Communication dynamics in twitter during political campaigns: The case of the 2011 Spanish national election
Abstract
The irruption of social media in the political sphere is generating repositories of “Big Data,” which can be mined to gain insights into communication dynamics. The research reported here relies on a large data set from Twitter to examine the activity, emotional content, and interactions of political parties and politicians during the campaign for the Spanish national elections in November 2011. The aim of this study is to investigate the adaptation of political parties to this new communication and organizational paradigm originating in the evolution of the Internet and online social networks. We analyze the reply and retweet networks of seven political parties with significant offline differences to assess their conversation and information diffusion patterns. We observe that political parties, and especially the major traditional parties, still tend to use Twitter just as a one‐way flow communication tool. Moreover, we find evidence of a balkanization trend in the Spanish online political sphere, as observed in previous research for other countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies also used content analysis for the same purpose.
“Otros estudios (Baquerizo-Neira, Luzuriaga-Uribe & Rovayo-Gonzalez, 2020; Aragón et al., 2013;Graham et al., 2013;Bruns & Highfield, 2013) también utilizaron esta herramienta para el mismo fin.”
From Twitter/X en la campaña presidencial de 2021 en Ecuador: interacciones digitales y su proyección en la polarización política de las siguientes campañas (2025) · cites this paper as Aragón et al., 2013
Previous studies reveal that homophily of the aggregate network measured using retweeting and mentioning tend to be the same, although mentioning is more volatile at the group levels.
“Previous studies (Lietz et al., 2014;Aragón et al., 2013) reveal that homophily of the aggregate network measured using retweeting and mentioning tend to be same, although mentioning is more volatile at the group (sub network with a particular ideology) levels.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Aragón et al., 2013
Cites
Bollobás, B. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814068 · Cited by 2,639 · see citing works
The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00197 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Partisan asymmetries in online political activity
Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2012) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Credibility of climate change denial in social media
Samantray, A., & Pin, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0344-4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Guerrero-Solé, F., & Lopez-Gonzalez, H. (2019) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439317744163 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Homophily and polarization on political twitter during the 2017 Norwegian election
Enjolras, B., & Salway, A. (2022) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-022-01018-z · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Luzuriaga Uribe, E., & Baquerizo-Neira, G. (2025) · Perspectivas de la comunicación · doi:10.56754/0718-4867.2025.3765
- Authors
- Aragón, P., Kappler, K. E., Kaltenbrunner, A., Laniado, D., & Volkovich, Y.
- Venue
- Policy & Internet
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-206
- ISSN
- 1944-2866 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152199665
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 29.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policy & Internet (publishedVersion)
- O2 - Repositori Institucional (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- Twitter, political campaigns, 2011 Spanish general election, political parties, politicians, retweet networks, information dissemination, emotional content, one-way communication, Balkanization, online political communication, social media adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review