The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget
Abstract
The radiative impact of clouds strongly depends on their partitioning between liquid and ice phases. Until recently, however, it has been challenging to unambiguously discriminate cloud phase in a number of important global regimes. CloudSat and CALIPSO supply vertically resolved measurements necessary to identify clouds composed of both liquid and ice that are not easily detected using conventional passive sensors. The capability of these active sensors to discriminate cloud phase has been incorporated into the fifth generation of CloudSat's 2B‐FLXHR‐LIDAR algorithm. Comparisons with Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System fluxes at the top of atmosphere reveal that an improved representation of cloud phase leads to better agreement compared to earlier versions of the algorithm. The RMS differences in annual mean outgoing longwave (LW) radiation gridded at 2.5° resolution are 4.9 W m−2, while RMS differences in outgoing shortwave (SW) are slightly larger at 8.9 W m−2 due to the larger diurnal range of solar insolation. This study documents the relative contributions of clouds composed of only liquid, only ice, and a combination of both phases to global and regional radiation budgets. It is found that mixed‐phase clouds exert a global net cloud radiative effect of −3.4 W m−2, with contributions of −8.1 W m−2 and 4.7 W m−2 from SW and LW radiation, respectively. When compared with the effects of warm liquid clouds (−11.8 W m−2), ice clouds (3.5 W m−2), and multilayered clouds consisting of distinct liquid and ice layers (−4.6 W m−2), these results reinforce the notion that accurate representation of mixed‐phase clouds is essential for quantifying cloud feedbacks in future climate scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation
Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., & Wang, P. K. (1998) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786829808965531 · Cited by 2,827
Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets
Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., & Webb, M. E. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35200a · Cited by 1,341
Zhang, Y., Rossow, W. B., Lacis, A. A., Oinas, V., & Mishchenko, M. I. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2003jd004457 · Cited by 1,125
An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models
Soden, B. J., & Held, I. M. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3799.1 · Cited by 1,082
How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes?
Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S., Dufresne, J.-L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., Ingram, W., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3819.1 · Cited by 1,038
Ritter, B., & Geleyn, J.-F. (1992) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<0303:acrsfn>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 817
The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O’Sullivan, D., & Malkin, T. L. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12278 · Cited by 800
A GCM Parameterization for the Shortwave Radiative Properties of Water Clouds
Slingo, A. (1989) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<1419:agpfts>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 642
On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates
Vial, J., Dufresne, J.-L., & Bony, S. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1725-9 · Cited by 524
Cited by
Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges
Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G., Field, P. R., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Wang, Z., Williams, E., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Borrmann, S., et al. (2017) · Meteorological Monographs · doi:10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1 · Cited by 455
Mixed-phase regime cloud thinning could help restore sea ice
Villanueva, D., Possner, A., Neubauer, D., Gasparini, B., Lohmann, U., & Tesche, M. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca16d · Cited by 18
Repurposing weather modification for cloud research showcased by ice crystal growth
Ramelli, F., Henneberger, J., Fuchs, C., Miller, A. J., Omanovic, N., Spirig, R., Zhang, H., David, R. O., Ohneiser, K., Seifert, P., et al. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae402 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Matus, A. V., & L'Ecuyer, T. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2017-03-03
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2559-2578
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-897X
- 2169-8996
- OpenAlex
- W2587328645
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2016jd025951
- The paper
- Matus, A. V., & L'Ecuyer, T. S. (2017). The role of cloud phase in Earth's radiation budget. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.