The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High atmospheric demand for water can limit forest carbon uptake and transpiration as severely as dry soil
Open accessAbstract
When stressed by low soil water content (SWC) or high vapor pressure deficit (VPD), plants close stomata, reducing transpiration and photosynthesis. However, it has historically been difficult to disentangle the magnitudes of VPD compared to SWC limitations on ecosystem‐scale fluxes. We used a 13 year record of eddy covariance measurements from a forest in south central Indiana, USA, to quantify how transpiration and photosynthesis respond to fluctuations in VPD versus SWC. High VPD and low SWC both explained reductions in photosynthesis relative to its long‐term mean, as well as reductions in transpiration relative to potential transpiration estimated with the Penman‐Monteith equation. Flux responses to typical fluctuations in SWC and VPD had similar magnitudes. Integrated over the year, VPD fluctuations accounted for significant reductions of GPP in both nondrought and drought years. Our results suggest that increasing VPD under climatic warming could reduce forest CO 2 uptake regardless of changes in SWC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python
Seabold, S., & Perktold, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference · doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-011 · Cited by 6,465
Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests
Bonan, G. B. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155121 · Cited by 6,238
Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003
Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Ogée, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, C., Carrara, A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03972 · Cited by 4,146
Global warming and changes in drought
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., van der Schrier, G., Jones, P. D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K. R., & Sheffield, J. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2067 · Cited by 3,382
Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought
Choat, B., Jansen, S., Brodribb, T. J., Cochard, H., Delzon, S., Bhaskar, R., Bucci, S. J., Feild, T. S., Gleason, S. M., Hacke, U. G., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11688 · Cited by 2,779
Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009
Zhao, M., & Running, S. W. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192666 · Cited by 2,674
Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate
Nicotra, A. B., Atkin, O. K., Bonser, S. P., Davidson, A. M., Finnegan, E. J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M. D., Richards, C. L., Valladares, F., et al. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008 · Cited by 2,196
Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality
Park Williams, A., Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Griffin, D., Woodhouse, C. A., Meko, D. M., Swetnam, T. W., Rauscher, S. A., Seager, R., Grissino-Mayer, H. D., et al. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1693 · Cited by 1,991
Little change in global drought over the past 60 years
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., & Roderick, M. L. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11575 · Cited by 1,978 · cited 1×
“Previous studies have argued that the Penman-Monteith model yields more physically accurate predictions of potential evapotranspiration than models that only include temperature and radiation [Sheffield et al., 2012].”
Background
Cited by
Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit
Grossiord, C., Buckley, T. N., Cernusak, L. A., Novick, K. A., Poulter, B., Siegwolf, R. T. W., Sperry, J. S., & McDowell, N. G. (2020) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16485 · Cited by 2,302
Self-citationMiralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I., & Teuling, A. J. (2019) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13912 · Cited by 1,080
Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought
Anderegg, W. R. L., Konings, A. G., Trugman, A. T., Yu, K., Bowling, D. R., Gabbitas, R., Karp, D. S., Pacala, S., Sperry, J. S., Sulman, B. N., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0539-7 · Cited by 674
Self-citationZheng, Y., Shen, R., Wang, Y., Li, X., Liu, S., Liang, S., Chen, J. M., Ju, W., Zhang, L., & Yuan, W. (2020) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-12-2725-2020 · Cited by 432
Atmospheric dryness reduces photosynthesis along a large range of soil water deficits
Fu, Z., Ciais, P., Prentice, I. C., Gentine, P., Makowski, D., Bastos, A., Luo, X., Green, J. K., Stoy, P. C., Yang, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28652-7 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Sulman, B. N., Roman, D. T., Yi, K., Wang, L., Phillips, R. P., & Novick, K. A.
- Venue
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2016-09-28
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9686-9695
- ISSN
- 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2520778777
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High atmospheric demand for water can limit forest carbon uptake and transpiration as severely as dry soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2016gl069416
- The paper
- Sulman, B. N., Roman, D. T., Yi, K., Wang, L., Phillips, R. P., & Novick, K. A. (2016). High atmospheric demand for water can limit forest carbon uptake and transpiration as severely as dry soil. Geophysical Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
