A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors
Open accessAbstract
Increased attention has focused on methods to increase empathy, compassion, and pro-social behavior. Meditation practices have traditionally been used to cultivate pro-social outcomes, and recently investigations have sought to evaluate their efficacy for these outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of meditation for pro-social emotions and behavior. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases (inception-April 2016) using the search terms: mindfulness, meditation, mind-body therapies, tai chi, yoga, MBSR, MBCT, empathy, compassion, love, altruism, sympathy, or kindness. Randomized controlled trials in any population were included (26 studies with 1,714 subjects). Most were conducted among healthy adults (n=11) using compassion or loving kindness meditation (n=18) over 8-12weeks (n=12) in a group format (n=17). Most control groups were wait-list or no-treatment (n=15). Outcome measures included self-reported emotions (e.g., composite scores, validated measures) and observed behavioral outcomes (e.g., helping behavior in real-world and simulated settings). Many studies showed a low risk of bias. Results demonstrated small to medium effects of meditation on self-reported (SMD = .40, p < .001) and observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001) and suggest psychosocial and neurophysiological mechanisms of action. Subgroup analyses also supported small to medium effects of meditation even when compared to active control groups. Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation can improve positive pro-social emotions and behaviors.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and meta-analysis found that meditation interventions produced small-to-medium improvements in empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors across 26 randomized controlled trials. Effects were significant for both self-reported and observable prosocial outcomes, including when compared with active controls.
Key findings
- Across 26 RCTs with 1,714 subjects, 22 of 26 studies (85%) showed significantly greater improvement in at least one prosocial outcome following meditation versus control.
- Meta-analysis found a small-to-medium effect on self-reported outcomes (SMD = .40, p < .001; 95% CI = .28–.52) and on observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001; 95% CI = .28–.61).
- Effects were similar for active controls (self-reported SMD = .43, p < .001; observable SMD = .48, p < .001) and inactive controls (self-reported SMD = .39, p < .001; observable SMD = .41, p < .001).
- Risk of bias was low in 11 studies, medium in 12, and high in 3; outcomes did not clearly differ by risk of bias.
Methods
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of meditation-based interventions assessing quantitative prosocial emotions or behaviors; searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through April 2016 yielded 26 included studies.
- Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane guidelines across eight domains; meta-analysis used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0 and standardized mean differences (SMD).
- Fixed-effects models were used given homogeneity (self-reported: I² = .00, Q = 3.94, p = .49; observable: I² = .00, Q = 1.82, p = .96), with subgroup analyses by active versus inactive control and publication bias assessed by funnel plot and fail-safe N.
Limitations
- The paper states limitations including heterogeneity in the interventions and exclusion of non-English studies, which may bias results and limit generalizability.
- The paper notes samples were all non-clinical and primarily female and White, with half not reporting racial composition, so greater sample diversity is needed.
- Evident from the text: most studies measured outcomes shortly after intervention, only 4 included longer-term follow-up, and there was variability among meditation interventions despite meta-analytic homogeneity.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
21 of 93 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tended to focus on one specific type of meditation practice, negative emotions, or self-focused positive emotions.
“Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tended to focus on one specific type of meditation practice (e.g., mindfulness or LKM; Galante et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2015;), negative emotions (Hofmann et al., 2010), or self-focused positive emotions (e.g., Zeng et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Galante et al., 2014 source
- cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
The Abstract identifies this as a systematic review and meta-analysis of loving-kindness meditation, supporting its use as an example of a review focused on one type of practice. But the Introduction says it examines other-focused as well as self-focused positive emotions, so it does not support describing its focus as self-focused positive emotions alone. The negative-emotions clause cites a different source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hofmann et al., 2010 source
- Findingown data
All 7 low-risk studies that measured observable prosocial outcomes reported improvements following meditation.
“There were 7 low-risk studies that measured observable pro-social outcomes and all of them reported improvements following meditation (Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014; Kemeny et al., 2012; Mascaro, Riling, Negi, & Raison, 2013; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2015; Weng et al., 2013; Weng, Fox, Hessenthaler, Stodola, & Davidson, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014 source
- cites Kemeny et al., 2012 source
- cites Mascaro, Riling, Negi, & Raison, 2013 source
The Empathic accuracy results report that more meditation participants improved on the observable RMET task than controls. But the Introduction distinguishes empathic accuracy from prosocial behavior, and the Discussion calls for future assessment of how practitioners relate to others in everyday life. This study supports an improvement in measured empathic accuracy, not an observed improvement in prosocial behavior. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Improvements in empathy were correlated with increased activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).
“Mascaro et al. (2013) found that improvements in empathy were correlated with increased activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mascaro et al., 2013 source
- Interpretationreasoning
One way meditation practice can lead to improvements in prosocial emotions is by improving individuals' own socio-emotional well-being.
“Consistent with the larger literature demonstrating that meditation interventions improve self-focused emotions (Hofmann et al. al., 2010; Kirby et al., 2016), these results suggest that one way meditation practice can lead to improvements in pro-social emotions is by improving individuals’ own socio-emotional well-being.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Hofmann et al. al., 2010 source
- cites Kirby et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
- Findingcitation
Meditation was associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex.
“Meditation was also associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex (Mascaro, Darcher, Negi, & Raison, 2015; Weng et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Mascaro, Darcher, Negi, & Raison, 2015 source
- cites Weng et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Greater prosocial behavior (charitable donations) were correlated with changes in the inferior parietal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
“Weng et al. (2015) found that greater pro-social behavior (charitable donations) were correlated with changes in the inferior parietal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Weng et al., 2015 source
The Study 1 Results report a correlation between empathic concern and spending in an economic Helping Game, not between charitable donations and changes in brain regions. The General Introduction mentions neural responses in a previous study, but our copy does not report the claimed correlation. Searches for “inferior parietal,” “dorsolateral prefrontal,” and “charitable donations” found no passage establishing it; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Fourteen studies reported results for potential mediators of effects of meditation on prosocial outcomes.
“Fourteen studies reported results for potential mediators of effects of meditation on pro-social outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 4 studies incorporated a longer-term follow-up (range = 8 - 52 weeks post intervention).
“All studies measured outcomes shortly after the end of the intervention; only 4 studies incorporated a longer-term follow-up (range = 8 – 52 weeks post intervention).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was sufficient homogeneity among studies on self-reported outcomes to conduct a fixed effects meta-analysis (i-squared = .00; Q-value = 3.94, p = .49).
