The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Temperature Sensitivity (Q10) of Soil Respiration: Controlling Factors and Spatial Prediction at Regional Scale Based on Environmental Soil Classes
Open accessAbstract
The temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic soil respiration is crucial for modeling carbon dynamics but it is variable. Presently, however, most models employ a fixed value of 1.5 or 2.0 for the increase of soil respiration per 10°C increase in temperature (Q10). Here we identified the variability of Q10 at a regional scale (Rur catchment, Germany/Belgium/Netherlands). We divided the study catchment into environmental soil classes (ESCs), which we define as unique combinations of land use, aggregated soil groups, and texture. We took nine soil samples from each ESC (108 samples) and incubated them at four soil moisture levels and five temperatures (5–25°C). We hypothesized that Q10 variability is controlled by soil organic carbon (SOC) degradability and soil moisture and that ESC can be used as a widely available proxy for Q10, owing to differences in SOC degradability. Measured Q10 values ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 and were correlated with indicators of SOC degradability (e.g., pH, r = −0.52). The effect of soil moisture on Q10 was variable: Q10 increased with moisture in croplands but decreased in forests. The ESC captured significant parts of Q10 variability under dry (R2 = 0.44) and intermediate (R2 = 0.36) moisture conditions, where Q10 increased in the order cropland<grassland<forest. Overall, the estimated heterotrophic CO 2 release from the catchment was up to 45% lower when ESC‐ and moisture‐specific Q10 values were used instead of 1.5, suggesting that scaling Q10 on the basis of both ESC and moisture might be a promising concept for spatially continuous assessments of carbon turnover at regional scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,825
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I. A., Kleber, M., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D. A. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10386 · Cited by 6,057
Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data
Potter, C. S., Randerson, J. T., Field, C. B., Matson, P. A., Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., & Klooster, S. A. (1993) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/93gb02725 · Cited by 2,986
Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-513840-6.x5014-9 · Cited by 2,831
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (1995) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-s · Cited by 2,036
Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission
Kerr, Y. H., Waldteufel, P., Wigneron, J.-P., Martinuzzi, J., Font, J., & Berger, M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.942551 · Cited by 1,697
The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles
Hassink, J. (1997) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004213929699 · Cited by 1,378
SoilGrids1km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping
Hengl, T., de Jesus, J. M., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ribeiro, E., Samuel-Rosa, A., Kempen, B., Leenaars, J. G. B., Walsh, M. G., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105992 · Cited by 1,268
Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta‐analysis
Manzoni, S., Schimel, J. P., & Porporato, A. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-0026.1 · Cited by 1,218
Cited by
The status and stability of permafrost carbon on the Tibetan Plateau
Mu, C., Abbott, B. W., Norris, A. J., Mu, M., Fan, C., Chen, X., Jia, L., Yang, R., Zhang, T., Wang, K., et al. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103433 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, N., Welp, G., & Amelung, W.
- Venue
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-323
- ISSN
- 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9224
- OpenAlex
- W2792129522
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Temperature Sensitivity (Q10) of Soil Respiration: Controlling Factors and Spatial Prediction at Regional Scale Based on Environmental Soil Classes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017gb005644
- The paper
- Meyer, N., Welp, G., & Amelung, W. (2018). The Temperature Sensitivity (Q10) of Soil Respiration: Controlling Factors and Spatial Prediction at Regional Scale Based on Environmental Soil Classes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gb005644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.