The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R
Abstract
A complete guide to carrying out complex survey analysis using R As survey analysis continues to serve as a core component of sociological research, researchers are increasingly relying upon data gathered from complex surveys to carry out traditional analyses. Complex Surveys is a practical guide to the analysis of this kind of data using R, the freely available and downloadable statistical programming language. As creator of the specific survey package for R, the author provides the ultimate presentation of how to successfully use the software for analyzing data from complex surveys while also utilizing the most current data from health and social sciences studies to demonstrate the application of survey research methods in these fields. The book begins with coverage of basic tools and topics within survey analysis such as simple and stratified sampling, cluster sampling, linear regression, and categorical data regression. Subsequent chapters delve into more technical aspects of complex survey analysis, including post-stratification, two-phase sampling, missing data, and causal inference. Throughout the book, an emphasis is placed on graphics, regression modeling, and two-phase designs. In addition, the author supplies a unique discussion of epidemiological two-phase designs as well as probability-weighting for causal inference. All of the book's examples and figures are generated using R, and a related Web site provides the R code that allows readers to reproduce the presen…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To incorporate the raking weights in our analyses, we used the svyglm function from the survey R package (80,81).”
From Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [81]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women.
Marrazzo, J. M., Ramjee, G., Richardson, B. A., Gomez, K., Mgodi, N., Nair, G., Palanee, T., Nakabiito, C., van der Straten, A., Noguchi, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1402269 · Cited by 1,296
Immune correlates analysis of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine efficacy clinical trial
Gilbert, P. B., Montefiori, D. C., McDermott, A. B., Fong, Y., Benkeser, D., Deng, W., Zhou, H., Houchens, C. R., Martins, K., Jayashankar, L., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm3425 · Cited by 1,137
Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman’s critique
Lin, W. T. (2013) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-aoas583 · Cited by 686
Generalizing Observational Study Results: Applying Propensity Score Methods to Complex Surveys
DuGoff, E. H., Schuler, M., & Stuart, E. A. (2014) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12090 · Cited by 605
survey: Analysis of Complex Survey Samples
Gao, P., Schneider, B., & Kolenkikov, S. (2003) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.survey · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Lumley, T.
- Corresponding author
- Lumley, Thomas
- ORCID
- Lumley, Thomas
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-15
- OpenAlex
- W4254617165
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 96 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- survey sampling, stratified sampling, cluster sampling, post-stratification, double sampling, missing data, causal inference, probability weighting, survey weighting, regression models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review