The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network
Open accessAbstract
Probabilistic inversion within a multiple‐point statistics framework is often computationally prohibitive for high‐dimensional problems. To partly address this, we introduce and evaluate a new training‐image based inversion approach for complex geologic media. Our approach relies on a deep neural network of the generative adversarial network (GAN) type. After training using a training image (TI), our proposed spatial GAN (SGAN) can quickly generate 2‐D and 3‐D unconditional realizations. A key characteristic of our SGAN is that it defines a (very) low‐dimensional parameterization, thereby allowing for efficient probabilistic inversion using state‐of‐the‐art Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. In addition, available direct conditioning data can be incorporated within the inversion. Several 2‐D and 3‐D categorical TIs are first used to analyze the performance of our SGAN for unconditional geostatistical simulation. Training our deep network can take several hours. After training, realizations containing a few millions of pixels/voxels can be produced in a matter of seconds. This makes it especially useful for simulating many thousands of realizations (e.g., for MCMC inversion) as the relative cost of the training per realization diminishes with the considered number of realizations. Synthetic inversion case studies involving 2‐D steady state flow and 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with and without direct conditioning data are used to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed SGAN‐based inversion. For the 2‐D case, the inversion rapidly explores the posterior model distribution. For the 3‐D case, the inversion recovers model realizations that fit the data close to the target level and visually resemble the true model well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
Improved Techniques for Training GANs
Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03498 · Cited by 6,965
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2 · Cited by 4,271
MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process
Harbaugh, A. W. (2005) · Techniques and Methods · doi:10.3133/tm6a16 · Cited by 2,163
Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics
Strebelle, S. B. (2002) · Mathematical Geology · doi:10.1023/a:1014009426274 · Cited by 1,469
Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J. F., Diks, C. G. H., Robinson, B. A., Hyman, J. M., & Higdon, D. (2009) · International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation · doi:10.1515/ijnsns.2009.10.3.273 · Cited by 1,145
The Direct Sampling method to perform multiple‐point geostatistical simulations
Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., & Straubhaar, J. (2010) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2008wr007621 · Cited by 629
Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks
Mosser, L., Dubrule, O., & Blunt, M. J. (2017) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.96.043309 · Cited by 569
Cited by
Deep learning of subsurface flow via theory-guided neural network
Wang, N., Zhang, D., Chang, H., & Li, H. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124700 · Cited by 322
Towards a predictor for CO2 plume migration using deep neural networks
Wen, G., Tang, M., & Benson, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103223 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N.
- Venue
- Water Resources Research
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 381-406
- ISSN
- 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7973
- OpenAlex
- W2956157136
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 27.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017wr022148
- The paper
- Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N. (2018). Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr022148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.