“Results indicated sufficient homogeneity to conduct a fixed effects meta-analysis (i-squared = .00; Q-value = 3.94, p = .49).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two of the 3 studies that did not find significant effects on observable outcomes were conducted in children.
“Two of the 3 studies that did not find significant effects were conducted in children (Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016; Velásquez, López, Quiñonez, & Paba, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Velásquez, López, Quiñonez, & Paba, 2015 source
- Findingown data
Publication bias was not suspected for observable outcomes based on funnel plot and fail-safe N (N = 76, p = .92).
“Publication bias was not suspected based on the funnel plot (see Figure 4) and the number of negative studies needed to make the results non-significant (N = 76, p = .92).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Eight of 9 medium-risk studies found support for subjective improvements.
“There were 9 medium-risk studies and 8 found support for subjective improvements (Ashar et al., 2016; Asuero et al., 2014; He et al., 2015; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Logie & Ferwen, 2015; Oman, Thoresen, & Hedberg, 2010; Shapiro, Schwartz, & Bonner, 1998; Taylor et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
Both studies that directly compared mindfulness and compassion meditation found no significant differences between them for improving prosocial outcomes.
“Both of the studies that directly compared mindfulness and compassion meditation found no significant differences between them for improving pro-social outcomes (Condon et al., 2013; Logie & Ferwen, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Condon et al., 2013 source
- cites Logie & Ferwen, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Both studies that included a long-term follow-up found that improvements were maintained over time.
“Both studies that included a long-term follow-up found that improvements were maintained over time (Oman et al., 2010; Shapiro et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Four of 7 medium-risk studies found support for improvements in observable prosocial outcomes as compared to active and wait-list controls.
“The remaining 7 studies were medium-risk, and 4 of these found support for improvements in observable pro-social outcomes as compared to active (Hutcherson, Seppala, & Gross, 2008; Logie & Frewen, 2015) and wait-list controls (Condon, Desbordes, Miller, & DeSteno, 2013; Flook, Goldberg, Pinger, & Davidson, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation
Increased positive affect mediated the effect of LKM on explicit bias toward marginalized groups.
“increased positive affect mediated the effect of LKM on explicit bias toward marginalized groups (Hutcherson et al., 2008);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hutcherson et al., 2008 source
- Findingown data
The effect size across studies on observable outcomes was .45 (p < .001; 95% CI = .28 - .61).
“The effect size across these studies was .45 (p < .001; 95% CI = .28 – .61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was sufficient homogeneity among studies on observable outcomes to conduct a fixed effects analysis (i-squared = .00; Q-value = 1.82, p = .96).
“There was sufficient homogeneity among studies to conduct a fixed effects analysis (i-squared = .00; Q-value = 1.82, p = .96).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Decreased stress mediated the effect of LKM on bias.
“decreased stress mediated the effect of LKM on bias (Kang et al., 2014);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kang et al., 2014 source
- Findingcitation
Three low-risk studies did not find support for subjective improvements.
“Three low-risk studies did not find support for subjective improvements (Kang et al., 2014; Keefe, 1979; Rosenberg et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Self-reported results did not appear to appreciably vary depending on the study's level of risk of bias.
“These results did not appear to appreciably vary depending on the study’s level of risk of bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Meditation training has a small to medium effect on self-reported prosocial outcomes (SMD = .40, p < .001).
“Results demonstrated small to medium effects of meditation on self-reported (SMD = .40, p < .001) and observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001)”
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Self-reported Outcomes · plain
“The effect size for subjective outcomes across these studies was .40 (95% CI = .28 – .52, p < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Self-reported Outcomes · plain
- Findingcitation
Six of these studies conducted formal mediation analyses.
“Six of these studies conducted formal mediation analyses (Ashar et al., 2016; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2014; Oman et al., 2010; Kok et al., 2013; Shapiro et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
The effect size for subjective outcomes across studies was .40 (95% CI = .28 - .52, p < .001).
“The effect size for subjective outcomes across these studies was .40 (95% CI = .28 – .52, p < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Results for self-reported outcomes were similar across studies that used active (SMD = .43) and inactive control groups (SMD = .39).
“The results were similar across studies that used active (SMD = .43, p < .001; 95% CI = .21 – .65) and inactive control groups (SMD = .39, p < .001; 95% CI = .24 – .53).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Meditation training has a small to medium effect on observable prosocial outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001).
“Results demonstrated small to medium effects of meditation on self-reported (SMD = .40, p < .001) and observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001)”
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Observable Outcomes · plain
“The effect size across these studies was .45 (p < .001; 95% CI = .28 – .61).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Observable Outcomes · plain
- Findingown data
The majority of studies (14 out of 19; 74%) found significant improvements in self-reported outcomes following meditation compared to control for at least one prosocial outcome.
“The majority of studies (14 out of 19; 74%) found significant improvements in self-reported outcomes following meditation compared to the control intervention for at least one pro-social outcome (e.g., empathy, compassion, or pro-social behavior).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Greater home practice and decreased stress mediated the effect of meditation on compassion.
“and greater home practice and decreased stress mediated the effect of meditation on compassion (Oman et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oman et al., 2010 source
- Findingown data
Results for observable outcomes were similar for studies with active (SMD = .48) and inactive control groups (SMD = .41).
“Results were similar for studies with active (SMD = .48, p < .001; 95% CI = .25 – .72) and inactive control groups (SMD = .41, p < .001; 95% CI = .19 – .63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most studies (11 out of 14; 79%) found support for improvements in observable outcomes following meditation as compared to control.
“Most studies (11 out of 14; 79%) found support for improvements in observable outcomes following meditation as compared to the control intervention, with no clear difference in results by study quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Publication bias was not suspected for self-reported outcomes based on funnel plot and fail-safe N (N = 165, p = .55).
“Publication bias was not suspected based on the funnel plot and because the number of studies needed to make the results non-significant was 165 (p = .55).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two of 3 high-risk studies found improvements.
“Three studies were classified as high-risk and two of these found improvements (Kok et al., 2013; Wallmark, Safarzadeh, Daukantaite, & Maddux, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Four of 7 low-risk studies found support for improvements in self-reported empathy or compassion as compared to wait-list and active control groups.
