The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process
Abstract
This report presents MODFLOW-2005, which is a new version of the finite-difference ground-water model commonly called MODFLOW. Ground-water flow is simulated using a block-centered finite-difference approach. Layers can be simulated as confined or unconfined. Flow associated with external stresses, such as wells, areal recharge, evapotranspiration, drains, and rivers, also can be simulated. The report includes detailed explanations of physical and mathematical concepts on which the model is based, an explanation of how those concepts are incorporated in the modular structure of the computer program, instructions for using the model, and details of the computer code. The modular structure consists of a MAIN Program and a series of highly independent subroutines. The subroutines are grouped into 'packages.' Each package deals with a specific feature of the hydrologic system that is to be simulated, such as flow from rivers or flow into drains, or with a specific method of solving the set of simultaneous equations resulting from the finite-difference method. Several solution methods are incorporated, including the Preconditioned Conjugate-Gradient method. The division of the program into packages permits the user to examine specific hydrologic features of the model independently. This also facilitates development of additional capabilities because new packages can be added to the program without modifying the existing packages. The input and output systems of the computer program also are designed to permit maximum flexibility. The program is designed to allow other capabilities, such as transport and optimization, to be incorporated, but this report is limited to describing the ground-water flow capability. The program is written in Fortran 90 and will run without modification on most computers that have a Fortran 90 compiler.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., & Ye, M. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011044 · Cited by 466
Cockett, R., Kang, S., Heagy, L. J., Pidlisecky, A., & Oldenburg, D. W. (2015) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.09.015 · Cited by 431
Training‐Image Based Geostatistical Inversion Using a Spatial Generative Adversarial Neural Network
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Jacques, D., & Linde, N. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2017wr022148 · Cited by 382
Laloy, E., Rogiers, B., Vrugt, J. A., Mallants, D., & Jacques, D. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20226 · Cited by 264
Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Lee, J., Jacques, D., & Linde, N. (2017) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.09.029 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Harbaugh, A. W.
- Venue
- Techniques and Methods
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2005
- ISSN
- 2328-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-7055
- OpenAlex
- W1531958500
- Cited by
- 2,163
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3133/tm6a16
- The paper
- Harbaugh, A. W. (2005). MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process. Techniques and Methods. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6a16
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.