Maintaining Reviews: Updates, Amendments and Feedback
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Some important definitions Important dates associated with Cochrane reviews Considerations when updating a Cochrane review ‘What's new’ and History tables Incorporating and addressing feedback in a Cochrane review Chapter information References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.
“Two independent reviewers (CML and NS) assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2008).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Higgins & Green, 2008
Heterogeneity of included studies was examined using the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model.
“We examined heterogeneity of the included studies based on the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model according to the results (i-squared < 40% for fixed effects; Higgins & Green, 2008).”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Higgins & Green, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Eckshtain, D., Ugueto, A. M., Vaughn-Coaxum, R., Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K. M., Krumholz Marchette, L. S., Chu, B. C., et al. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040360 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
English, C., Manns, P. J., Tucak, C., & Bernhardt, J. (2014) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20130175 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on depression in adolescents
Wang, X., Cai, Z.-D., Jiang, W.-T., Fang, Y.-Y., Sun, W.-X., & Wang, X. (2022) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-022-00453-2 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“Inclusion criteria Based on the PICOS (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, study design) process used in evidence-based medicine [28], the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Participants: adolescents aged 12–18 diagnosed with depression (based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Dis…”
MethodRoss, J., Stevenson, F., Lau, R., & Murray, E. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Higgins, J. P., Green, S., & Scholten, R. J.
- Affiliations
- MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
- Monash University (AU)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Pages
- 31-49
- OpenAlex
- W1539622455
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- review updating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