“There were 7 low-risk studies and 4 found support for improvements in self-reported empathy or compassion as compared to wait-list (Jazaieri et al., 2013; Shapiro, Brown, Thoresen, & Plante, 2010) and active control groups (Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2015; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Subgroup analyses supported small to medium effects of meditation even when compared to active control groups.
“Subgroup analyses also supported small to medium effects of meditation even when compared to active control groups.”
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Observable Outcomes · plain
“Results were similar for studies with active (SMD = .48, p < .001; 95% CI = .25 – .72) and inactive control groups (SMD = .41, p < .001; 95% CI = .19 – .63).”
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Self-reported Outcomes · plain
“The results were similar across studies that used active (SMD = .43, p < .001; 95% CI = .21 – .65) and inactive control groups (SMD = .39, p < .001; 95% CI = .24 – .53).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
- Also stated in: § Synthesis of Results for Observable Outcomes · plain
- Findingcitation
Increased social and emotional connectedness mediated the effects of compassion meditation on charitable donations.
“Formal mediation results revealed that increased social and emotional connectedness mediated the effects of compassion meditation and charitable donations (Ashar et al., 2016);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ashar et al., 2016 source
- Findingnone given
Both of the studies that compared LKM to mindfulness did not find significant differences in pro-sociality.
“both of the studies that compared LKM to mindfulness did not find significant differences in pro-sociality”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In the current review, meditation was associated with improvements in vagal tone.
“In the current review, meditation was indeed associated with improvements in vagal tone (Kok et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kok et al., 2013 source
- Findingown data
Meditation interventions showed significantly greater improvements in at least one prosocial outcome as compared to control groups in 22 out of the 26 included RCTs (85%).
“Meditation interventions showed significantly greater improvements in at least one pro-social outcome as compared to control groups in 22 out of the 26 included RCTs (85%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
- Rests on an assumption: The included studies' samples and interventions are sufficiently representative to generalize the pooled effects to broader populations.
- Findingown data
Meta-analysis results were similar across type of control group and outcome measure.
“meta-analysis results were similar across type of control group and outcome measure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the current review, most studies incorporating LKM found significant pro-social benefits.
“and found significant pro-social benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the current review, most studies incorporated LKM.
“In the current review, most studies incorporated LKM”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Logie & Frewen (2015) found a greater effect of LKM on reducing self-positivity bias as compared to mindfulness meditation.
“Logie & Frewen (2015) found a greater effect of LKM on reducing self-positivity bias as compared to mindfulness meditation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Logie & Frewen, 2015 source
- Interpretationown data
Meditation can improve positive prosocial emotions and behaviors.
“Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation can improve positive pro-social emotions and behaviors.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The results of the current systematic review support the efficacy of meditation-based interventions for increasing empathy, compassion, and pro-social behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
- Rests on an assumption: The included studies' samples and interventions are sufficiently representative to generalize the pooled effects to broader populations.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Premisereasoning
No prior research has systematically reviewed the results of meditation interventions for prosocial outcomes.
“Despite the multiple reports of meditation and emotional well-being, no research has systematically reviewed the results of meditation interventions for pro-social outcomes.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“Thus, a comprehensive and systematic review of meditation for pro-social outcomes is lacking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
There is a scientific evidence base to support the broader pro-social benefits of individual meditation training.
“Meditation teachers in non-clinical settings should be aware that there is a scientific evidence base to support the broader pro-social benefits of individual meditation training”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Regular elicitation of the relaxation response is associated with reduced stress and negative emotions.
“Regular elicitation of the relaxation response is associated with reduced stress and negative emotions (Esch et al., 2003)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Esch et al., 2003
- Premisecitation
Greater meditation practice is associated with greater improvements.
“Amount of meditation practice may play a role in a dose-response relationship, with reports of greater practice associated with greater improvements (Jazaieri et al., 2013; Keefe, 1979; Oman et al., 2010; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Shapiro et al., 1998; Velásquez et al., 2015; Wallmark et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
Half of the studies did not report the racial composition of the sample.
“half did not report the racial composition of the sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The current findings are supported by the relatively strong design and low risk of bias across many RCTs.
“The current findings are supported by the relatively strong design and low risk of bias across many RCTs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Regular elicitation of the relaxation response is thought to play a role in improving pro-social emotions.
“and is thought to play a role in improving pro-social emotions (Kirby, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kirby, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Meditation training is a promising way to increase individual-level pro-social outcomes.
“and suggest that meditation training is a promising way to increase individual-level pro-social outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In the current systematic review, limitations include an inability to include non-English studies.
“and an inability to non-English studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
There was variability among the meditation interventions.
“there was variability among the meditation interventions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others' suffering and thus greater opportunities for pro-social action.
“as trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others’ suffering and thus greater opportunities for pro-social action (Bibeau et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bibeau et al., 2016 source
- Study design and conductnone given
There is evidence for lack of publication bias.
“and evidence for lack of publication bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The studies included in the meta-analysis were homogeneous.
“the homogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“although the meta-analysis indicated homogeneity among studies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Study design and conductnone given
Samples were all non-clinical.
“samples were all non-clinical”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Meditation's effects on pro-social outcomes specifically have a neural and physiological basis.
“and further support a neural and physiological basis for meditation’s effects on pro-social outcomes specifically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Results of several studies suggest potential mechanisms by which meditation can improve prosocial outcomes.
“Results of several studies suggest potential mechanisms by which meditation can improve pro-social outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
- Premisecitation
Many meditation practices elicit physiological processes associated with the relaxation response (parasympathetic dominance), which is the physiological counter to the stress response (sympathetic dominance).
“Many meditation practices elicit physiological processes associated with the relaxation response (i.e., parasympathetic dominance), which is the physiological counter to the stress response (i.e., sympathetic dominance; Benson, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benson, 1997 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Integrating meditation training into other evidence-based interventions may be feasible.
“Results suggest that integrating meditation training into other evidence-based interventions may be feasible”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Brief mobile-phone meditation practice (two weeks, 20 minutes daily) has shown significant pro-social benefits.
- May combine two claims. 34
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeditation-based interventions improve stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and emotion regulation across a range of psychiatric and medical populations.
