The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review
Abstract
Easier access to X‐ray microtomography (μCT) facilities has provided much new insight from high‐resolution imaging for various problems in porous media research. Pore space analysis with respect to functional properties usually requires segmentation of the intensity data into different classes. Image segmentation is a nontrivial problem that may have a profound impact on all subsequent image analyses. This review deals with two issues that are neglected in most of the recent studies on image segmentation: (i) focus on multiclass segmentation and (ii) detailed descriptions as to why a specific method may fail together with strategies for preventing the failure by applying suitable image enhancement prior to segmentation. In this way, the presented algorithms become very robust and are less prone to operator bias. Three different test images are examined: a synthetic image with ground‐truth information, a synchrotron image of precision beads with three different fluids residing in the pore space, and a μCT image of a soil sample containing macropores, rocks, organic matter, and the soil matrix. Image blur is identified as the major cause for poor segmentation results. Other impairments of the raw data like noise, ring artifacts, and intensity variation can be removed with current image enhancement methods. Bayesian Markov random field segmentation, watershed segmentation, and converging active contours are well suited for multiclass segmentation, yet with different success to correct for partial volume effects and conserve small image features simultaneously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms
Otsu, N. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076 · Cited by 43,398
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion
Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.56205 · Cited by 12,119
A Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J.-M. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.38 · Cited by 7,616
scikit-image: image processing in Python
(2014) · doi:10.7717/peerj.453 · Cited by 6,794
Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations
Vincent, L., & Soille, P. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.87344 · Cited by 5,649
Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation
Sankur, B. (2004) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.1631315 · Cited by 4,583
Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside
Pratt, W. K. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221325 · Cited by 4,340
On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures
Besag, J. (1986) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x · Cited by 4,191
Cited by
Tortuosity of porous media: Image analysis and physical simulation
Fu, J., Thomas, H. R., & Li, C. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103439 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K., & Wildenschild, D.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3615-3639
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2014988088
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2014wr015256
- The paper
- Schlüter, S., Sheppard, A., Brown, K., & Wildenschild, D. (2014). Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.