Cited by 1,027Climate variability and modelsAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateClimate Change and Environmental Impact

Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: a significant revision of the methane radiative forcing

Open access
Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., Shine, K. P.·2016·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

New calculations of the radiative forcing (RF) are presented for the three main well‐mixed greenhouse gases, methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide. Methane's RF is particularly impacted because of the inclusion of the shortwave forcing; the 1750–2011 RF is about 25% higher (increasing from 0.48 W m −2 to 0.61 W m −2 ) compared to the value in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2013 assessment; the 100 year global warming potential is 14% higher than the IPCC value. We present new simplified expressions to calculate RF. Unlike previous expressions used by IPCC, the new ones include the overlap between CO 2 and N 2 O; for N 2 O forcing, the CO 2 overlap can be as important as the CH 4 overlap. The 1750–2011 CO 2 RF is within 1% of IPCC's value but is about 10% higher when CO 2 amounts reach 2000 ppm, a value projected to be possible under the extended RCP8.5 scenario.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2016gl071930

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NOx treatment in Lee et al. (2009) did not include the negative forcing contributions of the long-term O3 decrease or the SWV decrease, the updated treatment of CH4 of Etminan et al. (2016), nor an equilibrium-to-transient correction.

    “The NOx treatment in Lee et al. (2009) did not include the negative forcing contributions of the long-term O3 decrease or the SWV decrease, the updated treatment of CH4 of Etminan et al. (2016), nor an equilibrium-to-transient correction.”
  • The inclusion of shortwave forcing in the simplified expression increases CH4 RF from aviation NOx emissions by 23%.

    “The inclusion of shortwave forcing in the simplified expression increases CH4 RF from aviation NOx emissions by 23% (based on MOZART-3 CTM runs driven for all the aircraft emission inventories represented in the model ensemble) (Table D.1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J., & Shine, K. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO)
Corresponding author
Shine, K. P.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2016-12-27
Volume
43
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2564065614
Cited by
1,027
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 137 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 2
FWCI
33.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance (225814)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
radiative forcing, methane, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, greenhouse gases, shortwave forcing, global warming potential, RCP8.5, climate change projections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review