“The results of several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions suggest that these treatments significantly improve stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and emotion regulation across a range of psychiatric and medical populations (Bohlmeijer, Prenger, Taal, & Cuijpers, 2010; Eberth & Sedlmeier, 2012; Gotink et al., 2015; Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010; Kh”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bohlmeijer, Prenger, Taal, & Cuijpers, 2010 source
- cites Eberth & Sedlmeier, 2012 source
- cites Gotink et al., 2015 source
The Discussion’s summary of main results (page not available) reports significant improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life after MBSR or MBCT in patients with medical conditions and psychological disorders. The cited paper does not report a significant improvement in emotion regulation as an outcome; its Results instead mention increased metacognitive awareness of negative thoughts and feelings. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLKM improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect.
“a recent meta-analysis found that LKM indeed improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect (Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014 source
The Abstract and Conclusions report reduced depression and increased mindfulness, compassion, and self-compassion versus passive controls, plus increased positive emotions versus progressive relaxation. But these are findings for kindness-based meditation as a group of practices, not specifically for LKM; the citing sentence also omits the differing comparators. The Effects of the intervention section reports mixed or nonsignificant results against some active controls. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn studies with follow-up assessments, one found maintained gains at 5-months post-intervention and the other found no significant improvements post-intervention or at follow-up.
“In studies with follow-up assessments, one found maintained gains at 5-months post-intervention (Kemeny et al., 2012) and the other found no significant improvements post-intervention or at follow-up (Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Kemeny et al., 2012 source
- cites Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmpathy and compassion are related but distinct prosocial emotions that consist of cognitive and affective components and can be learned with practice.
“Although there are varying definitions of empathy and compassion, they are often considered related but distinct pro-social emotions that consist of cognitive and affective components and can be learned with practice (Bibeau, Dionne, & Leblanc, 2016; Goetz, Keltner, & Simon-Thomas, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Bibeau, Dionne, & Leblanc, 2016 source
- cites Goetz, Keltner, & Simon-Thomas, 2010 source
The Critical Summary of Alternatives (page unavailable) distinguishes compassion from empathic distress and describes compassion as involving appraisals and feelings. It also says loving-kindness meditation may cultivate a lasting disposition toward compassion. These passages do not establish that empathy itself can be learned with practice or that both empathy and compassion have the claimed cognitive and affective components. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is associated with greater pro-social behaviors.
“Oxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is also associated with greater pro-social behaviors (e.g., improved face expression recognition, enhanced encoding of positive social memories; Isgett, Algoe, Boulton, Way, & Fredrickson, 2016; Mascaro et al, 2015; Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Isgett, Algoe, Boulton, Way, & Fredrickson, 2016 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes oxytocin as implicated in sociality, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links it to altruistic behavior, attention to positive faces, and constructive behavior during couple conflict. Those passages support the broad social-behavior association, but they do not establish a role in relaxation or secure-attachment physiology, improved facial-expression recognition, or enhanced encoding of positive social memories. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mascaro et al, 2015 source
The Neuromodulatory Backdrop section links oxytocin to prosocial behaviors and to vagal activity and reduced sympathetic responses to stress, which supports the prosocial and relaxation-related parts of the claim. It does not discuss secure attachment physiology or the specific examples of facial-expression recognition and positive social-memory encoding. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports higher oxytocin levels in securely attached mothers after interacting with their infants and suggests a role in attachment and social behavior. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes improved facial-expression recognition, social memory, and trust in trials of intranasal oxytocin. Our copy does not establish a role for oxytocin in relaxation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEmotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes.
“and emotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes (Mascaro et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mascaro et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividuals must be able to tolerate the distress they feel in response to another's suffering in order to effectively enact helping behaviors.
“Theoretical conceptualizations of compassion emphasize that individuals must be able to tolerate the distress they feel in response to another’s suffering in order to effectively enact helping behaviors (Strauss et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Strauss et al., 2016 source
Section 1.1 describes distress tolerance as a component of several conceptualizations of compassion and says overwhelming personal distress may hinder the ability to help. The claim’s categorical “must” is stronger than the review’s qualified account. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmpathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior.
“Empathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source
- cites Singer & Klimecki, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes.
“while compassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes (e.g., Klimecki et al., 2014; Singer & Klimecki, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source
The Introduction says compassion is concern for others’ suffering associated with motivation to help, and describes it as a promising way to strengthen personal resources. The Discussion reports increased positive affect after compassion training. However, the paper characterizes sharing others’ painful feelings as empathy, which it distinguishes from compassion; it does not support the parenthetical definition of compassion as affect-sharing. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Singer & Klimecki, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther previous studies have found some differences in emotional outcomes across meditation types.
“other previous studies have found some differences in emotional outcomes across meditation types (Zeng et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 18 studies provided sufficient data on self-reported outcomes for meta-analysis, allowing 19 comparisons.
“A total of 18 studies provided sufficient data on self-reported outcomes for meta-analysis. These studies allowed for 19 comparisons because one study used two control groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations.
“Most studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations using a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGreater meditation compliance led to decreased anxiety, which led to greater empathy.
“Shapiro et al. (1998) found that greater meditation compliance led to decreased anxiety, which led to greater empathy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shapiro et al., 1998 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 11 studies provided sufficient data on observable outcomes for meta-analysis with 12 comparisons available.
“A total of 11 studies provided sufficient data on observable outcomes for meta-analysis with 12 comparisons available (see Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudies showed lower risk of bias in selective reporting (24 low risk) but higher risk in baseline imbalance (4 high risk), participant blinding, incomplete outcome data, and differential attrition (3 high risk each).
“In general, studies showed lower risk of bias in terms of selective reporting of outcome measures (24 low risk), but higher risk of bias in terms of baseline imbalance (4 high risk), participant blinding, incomplete outcome data, and differential attrition (3 high risk each; see Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMost studies used a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).
“Most studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations using a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIncreases in mindfulness and self-compassion, and decreases in stress, were significantly correlated with increases in empathy.
“One study also found that increases in mindfulness and self-compassion, and decreases in stress, were significantly correlated with increases in empathy (Wallmark et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wallmark et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEleven studies showed a low risk of bias, 12 showed a medium risk, and 3 showed high risk.
“Eleven studies showed a low risk of bias, 12 showed a medium risk, and 3 showed high risk (Tables 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe literature search yielded 479 results, and after exclusions, 26 studies met eligibility criteria.
