The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Administration of Nasal Nafarelin as Compared with Oral Danazol for Endometriosis
Abstract
Treatment with nafarelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, reversibly inhibits ovarian function and induces hypoestrogenemia. To determine the efficacy of such hormonal manipulation in the treatment of endometriosis, we randomly assigned 213 patients with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis to receive, for six months, either nafarelin by nasal spray (400 or 800 micrograms per day) or oral danazol (800 mg per day). Placebo nasal spray and placebo tablets were used to double blind the study. Pretreatment and post-treatment laparoscopies were compared by means of the American Fertility Society's scoring system. More than 80 percent of the patients in each treatment group had a reduction in the extent of disease as assessed by laparoscopy. The mean laparoscopic scores decreased from 21.9 to 12.6 with 800 micrograms of nafarelin, from 20.4 to 11.7 with 400 micrograms of nafarelin, and from 18.4 to 10.5 with danazol (P = 0.0001 within each group; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups). The percentage of women with severely painful symptoms of endometriosis decreased from about 40 percent to 5 to 10 percent, whereas the percentage with no or minimal discomfort rose from 25 to 70 percent. Of the 149 patients who tried to become pregnant, 58 (39 percent) succeeded after the completion of treatment; similar rates of pregnancy applied to the three treatment groups. Danazol use decreased high-density lipoprotein levels and increased low-density lipoprotein levels. These changes were not observed in nafarelin users, but a higher percentage of them reported hot flashes and decreased libido. We conclude that nafarelin is an effective agent for treating endometriosis and has few side effects other than hypoestrogenism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
Groggel, D. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486067 · Cited by 11,041
Revised American Fertility Society Classification of Endometriosis: 1985
(1985) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48430-x · Cited by 1,803
Landis, J. R., Heyman, E. R., & Koch, G. G. (1978) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1402373 · Cited by 454
Cholesterol in high-density lipoprotein: use of Mg2+/dextran sulfate in its enzymic measurement.
Finley, P. R., Schifman, R. B., Williams, R. J., & Lichti, D. A. (1978) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/24.6.931 · Cited by 418
DeLong, D. M. (1986) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.256.17.2372 · Cited by 349
Statistical Methods for Comparative Studies: Techniques for Bias Reduction
Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., & Weisberg, H. I. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316498 · Cited by 306
Meldrum, D. R., Chang, R. J., LU, J., Vale, W., Rivier, J., & Judd, H. L. (1982) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-54-5-1081 · Cited by 248
Lemay, A., Maheux, R., Faure, N., Jean, C., & Fazekas, A. T. A. (1984) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47899-4 · Cited by 209
Danazol: Endocrine pharmacology and therapeutic applications
Barbieri, R. L., & Ryan, K. J. (1981) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(81)90611-6 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Olive, D. L., & Pritts, E. A. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107263450407 · Cited by 340
Hormone treatment of endometriosis: The estrogenthreshold hypothesis
Barbieri, R. L. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91706-g · Cited by 335
Reevaluating response and failure of medical treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review
Becker, C. M., Gattrell, W. T., Gude, K., & Singh, S. S. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.004 · Cited by 302
Dlugi, A. M., Miller, J. D., & Knittle, J. (1990) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53755-8 · Cited by 279
Treatment of severe postmenopausal endometriosis with an aromatase inhibitor
Takayama, K., Zeitoun, K., Gunby, R. T., Sasano, H., Carr, B. R., & Bulun, S. E. (1998) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00022-3 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Henzl, M. R., Corson, S. L., Moghissi, K., Buttram, V. C., Berqvist, C., & Jacobson, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1988-02-25
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 485-489
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2322557386
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 32.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Administration of Nasal Nafarelin as Compared with Oral Danazol for Endometriosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198802253180805
- The paper
- Henzl, M. R., Corson, S. L., Moghissi, K., Buttram, V. C., Berqvist, C., & Jacobson, J. (1988). Administration of Nasal Nafarelin as Compared with Oral Danazol for Endometriosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198802253180805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.