Cited by 29Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and Development

Exploring the skin-to-skin contact experience during cesarean section

Frederick, Anitra C., Busen, Nancy H., Engebretson, Joan C., Hurst, Nancy M., Schneider, Karen M.·2016·Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore and describe the mother's experience of holding her neonate in skin-to-skin contact (SSC) immediately after cesarean delivery during surgical closure and recovery. DATA SOURCES: Eleven women between the ages of 23 and 38 years, who had achieved 39.1-40.2 weeks gestational age, participated in an ethnographic study using observations and interviews with the mothers conducted at 24-48 h postdelivery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and content analysis of both observational notes and transcripts were used to analyze the data. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study describe the mother's experience of SSC during cesarean section. The primary theme that emerged was mutual caregiving: the mother-neonatal interaction and their shared and reciprocal relationship and benefits during SSC. Two contextual issues also were illuminated (a) the father's influence on the SSC experience and (b) the cesarean environment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With cesarean section the most common surgical procedure among American women, advanced practice nurses are in a unique position to encourage and educate women on the use of SSC for their benefit and that of their newborn. Advanced practice nurses are also empowered to influence institutional policy on SSC during cesarean deliveries at the local and national level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2327-6924.12229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 4 predominant themes that emerged were consistent with those in previous studies exploring the role of skin-to-skin cesarean birth, which also showed positive outcomes.

    “the 4 predominant themes that emerged were consistent with those in previous studies exploring the role of skin-to-skin cesarean birth, which also showed positive outcomes.8,46,47”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frederick, A. C., Busen, N. H., Engebretson, J. C., Hurst, N. M., & Schneider, K. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Frederick, Anitra C.
Venue
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Published
2016-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 2327-6886 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-6924
OpenAlex
W1599592555
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
skin-to-skin contact, cesarean section, maternal experience, paternal effects, advanced practice nurses, neonatal care, postpartum recovery
MeSH terms
Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Life Change Events, Mothers, Pregnancy, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review