The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overviews of Reviews
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Preparing a Cochrane Overview of reviews Format of a Cochrane Overview Chapter information References
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As shown below, the Cochrane Collaboration methodology [11] and available methodological guidelines for overviews of reviews [12,13] were rigorously applied throughout this study.”
From Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
Self-citationIndirect comparisons of competing interventions
Glenny, A., Altman, D. G., Song, F., Sakarovitch, C., Deeks, J. J., D’Amico, R., Bradburn, M. J., & Eastwood, A. J. (2005) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta9260 · Cited by 681
Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea, B., Boers, M., Grimshaw, J., Hamel, C., & Bouter, L. M. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-27 · Cited by 49
Petticrew, M. P., Song, F., Wilson, P. M., & Wright, K. E. (1999) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462399015469 · Cited by 40
The Cochrane Library and nocturnal enuresis; an umbrella review
Russell, K. F., & KIDDOO, D. A. (2006) · Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal · doi:10.1002/ebch.13 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000055 · Cited by 2,587
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions
Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., & Clarke, M. (2011) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15 · Cited by 1,227
Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews
Marchi, J., Berg, M., Dencker, A., Olander, E. K., & Begley, C. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12288 · Cited by 991
Park, M., Giap, T., Lee, M., Jeong, H. C., Jeong, M., & Go, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006 · Cited by 502
Alderwick, H., Hutchings, A., Briggs, A., & Mays, N. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, L. A., & Oxman, A. D.
- Affiliations
- SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
- Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
- ORCID
- Oxman, Andrew D
- Venue
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Pages
- 607-631
- OpenAlex
- W1495670988
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- Cochrane Handbook
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
