Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations: Comparing chemistry‐climate models and observations at northern midlatitudes

Open access
Parrish, D. D., Lamarque, J.‐F., Naik, V., Horowitz, L., Shindell, D. T., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto, H., Volz‐Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H.‐E., Steinbacher, M., Fröhlich, M.·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Two recent papers have quantified long‐term ozone (O 3) changes observed at northern midlatitude sites that are believed to represent baseline (here understood as representative of continental to hemispheric scales) conditions. Three chemistry‐climate models (NCAR CAM‐chem, GFDL‐CM3, and GISS‐E2‐R) have calculated retrospective tropospheric O 3 concentrations as part of the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 model intercomparisons. We present an approach for quantitative comparisons of model results with measurements for seasonally averaged O 3 concentrations. There is considerable qualitative agreement between the measurements and the models, but there are also substantial and consistent quantitative disagreements. Most notably, models (1) overestimate absolute O 3 mixing ratios, on average by ~5 to 17 ppbv in the year 2000, (2) capture only ~50% of O 3 changes observed over the past five to six decades, and little of observed seasonal differences, and (3) capture ~25 to 45% of the rate of change of the long‐term changes. These disagreements are significant enough to indicate that only limited confidence can be placed on estimates of present‐day radiative forcing of tropospheric O 3 derived from modeled historic concentration changes and on predicted future O 3 concentrations. Evidently our understanding of tropospheric O 3, or the incorporation of chemistry and transport processes into current chemical climate models, is incomplete. Modeled O 3 trends approximately parallel estimated trends in anthropogenic emissions of NOx, an important O 3 precursor, while measured O 3 changes increase more rapidly than these emission estimates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013jd021435

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Parrish, D. D., Lamarque, J. ‐., Naik, V., Horowitz, L., Shindell, D. T., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto, H., Volz‐Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H. ‐., Steinbacher, M., & Fröhlich, M.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-05-13
Volume
119
Issue
9
Pages
5719-5736
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W1967603430
Cited by
221
References
2
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations: Comparing chemistry‐climate models and observations at northern midlatitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013jd021435
The paper
Parrish, D. D., Lamarque, J. ‐., Naik, V., Horowitz, L., Shindell, D. T., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto, H., Volz‐Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H. ‐., Steinbacher, M., & Fröhlich, M. (2014). Long‐term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations: Comparing chemistry‐climate models and observations at northern midlatitudes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021435

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.