1% of women.4,5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies showed a trend towards a positive association with recurrent miscarriage, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.69-6.53).
“Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I antibodies showed a trend towards a positive association, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.69-6.53)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. Opatrny L, David M, Kahn SR, Shrier I, Rey E. Association be- tween antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent fetal loss in women without autoimmune disease: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2214-21.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMTHFR mutation (heterozygous and homozygous) has been found to have a significant association with recurrent miscarriage in one meta-analysis from China, but other meta-analyses did not find an association and advise against testing for this mutation.
“Methylenetatrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation (heterozygous and homozygous) has been found to have a significant association with recurrent miscarriage in one meta-analysis from China.46 However other metaanalyses did not find an association and advise against testing for this mutation.41,47”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [46] 46. Chen H, Yang X, Lu M. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(2):283-90. source
- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [47] 47. Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med. 2013;15(2):153-6. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of aneuploidy in recurrent miscarriage was found to be approximately 40% (40.4%; 95% CI 25.2-55.7%), suggesting that non-genetic factors may play a more important role in recurrent miscarriage.
“The incidence of aneuploidy in recurrent miscarriage was found to be approximately 40% (40.4%; 95% CI 25.2-55.7%),suggesting that non-genetic factors may play a more important role in recurrent miscarriage.53”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] 53. Zhang T, Sun Y, Chen Z, Li T. Traditional and molecular chromo- somal abnormality analysis of products of conception in sponta- neous and recurrent miscarriage. BJOG. 2018;125(4):414-20. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProtein S deficiency has not demonstrated a consistent association with recurrent first trimester miscarriage, but has shown an association with second trimester.
“Protein S deficiency has not demonstrated a consistent association with recurrent first trimester miscarriage, but has shown an association with second trimester.41,44,45”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
- cites [44] 44. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):913-6. source
- cites [45] 45. Alfirevic Z, Roberts D, Martlew V. How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy out- come? A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;101(1):6-14. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of parental chromosomal rearrangements appears to be associated with recurrent miscarriage, with a translocation present in 2.2% of parents after one miscarriage, 4.8% after two miscarriages, and 5.7% after three miscarriages.
“The incidence of parental chromosomal rearrangements appears to be associated with recurrent miscarriage, with one large database study estimating that a translocation is present in 2.2% of parents after one miscarriage, 4.8% after two miscarriages, and 5.7% after three miscarriages.48”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 48. De Braekeleer M, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experi- encing repeated pregnancy losses. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(5):519-28. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAntithrombin deficiency is the rarer yet most thrombogenic mutation; the EPCOT study found only a possible association with sporadic miscarriage while a subsequent meta-analysis did not.
“Antithrombin deficiency is the rarer yet most thrombogenic mutation; however, the European prospective cohort study on thrombophilia (EPCOT) found only a possible association with sporadic miscarriage 44 while a subsequent meta-analysis did not.41”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] 44. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, Briet E, Berntorp E, Conard J, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):913-6. source
- cites [41] 41. Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003;361(9361):901-8. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with intramural/subserosal myomas did not undergo surgery and experienced similar live birth rate compared with the unexplained recurrent miscarriage group in the subsequent pregnancy.
“In the same study, women with intramural/subserosal myomas did not undergo surgery and experienced similar live birth rate compared with the unexplained recurrent miscarriage group in the subsequent pregnancy.70”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe higher the number of euploid miscarriages, the higher the chance of a subsequent miscarriage, presumably owing to a higher chance of a persistent maternal pathology rather than a sporadic aneuploidy.
“Studies have shown that the higher the number of euploid miscarriages, the higher the chance of a subsequent miscarriage, 57 presumably owing to the higher chance of a persistent maternal pathology rather than a sporadic aneuploidy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] 57. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):300-4. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with submucosal myomas undergoing resection had a significant reduction in second trimester miscarriage rates (21.7% to 0%; P < 0.01), although there was a lack of a case-control group.
“Women with submucosal myomas undergoing resection had a significant reduction in second trimester miscarriage rates (21.7% to 0%; P < 0.01), although there was a lack of a case-control group to compare what the outcome would have been if women with submucosal myomas had not undergone resection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] 70. Saravelos SH, Yan J, Rehmani H, Li TC. The prevalence and impact of fibroids and their treatment on the outcome of pregnancy in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12):3274-9. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe incidence of intrauterine adhesions increases with the number of previous miscarriages experienced (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-3.00) and the number of previous dilatation and curettage procedures (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.35-3.12).
“A systematic review and meta-analysis has demonstrated that the incidence of intrauterine adhesions increases with the number of previous miscarriages experienced (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-3.00;seven studies) and the number of previous dilatation and curettage procedures (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.35-3.12;seven studies).73”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] 73. Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Opmeer BC, Brolmann HA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk fac- tors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):262-78. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWell-controlled diabetes mellitus is not a risk factor for recurrent miscarriage, nor is treated thyroid dysfunction.
“However, well-controlled diabetes mellitus is not a risk factor for recurrent miscarriage, nor is treated thyroid dysfunction.81,82”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [81] 81. Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Van Allen M, Aarons JH, et al. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among nor- mal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose preg- nancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(25):1617-23. source
- cites [82] 82. Abalovich M, Gutierrez S, Alcaraz G, Maccallini G, Garcia A, Levalle O. Overt and subclinical hypothyroidism complicating pregnancy. Thyroid. 2002;12(1):63-8. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore recent meta-analyses have shown an association between some cytokine gene promoter polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage but not for others.
“More recent meta-analyses have shown an association between some cytokine gene promoter polymorphisms and recurrent miscarriage but not for others.99”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] 99. Su D, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Wang J, Jiao B, Wang G, et al. Association of interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms with recurrent mis- carriage: a meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;76(2):172-80. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen with recurrent miscarriage versus controls had higher peripheral NK cell percentages (SMD 1.36; 95% CI 0.04-2.69; P = 0.04) and higher peripheral NK cell numbers (SMD 0.81; 95% CI 0.47-1.16; P < 0.00001).
“A meta-analysis of studies found that women with recurrent miscarriage versus controls had higher peripheral NK cell percentages (standardised mean difference [SMD] 1.36; 95% CI 0.04-2.69;P = 0.04) and higher peripheral NK cell numbers (SMD 0.81; 95% CI 0.47-1.16;P < 0.00001).100”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] 100. Seshadri S, Sunkara SK. Natural killer cells in female infertility and recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):429-38. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been linked to an increased risk of miscarriage but the exact mechanism remains unclear.
“Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been linked to an increased risk of miscarriage but the exact mechanism remains unclear.89”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] 89. Cocksedge KA, Li TC, Saravelos SH, Metwally M. A reappraisal of the role of polycystic ovary syndrome in recurrent miscarriage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(1):151-60. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe authors of the HLA meta-analysis suggested that no consistent conclusions can be drawn since the observed ORs were relatively small and there was a high risk of selection and information bias present in the studies available.
“However, although associations between specific HLA alleles and HLA sharing with recurrent miscarriage were identified, the authors suggested that no consistent conclusions can be drawn since the observed ORs were relatively small and there was a high risk of selection and information bias present in the studies available.96”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] 96. Meuleman T, Lashley LE, Dekkers OM, van Lith JM, Claas FH, Bloemenkamp KW. HLA associations and HLA sharing in recur- rent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Immunol. 2015;76(5):362-73. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChronic endometritis has been implicated in recurrent miscarriage, although the diagnostic criteria remain controversial.
“Chronic endometritis has also been implicated in recurrent miscarriage, although the diagnostic criteria remain controversial.116”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] 116. Bouet PE, El Hachem H, Monceau E, Gariepy G, Kadoch IJ, Sylvestre C. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure: prevalence and role of office hysteroscopy and immunohistochemistry in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):106-10. source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFor an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.
“For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA retrospective audit of four UK centres over periods of 5-30 years reported that balanced translocations were found in 1.9% (406 out of 20 432) of parents with recurrent miscarriage, but only four unbalanced translocations were found after referral for prenatal diagnosis because of balanced parental translocation ascertained for recurrent miscarriage.
“A retrospective audit of four UK centres over periods of 5-30 years, reported that balanced translocations were found in 1.9% (406 out of 20 432) of parents with recurrent miscarriage, but only four unbalanced translocations were found after referral for prenatal diagnosis because of balanced parental translocation ascertained for recurrent miscarriage.50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] 50. Barber JC, Cockwell AE, Grant E, Williams S, Dunn R, Ogilvie CM. Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost? BJOG. 2010;117(7):885-8. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChen et al. established a control reference range from fertile women and found that women with recurrent miscarriage did have significant increase of uterine NK cell density in precisely timed endometrial specimens.
“based on which Chen et al. established a control reference range from fertile women and found that women with recurrent miscarriage did have significant increase of uterine NK cell density in precisely timed endometrial specimens.109”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] 109. Chen X, Mariee N, Jiang L, Liu Y, Wang CC, Li TC, et al. Measurement of uterine natural killer cell percentage in the periim- plantation endometrium from fertile women and women with re- current reproductive failure: establishment of a reference range. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):680:e1-6. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment showed a significant increase in miscarriage where high sperm DNA damage was identified compared with those with low DNA damage (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.54-3.03, P < 0.00001), and this was confirmed in a meta-analysis 2 years later.
