Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument

Open access
Jin, Xiaomeng, Holloway, Tracey·2015·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Surface ozone (O 3) air pollution in populated regions has been attributed to emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO + NO 2 = NO x) and reactive volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These constituents react with hydrogen oxide radicals (OH + HO 2 = HO x) in the presence of sunlight and heat to produce O 3. The question of whether to reduce NO x emissions, VOC emissions, or both is complicated by spatially and temporally heterogeneous ozone‐NO x‐VOC sensitivity. This study characterizes spatial and temporal variations in O 3 sensitivity by analyzing the ratio of formaldehyde (HCHO, a marker of VOCs) to nitrogen dioxide (NO 2), a metric known as the formaldehyde nitrogen ratio (FNR). Level 3 gridded retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aboard the NASA Aura satellite were used to calculate FNR, with our analysis focusing on China. Based on previous studies, we take FNR < 1.0 as indicating VOC‐limited regimes, FNR > 2.0 as indicating NO x‐limited regime, and FNR between 1.0 and 2.0 as indicating transitional regime (where either NO x reductions or VOC reductions would be expected to reduce O 3). We find that the transitional regime is widespread over the North China Plain (NCP), the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta during the ozone season (defined as having near‐surface air temperatures >20°C at the early afternoon OMI overpass time). Outside of these regions, the NO x‐limited regime is dominant. Because HCHO and NO 2 have distinct seasonal patterns, FNR also has a pronounced seasonality, consistent with the seasonal cycle of surface O 3. Examining trends from 2005 to 2013 indicates rapid growth in NO 2, especially over less‐developed areas where O 3 photochemistry is NO x limited. Over this time period, HCHO decreased in southern China, where VOC emissions are dominated by biogenic sources, but increased slightly over the NCP, where VOC emissions are dominated by anthropogenic sources. A linear regression approach suggests that most of China (70% of grid cells) will be characterized by a transitional regime during the O 3 season by 2030. However, in megacities such as Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Beijing, NO 2 has decreased such that the chemical regime has shifted from VOC limited in 2005 to transitional in 2013.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2015jd023250

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Jin, X., & Holloway, T.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2015-07-27
Volume
120
Issue
14
Pages
7229-7246
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W1889996709
Cited by
451
References
65
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2015jd023250
The paper
Jin, X., & Holloway, T. (2015). Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.