Cited by 165Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry

Resolved Hapke parameter maps of the Moon

Sato, H., Robinson, M. S., Hapke, B., Denevi, B. W., Boyd, A. K.·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

We derived spatially resolved near-global Hapke photometric parameter maps of the Moon from 21 months of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Wide Angle Camera (WAC) multispectral observations using a novel “tile-by-tile method” (1° latitude by 1° longitude bins). The derived six parameters (w,b,c,BS0,hS, andθp) for each tile were used to normalize the observed reflectance (standard angles i = g = 60°, e = 0° instead of the traditional angles i = g = 30°, e = 0°) within each tile, resulting in accurate normalization optimized for the local photometric response. Each pixel in the seven-color near-global mosaic (70°S to 70°N and 0°E to 360°E) was computed by the median of normalized reflectance from large numbers of repeated observations (UV: ∼50 and visible: ∼126 on average). The derived mosaic exhibits no significant artifacts with latitude or along the tile boundaries, demonstrating the quality of the normalization procedure. The derived Hapke parameter maps reveal regional photometric response variations across the lunar surface. The b, c (Henyey-Greenstein double-lobed phase function parameters) maps demonstrate decreased backscattering in the maria relative to the highlands (except 321 nm band), probably due to the higher content of both SMFe (submicron iron) and ilmenite in the interiors of back scattering agglutinates in the maria. The hS (angular width of shadow hiding opposition effect) map exhibits relatively lower values in the maria than the highlands and slightly higher values for immature highland crater ejecta, possibly related to the variation in a grain size distribution of regolith.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013je004580

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors have previously developed LunaNet, a neural network-based crater detector that visually detects craters in a camera image and matches those detected craters to a database of known lunar craters with absolute latitudes and longitudes.

    “We have previously developed a system that visually detects craters in a camera image using a neural network and matches those detected craters to a database of known lunar craters with absolute latitudes and longitudes [5].This crater detector is called LunaNet.”
  • This work improved an existing lunar terrain relative navigation system by replacing the crater detector with LunaNet, a neural network-based crater detector developed in [5].

    “In summary, this work improved an existing lunar terrain relative navigation system by replacing the crater detector with LunaNet, a neural network-based crater detector developed in [5].”
  • Analysis in [5] demonstrates the high level of robustness of LunaNet to noise and variations in image brightness.

    “Analysis in [5] demonstrates the high level of robustness of LunaNet to noise and variations in image brightness.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, H., Robinson, M. S., Hapke, B., Denevi, B. W., & Boyd, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2014-08
Volume
119
Issue
8
Pages
1775-1805
ISSN
2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069833494
Cited by
165
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Keywords
Moon, Hapke model, multispectral reflectance, Henyey-Greenstein phase function, opposition effect, lunar maria, lunar highlands, ilmenite, crater ejecta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review