“A meta-analysis in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment showed a significant increase in miscarriage where high sperm DNA damage was identified compared with those with low DNA damage (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.54-3.03,P < 0.00001).126”
- Also stated in: § [Evidence level 2+] · plain
“This was confirmed in a meta-analysis 2 years later.127”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [126] 126. Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, Rajkhowa M, Miller D, Lewis S, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(10):2908-17. source
- cites [127] 127. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):998-1005 e8. source
- Also stated in: § [Evidence level 2+] · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRetrospective studies have shown that blanket testing for parental karyotyping reveals an abnormality in less than 2%, while genetic analysis of pregnancy tissue may point towards the diagnosis.
“Retrospective studies have shown that blanket testing for parental karyotyping reveals an abnormality in less than 2%, while genetic analysis of pregnancy tissue may point towards the diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHeparin does not cross the placenta and hence there is no potential to cause fetal haemorrhage or teratogenicity.
“Heparin does not cross the placenta and hence there is no potential to cause fetal haemorrhage or teratogenicity.170”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLMWH is as safe as UFH with potential advantages during pregnancy, since they cause less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, can be administered once daily, and are associated with a lower risk of heparin-induced osteoporosis.
“LMWH is as safe as UFH with potential advantages during pregnancy, since they cause less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, can be administered once daily, and are associated with a lower risk of heparin-induced osteoporosis.173”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] 173. Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C. Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood. 2005;106(2):401-7. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningThere are concerns of potential over-diagnosis and treatment of septate uteri by using the ESHRE-ESGE classification.
“Although there are concerns of potential over-diagnosis and treatment of septate uteri by using the ESHRE-ESGE classification, there are still a lack of prospective data to determine the use of which classification would lead to the most favourable reproductive outcomes (i.e. increase in live birth rate).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenUFH can be associated with maternal complications including bleeding, hypersensitivity reactions, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and when used long term, osteopenia and vertebral fractures.
“UFH can, however, be associated with maternal complications including bleeding, hypersensitivity reactions, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and when used long term, osteopenia and vertebral fractures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeta-analyses have shown that aspirin and/or heparin does not improve outcomes in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and may be associated with adverse effects.
“Meta-analyses have shown it does not improve outcomes and may be associated with adverse effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSubgroup meta-analysis of RCTs do not show a consistent benefit of treatment in women with inherited thrombophilia, however the subgroups were underpowered for firm conclusions.
“There is a lack of evidence to support routine treatment for women with Factor V Leiden, protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation to reduce the incidence of recurrent miscarriage or second trimester loss.2-C Subgroup metaanalysis of RCTs do not show a consistent benefit of treatment in women with inherited thrombophilia, however the subgroups were underpowered for firm conclusions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis has shown that aspirin and/or LMWH does not increase the live birth rate in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage and may be associated with adverse effects.
“It should be noted that a meta-analysis has shown that aspirin and/or LMWH does not increase the live birth rate in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, may be associated with adverse effects and should therefore not be used.176”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] 176. de Jong PG, Kaandorp S, Di Nisio M, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD004734. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNo statistically significant differences were found in preterm birth (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66), neonatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.44-7.34), and fetal genital anomalies (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.22-12.62) in the same meta-analysis.
“No statistically significant differences were found in the other secondary outcomes, including preterm birth (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66),neonatal mortality (RR 1.80, 95% CI 0.44-7.34),and fetal genital anomalies (RR 1.68, 95% CI 0.22-12.62).195”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] 195. Saccone G, Schoen C, Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr, Berghella V. Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of preg- nancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):430-8 e3. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn intention to treat retrospective analysis involving 112 couples choosing PGT-A and 188 couples choosing expectant management found the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate to be similar between the two groups.
“An intention to treat retrospective analysis involving 112 couples choosing PGT-A and 188 couples choosing expectant management found the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate to be similar between the two groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] 185. Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with re- current pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1668-74. source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThere is a lack of consistently demonstrable benefit when progestogen supplementation is used routinely in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and there remains uncertainty about the optimal specific drug, route, timing and dose.
“However, there is a lack of consistently demonstrable benefit when used routinely in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, and there remains uncertainty about the optimal specific drug, route, timing and dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationObservational studies have not demonstrated improved outcomes with PGT-A to date, both in terms of live birth rate and time to pregnancy interval.
“There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk.2-C Observational studies have not demonstrated improved outcomes to date, both in terms of live birth rate and time to pregnancy interval.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe PRISM trial reported no significant differences in live births in women presenting with bleeding in early pregnancy and receiving progesterone supplementation; however, in the subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, a significant improvement in live birth rate was observed.
“The PRISM trial reported no significant differences in live births in women presenting with bleeding in early pregnancy and receiving progesterone supplementation; however, in the subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage, a significant improvement in live birth rate was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review of non-RCTs reported similar live birth rates, time to conception rates and even miscarriage rates between natural conception and PGT-SR groups.
“A systematic review of non-RCTs reported similar live birth rates, time to conception rates and even miscarriage rates between natural conception and PGT-SR groups.183”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe PROMISE trial, the largest multicentre RCT to date, which was adequately powered and with a very low risk of bias, showed that routine progesterone supplementation did not improve the outcome.
“The PROMISE trial, the largest multicentre RCT to date, which was adequately powered and with a very low risk of bias, showed that routine progesterone supplementation did not improve the outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThere is limited evidence regarding both the association and treatment of acquired uterine anomalies in women and people with recurrent miscarriage.
“There is limited evidence regarding both the association and treatment of acquired uterine anomalies in women and people with recurrent miscarriage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA systematic review and meta-analysis of ten RCTs of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage receiving progesterone versus placebo or no treatment showed a lower risk of miscarriage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97) and higher live birth rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.15).
“A systematic review and meta-analysis of ten RCTs of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage receiving progesterone versus placebo or no treatment showed a lower risk of miscarriage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97)and higher live birth rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.15)respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] 195. Saccone G, Schoen C, Franasiak JM, Scott RT Jr, Berghella V. Supplementation with progestogens in the first trimester of preg- nancy to prevent miscarriage in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):430-8 e3. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the same retrospective analysis, the median time to pregnancy was 6.5 months in the PGT-A group and 3.0 months in the expectant management group.
“The median time to pregnancy was 6.5 months in the PGT-A group and 3.0 months in the expectant management group.Although the study is limited by its retrospective non-randomised nature, the embryo biopsies were performed on day 5 of development, which better reflects routine practice today.185”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] 185. Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with re- current pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1668-74. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the trial by Kumar et al., a miscarriage rate of only 3.5% was observed in the control group, reflecting a potential selection bias.
“Consequently, in their healthy control group a miscarriage rate of only 3.5% was observed, reflecting a potential selection bias.200”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [200] 200. Kumar A, Begum N, Prasad S, Aggarwal S, Sharma S. Oral dydro- gesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1357-63 e3. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSignificant differences in miscarriage outcomes were observed in the Kumar et al. trial but not in the PROMISE trial.
“Significant differences were observed in the former trial but not in the latter trial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [200] 200. Kumar A, Begum N, Prasad S, Aggarwal S, Sharma S. Oral dydro- gesterone treatment during early pregnancy to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss and its role in modulation of cytokine production: a double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1357-63 e3. source
- cites [201] 201. Coomarasamy A, Williams H, Truchanowicz E, Seed PT, Small R, Quenby S, et al. PROMISE: first-trimester progesterone therapy in women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriages -a ran- domised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicentre trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(41):1-92. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the questionnaire study, ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.
“Ethnicity, parity and pregnancy at the time of the survey were associated with different preferences, but female age, education level and time passed since the last miscarriage were not.211”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a questionnaire study, the majority of women with recurrent miscarriage expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and a low preference for bereavement therapy.
“• The majority of women expressed a low preference for admission to a hospital ward at the same gestational age as previous miscarriages and a low preference for bereavement therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [211] 211. Musters AM, Koot YE, van den Boogaard NM, Kaaijk E, Macklon NS, van der Veen F, et al. Supportive care for women with recur- rent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):398-405. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBicornuate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 2.32 (95% CI 1.05-5.13) in the first trimester and 2.90 (95% CI 1.56-5.41) in the second trimester for miscarriage.
“Bicornuate 62,a RR 1st trimester: 2.32 (1.05-5.13)2nd trimester: 2.90 (1.56-5.41)2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFactor V Leiden is associated with an odds ratio of 2.01 (95% CI 1.13-3.58) in the first trimester and 7.83 (95% CI 2.83-21.67) in the second trimester for miscarriage.
“Factor V Leiden b OR 1 st trimester: 2.01 (1.13-3.58) 2 nd trimester: 7.83 (2.83-21.67)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnicornate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.38 (95% CI 0.83-2.28) in the first trimester and 2.27 (95% CI 0.64-7.96) in the second trimester for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).
“Unicornate 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.38 (0.83-2.28) *2nd trimester: 2.27 (0.64-7.96) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDidelphis uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.13 (95% CI 0.45-2.86) in the first trimester and 1.71 (95% CI 0.63-4.59) in the second trimester for miscarriage (not reaching statistical significance).
“Didelphis 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.13 (0.45-2.86) *2nd trimester: 1.71 (0.63-4.59) 2++”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArcuate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 1.22 (95% CI 0.87-1.72) in the first trimester and 1.98 (95% CI 1.06-3.69) in the second trimester for miscarriage.
“Arcuate 62,a RR *1st trimester: 1.22 (0.87-1.72) 2nd trimester: 1.98 (1.06-3.69)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeptate uterus is associated with a relative risk of 2.65 (95% CI 1.39-5.06) in the first trimester and 2.95 (95% CI 1.51-5.77) in the second trimester for miscarriage.