“Our search yielded 479 results. After excluding duplicates (n = 282), unpublished manuscripts (n = 18), non-RCTs (n = 52), non-meditation interventions (n = 18), and studies that did not quantitatively measure pro-social outcomes (n = 43) or only measured self-focused compassion (n = 40), there were 26 studies that met our eligibility criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationLoving kindness meditation led to improvements in positive emotions, which led to improvements in social connectedness, which led to improvements in vagal tone.
“Kok et al. (2013) tested more complex structural models and found that loving kindness meditation led to improvements in positive emotions, which led to improvements in social connectedness, which led to improvements in vagal tone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kok et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAlmost all (7 out of 8) studies examined the relationship between amount of home practice/meditation adherence and prosocial outcomes; 5 found greater meditation practice correlated with greater prosocial outcomes and 2 found no significant correlation.
“Almost all (7 out of 8) examined the relationship between amount of home practice/meditation adherence and pro-social outcomes: 5 found that greater meditation practice was correlated with greater pro-social outcomes (Jazaieri et al., 2013; Keefe, 1979; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Velásquez et al., 2015; Wallmark et al., 2013) and 2 found no significant correlation (Kemeny et la., 2012; Mascaro et al.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEffects for observable outcomes were somewhat stronger and more consistent than results for self-reported outcomes, though both showed significant improvements in the meta-analysis.
“Effects for observable outcomes (e.g., real-world helping behavior, facial expressions) were somewhat stronger and more consistent than results for self-reported outcomes, though both showed significant improvements in the meta-analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMeta-analysis results indicated that meditation training had a small-medium and significant effect on both subjective and objective prosocial outcomes, similar across studies with active and inactive control groups.
“Meta-analysis results indicated that meditation training had a small-medium and significant effect on both subjective and objective pro-social outcomes, which was similar across studies with active and inactive control groups if not slightly higher among those with active controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany studies were low-risk, with only 3 studies showing a high risk of bias and no clear differences in outcomes based on risk of bias.
“Many studies were low-risk, with only 3 studies showing a high risk of bias and there were no clear differences in outcomes based on risk of bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationTwo independent reviewers assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.
“Two independent reviewers (CML and NS) assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins & Green, 2008 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationHeterogeneity of included studies was examined using the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model.
“We examined heterogeneity of the included studies based on the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model according to the results (i-squared < 40% for fixed effects; Higgins & Green, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Higgins & Green, 2008 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEngaging in prosocial behavior is associated with greater happiness, psychological well-being, indices of physiological health, better physical functioning, better interpersonal relationships, and decreased morbidity in medical populations.
“Indeed, a large body of research demonstrates that engaging in pro-social behavior is associated with greater happiness and psychological well-being, indices of physiological health (e.g., increased heart rate variability, immune function, telomere length, genetic expression), better physical functioning, better interpersonal relationships, and decreased morbidity in medical populations (Dunn, Akn”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGreater empathy leads to greater compassion, and greater compassion leads to greater prosocial behavior.
“Research supports the idea that greater empathy leads to greater compassion, and greater compassion leads to greater pro-social behavior (Lim & DeSteno, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lim & DeSteno, 2016 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFor studies that included two control groups, two comparisons were conducted and the total N was divided by 2 to avoid over-estimation.
“For studies that included two control groups, we conducted two comparisons and divided the total N by 2 to avoid over-estimation of the study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAuthors did not contact authors to obtain missing data in order to prevent bias introduced by selective responding of authors.
“We did not contact authors to obtain missing data in order to prevent bias introduced by selective responding of authors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCompassion meditation promotes prosocial outcomes in psychotherapists.
“A narrative review also suggested that compassion meditation promotes pro-social outcomes in psychotherapists (Bibeau et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bibeau et al., 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPublication bias was assessed by funnel plot and the fail-safe N.
“Publication bias was also assessed by funnel plot and the fail-safe N.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOne reviewer extracted data for meta-analysis and a second independent reviewer verified the results, with no discrepancies noted.
“One reviewer (CML) extracted data for meta-analysis and a second independent reviewer (RS) verified the results, with no discrepancies noted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo independent reviewers extracted data from each study and discussed results to ensure agreement, with discrepancies resolved through discussion with the senior author.
“Two independent reviewers (CML and NS) extracted data from each study and discussed results to ensure agreement. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with the senior author (GY).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningImproving these pro-social outcomes has the potential to promote important societal changes needed today.
“Improving these pro-social outcomes has the potential to promote important societal changes needed today.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPotential emotional mechanisms include an increased sense of social-emotional connectedness with others, increased positive affect, decreased stress and negative affect, and greater trait mindfulness and self-compassion.
“Potential emotional mechanisms include an increased sense of social-emotional connectedness with others (Ashar et al., 2016; Kok et al., 2013), increased positive affect (Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kok et al., 2013), decreased stress and negative affect (Kang et al., 2014; Oman et al., 2010; Shapiro et al., 1998), and greater trait mindfulness and self-compassion (Wallmark et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn the current systematic review, limitations include heterogeneity in the interventions.
“limitations include heterogeneity in the interventions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThese results advance the scientific understanding of meditation for health outcomes.
“Nonetheless, these results advance the scientific understanding of meditation for health outcomes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSamples were primarily female and White.
“primarily female and White”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe role of oxytocin in social behavior is complex and not necessarily pro-social, depending on individual difference characteristics (e.g., gender, psychopathology).
“Recent theories highlight that the role of oxytocin in social behavior is complex and not necessarily pro-social, depending on individual difference characteristics (e.g., gender, psychopathology; Shamay-Tsoory & Abu-Akel, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shamay-Tsoory & Abu-Akel, 2016 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThese mechanisms are consistent with research demonstrating that mindfulness-based interventions increase trait mindfulness, as trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others' suffering.
“These mechanisms are also consistent with research demonstrating that mindfulness-based interventions increase trait mindfulness (Quaglia, Braun, Freeman, McDaniel, & Brown, 2016), as trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others’ suffering”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Quaglia, Braun, Freeman, McDaniel, & Brown, 2016 source
- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSome studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on prosocial outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals' own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in prosocial outcomes.
“Some studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on pro-social outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in pro-social outcomes (Ashar et al., 2016; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2014; Kok et al., 2013; Shapiro”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThese limitations may have biased the results and limits generalizability.
