Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatio‐temporal interpolation of daily temperatures for global land areas at 1 km resolution

Open access
Kilibarda, Milan, Hengl, Tomislav, Heuvelink, Gerard B. M., Gräler, Benedikt, Pebesma, Edzer, Perčec Tadić, Melita, Bajat, Branislav·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Combined Global Surface Summary of Day and European Climate Assessment and Dataset daily meteorological data sets (around 9000 stations) were used to build spatio‐temporal geostatistical models and predict daily air temperature at ground resolution of 1 km for the global land mass. Predictions in space and time were made for the mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures using spatio‐temporal regression‐kriging with a time series of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 8 day images, topographic layers (digital elevation model and topographic wetness index), and a geometric temperature trend as covariates. The accuracy of predicting daily temperatures was assessed using leave‐one‐out cross validation. To account for geographical point clustering of station data and get a more representative cross‐validation accuracy, predicted values were aggregated to blocks of land of size 500×500 km. Results show that the average accuracy for predicting mean, maximum, and minimum daily temperatures is root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) =±2°C for areas densely covered with stations and between ±2°C and ±4°C for areas with lower station density. The lowest prediction accuracy was observed at high altitudes (>1000 m) and in Antarctica with an RMSE around 6°C. The model and predictions were built for the year 2011 only, but the same methodology could be extended for the whole range of the MODIS land surface temperature images (2001 to today), i.e., to produce global archives of daily temperatures (a next‐generation http://WorldClim.org repository) and to feed various global environmental models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013jd020803

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Kilibarda, M., Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gräler, B., Pebesma, E., Perčec Tadić, M., & Bajat, B.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-03-13
Volume
119
Issue
5
Pages
2294-2313
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W2033585087
Cited by
260
References
38
FWCI
13.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatio‐temporal interpolation of daily temperatures for global land areas at 1 km resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013jd020803
The paper
Kilibarda, M., Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gräler, B., Pebesma, E., Perčec Tadić, M., & Bajat, B. (2014). Spatio‐temporal interpolation of daily temperatures for global land areas at 1 km resolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd020803

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.