“Septate 62,a RR 1st trimester: 2.65 (1.39-5.06)2nd trimester: 2.95 (1.51-5.77)2++”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 62,a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
“There are currently insufficient data to support the routine use of PGT-A for couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage, while the treatment may carry a significant cost and potential risk.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The women are age adjusted when comparing prognosis after aneuploid versus euploid miscarriage.
“This is assuming that the women are age adjusted, as an older woman with an aneuploid loss may still have a worse prognosis compared with a younger woman with a euploid loss.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The mechanism linking inherited thrombophilias to recurrent miscarriage is thrombosis of the uteroplacental circulation.
“with the presumed mechanism being thrombosis of the uteroplacental circulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The true incidence of cervical insufficiency is unknown because the diagnosis is clinical.
“The true incidence of cervical insufficiency remains unknown, since the diagnosis is clinical.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is currently no satisfactory objective test that can identify women with cervical insufficiency in the non-pregnant state.
“There is currently no satisfactory objective test that can identify women with cervical insufficiency in the non-pregnant state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no data specifically examining the effect of polyps on sporadic or recurrent miscarriage.
“There are no data to our knowledge specifically examining the effect of polyps on sporadic or recurrent miscarriage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.
“For an infective agent to be implicated in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, it must be capable of persisting in the genital tract and avoiding detection or must cause insufficient symptoms to disturb the woman.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Immunotherapy is expensive and has potentially serious adverse effects including transfusion reaction, anaphylactic shock and hepatitis.
“Moreover, immunotherapy is expensive and has potentially serious adverse effects including transfusion reaction, anaphylactic shock and hepatitis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no published data on the use of anti-TNF agents to improve pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage.
“There are no published data on the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents to improve pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent miscarriage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a lack of studies examining relevant interventions for male factors.
“There is a lack of studies examining relevant interventions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no evidence regarding women with recurrent miscarriage on endometrial scratch.
“There is no evidence regarding women with recurrent miscarriage and therefore by extrapolation of the data above endometrial scratch should not be recommended for women and people with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The value of psychological support in improving pregnancy outcome has not been tested in the form of an RCT.
“The value of psychological support in improving pregnancy outcome has not been tested in the form of an RCT.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A proportion of women will experience further miscarriage(s) following referral.
“A proportion of women will experience further miscarriage(s) following referral.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A significant proportion of cases of recurrent miscarriage remain unexplained, despite detailed investigation.
“A significant proportion of cases of recurrent miscarriage remain unexplained, despite detailed investigation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no evidence to recommend treatments for male factors.
“There is no evidence to recommend treatments for male factors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, there is a paucity of studies available evaluating interventions that may improve the outcome of couples with recurrent miscarriage, in particular through reducing sperm DNA fragmentation, which has been implicated in miscarriage.
“To date, there is a paucity of studies available evaluating interventions that may improve the outcome of couples with recurrent miscarriage, in particular through reducing sperm DNA fragmentation, which has been implicated in miscarriage.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Chromosomal-anomaly percentage does not match its fraction
MajorThe stated numerator and denominator give 46.3%, not 59.4%. This changes the reported anomaly rate used to support the comparison with earlier studies.
Reported 59.4 · recomputed 46.295521
“up to 59.4% (1106/2389)”
Balanced-translocation percentage does not match its count
MinorThe reported count is 1.99% of the stated total, which rounds to 2.0%, not 1.9%.
Reported 1.9 · recomputed 1.987079
“balanced translocations were found in 1.9% (406 out of 20 432) of parents with recurrent miscarriage”
Conflicting accounts of the TABLET recurrent-miscarriage subgroup
MinorOne passage says there were insufficient data to analyse women with recurrent miscarriage as a subgroup; another says that subgroup analysis was performed and found no difference.
“There were insufficient data to perform a subgroup analysis for women with recurrent miscarriage but the ongoing 'T4-Life' study (RCT) will examine this group.”
“found no difference between the two groups, including subgroup analysis of women with recurrent miscarriage.”
Cited works that were retracted
Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.
Cites a retracted work: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251
MajorThe cited work was retracted on 2023-02-28 (notice 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.001), before this paper was published (2023-06-19). Its authors could have known.
Cited work 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251 · retracted 2023-02-28 · notice 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.001 · this paper published 2023-06-19
“10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251”
Cites a retracted work: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527
InfoThe cited work was retracted; the date of the notice is not on record.
Cited work 10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527 · retraction date not known · this paper published 2023-06-19
“2020, Statement of Retraction: Peri‐conceptional progesterone treatment in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 33, 1073, 10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527”
Cites
2 retracted
Kumar, A., Begum, N., Prasad, S., Aggarwal, S., & Sharma, S. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1251 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Retracted(2020) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1703527 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
RetractedMIYAKIS, S., LOCKSHIN, M. D., ATSUMI, T., BRANCH, D. W., BREY, R. L., CERVERA, R., DERKSEN, R. H. W. M., DE GROOT, P. G., KOIKE, T., MERONI, P. L., et al. (2006) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x · Cited by 7,203 · see citing works
Wegmann, T. G., Lin, H., Guilbert, L., & Mosmann, T. R. (1993) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/0167-5699(93)90235-d · Cited by 2,852 · see citing works
Alexander, E. K., Pearce, E. N., Brent, G. A., Brown, R. S., Chen, H., Dosiou, C., Grobman, W. A., Laurberg, P., Lazarus, J. H., Mandel, S. J., et al. (2017) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2016.0457 · Cited by 2,731 · see citing works
The American Fertility Society (1988) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7 · Cited by 1,847 · see citing works
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study
Andersen, A.-M. N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 · Cited by 1,690 · see citing works
Quenby, S., Gallos, I. D., Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Podesek, M., Stephenson, M. D., Fisher, J., Brosens, J. J., Brewin, J., Ramhorst, R., Lucas, E. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00682-6 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion
(2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Self-citationAntiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications
Duley, L., Henderson-Smart, D. J., Meher, S., & King, J. F. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004659.pub2 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss
The ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender-Atik, R., Christiansen, O. B., Elson, J., Kolte, A. M., Lewis, S. E. M., Middeldorp, S., Nelen, W. L. D. M., Peramo, B., Quenby, S. M., et al. (2018) · Human Reproduction Open · doi:10.1093/hropen/hoy004 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence
Pritts, E. A., Parker, W. H., & Olive, D. L. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Asherman syndrome—one century later
Yu, D., Wong, Y.-M., Cheong, Y., Xia, E., & Li, T.-C. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Self-citationThe ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
Grimbizis, G. F., Gordts, S., Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Brucker, S., De Angelis, C., Gergolet, M., Li, T.-C., Tanos, V., Brolmann, H., Gianaroli, L., et al. (2013) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det098 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Self-citationThrombophilic disorders and fetal loss: a meta-analysis
Rey, E., Kahn, S. R., David, M., & Shrier, I. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12771-7 · Cited by 872 · see citing works
Greer, I. A., & Nelson-Piercy, C. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-02-0626 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Chan, Y. Y., Jayaprakasan, K., Zamora, J., Thornton, J. G., Raine-Fenning, N., & Coomarasamy, A. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr028 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Overt and Subclinical Hypothyroidism Complicating Pregnancy
Abalovich, M., Gutierrez, S., Alcaraz, G., Maccallini, G., Garcia, A., & Levalle, O. (2002) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/105072502753451986 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Saravelos, S. H., Cocksedge, K. A., & Li, T.-C. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn018 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Self-citationIncreased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia
Preston, F., Rosendaal, F., Walker, I., Briët, E., Berntorp, E., Conard, J., Fontcuberta, J., Makris, M., Mariani, G., Noteboom, W., et al. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)04125-6 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Hay, P. E., Lamont, R. F., Taylor-Robinson, D., Morgan, D. J., Ison, C., & Pearson, J. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6924.295 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Robinson, L., Gallos, I. D., Conner, S. J., Rajkhowa, M., Miller, D., Lewis, S., Kirkman-Brown, J., & Coomarasamy, A. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des261 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion
(2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages
Ogasawara, M., Aoki, K., Okada, S., & Suzumori, K. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00495-1 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Thangaratinam, S., Tan, A., Knox, E., Kilby, M. D., Franklyn, J., & Coomarasamy, A. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d2616 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Recurrent miscarriage I: definition and epidemiology
Stirrat, G. M. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92159-f · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Lashen, H. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh277 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Metwally, M., Ong, K. J., Ledger, W. L., & Li, T. C. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1290 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Self-citationvan den Boogaard, E., Vissenberg, R., Land, J. A., van Wely, M., van der Post, J. A. M., Goddijn, M., & Bisschop, P. H. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr024 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Kyrgiou, M., Athanasiou, A., Paraskevaidi, M., Mitra, A., Kalliala, I., Martin-Hirsch, P., Arbyn, M., Bennett, P., & Paraskevaidis, E. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3633 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Prevention of recurrent miscarriage for women with antiphospholipid antibody or lupus anticoagulant
Empson, M. B., Lassere, M., Craig, J. C., & Scott, J. R. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002859.pub2 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Stray-Pedersen, B., & Stray-Pedersen, S. (1984) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(84)80164-7 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Hooker, A. B., Lemmers, M., Thurkow, A. L., Heymans, M. W., Opmeer, B. C., Brolmann, H. A. M., Mol, B. W., & Huirne, J. A. F. (2014) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt045 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 434 · see citing works
ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021
Pfeifer, S. M., Attaran, M., Goldstein, J., Lindheim, S. R., Petrozza, J. C., Rackow, B. W., Siegelman, E., Troiano, R., Winter, T., Zuckerman, A., et al. (2021) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Mills, J. L., Simpson, J. L., Driscoll, S. G., Jovanovic-Peterson, L., Van Allen, M., Aarons, J. H., Metzger, B., Bieber, F. R., Knopp, R. H., Holmes, L. B., et al. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812223192501 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Gris, J.-C., Mercier, E., Quéré, I., Lavigne-Lissalde, G., Cochery-Nouvellon, E., Hoffet, M., Ripart-Neveu, S., Tailland, M.-L., Dauzat, M., & Marès, P. (2004) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-12-4250 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
ALCOHOL, SMOKING, AND INCIDENCE OF SPONTANEOUS ABORTIONS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND TRIMESTER
Harlap, S., & Shiono, P. H. (1980) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90061-6 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage
Brigham, S. A., Conlon, C., & Farquharson, R. G. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2868 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Zhao, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.033 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage
Wong, L. F., Porter, T. F., & Scott, J. R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000112.pub3 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Moreno, I., Cicinelli, E., Garcia-Grau, I., Gonzáléz-Monfort, M., Baù, D., Vilella, F., de Ziegler, D., Resta, L., Valbuena, D., & Simón, C. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.012 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Leitich, H., & Kiss, H. (2007) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.005 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
How strong is the association between maternal thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcome?