“which may have biased the results and limits generalizability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDistress tolerance is a well-established risk factor for emotional disorders that influences emotion regulation strategies (i.e., low levels of distress tolerance motivate maladaptive avoidance).
“Distress tolerance, an individual difference variable defined as the ability to withstand negative affective states (Simons & Gaher, 2005), is a well-established risk factor for emotional disorders that influences emotion regulation strategies (i.e., low levels of distress tolerance motivate maladaptive avoidance).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simons & Gaher, 2005 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome research suggests empathy and compassion may have different utility for the person giving versus receiving help, particularly when empathizing with another's suffering.
“It is also worth noting that some research suggests empathy and compassion may have different utility for the person giving versus receiving help, particularly when empathizing with another’s suffering.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenMany studies used active control groups and objective behavioral outcomes.
“Many studies used active control groups and objective behavioral outcomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe same physiological processes that characterize the relaxation response occur in the context of secure attachment and mother-child dyads, which provide a foundation for compassion.
“The same physiological processes that characterize the relaxation response have been shown to occur in the context of secure attachment and mother-child dyads, which provide a foundation for compassion (Fricchione, 2011; Hill-Soderlund et al, 2008; Mikulincer, Shaver, Gillath, & Nitzberg, 2005; Oosterman, De Schipper, Fisher, Dozier, & Schuengel, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMeditation interventions, particularly mindfulness meditation, significantly increase distress tolerance and improve emotion regulation.
“Meditation interventions, particularly mindfulness meditation, have been shown to significantly increase distress tolerance and improve emotion regulation (Lotan, Tanay, & Bernstein, 2013; Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningMeditation interventions (e.g., MBSR, MBCT) could provide additional benefits beyond reduced emotional distress.
“Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation interventions (e.g., MBSR, MBCT) could provide additional benefits beyond reduced emotional distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
“Outcome measures included self-reported emotions (e.g., composite scores, validated measures) and observed behavioral outcomes (e.g., helping behavior in real-world and simulated settings).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The included studies' samples and interventions are sufficiently representative to generalize the pooled effects to broader populations.
“Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation can improve positive pro-social emotions and behaviors.”
“The results of the current systematic review support the efficacy of meditation-based interventions for increasing empathy, compassion, and pro-social behaviors.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
“and suggest psychosocial and neurophysiological mechanisms of action.”
“Results of several studies suggest potential mechanisms by which meditation can improve pro-social outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Brief mobile-phone meditation practice (two weeks, 20 minutes daily) has shown significant pro-social benefits.
“as even two weeks of 20 minutes daily practice via mobile phone applications have shown significant pro-social benefits.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Meta-analyses involving hundreds of RCTs suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning.
“Meta-analyses involving hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety, stress) and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning (eg, meaning in life, compassion, prosocial behavior) [6-15].”
From Testing the efficacy of a multicomponent, self-guided, smartphone-based meditation app: Three-armed randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The Introduction reports that other meta-analyses found improvements in stress, anxiety, and depression; the Discussion reports this paper’s finding of improved compassion and prosocial behavior. This review included 26 RCTs, not hundreds, and the passages do not establish an effect on meaning in life. The claim is therefore supported for several outcomes but not in all its specifics. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMindfulness meditation can modulate intersubjective and self-other representations and promote positive social behaviors such as compassion, empathy, and altruism.
“Several studies reported that mindfulness meditation can modulate intersubjective and self–other representations [102,103,104] while promoting positive social behaviors, such as compassion, empathy, and altruism [105].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cited works that were retracted
Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.
Cites a retracted work: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124344
InfoThe cited work was retracted on 2019-04-12 (notice 10.1371/journal.pone.0215608), not before this paper was published (2017-10-23).
Cited work 10.1371/journal.pone.0124344 · retracted 2019-04-12 · notice 10.1371/journal.pone.0215608 · this paper published 2017-10-23
“Gotink, R. A., Chu, P., Busschbach, J. J., Benson, H., Fricchione, G. L., & Hunink, M. G. (2015). Standardised mindfulness-based interventions in healthcare: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs. PLoS One, 10(4), e0124344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124344 .”
Cites
1 retracted
Gotink, R. A., Chu, P., Busschbach, J. J. V., Benson, H., Fricchione, G. L., & Hunink, M. G. M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124344 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractedPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859 · see citing works
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554 · see citing works
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164 · see citing works
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691 · see citing works
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136 · Cited by 10,349 · see citing works
Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review.
Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0016059 · Cited by 4,427 · see citing works
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3 · Cited by 4,255 · see citing works
The effect of mindfulness based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta analytic review
Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018555 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…low, or unclear for each of the eight domains: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessors, incomplete data, selective reporting, baseline imbalance, and differential attrition (Jüni et al. 2001; Liberati et al. 2009).”
Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018807 · Cited by 2,200 · see citing works
Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis
Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., Chapleau, M.-A., Paquin, K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure
Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3 · Cited by 1,730 · see citing works
Spending money on others promotes happiness
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150952 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives
Penner., L. A., Dovidio., J. F., Piliavin., J. A., & Schroeder., D. A. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141 · Cited by 1,569 · see citing works
Development of an empathy scale.
Hogan, R. (1969) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027580 · Cited by 1,532 · see citing works
Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and premedical students
Shapiro, S. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Bonner, G. (1998) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1023/a:1018700829825 · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016984 · Cited by 1,484 · see citing works
Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review
Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005 · Cited by 1,360 · see citing works
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression
TEASDALE, J. D. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203098899-33 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054 · Cited by 1,254 · see citing works
What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures
Strauss, C., Lever Taylor, B., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004 · Cited by 1,021 · see citing works
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression
Kumari, D., & Satyapal, N. (2024) · Industrial Psychiatry Journal · doi:10.4103/ipj.ipj_127_24 · Cited by 1,005 · see citing works
The Social Salience Hypothesis of Oxytocin
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Abu-Akel, A. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.020 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Bohlmeijer, E., Prenger, R., Taal, E., & Cuijpers, P. (2010) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.005 · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F., & Diamond, A. (2015) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038454 · Cited by 813 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The majority of these studies used active control groups (n = 5; Kang et al. 2014; Mascaro et al. 2013; Schonert-Reichl et al. 2015; Weng et al. 2013, 2015).”
InfluentialThe Effects of Mindfulness Meditation: A Meta-Analysis
Eberth, J., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Adult attachment predicts maternal brain and oxytocin response to infant cues.
