Cited by 71Landslides and related hazardsCryospheric studies and observationsTree Root and Stability Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new mixed‐mode failure criterion for weak snowpack layers

Open access
Reiweger, I., Gaume, J., Schweizer, J.·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The failure of a weak snow layer is the first in a series of processes involved in dry‐snow slab avalanche release. The nature of the initial failure within the weak layer is not yet fully understood but widely debated. The knowledge of the failure criterion is essential for developing avalanche release models and hence for avalanche hazard assessment. Yet different release models assume contradictory criteria as input parameters. We analyzed loading experiments on snow failure performed in a cold laboratory with samples containing a persistent weak snow layer of either faceted crystal, depth hoar, or buried surface hoar. The failure behavior of these layers can be described well with a modified Mohr‐Coulomb model accounting for the possible compressive failure of snow. We consequently propose a new mixed‐mode shear‐compression failure criterion that can be used in avalanche release models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gl062780

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Birkeland K. W., 2014, Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop 2014, Banff, Alberta, 746
  2. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.08.003 · DOI
  3. Dimaggio F. L., 1971, Material model for granular soils, J. Eng. Mech. Div., 97, 935, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0001427 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.09.011 · DOI
  5. 10.3189/2013JoG12J161 · DOI
  6. 10.5194/tcd-8-6033-2014 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/2014JF003193 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.024 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1153948 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/JB084iB07p03519 · DOI
  11. McClung D., 2006, The Avalanche Handbook
  12. 10.5194/tcd-8-2465-2014 · DOI
  13. 10.5194/nhessd-2-4525-2014 · DOI
  14. 10.1029/2010GL045433 · DOI
  15. 10.5194/tcd-7-1907-2013 · DOI
  16. Reiweger I., 2009, Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop ISSW, Davos, Switzerland, 27 September ‐ 2 October 2009, 120
  17. 10.3189/002214309790794869 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:7(855) · DOI
  20. 10.5194/tcd-8-5825-2014 · DOI
  21. Roch A., 1966, Symposium at Davos 1965 – Scientific Aspects of Snow and Ice Avalanches, IAHS Publication, 182
  22. 10.1017/S0260305500014634 · DOI
  23. Schweizer J. andB.Jamieson(2008) Dry‐snow slab avalanche release revisited: Shear vs. collapse? Geophysical Research Abstracts 2008‐A‐10994 presented at EGU General Assembly vol. 10.
  24. 10.3189/172756410791386652 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0165-232X(01)00039-8 · DOI
  26. 10.5194/nhess-15-109-2015 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/2002RG000123 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.05.007 · DOI
  29. 10.1029/2009GL040389 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1029/2009JF001515 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reiweger, I., Gaume, J., & Schweizer, J.
Affiliations
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Reiweger, I.
  • Gaume, J.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
1427-1432
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2087194051
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Tree Root and Stability Studies
Keywords
weak snow layers, dry-snow slab avalanches, Mohr-Coulomb model, depth hoar, faceted crystals, avalanche hazard assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review