Alfirevic, Z., Roberts, D., & Martlew, V. (2002) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00496-1 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Bouet, P.-E., El Hachem, H., Monceau, E., Gariépy, G., Kadoch, I.-J., & Sylvestre, C. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.025 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Cicinelli, E., Matteo, M., Tinelli, R., Pinto, V., Marinaccio, M., Indraccolo, U., De Ziegler, D., & Resta, L. (2014) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719113508817 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies
Venetis, C. A., Papadopoulos, S. P., Campo, R., Gordts, S., Tarlatzis, B. C., & Grimbizis, G. F. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.006 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Karyotype of the abortus in recurrent miscarriage
Carp, H., Toder, V., Aviram, A., Daniely, M., Mashiach, S., & Barkai, G. (2001) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01801-x · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Future pregnancy outcome in unexplained recurrent first trimester miscarriage
Clifford, K., Rai, R., & Regan, L. (1997) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/12.2.387 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Self-citationA Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages
Coomarasamy, A., Williams, H., Truchanowicz, E., Seed, P. T., Small, R., Quenby, S., Gupta, P., Dawood, F., Koot, Y. E. M., Bender Atik, R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504927 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-citationSeshadri, S., & Sunkara, S. K. (2014) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt056 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Levothyroxine in Women with Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies before Conception
Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Middleton, L. J., Sunner, K. K., Cheed, V., Baker, K., Farrell-Carver, S., Bender-Atik, R., Agrawal, R., Bhatia, K., Edi-Osagie, E., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812537 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Self-citationPre-implantation endometrial leukocytes in women with recurrent miscarriage
Quenby, S., Bates, M., Doig, T., Brewster, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Johnson, P. M., & Vince, G. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.9.2386 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study
Ralph, S. G., Rutherford, A. J., & Wilson, J. D. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7204.220 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Nastri, C., Lensen, S., Gibreel, A., Raine-Fenning, N., Ferriani, R., Bhattacharya, S., & Martins, W. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub3 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Philipp, T. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg309 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system†
Acién, P., & Acién, M. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr021 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
van den Berg, M. M. J., van Maarle, M. C., van Wely, M., & Goddijn, M. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Bosteels, J., Kasius, J. C., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., Mol, B. W., & D’Hooghe, T. M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub3 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Weng, X., Odouli, R., & Li, D.-K. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.803 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
du Fossé, N. A., van der Hoorn, M.-L. P., van Lith, J. M. M., le Cessie, S., & Lashley, E. E. L. O. (2020) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaa010 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses
Braekeleer, M. D., & Dao, T.-N. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137135 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic endometritis and recurrent pregnancy loss
McQueen, D. B., Perfetto, C. O., Hazard, F. K., & Lathi, R. B. (2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.044 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
van Oostrum, N., De Sutter, P., Meys, J., & Verstraelen, H. (2013) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det096 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Fetal carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation are prone to miscarriage and placental infarction
Dizon‐Townson, D., Meline, L., Nelson, L. M., Varner, M. W., & Ward, K. J. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70205-9 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Oppelt, P., Oppelt, P., Renner, S. P., et al. (2005) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.036 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
(2006) · PubMed · Cited by 248 · see citing works
The ESHRE–ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
Grimbizis, G., Gordts, S., Sardo, A. D. S., Brucker, S. Y., Angelis, C. D., Gergolet, M., Li, T. C., Tanos, V., Brölmann, H. A. M., Gianaroli, L., et al. (2013) · Gynecological Surgery · doi:10.1007/s10397-013-0800-x · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationSperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations
Esteves, S., Zini, A., Coward, R., Evenson, D., Gosálvez, J., Lewis, S., Sharma, R., & Humaidan, P. (2020) · Andrologia · doi:10.1111/and.13874 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Levy, B., Sigurjonsson, S., Pettersen, B., Maisenbacher, M. K., Hall, M. P., Demko, Z., Lathi, R. B., Tao, R., Aggarwal, V., & Rabinowitz, M. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000325 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Rai, R. S., Regan, L., Clifford, K., Pickering, W., Dave, M., Mackie, I., McNally, T., & Cohen, H. (1995) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136224 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationNoble, L. S., Kutteh, W. H., Lashey, N., Franklin, R. D., & Herrada, J. (2005) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.002 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies
Grimbizis, G. F., Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Saravelos, S. H., Gordts, S., Exacoustos, C., Van Schoubroeck, D., Bermejo, C., Amso, N. N., Nargund, G., Timmerman, D., et al. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev264 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationClifford, K., Flanagan, A. M., & Regan, L. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2727 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationPfeifer, S. M., Butts, S. F., Dumesic, D. A., Gracia, C. R., Vernon, M. W., Fossum, G., LaBarbera, A. R., Mersereau, J. E., Odem, R. R., Penzias, A. S., et al. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.014 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Risks to the Fetus of Anticoagulant Therapy During Pregnancy
Ginsberg, J. S., Hirsh, J., Turner, D. C., Levine, M. N., & Burrows, R. (1989) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1646558 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage—a reappraisal
Rai, R., Backos, M., Rushworth, F., & Regan, L. (2000) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/15.3.612 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, Y., Chen, X., Huang, J., Wang, C.-C., Yu, M.-Y., Laird, S., & Li, T.-C. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.022 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationOta, K., Dambaeva, S., Han, A.-R., Beaman, K., Gilman-Sachs, A., & Kwak-Kim, J. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/det424 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
de Jong, P. G., Kaandorp, S., Di Nisio, M., Goddijn, M., & Middeldorp, S. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004734.pub4 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
A Randomized Trial of Endometrial Scratching before In Vitro Fertilization
Lensen, S., Osavlyuk, D., Armstrong, S., Stadelmann, C., Hennes, A., Napier, E., Wilkinson, J., Sadler, L., Gupta, D., Strandell, A., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1808737 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Backos, M., Rai, R., Baxter, N., Chilcott, I. T., Cohen, H., & Regan, L. (1999) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08208.x · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Self-citationA Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy
Coomarasamy, A., Devall, A. J., Cheed, V., Harb, H., Middleton, L. J., Gallos, I. D., Williams, H., Eapen, A. K., Roberts, T., Ogwulu, C. C., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1813730 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
MODERATE ALCOHOL INTAKE IN PREGNANCY AND THE RISK OF SPONTANEOUS ABORTION
Kesmodel, U. (2002) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/37.1.87 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action
Coomarasamy, A., Dhillon‐Smith, R. K., Papadopoulou, A., Al‐Memar, M., Brewin, J., Abrahams, V. M., Maheshwari, A., Christiansen, O. B., Stephenson, M. D., Goddijn, M., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00681-4 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationZiakas, P. D., Pavlou, M., & Voulgarelis, M. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181deba40 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Tuckerman, E., Laird, S. M., Prakash, A., & Li, T. C. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem141 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationHanson, U., Persson, B., & Thunell, S. (1990) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00401047 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities
Bosteels, J., van Wessel, S., Weyers, S., Broekmans, F. J., D'Hooghe, T. M., Bongers, M. Y., & Mol, B. W. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009461.pub4 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing
Hickey, S. E., Curry, C. J., & Toriello, H. V. (2013) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2012.165 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Application of Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Clinical Diagnostics
Bejjani, B. A., & Shaffer, L. G. (2006) · The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060029 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Visser, J., Ulander, V.-M., Helmerhorst, F., Lampinen, K., Morin-Papunen, L., Bloemenkamp, K., & Kaaja, R. (2011) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th10-05-0334 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Body mass index and risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage
Metwally, M., Saravelos, S. H., Ledger, W. L., & Li, T. C. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.021 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationZidi-Jrah, I., Hajlaoui, A., Mougou-Zerelli, S., Kammoun, M., Meniaoui, I., Sallem, A., Brahem, S., Fekih, M., Bibi, M., Saad, A., et al. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.041 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Increased prevalence of insulin resistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss
Craig, L. B., Ke, R. W., & Kutteh, W. H. (2002) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03247-8 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Micronized vaginal progesterone to prevent miscarriage: a critical evaluation of randomized evidence
Coomarasamy, A., Devall, A. J., Brosens, J. J., Quenby, S., Stephenson, M. D., Sierra, S., Christiansen, O. B., Small, R., Brewin, J., Roberts, T. E., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.006 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationRikken, J. F. W., Kowalik, C. R., Emanuel, M. H., Bongers, M. Y., Spinder, T., Jansen, F. W., Mulders, A. G. M. G. J., Padmehr, R., Clark, T. J., van Vliet, H. A., et al. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab037 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Franssen, M. T. M., Korevaar, J. C., van der Veen, F., Leschot, N. J., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Goddijn, M. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38735.459144.2f · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Hyperprolactinemic recurrent miscarriage and results of randomized bromocriptine treatment trials
Hirahara, F., Andoh, N., Sawai, K., Hirabuki, T., Uemura, T., & Minaguchi, H. (1998) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00164-2 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Subtil, D., Brabant, G., Tilloy, E., Devos, P., Canis, F., Fruchart, A., Bissinger, M.-C., Dugimont, J.-C., Nolf, C., Hacot, C., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31617-9 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation?
