Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The time scale of the silicate weathering negative feedback on atmospheric CO 2

Colbourn, G., Ridgwell, A., Lenton, T. M.·2015·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

The ultimate fate of CO 2 added to the ocean‐atmosphere system is chemical reaction with silicate minerals and burial as marine carbonates. The time scale of this silicate weathering negative feedback on atmospheric p CO 2 will determine the duration of perturbations to the carbon cycle, be they geological release events or the current anthropogenic perturbation. However, there has been little previous work on quantifying the time scale of the silicate weathering feedback, with the primary estimate of 300–400 kyr being traceable to an early box model study by Sundquist (1991). Here we employ a representation of terrestrial rock weathering in conjunction with the “GENIE” (Grid ENabled Integrated Earth system) model to elucidate the different time scales of atmospheric CO 2 regulation while including the main climate feedbacks on CO 2 uptake by the ocean. In this coupled model, the main dependencies of weathering—runoff, temperature, and biological productivity—were driven from an energy‐moisture balance atmosphere model and parameterized plant productivity. Long‐term projections (1 Myr) were conducted for idealized scenarios of 1000 and 5000 PgC fossil fuel emissions and their sensitivity to different model parameters was tested. By fitting model output to a series of exponentials we determined the e ‐folding time scale for atmospheric CO 2 drawdown by silicate weathering to be ∼240 kyr (range 170–380 kyr), significantly less than existing quantifications. Although the time scales for reequilibration of global surface temperature and surface ocean pH are similar to that for CO 2 , a much greater proportion of the peak temperature anomaly persists on this longest time scale; ∼21% compared to ∼10% for CO 2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gb005054

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1029/2002GB001891 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1029/91JC01812 · DOI
  3. 10.1029/2004JC002625 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100206 · DOI
  5. 10.2475/ajs.291.4.339 · DOI
  6. 10.2475/ajs.301.2.182 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1130/0091-7613 · DOI
  8. 10.1023/A:1006065620344 · DOI
  9. 10.1029/91JB01898 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-3-540-32730-1_6 · DOI
  11. 10.5194/bg-6-375-2009 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0009-2541(96)00042-3 · DOI
  13. Colbourn G.(2011) Weathering effects on the carbon cycle in an Earth system model PhD thesis Univ. of East Anglia Norwich U. K. [Available athttps://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/34242.]
  14. 10.5194/gmd-6-1543-2013 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00382-004-0508-8 · DOI
  16. 10.2475/ajs.299.7-9.611 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.018 · DOI
  18. 10.1029/2008GB003449 · DOI
  19. 10.1029/2008GB003184 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/WR011i006p00963 · DOI
  21. 10.1023/A:1005919306687 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1136188 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ngeo689 · DOI
  24. 10.1029/2005GB002678 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF01054491 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1029/2011GB004098 · DOI
  27. 10.2475/ajs.287.5.401 · DOI
  28. 10.1029/2007GL030905 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01849.x · DOI
  30. 10.5194/bg-4-87-2007 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Royal Society, 2009, Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty
  32. 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Solomon S. et al. (2007) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Tech. Rep. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge U. K.
  34. 10.1016/0277-3791(91)90026-Q · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00282-1 · DOI
  36. 10.1029/1999GB900092 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/07055900.2001.9649686 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.03.020 · DOI

Cited by

See all 103

Metadata

Authors
Colbourn, G., Ridgwell, A., & Lenton, T. M.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2015-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
583-596
ISSN
  • 0886-6236
  • 1944-9224
Cited by
103
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • NERC ((NE/G018332/2))
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2013106)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The time scale of the silicate weathering negative feedback on atmospheric CO 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2014gb005054
The paper
Colbourn, G., Ridgwell, A., & Lenton, T. M. (2015). The time scale of the silicate weathering negative feedback on atmospheric CO 2. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gb005054