Cited by 42Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsWastewater Treatment and ReuseWater resources management and optimization

A game theory analysis of green infrastructure stormwater management policies

William, Reshmina, Garg, Jugal, Stillwell, Ashlynn S.·2017·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Green stormwater infrastructure has been demonstrated as an innovative water resources management approach that addresses multiple challenges facing urban environments. However, there is little consensus on what policy strategies can be used to best incentivize green infrastructure adoption by private landowners. Game theory, an analysis framework that has historically been under‐utilized within the context of stormwater management, is uniquely suited to address this policy question. We used a cooperative game theory framework to investigate the potential impacts of different policy strategies used to incentivize green infrastructure installation. The results indicate that municipal regulation leads to the greatest reduction in pollutant loading. However, the choice of the “best” regulatory approach will depend on a variety of different factors including politics and financial considerations. Large, downstream agents have a disproportionate share of bargaining power. Results also reveal that policy impacts are highly dependent on agents' spatial position within the stormwater network, leading to important questions of social equity and environmental justice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2017wr021024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The implementation of fees and fee reductions is a highly local decision.

    “making the implementation of fees and fee reductions a highly local decision (Fedorchak et al. 2017;William et al. 2017William et al. , 2020)).”
  • Fee reductions may be effective in incentivizing BMP installations on private property, but may also exacerbate inequity in certain communities.

    “Fee reductions may be effective in incentivizing BMP installations on private property, but may also exacerbate inequity in certain communities”
  • The effectiveness of stormwater funding strategies varies with local socio-political and environmental factors.

    “Municipalities will benefit most from a funding strategy tailored to their community, given that the above strategies will have differing effectiveness based on highly local socio-political and environmental factors (William et al. 2017(William et al. , 2020)).”
  • Fees based on some measure of per-unit runoff or impervious cover level from parcels may not always be the most effective at abating pollution.

    “though they may not always be the most effective at abating pollution (William et al. 2017).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
William, R., Garg, J., & Stillwell, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Stillwell, Ashlynn S.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2017-09
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
8003-8019
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2751209301
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Resources Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
green stormwater infrastructure, cooperative game theory, municipal regulation, bargaining power, social equity, environmental justice, urban water management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review