Agarwal, A., Cho, C.-L., & Esteves, S. C. (2016) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000271 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Pan, X., Teng, W., & Shan, Z. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175708 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Popescu, F., Jaslow, C. R., & Kutteh, W. H. (2018) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dey021 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Stephenson, M. D., Ballem, P. J., Tsang, P., Purkiss, S., Ensworth, S., Houlihan, E., & Ensom, M. H. H. (2004) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30644-2 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Ludwin, A., Martins, W. P., Nastri, C. O., Ludwin, I., Coelho Neto, M. A., Leitão, V. M., Acién, M., Alcazar, J. L., Benacerraf, B., Condous, G., et al. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.18923 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies
Grimbizis, G., Sardo, A. D. S., Saravelos, S. H., Gordts, S., Exacoustós, C., Schoubroeck, D. V., Bermejo, C., Amso, N. N., Nargund, G., Timmerman, D., et al. (2015) · Gynecological Surgery · doi:10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationProgestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology
Haas, D. M., Hathaway, T. J., & Ramsey, P. S. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003511.pub4 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Saccone, G., Schoen, C., Franasiak, J. M., Scott, R. T., & Berghella, V. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.031 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Recurrent Miscarriage ‐ Outcome After Supportive Care in Early Pregnancy
Liddell, H. S., Pattison, N. S., & Zanderigo, A. (1991) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02811.x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
McNamee, K. M., Dawood, F., & Farquharson, R. G. (2014) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.007 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Maternal microbiome – A pathway to preterm birth
Vinturache, A., Gyamfi‐Bannerman, C., Hwang, J. K., Mysorekar, I. U., & Jacobsson, B. (2016) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.004 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Endocrine abnormalities during the follicular phase in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion
Bussen, S. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.18 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Is karyotyping couples experiencing recurrent miscarriage worth the cost?
Barber, J., Cockwell, A., Grant, E., Williams, S., Dunn, R., & Ogilvie, C. (2010) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02566.x · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Genetic Factors as a Cause of Miscarriage
Suzumori, N., & Sugiura-Ogasawara, M. (2010) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986710793176302 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Endocrinological and endometrial factors in recurrent miscarriage
Li, T. C., Spuijbroek, M. D. E. H., Tuckerman, E., Anstie, B., Loxley, M., & Laird, S. (2000) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11670.x · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationAge-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population
Wyatt, P. R., Owolabi, T., Meier, C., & Huang, T. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.099 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Murugappan, G., Shahine, L. K., Perfetto, C. O., Hickok, L. R., & Lathi, R. B. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew135 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Immunological Risk Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Guidelines Versus Current State of the Art
Vomstein, K., Feil, K., Strobel, L., Aulitzky, A., Hofer-Tollinger, S., Kuon, R.-J., & Toth, B. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10040869 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Graupera, B., Pascual, M. A., Hereter, L., Browne, J. L., Úbeda, B., Rodríguez, I., & Pedrero, C. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14825 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Coomarasamy, A., Williams, H., Truchanowicz, E., Seed, P. T., Small, R., Quenby, S., Gupta, P., Dawood, F., Koot, Y. E., Atik, R. B., et al. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20410 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationHereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Liu, X., Chen, Y., Ye, C., Xing, D., Wu, R., Li, F., Chen, L., & Wang, T. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab010 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Ramasamy, R., Scovell, J. M., Kovac, J. R., Cook, P. J., Lamb, D. J., & Lipshultz, L. I. (2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.029 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The selenium status of women with a history of recurrent miscarriage
Al‐Kunani, A. S., Knight, R., Haswell, S. J., Thompson, J. W., & Lindow, S. W. (2001) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00253.x · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Cigarette smoking, menstrual symptoms and miscarriage among young women
MISHRA, G. D., DOBSON, A. J., & SCHOFIELD, M. J. (2000) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb01604.x · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples’ perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up
Koert, E., Malling, G. M. H., Sylvest, R., Krog, M. C., Kolte, A. M., Schmidt, L., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dey362 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Chen, L.-W., Wu, Y., Neelakantan, N., Chong, M. F.-F., Pan, A., & van Dam, R. M. (2016) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980015002463 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Carlin, A. J. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh115 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Saravelos, S. H., Yan, J., Rehmani, H., & Li, T.-C. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der293 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationReproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies
Akhtar, M. A., Saravelos, S. H., Li, T. C., & Jayaprakasan, K. M. (2019) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15968 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, X., Mariee, N., Jiang, L., Liu, Y., Wang, C. C., Li, T. C., & Laird, S. (2017) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.010 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of subclinical hypothyroidism in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss
Bernardi, L. A., Cohen, R. N., & Stephenson, M. D. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1975 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
HLA associations and HLA sharing in recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Meuleman, T., Lashley, L. E. L. O., Dekkers, O. M., van Lith, J. M. M., Claas, F. H. J., & Bloemenkamp, K. W. M. (2015) · Human Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2015.02.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Ikuma, S., Sato, T., Sugiura-Ogasawara, M., Nagayoshi, M., Tanaka, A., & Takeda, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129958 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Sperm DNA fragmentation in Italian couples with recurrent pregnancy loss
Carlini, T., Paoli, D., Pelloni, M., Faja, F., Dal Lago, A., Lombardo, F., Lenzi, A., & Gandini, L. (2017) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.09.014 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Does caffeine and alcohol intake before pregnancy predict the occurrence of spontaneous abortion?
Tolstrup, J. S. (2003) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deg480 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Lathi, R. B., Gustin, S. L. F., Keller, J., Maisenbacher, M. K., Sigurjonsson, S., Tao, R., & Demko, Z. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.031 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Unexplained recurrent miscarriage: how can we explain it?
Saravelos, S. H., & Li, T.-C. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des102 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationBone density changes in pregnant women treated with heparin: a prospective, longitudinal study
Backos, M., Rai, R., Thomas, E., Murphy, M., Doré, C., & Regan, L. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.11.2876 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationSporadic miscarriage: evidence to provide effective care
Coomarasamy, A., Gallos, I. D., Papadopoulou, A., Dhillon-Smith, R. K., Al-Memar, M., Brewin, J., Christiansen, O. B., Stephenson, M. D., Oladapo, O. T., Wijeyaratne, C. N., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00683-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationBareh, G. M., Jacoby, E., Binkley, P., Chang, T.-C. “., Schenken, R. S., & Robinson, R. D. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.033 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Prior, M., Richardson, A., Asif, S., Polanski, L., Parris‐Larkin, M., Chandler, J., Fogg, L., Jassal, P., Thornton, J. G., & Raine‐Fenning, N. J. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.18935 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Miscarriage: worldwide reform of care is needed
Lancet, T. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00954-5 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences
Musters, A. M., Koot, Y. E. M., van den Boogaard, N. M., Kaaijk, E., Macklon, N. S., van der Veen, F., Nieuwkerk, P. T., & Goddijn, M. (2013) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des374 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status?