Strathearn, L., Fonagy, P., Amico, J., & Montague, P. R. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.103 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness.
Hutcherson, C. A., Seppala, E. M., & Gross, J. J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0013237 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., Brantley, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612470827 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
Pace, T. W. W., Negi, L. T., Adame, D. D., Cole, S. P., Sivilli, T. I., Brown, T. D., Issa, M. J., & Raison, C. L. (2009) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.08.011 · Cited by 748 · cited 4× · see citing works
“These findings are similar to previous studies of meditation for general health outcomes (Marchand 2014; Pace et al. 2009) and non-RCTs of meditation for prosocial outcomes (Klimecki et al. 2012, 2014; Leiberg et al. 2011) and further support a neural and physiological basis for meditation’s…”
InfluentialAttachment, Caregiving, and Altruism: Boosting Attachment Security Increases Compassion and Helping.
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.817 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
The meeting of meditative disciplines and western psychology: A mutually enriching dialogue.
WALSH, R. N., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.227 · Cited by 687 · see citing works
Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst060 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Functional Neural Plasticity and Associated Changes in Positive Affect After Compassion Training
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs142 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering.
Weng, H. Y., Fox, A. S., Shackman, A. J., Stodola, D. E., Caldwell, J. Z. K., Olson, M. C., Rogers, G. M., & Davidson, R. J. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612469537 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038256 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 481 · see citing works
‘Yoga for Anxiety: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence’
Kirkwood, G., Rampes, H., Tuffrey, V, Richardson, J., & Pilkington, K. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.018069 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Enhancing Compassion: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Compassion Cultivation Training Program
Jazaieri, H., Jinpa, T., McGonigal, K. M., Rosenberg, E. L., Finkelstein, J., Simon-Thomas, E. R., Cullen, M., Doty, J. R., Gross, J. J., & Goldin, P. R. (2012) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9373-z · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Meditation increases compassionate responses to suffering.
Condon, P., Desbordes, G., Miller, W. B., & DeSteno, D. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613485603 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Short-term compassion training increases prosocial behavior in a newly developed prosocial game
Leiberg, S., Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017798 · Cited by 442 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…studies of meditation for general health outcomes (Marchand 2014; Pace et al. 2009) and non-RCTs of meditation for prosocial outcomes (Klimecki et al. 2012, 2014; Leiberg et al. 2011) and further support a neural and physiological basis for meditation’s effects on prosocial outcomes specifically.”
Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., Thoresen, C., & Plante, T. G. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20761 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Piet, J., Würtzen, H., & Zachariae, R. (2012) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028329 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Compassion interventions: The programmes, the evidence, and implications for research and practice
Kirby, J. N. (2017) · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12104 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Contemplative/emotion training reduces negative emotional behavior and promotes prosocial responses.
Kemeny, M. E., Foltz, C., Cavanagh, J. F., Cullen, M., Giese-Davis, J., Jennings, P., Rosenberg, E. L., Gillath, O., Shaver, P. R., Wallace, B. A., et al. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0026118 · Cited by 391 · cited 9× · see citing works
“…prosocial outcomes: five found that greater meditation practice was correlated with greater prosocial outcomes (Jazaieri et al. 2013; Keefe 1979; Rosenberg et al. 2015; Velásquez et al. 2015;Wallmark et al. 2013) and two found no significant correlation (Kemeny et al. 2012; Mascaro et al. 2013).”
InfluentialEffect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Galante, J., Galante, I., Bekkers, M.-J., & Gallacher, J. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037249 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Nelson, S. K., Layous, K., Cole, S. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000178 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Quaglia, J. T., Braun, S. E., Freeman, S. P., McDaniel, M. A., & Brown, K. W. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000268 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
An Introduction to Compassion Focused Therapy in Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Gilbert, P. (2010) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2010.3.2.97 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Lim, D., & DeSteno, D. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000144 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Uebelacker, L. A., Epstein-Lubow, G. P., Gaudiano, B. A., Tremont, G. N., Battle, C. L., & Miller, I. W. (2010) · Journal of Psychiatric Practice · doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000367775.88388.96 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Compare, A., Zangeneh, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0368-1 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
The effect of loving-kindness meditation on positive emotions: a meta-analytic review
Zeng, X., Chiu, C. P. K., Wang, R., Oei, T. P. S., & Leung, F. Y. K. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01693 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch5 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Compassion meditation enhances empathic accuracy and related neural activity
Mascaro, J. S., Rilling, J. K., Tenzin Negi, L., & Raison, C. L. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss095 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Asuero, A. M., Queraltó, J. M., Pujol-Ribera, E., Berenguera, A., Rodriguez-Blanco, T., & Epstein, R. M. (2014) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.21211 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
The nondiscriminating heart: Lovingkindness meditation training decreases implicit intergroup bias.
Kang, Y., Gray, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0034150 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Seeking the Heart of Wisdom: The Path of Insight Meditation
Goldstein, J., Kornfield, J., & Bstan-ʾdzin-rgya-mtsho, D. L. X. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 217 · see citing works
(2003) · PubMed · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of mindfulness and meditation: Evidence from neuroimaging studies
Marchand, W. R. (2014) · World Journal of Radiology · doi:10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.471 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Taylor, C., Harrison, J., Haimovitz, K., Oberle, E., Thomson, K., Schonert-Reichl, K., & Roeser, R. W. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0425-4 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences
Hurst, C. E. (1992) · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Hill‐Soderlund, A. L., Mills‐Koonce, W. R., Propper, C., Calkins, S. D., Granger, D. A., Moore, G. A., Gariepy, J., & Cox, M. J. (2008) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20302 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Autonomic reactivity in relation to attachment and early adversity among foster children
Oosterman, M., de Schipper, J. C., Fisher, P. A., Dozier, M., & Schuengel, C. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579409990290 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
The Role of Compassion in Altruistic Helping and Punishment Behavior
Weng, H. Y., Fox, A. S., Hessenthaler, H. C., Stodola, D. E., & Davidson, R. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143794 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Promoting Altruism Through Meditation: An 8-Week Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Wallmark, E., Safarzadeh, K., Daukantaitė, D., & Maddux, R. E. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0115-4 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Loving-kindness meditation practice associated with longer telomeres in women
Hoge, E. A., Chen, M. M., Orr, E., Metcalf, C. A., Fischer, L. E., Pollack, M. H., DeVivo, I., & Simon, N. M. (2013) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2013.04.005 · Cited by 116 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…rate variability, immune function, telomere length, genetic expression), better physical functioning, better interpersonal relationships, and decreased morbidity in medical populations (Dunn et al. 2008; Hoge et al. 2013; Ironson 2007; Nelson et al. 2016; Pace et al. 2009; Weinstein and Ryan 2010).”
