The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation
Rubin, D. B. (2001) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1023/a:1020363010465 · Cited by 2,228
Administration of Nasal Nafarelin as Compared with Oral Danazol for Endometriosis
Henzl, M. R., Corson, S. L., Moghissi, K., Buttram, V. C., Berqvist, C., & Jacobson, J. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198802253180805 · Cited by 361
Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing
Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150905 · Cited by 343
A 40-Year Perspective on the Prevalence of Depression: The Stirling County Study
Murphy, J. M., Laird, N. M., Monson, R. R., Sobol, A. M., & Leighton, A. H. (2000) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.3.209 · Cited by 318
A Study of Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs and Fetal Loss in Nurses
Selevan, S. G., Lindbohm, M.-L., Hornung, R. W., & Hemminki, K. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198511073131901 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., & Weisberg, H. I.
- Venue
- Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-07-25
- ISSN
- 1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4244031314
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470316498
- The paper
- Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., & Weisberg, H. I. (1980). Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.