van den Boogaard, E., Kaandorp, S. P., Franssen, M. T. M., Mol, B. W. J., Leschot, N. J., Wouters, C. H., van der Veen, F., Korevaar, J. C., & Goddijn, M. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deq089 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Maternal smoking predicts the risk of spontaneous abortion
Nielsen, A., Gerd Hannibal, C., Eriksen Lindekilde, B., Tolstrup, J., Frederiksen, K., Munk, C., Bergholt, T., Buss, L., Ottesen, B., Grønbaek, M., et al. (2006) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340600589560 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A reappraisal of the role of polycystic ovary syndrome in recurrent miscarriage
Cocksedge, K. A., Li, T.-C., Saravelos, S. H., & Metwally, M. (2008) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60304-5 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationMaraka, S., Singh Ospina, N. M., Mastorakos, G., & O’Keeffe, D. T. (2018) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/js.2018-00090 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Shearer, B. M., Thorland, E. C., Carlson, A. W., Jalal, S. M., & Ketterling, R. P. (2011) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e31820c685b · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Systematic review and meta-analysis of female lifestyle factors and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss
Ng, K. Y. B., Cherian, G., Kermack, A. J., Bailey, S., Macklon, N., Sunkara, S. K., & Cheong, Y. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86445-2 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Air pollution exposure and risk of spontaneous abortion in the Nurses’ Health Study II
Gaskins, A. J., Hart, J. E., Chavarro, J. E., Missmer, S. A., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Laden, F., & Mahalingaiah, S. (2019) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez111 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Saravelos, S. H., & Regan, L. (2014) · Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.008 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationProgestogen for preventing miscarriage in women with recurrent miscarriage of unclear etiology
Haas, D. M., Hathaway, T. J., & Ramsey, P. S. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003511.pub5 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Zolghadri, J., Tavana, Z., Kazerooni, T., Soveid, M., & Taghieh, M. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.079 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Katano, K., Suzuki, S., Ozaki, Y., Suzumori, N., Kitaori, T., & Sugiura-Ogasawara, M. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1996 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Sun, Y., Chen, Z., & Li, T. (2018) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15052 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationChance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study
Kolte, A. M., Westergaard, D., Lidegaard, Ø., Brunak, S., & Nielsen, H. S. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa326 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Lata, K., Dutta, P., Sridhar, S., Rohilla, M., Srinivasan, A., Prashad, G. R. V., Shah, V. N., & Bhansali, A. (2013) · Endocrine Connections · doi:10.1530/ec-13-0012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Sperm morphology and recurrent abortion
Hill, J. A., Abbott, A. F., & Politch, J. A. (1994) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56661-8 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Bradley, L. A., Palomaki, G. E., Bienstock, J., Varga, E., & Scott, J. A. (2012) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.0b013e31822e575b · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Sneider, K., Christiansen, O. B., Sundtoft, I. B., & Langhoff‐Roos, J. (2016) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.13027 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Rai, R. S., Regan, L., Chitolie, A., et al. (1996) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09887.x · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationFlynn, H., Yan, J., Saravelos, S. H., & Li, T. C. (2013) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.12133 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationLeiomyomas in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Sundermann, A. C., Velez Edwards, D. R., Bray, M. J., Jones, S. H., Latham, S. M., & Hartmann, K. E. (2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002313 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Chen, H., Yang, X., & Lu, M. (2016) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3894-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Lash, G. E., Bulmer, J. N., Li, T. C., Innes, B. A., Mariee, N., Patel, G., Sanderson, J., Quenby, S., & Laird, S. M. (2016) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2016.04.290 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationSperm DNA fragmentation is a novel biomarker for early pregnancy loss
Haddock, L., Gordon, S., Lewis, S. E. M., Larsen, P. B., Shehata, A., & Shehata, H. A. (2020) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.016 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination
Lensen, S. F., Manders, M., Nastri, C. O., Gibreel, A., Martins, W. P., Templer, G. E., & Farquhar, C. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011424.pub2 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Ruixue, W., Zhou, H., Zhihong, Z., et al. (2013) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-013-0091-1 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Iews, M., Tan, J., Taskin, O., Alfaraj, S., AbdelHafez, F. F., Abdellah, A. H., & Bedaiwy, M. A. (2018) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.005 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Ultrasound and intrauterine adhesions: a novel structured approach to diagnosis and management
Amin, T. N., Saridogan, E., & Jurkovic, D. (2015) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.14927 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Gao, H., & Tao, F.-B. (2015) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2014.12.001 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Prospective Cohort Study of Uterine Fibroids and Miscarriage Risk
Hartmann, K. E., Velez Edwards, D. R., Savitz, D. A., Jonsson-Funk, M. L., Wu, P., Sundermann, A. C., & Baird, D. D. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx062 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Greenwold, N. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.452 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Hereditary Thrombophilia and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
PRITCHARD, A. M., HENDRIX, P. W., & PAIDAS, M. J. (2016) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000226 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: role of paternal factors; a pilot study.
Imam, S. N., Shamsi, M. B., Kumar, K., Deka, D., & Dada, R. (2011) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Immunologic Abnormalities, Treatments, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: What Is Real and What Is Not?
WANG, N. F., KOLTE, A. M., LARSEN, E. C., NIELSEN, H. S., & CHRISTIANSEN, O. B. (2016) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/grf.0000000000000215 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Are serum progesterone levels predictive of recurrent miscarriage in future pregnancies?
Ogasawara, M., Kajiura, S., Katano, K., Aoyama, T., & Aoki, K. (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00328-2 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Is abnormal sperm function an indicator among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss?
Saxena, P., Misro, M. M., Chaki, S. P., Chopra, K., Roy, S., & Nandan, D. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.031 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Musters, A. M., Repping, S., Korevaar, J. C., Mastenbroek, S., Limpens, J., van der Veen, F., & Goddijn, M. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.022 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Laird, S. M., Mariee, N., Wei, L., & Li, T. C. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der104 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationBhattacharya, S. M. (2008) · International Urology and Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s11255-007-9282-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Vissenberg, R., van Dijk, M. M., Fliers, E., van der Post, J., van Wely, M., Bloemenkamp, K. W. M., Hoek, A., Kuchenbecker, W. K. H., Verhoeve, H. R., Scheepers, H. C. J., et al. (2015) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Creus, M., Deulofeu, R., Peñarrubia, J., Carmona, F., & Balasch, J. (2013) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1515/cclm-2012-0452 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
van den Boogaard, E., Cohn, D. M., Korevaar, J. C., Dawood, F., Vissenberg, R., Middeldorp, S., Goddijn, M., & Farquharson, R. G. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Reappraisal of peripheral NK cells in women with recurrent miscarriage
Wang, Q., Li, T.-C., Wu, Y.-P., Cocksedge, K. A., Fu, Y.-S., Kong, Q.-Y., & Yao, S.-Z. (2008) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60410-5 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationRecurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity
Saad, F. A., & Jauniaux, E. (2002) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61620-3 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Bug, S., Solfrank, B., Schmitz, F., Pricelius, J., Stecher, M., Craig, A., Botcherby, M., & Nevinny-Stickel-Hinzpeter, C. (2014) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/1755-8166-7-43 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Baradwan, S., Shafi, D., Baradwan, A., Bashir, M., & Al-Jaroudi, D. (2018) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s151283 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Endometrial polyps: when to resect?
de Azevedo, J. M. D. R., de Azevedo, L. M. D. R., de Freitas, F. M., et al. (2015) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3854-3 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Tebo, A. E., Jaskowski, T. D., Hill, H. R., & Branch, D. W. (2008) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03774.x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Li, W., Ma, N., Laird, S. M., Ledger, W. L., & Li, T. C. (2013) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.3109/01443615.2012.759916 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationOliver‐Williams, C. T., & Steer, P. J. (2015) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.004 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage
Zhu, X., Li, J., Zhu, Y., Wang, W., Wu, X., Yang, Y., Gu, L., Gu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2018) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/s13039-018-0396-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Liu, X., Qiu, Y., Yu, E. D., Xiang, S., Meng, R., Niu, K. F., & Zhu, H. (2020) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.13219 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Inter‐assay variation in antiphospholipid antibody testing
Roberts, J. M., Macara, L. M., Chalmers, E. A., & Smith, G. C. S. (2002) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01048.x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Ye, X., Zhu, T., XIAO, X., Liu, Y., Wei, X., Liu, Y., Wu, C., Guan, R., Li, X., et al. (2015) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000001732 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., Wang, L., Wang, B., Shen, H., Wu, J., He, J., Liu, A., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Ma, B. (2023) · American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM · doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100762 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity in Omani couples
GOWRI, V., UDAYAKUMAR, A. M., BSISO, W., AL FARSI, Y., & RAO, K. (2011) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01200.x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Lescoat, D., Jouan, H., Loeuillet-Olivo, L., & Le Calvé, M. (2005) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1132 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Regan L, 2001, Infection and pregnancy loss
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.021 · DOI · Paper page
- Rikken JFW, 2021, Reply: Septum resection versus expectant management: paucity of good quality data, Hum Reprod, 36, 2627
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines on the investigation and management of antiphospholipid syndrome
Arachchillage, D. J., Platton, S., Hickey, K. P., Chu, J., Pickering, M. C., Sommerville, P., MacCallum, P., & Breen, K. A. (2024) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.19635 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“165 It is well recognised that testing for APS can be affected by pregnancy itself and that testing should be performed between pregnancies wherever possible.”
Genetic causes of sporadic and recurrent miscarriage
Melo, P., Dhillon‐Smith, R. K., Islam, M. A., Devall, A., & Coomarasamy, A. (2023) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.952 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Evaluation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
de Assis, V., Schenone, C. V., & Ros, S. T. (2024) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005498 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“17”
Busnelli, A., Barbaro, G., Pozzati, F., D’Ippolito, S., Cristodoro, M., Nobili, E., Scambia, G., & Simone, N. D. (2024) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae148 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Li, M., Zhou, R., Yu, D., Chen, D., & Zhao, A. (2024) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deae181 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Cavalcante, M. B., Tavares, A. C. M., Rocha, C. A., de Souza, G. F., Lima, E. M., Simões, J. M. L., de Souza, L. C., Martins, M. Y. M., ARAÚJO, N. O. D., & Barini, R. (2023) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2023.104157 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Miscarriage after SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination: A population‐based cohort study
Vélez, M. P., Fell, D. B., Shellenberger, J. P., et al. (2023) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17721 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
D’Ippolito, S., Gavi, F., Granieri, C., de Waure, C., Giuliano, S., Cosentino, F., Tersigni, C., Scambia, G., & Simone, N. D. (2025) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.70037 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Guideline No. 464: Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Motan, T., Cockwell, H., Elliott, J., Antaki, R., & White, J. S. (2025) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103167 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Nielsen, J. R., Kolte, A. M., Bliddal, S., Jørgensen, H. L., Johnsen, M. G., Krog, M. C., Westergaard, D., & Nielsen, H. S. (2024) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2024.104297 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Tuyl, R. V. (2024) · Women s Health · doi:10.1177/17455057231224180 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Instead, BC and Canada can adopt existing recommendations for earlier testing, 81,82 such as Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research graded module of care in the United Kingdom.”
