Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network

Open access
Laloy, Eric, Hérault, Romain, Jacques, Diederik, Linde, Niklas·2018·Water Resources Research

Abstract

Probabilistic inversion within a multiple‐point statistics framework is often computationally prohibitive for high‐dimensional problems. To partly address this, we introduce and evaluate a new training‐image based inversion approach for complex geologic media. Our approach relies on a deep neural network of the generative adversarial network (GAN) type. After training using a training image (TI), our proposed spatial GAN (SGAN) can quickly generate 2‐D and 3‐D unconditional realizations. A key characteristic of our SGAN is that it defines a (very) low‐dimensional parameterization, thereby allowing for efficient probabilistic inversion using state‐of‐the‐art Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. In addition, available direct conditioning data can be incorporated within the inversion. Several 2‐D and 3‐D categorical TIs are first used to analyze the performance of our SGAN for unconditional geostatistical simulation. Training our deep network can take several hours. After training, realizations containing a few millions of pixels/voxels can be produced in a matter of seconds. This makes it especially useful for simulating many thousands of realizations (e.g., for MCMC inversion) as the relative cost of the training per realization diminishes with the considered number of realizations. Synthetic inversion case studies involving 2‐D steady state flow and 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with and without direct conditioning data are used to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed SGAN‐based inversion. For the 2‐D case, the inversion rapidly explores the posterior model distribution. For the 3‐D case, the inversion recovers model realizations that fit the data close to the target level and visually resemble the true model well.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2017wr022148

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2018-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
381-406
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2956157136
Cited by
382
References
25
FWCI
27.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017wr022148
The paper
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N. (2018). Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr022148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.