The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta‐analysis
Abstract
Soil heterotrophic respiration and nutrient mineralization are strongly affected by environmental conditions, in particular by moisture fluctuations triggered by rainfall events. When soil moisture decreases, so does decomposers' activity, with microfauna generally undergoing stress sooner than bacteria and fungi. Despite differences in the responses of individual decomposer groups to moisture availability (e.g., bacteria are typically more sensitive than fungi to water stress), we show that responses of decomposers at the community level are different in soils and surface litter, but similar across biomes and climates. This results in a nearly constant soil‐moisture threshold corresponding to the point when biological activity ceases, at a water potential of about −14 MPa in mineral soils and −36 MPa in surface litter. This threshold is shown to be comparable to the soil moisture value where solute diffusion becomes strongly inhibited in soil, while in litter it is dehydration rather than diffusion that likely limits biological activity around the stress point. Because of these intrinsic constraints and lack of adaptation to different hydro‐climatic regimes, changes in rainfall patterns (primary drivers of the soil moisture balance) may have dramatic impacts on soil carbon and nutrient cycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bauer, J., Herbst, M., Huisman, J. A., Weihermüller, L., & Vereecken, H. (2008) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes
Fierer, N., Leff, J. W., Adams, B. J., Nielsen, U. N., Bates, S. T., Lauber, C. L., Owens, S., Gilbert, J. A., Wall, D. H., & Caporaso, J. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215210110 · Cited by 1,643
Fuchslueger, L., Bahn, M., Fritz, K., Hasibeder, R., & Richter, A. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12569 · Cited by 369
Addressing agricultural nitrogen losses in a changing climate
Bowles, T. M., Atallah, S. S., Campbell, E. E., Gaudin, A. C. M., Wieder, W. R., & Grandy, A. S. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0106-0 · Cited by 336
Meyer, N., Welp, G., & Amelung, W. (2018) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2017gb005644 · Cited by 292
Negative effects of multiple global change factors on soil microbial diversity
Yang, Y., Li, T., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Chang, S. X., Liang, C., & An, S. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108229 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Manzoni, S., Schimel, J. P., & Porporato, A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 930-938
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2106320450
- Cited by
- 1,218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/11-0026.1
- The paper
- Manzoni, S., Schimel, J. P., & Porporato, A. (2012). Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta‐analysis. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0026.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.