BackgroundRecurrent Pregnancy Loss: Immunological aetiologies and associations with mental health
Laijawala, R. (2024) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100868 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Immune Treatment Strategies in Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Rui, C., Yang, Q., Liao, Y., Qin, L., Han, J., & Gao, R. (2025) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.70060 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Pearson-Farr, J. E., Doherty, R., Chatelet, D. S., et al. (2023) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-23-0173 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Mercier, M., Lescoat, A., Pierre‐Jean, M., Dumontet, E., Lous, M. L., & Belhomme, N. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13247698 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Inclusion criteria included a complete negative RPL investigation according to current guidelines [5], with normal cytogenetic analysis of the conception product when available, normal parental peripheral blood karyotyping, normal pelvic ultrasound, and complete antiphospholipid testing.”
InfluentialFang, T., Ji, X., Su, Z. Z., Zhang, A., Zhu, L., Tang, J., Mai, Z., Lin, H., Ouyang, N., & Chen, H. (2024) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-024-07048-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In the 2023 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline, the criterion of “three or more consecutive first-trimester miscarriages” is utilized for RPL definition [3].”
Liu, X., Wei, X., Wu, J., Xu, Y., Hu, J., Qin, C., Chen, C., & Lin, Y. (2024) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.202400972r · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Expanding the role of chromosomal microarray analysis in the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss
Eliwa, J., Papas, R. S., & Kutteh, W. H. (2023) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2023.104188 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss—A case–control study
Hautamäki, H., Gissler, M., Heikkinen‐Eloranta, J., et al. (2024) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.15039 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kargar, R., Yahoo, Z., Rafiemanesh, H., Aslani, S., Shamosi, A., & Mohammadi, H. (2025) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.70125 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Di, L., Chen, T., Fan, C., & Xie, Q. (2024) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135594 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Guideline No. 460: Diagnosis and Management of Intrauterine Early Pregnancy Loss
Pymar, H. C., Waddington, A., Prager, S., Shorter, J. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102914 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Che, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1554875 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sheth, F. J., Shah, J., Liehr, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-024-03316-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“It is a common issue faced by 1–2% of women of the reproductive age population [1, 2].”
Reproductive Immunology and Pregnancy 3.0
Szukiewicz, D. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242316606 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Minimal vasculitis combined with complement consumption in patients experiencing infertility may be an underlying mechanism for impaired implantation because aPL antibodies regulate the inflammatory response [26].”
BackgroundThe landscape of recurrent spontaneous abortion registered on clinical trials.gov
Zhou, X., Lai, F., Chen, W., Zhou, C., Deng, Y., Wang, T., Xing, S., Diao, H., Tang, M., Guo, W., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1460968 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
de Lima, J. J. A. V., Guerreiro, J., Ângelo‐Dias, M., Serra, S. S., Costa, T., Marto, N., de Pinho, J. F., Costa, J. N., Ruano, R., & Duarte, G. S. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1569819 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Unfortunately, despite numerous advances in this field, several pregnancies still end in miscarriage; thus, no satisfactory explanation can be provided to approximately 50% of women with idiopathic RPL (1, 2, 11, 17).”
Yamaya, A., Fukui, A., Kawai, K., et al. (2025) · Reproductive Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1002/rmb2.12662 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Furthermore, women aged 35–39 years with a history of three miscarriages have a miscarriage rate of 40%–50% in subsequent pregnancies [35, 36]; in comparison, the miscarriage rates in both treatment groups in this study appear to have decreased.”
Drakeley, A., Lunt, R., Newton, E., Gregoire, R. C., Watkins, L., Bambang, K. N., Ellard, A.-M., Ledgerwood, C. J., Rae, L., Sloan, A., et al. (2025) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105184 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Carvalho, T., Ângelo‐Dias, M., Moutinho, F., Serra, S. S., da Costa, T. D., Martins, J. P., Duarte, G. S., & Lima, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1805994 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Endocrine factors relevant to RPL include polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), prolactin imbalances, thyroid antibodies, luteal phase defect, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, and subclinical hypothyroidism (12).”
InfluentialMu, F., Huo, H., Wang, M., Liu, L., & Wang, F. (2024) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2024.104322 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hawkes, A., Shields, R. C., Quenby, S. M., Bick, D., Parsons, J., & Harris, B. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075062 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Do we need more guidance on thrombophilia testing? Challenges and special considerations
Marongiu, F., Ruberto, M. F., Marongiu, S., Mameli, A., & Barcellona, D. (2024) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2024.2306821 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“In addition, screening for FVL, PT2010A, and protein S is recommended for women with second trimester miscarriage [Grade C] [86].”
BackgroundKent-Nye, F. E., Sheen, K. S., Burgess, K., Oza, M., Magee, L. A., Jurković, D., & Silverio, S. A. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20882-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Interventions to Improve Outcomes After Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review
MacGregor, B., Madejowski, S., Leach, H., Macdonald, C., Dale, J. R., Grove, A., Heazell, A. E. P., Parsons, J., Staniszewska, S. H., & Hillman, S. (2025) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.70043 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Alghamdi, A., & Alotaibi, A. (2023) · Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences · doi:10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The mean HOMA‑IR in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (3.2 ± 0.89 vs. 1.58 ± 0.59; P < 0.0001) [Table 1].”
ResultInfluentialThe use of newer anti-seizure medicines in women with epilepsy in pregnancy: A case series
Devin, J. E., O’Shaughnessy, F., Sardana, M., Cleary, B., Donnelly, J. C., & Maher, N. (2025) · Epilepsy & Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ebr.2025.100741 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yao, Z. Q., Li, C. H., Li, X. Y., et al. (2023) · PubMed · doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167x.2023.06.016 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Value of Parental Karyotyping in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Lies in Individual Risk Assessments
Popescu‐Hobeanu, G., Sosoi, S. S., Cucu, M., Streață, I., Dobrescu, A., Pleşea, I. E., Costache, A. L., Iordache, A., Petre-Mandache, B., Tudorache, Ş., et al. (2024) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina60111778 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Jin, H., Cheng, J., Li, H., et al. (2025) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000042654 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“[2,4] Immune dysfunction is a critical pathogenic factor.”
Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Yang, Y., Guo, G., Sun, Y., Zhang, T., Zhang, Z., Zeng, L., Huang, W., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202417558 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
New models of implantation: towards a whole better than the sum of parts
Rawlings, T. M., Guttridge, S. A., & Lucas, E. S. (2025) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf223 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Infertility and early pregnancy loss each affect between 10 and 18% of people of reproductive age (Quenby et al. , 2021; WHO, 2023); in approximately one third to one half of cases, the underlying causes are unexplained (Regan et al. , 2023; Romualdi et al. , 2023).”
Thabet, M., Hasan, K. A., Elhefnawy, I. A., Barakat, G., Moemen, D., Ragab, A., Elsherbini, D. M. A., El‐Sherbiny, M., Bahgat, N. A., Elshamy, M. R., et al. (2025) · Libyan Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1080/19932820.2025.2472492 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“However, they recommended a threshold of three or more losses for epidemiological studies [1], Whereas the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) from 2017 defined RPL as two or more pregnancies that do not have to be consecutive [2].”
Davis, S. H., Himes, D. O., Dewell, S., Dungan, J. R., & Lucas, R. (2025) · Nursing Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cnur.2025.01.007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Hennessy, M., Dennehy, R., Matvienko‐Sikar, K., O’Sullivan-Lago, R., Dhúbhgáin, J. U., Lucey, C., & O’Donoghue, K. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094753 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Gynaecologists 50 (though how they define RM varies) regarding the importance of appropriate investigations and treatments, dedicated clinics, psychological supports, and supportive care in subsequent pregnancies.”
Datar, M., Bansal, V., Samant, P. Y., Nishi, K., & Balasinor, N. (2024) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-024-01737-y · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Liu, M., Zhang, H., Xu, S., Zhang, R., Yuan, M., Ren, B., Zhang, W., Liu, Z., & Guan, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.16183 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“…guidelines of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), 3,4 the spontaneous demise of a pregnancy before 24 weeks of pregnancy is referred to as a PL, while in China, PL before 28 weeks of pregnancy is still…”
Kongwattanakul, K., Jatavan, P., Musigavong, O., Pranpanus, S., Salang, L., Satirapod, C., Petyim, S., & Uerpairojkit, B. (2025) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.70038 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Trilla, C., Platero, J., Camprubí, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14165797 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has been historically defined as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies before the fetus reaches viability.”
Cui, L., Sun, F., Meng, X., et al. (2025) · Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1186/s10020-025-01361-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), which generally refers to the spontaneous loss of two or more pregnancies before the fetus reaching viability(Regan et al. 2023), has a profound impact on the physical and psychological health of women.”
Leeson, C., Chung, Y., Odendaal, J., Easter, C., Devall, A., & Quenby, S. M. (2025) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.10.036 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Incognito, G. G., Ettore, C., D’Asta, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm15120606 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The optimal definition remains debated, with some guidelines adopting a stricter threshold of three or more consecutive losses [2].”
