Cited by 1,533Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 247 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall: FUTURE INTENSITY OF SUB-DAILY RAINFALL

Open access

Abstract

Evidence that extreme rainfall intensity is increasing at the global scale has strengthened considerably in recent years. Research now indicates that the greatest increases are likely to occur in short-duration storms lasting less than a day, potentially leading to an increase in the magnitude and frequency of flash floods. This review examines the evidence for subdaily extreme rainfall intensification due to anthropogenic climate change and describes our current physical understanding of the association between subdaily extreme rainfall intensity and atmospheric temperature. We also examine the nature, quality, and quantity of information needed to allow society to adapt successfully to predicted future changes, and discuss the roles of observational and modeling studies in helping us to better understand the physical processes that can influence subdaily extreme rainfall characteristics. We conclude by describing the types of research required to produce a more thorough understanding of the relationships between local-scale thermodynamic effects, large-scale atmospheric circulation, and subdaily extreme rainfall intensity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014rg000464

Cites

246 of 246 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 247 references

1 of the 247 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Boucher , O. 2013 Chapter 7: Clouds and aerosols Working Group 1 Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis
  2. Chow, 1988, Applied hydrology
  3. Cordery, 1970, Antecedent wetness for design flood estimation, Civ. Eng. Trans., Inst. Eng. Aust., CE12, 181
  4. Dingman, 2002, Physical Hydrology
  5. Flato, 2013, Working Group 1 Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report-Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis
  6. Hartmann , D. L. 2013 Chapter 2: Observations-Atmosphere and Surface Working Group 1 Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis
  7. Kiktev, 2003, Comparison of modelled and observed trends in indicators of daily climate extremes, J. Clim., 16, 3560, 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3560:COMAOT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Kiprich, 1940, Time of concentration for small agricultural watersheds, Civ. Eng., 10, 362
  9. Lenderink, 2009, Unexpected rise in extreme precipitation caused by a shift in rain type? Reply to comment by Haerter et al, Nat. Geosci., 2
  10. Nathan, 1998, Australian Rainfall and Runoff
  11. Peterson, 2005, Climate change indices, WMO Bull., 54, 83
  12. 1987, Australian Rainfall and Runoff-A Guide to Flood Estimation
  13. Seneviratne, 2012, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation, A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 109
  14. Zhang, 2004, Monte Carlo experiments on the detection of trends in extreme values, J. Clim., 17, 1945, 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1945:MCEOTD>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Westra, S., Fowler, H. J., Evans, J. P., Alexander, L. V., Berg, P., Johnson, F., Kendon, E. J., Lenderink, G., & Roberts, N. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE)
  • Met Office (GB)
  • Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL)
Corresponding author
Westra, S.
Venue
Reviews of Geophysics
Published
2014-08-27
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
522-555
ISSN
  • 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1209
OpenAlex
W1590065089
Cited by
1,533
References
247
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 2
FWCI
44.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reviews of Geophysics (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP120100338, CE110001028, FT110100576)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
rainfall intensity, flash floods, climate change, anthropogenic climate change, air temperature, large-scale circulation, thermodynamic effects, climate change adaptation, heavy rainfall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review