Cited by 14Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

A Near‐Global Atmospheric Distribution of N2O Isotopologues

Bernath, Peter F., Yousefi, Mahdi, Buzan, Eric, Boone, Chris D.·2017·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

The distributions of the four most abundant isotopologues and isotopomers (N 2 O, 15 NNO, N 15 NO, and NN 18 O) of nitrous oxide have been measured in the Earth's stratosphere by infrared remote sensing with the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) Fourier transform spectrometer. These satellite observations have provided a near‐global picture of N 2 O isotopic fractionation. The relative abundances of the heavier species increase with altitude and with latitude in the stratosphere as the air becomes older. The heavy isotopologues are enriched by 20–30% in the upper stratosphere and even more over the poles. These observations are in general agreement with model predictions made with the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM). A detailed 3‐D chemical transport model is needed to account for the global isotopic distributions of N 2 O and to infer sources and sinks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2017gl075122

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many satellites are equipped with hyperspectral cameras and can perform, to some extent, estimations of CO2, CH4, H2O, and N2O emissions.

    “Many satellites are equipped with such cameras and can perform, to some extent, estimations of CO 2 , CH 4 (methane), H 2 O, and N 2 O (nitrous oxide) emissions [73,378].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernath, P. F., Yousefi, M., Buzan, E., & Boone, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Old Dominion University (US)
Corresponding author
Bernath, Peter F.
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2017-10-28
Volume
44
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2763330049
Cited by
14
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Space Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
nitrous oxide, isotope fractionation, stratosphere, satellite remote sensing, Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment, infrared spectroscopy, polar stratosphere, isotopomer distribution, chemical transport modeling, WACCM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review