Boyle, P. C., Pandalache, C., & Turczynski, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1358563 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Shinwari, L., Aman, A., Syed, M., et al. (2024) · Khyber Medical University Journal · doi:10.35845/kmuj.2024.22727 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wang, J., Li, D., Guo, Z., Ren, Y., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Kang, K., Shi, W., Huang, J., Liao, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1443056 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) defines RSA as three or more pregnancy loss before 24 weeks of pregnancy (6).”
BackgroundNew aspects of immunological risk factors in the treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss
Aliyeva, G., Tarverdiyeva, S., & Ibrahimov, M. (2024) · Healthcare in Low-resource Settings · doi:10.4081/hls.2024.12563 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Borrell, M., Pauta, M., Mallorquí, A., Ardiles‐Ruesjas, V., Borobio, V., Illanes, C., Matas, I., & BORRELL, A. (2025) · Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy · doi:10.1159/000543684 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Currently, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists endorse the genetic study of the embryo in recurrent loss [11, 12].”
Meng, X., Shi, M., Qian, J., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1522346 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jian, Q., Mu, F., Wang, K., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1582156 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ledowsky, C., Scarf, V. L., & Steel, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13772-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, M., Zhang, H., Xu, S., Zhang, R., Yuan, M., Ren, B., Zhang, W., Liu, Z., & Guan, Y. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4580876/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
CARACTERIZAÇÃO DE MULHERES COM PERDA GESTACIONAL RECORRENTE ACOMPANHADAS NO PRÉ-NATAL DE ALTO RISCO
de Morais, M. K. S., Roque, L. M. V., da Silva, T. M. A., et al. (2024) · Revista de Enfermagem e Atenção à Saúde · doi:10.18554/reas.v13i1.7018 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Xu, Q., et al. (2024) · Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfae031 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Koki, C., Shields, R. C., Sweetman, R., Boyle, J. F., Khan, O. A., Keung, S. N. L. C., Arvanitis, T. N., Devall, A., Burroughs, N. J., & Quenby, S. M. (2025) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101343 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Brinkmann, C., Westergaard, D., Nielsen, H. S., & Hartwig, T. S. (2025) · International Journal of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss · doi:10.5005/ijrpl-11032-0003 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yang, L. V., Shen, Y., Xu, M., et al. (2025) · Human Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2025.111585 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Identification of potential NAD-related biomarkers of recurrent miscarriage risk
Cuny, H., Shand, A., Goth, J., Sheng, D. Z., Tossey, T., Martin, E. M. M. A., Sipka, A., Aleshin, O., Schneuer, F. J., Nassar, N., et al. (2025) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf195 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Causes are varied and complex, and a significant number remain unexplained despite full investigation (Regan et al. , 2023).”
Liang, J., Han, Y., Zhang, L., Qi, Y., Wu, J., & Zhai, J. (2025) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2025.2601449 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Frenzel, E., Keller, M., Weise, M., Klöter, T., Federbusch, M., Heinemann, M. L., Metze, M., Petros, S., & Pfrepper, C. (2026) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2026.109589 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Xu, R., Huang, R., Zhao, Y., Song, D., Ma, N., Peng, X., Xia, E., Li, T. C., & Huang, X. (2026) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.01.027 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationWoolner, A., Shestopaloff, K., & Heazell, A. E. P. (2026) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.70161 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Linnemann, B., Bauersachs, R. M., Bergmann, F., Hart, C., Lindhoff‐Last, E., Rott, H., & Pfrepper, C. (2026) · Hämostaseologie · doi:10.1055/a-2780-3709 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“125 , 128 , 129 9.”
Yue, C., Huang, W., Han, J., Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., Gao, R., & Qin, L. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15072618 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…although maternal and neonatal mortality have effectively decreased around the world, the incidence of many other fertility and pregnancy disorders, such as infertility, spontaneous abortion, pre-eclampsia, stillbirth and premature delivery, still heavily affects female reproductive health [6–8].”
Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Tang, H., Zhou, Z., Zhai, M., Zhou, X., Bi, X., Liao, J., Zhang, C., & Jiang, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1811970 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Women with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Khalmirzaeva, M., Urazbayeva, G., Kurmanova, А., et al. (2026) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines14061177 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), defined as two or more spontaneous pregnancy losses, affects approximately 1–3% of women of reproductive age and represents one of the most clinically and psychologically challenging reproductive disorders [1–3].”
Boguenet, M., Michel, M., Bocca, C., et al. (2026) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2026.105798 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing: An Audit on Testing Practices in a Public Tertiary Care Center
Mansory, E. M., Alahwal, H. M., Bahashwan, S., Radhwi, O., Almohammadi, A. T., Daghistani, Y., Al-Mughales, J., & Barefah, A. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13010243 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Currently, the American college of obstetricians and gynecologist (ACOG) and the royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists (RCOG) suggest considering aPL testing after two or more and three or more early pregnancy losses, respectively [14,15].”
BackgroundZiogas, A. C., Liasidi, P.-N., Katouna, A., et al. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.84084 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the occurrence of at least two histologically or ultrasonographically confirmed pregnancy losses from conception up to 24 weeks of gestation [1,2], although some investigators support defining it as three or more losses [3].”
Amorim, M. M. R., da Cunha, A. C. C., Braga, G. C., et al. (2025) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.70152 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Trolice, M. P. (2023) · OBG Management · doi:10.12788/obgm.0300
The Pregnancy Loss Review: what does it mean for general practice?
Khan, N. (2023) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp23x735117
Endocrine causes of recurrent pregnancy loss in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder
Kharun, I. L., & Kaminskiy, A. V. (2023) · Reproductive Endocrinology · doi:10.18370/2309-4117.2023.70.16-22
Corrales, D. M., Agudelo, J. S., Contreras, G., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.15803
Zhang, J., Du, W., Xiang, J., et al. (2024) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2024.2382898
“Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as the occurrence of two or more consecutive unsuccessful pregnancies with the same sexual partner, affecting 1-5% of couples of childbearing age [1,2].”
ANXA5 and VEGFA Gene Variants in Women with Early Pregnancy Losses from North Macedonia
Terzikj, M., Bozhinovski, G., Branoski, A., et al. (2024) · Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.2478/bjmg-2024-0006
Evaluating Medical and Surgical Treatments for Ectopic Pregnancy at a Tertiary Hospital in Dubai
Akbari, E. A. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.69216
“Miscarriages were defined as spontaneous pregnancy losses before fetal viability (up to 24 weeks gestation) and classified as a dichotomous variable (yes/no) [13].”
BackgroundThyroid Function and Reproduction
Eliwa, J., Ke, R. W., & Kutteh, W. H. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21477-6.00234-0
Wiederholter Spontanabort: Genetisch determinierte Risikofaktoren
Toth, B., Tempfer, C. M., Bohlmann, M. K., Rudnik‐Schöneborn, S., Braun, A.-S., & Nawroth, F. (2024) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt · doi:10.3238/persgyn.2024.11.15.01
The Reproductive Systems and Associated Disorders
Millington, T., & Yarrington, A. (2024) · doi:10.1002/9781394322237.ch13
The Diagnostic Performance of Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 during Early Stage of Missed Miscarriage
Awad, A. A., Ali, E. A., & Hameed, B. H. (2025) · Mustansiriya Medical Journal · doi:10.4103/mj.mj_35_24
Urticarial reaction to low molecular weight heparin injections
Hill, A., Williams, C., Finucane, K., et al. (2025) · Obstetric Medicine · doi:10.1177/1753495x251317303
Global research on NK cells in miscarriage: a bibliometric study
Wang, Y., He, X., Yang, C., & Ding, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1513213
“The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (61) did not recommend circulating CD16 NK (62) cell testing, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (62) showed that pNK/uNK cell tests should not be offered routinely in the investigation of RSA, and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryolo…”
Genetics of Recurrent Miscarriage and Pregnancy Loss in Women’s Reproductive HealthPreprint
Mirakbarova, Z., Pascat, V., Akramkhanova, S., Chu, C.-Y., Yusupov, U., Scapoli, C., Rakhmatullaev, A. I., Kapralova, Y., Nishanova, S., Nazirova, M., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.02.15.25321247
Özkalaycı, H., & Kocabey, M. (2025) · Meandros Medical And Dental Journal · doi:10.69601/meandrosmdj.1570237
A Survey of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Management in Canada
Bacal, V., Sierra, S., Shin, M. E., et al. (2025) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102844
Investigation of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Al-Lamee, H., & Elson, J. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009532549.016
Pregnancy Loss: From Cytogenetics to Genomics
Tise, C. G., Verma, K., & Lathi, R. B. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009532549.029
Progesterone Use in Early Pregnancy
Harb, H. M., & Coomarasamy, A. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009532549.030
Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Sporadic Miscarriage
Oliver, A., & Overton, C. E. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009532549.015
Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Obstetric Complications
Bottone-Post, C. L. (2025) · Clinical Journal for Nurse Practitioners in Women s Health · doi:10.1891/cjnpwh-2504
- Authors
- Regan, L., Rai, R., Saravelos, S., Li, T., & the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
- Affiliations
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Regan, Lesley
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-06-19
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e9-e39
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W4381158089
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 221
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 13
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- recurrent pregnancy loss, unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion, inherited thrombophilia, acquired thrombophilia, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene mutation, protein S deficiency, cytogenetic analysis, karyology, congenital uterine anomalies, thyroid peroxidase antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, aspirin, heparin, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Habitual, Aspirin, Female, Heparin, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Progesterone, Semen, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Thrombophilia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review