Cited by 1,385Precipitation Measurement and AnalysisClimate variability and modelsHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

GPCC's new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle

Open access
Schneider, Udo, Becker, Andreas, Finger, Peter, Meyer-Christoffer, Anja, Ziese, Markus, Rudolf, Bruno·2014·Theoretical and Applied Climatology

Abstract

In 1989, the need for reliable gridded land surface precipitation data sets, in view of the large uncertainties in the assessment of the global energy and water cycle, has led to the establishment of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) at Deutscher Wetterdienst on invitation of the WMO. The GPCC has calculated a precipitation climatology for the global land areas for the target period 1951–2000 by objective analysis of climatological normals of about 67,200 rain gauge stations from its data base. GPCC's new precipitation climatology is compared to several other station-based precipitation climatologies as well as to precipitation climatologies derived from the GPCP V2.2 data set and from ECMWF's model reanalyses ERA-40 and ERA-Interim. Finally, how GPCC's best estimate for terrestrial mean precipitation derived from the precipitation climatology of 786 mm per year (equivalent to a water transport of 117,000 km 3 ) is fitting into the global water cycle context is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00704-013-0860-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current quality control of surface precipitation data in China primarily relies on precipitation-threshold-based traditional methods, such as regional extreme value checks, temporal consistency checks, and spatial consistency comparisons.

    “Currently, the quality control (QC) of surface precipitation data in China primarily relies on precipitation-threshold-based traditional methods, such as regional extreme value checks, temporal consistency checks, and spatial consistency comparisons between stations [16][17][18][19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, U., Becker, A., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Ziese, M., & Rudolf, B.
Affiliations
Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Udo
Venue
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Published
2013-03-20
Volume
115
Issue
1-2
Pages
15-40
ISSN
  • 0066-6424 (ISSN-L)
  • 0177-798X
  • 1434-4483
OpenAlex
W1989839776
Cited by
1,385
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 17
FWCI
64.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Theoretical and Applied Climatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centrum fÖr Personcentrerad Vård
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
GPCC, gridded precipitation, rain gauge stations, quality control, global water cycle, water transport, GPCP, ERA-Interim reanalysis, ERA-40, climate normals, objective analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review