Maternal oxytocin response predicts mother-to-infant gaze
Kim, S., Fonagy, P., Koos, O., Dorsett, K., & Strathearn, L. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.050 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Poehlmann, J., Vigna, A. J., Weymouth, L., Gerstein, E. D., Burnson, C., Zabransky, M., Lee, P., & Zahn‐Waxler, C. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0426-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Effects of compassion meditation on a psychological model of charitable donation.
Ashar, Y. K., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Yarkoni, T., Sills, J., Halifax, J., Dimidjian, S., & Wager, T. D. (2016) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000119 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Teaching Medical Students Social Responsibility
Faulkner, L. R., & McCurdy, R. L. (2000) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200004000-00010 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Velásquez, A. M., López, M. A., Quiñonez, N., & Paba, D. P. (2015) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2015.1111804 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Intensive meditation training influences emotional responses to suffering
Rosenberg, E. L., Zanesco, A. P., King, B. G., Aichele, S. R., Jacobs, T. L., Bridwell, D. A., MacLean, K. A., Shaver, P. R., Ferrer, E., Sahdra, B. K., et al. (2015) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000080 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Can Compassion Meditation Contribute to the Development of Psychotherapists’ Empathy? A Review
Bibeau, M., Dionne, F., & Leblanc, J. (2016) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0439-y · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Mindfulness and Distress Tolerance: Relations in a Mindfulness Preventive Intervention
Lotan, G., Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2013.6.4.371 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The neural mediators of kindness-based meditation: a theoretical model
Mascaro, J. S., Darcher, A., Negi, L. T., & Raison, C. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00109 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Royle, P., & Waugh, N. R. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-23 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Maintaining Reviews: Updates, Amendments and Feedback
Higgins, J. P., Green, S., & Scholten, R. J. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The Relaxation Response: Therapeutic Effect
Benson, H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5344.1693b · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Common variant in OXTR predicts growth in positive emotions from loving-kindness training
Isgett, S. F., Algoe, S. B., Boulton, A. J., Way, B. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2016) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.08.010 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Does passage meditation foster compassionate love among health professionals?: a randomised trial
Oman, D., Thoresen, C. E., & Hedberg, J. (2010) · Mental Health, Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13674670903261954 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Hurst, C. E. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315536859 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self/Other Referential Processing Following Mindfulness and Loving-Kindness Meditation
Logie, K., & Frewen, P. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0317-z · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Fricchione, G. L. (2011) · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationShi, W., He, X., Han, X., Wang, N., Zhang, N., & Wang, X. (2015) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s79607 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Integrative Medicine for Treating Depression: An Update on the Latest Evidence
Luberto, C. M., White, C., Sears, R. W., & Cotton, S. (2013) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-013-0391-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationIronson, G. (2007) · Altruism and Health · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195182910.003.0007 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kang, Y., Gray, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0355-6 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Compassion and Healing in Medicine and Society
Fricchione, G. (2011) · doi:10.56021/9781421402208 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Way Things Are: A Living Approach to Buddhism for Today's World
Nydahl, O. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Effect of Meditation on Empathy and Anxiety
Pearl, J. H., & Carlozzi, A. F. (1994) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1994.78.1.297 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Development of Empathic Skill: A Study
Keefe, T. (1979) · Journal of Education for Social Work · doi:10.1080/00220612.1979.10671563 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A Potential Role for Oxytocin in the Intergenerational Transmission of Secure Attachment
Rilling, J. K. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.136 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3.0 [computer software]. Englewood: Biostat.
- Sears, R. W., Tirch, D. D., & Denton, R. B. (2011). Mindfulness in clinical practice. New York: Professional Resource Exchange.
- Wallace, B. A. (1999). Boundless heart: cultivation of the four immeasurables. Boston: Snow Lion Publications.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale
Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191119874108 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Wakelin, K. E., Perman, G., & Simonds, L. M. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2586 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Mascaro, J. S., Florian, M. P., Ash, M. J., Palmer, P. K., Frazier, T., Condon, P., & Raison, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.547241 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Goldberg, S. B., Imhoff-Smith, T., Bolt, D. M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Dahl, C. J., Davidson, R. J., & Rosenkranz, M. A. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/23825 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Meta-analyses involving hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety, stress) and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning (eg, meaning in life, compassion, prosocial behavior) [6-15].”
BackgroundCanby, N. K., Eichel, K., Lindahl, J., Chau, S., Cordova, J., & Britton, W. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603394 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Campos, D., Modrego-Alarcón, M., López-del-Hoyo, Y., González-Panzano, M., Van Gordon, W., Shonin, E., Navarro-Gil, M., & García-Campayo, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00809 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Furthermore, mindfulness training has been used to elicit changes in self-awareness, emotion regulation, and neurophysiology (e.g., Ospina et al., 2007; Slagter et al., 2007; Lutz et al., 2008; Chiesa et al., 2011; Vago and Silbersweig, 2012; Lippelt et al., 2014).”
MethodAccoto, A., Chiarella, S. G., Raffone, A., Montano, A., de Marco, A., Mainiero, F., Rubbino, R., Valzania, A., & Conversi, D. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115512 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Does mindfulness change the mind? A novel psychonectome perspective based on Network Analysis
Roca, P., Diez, G. G., Castellanos, N., & Vazquez, C. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219793 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Godara, M., Silveira, S., Matthäus, H., Heim, C., Voelkle, M., Hecht, M., Binder, E. B., & Singer, T. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256323 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Mindfulness meditation weakens attachment to self: Evidence from a self vs other binding task
Chiarella, S. G., Makwana, M., Simione, L., Hartkamp, M., Calabrese, L., Raffone, A., & Srinivasan, N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01457-9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Silveira, S., Godara, M., & Singer, T. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/45027 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Giving yourself some breathing room…”: an exploration of group meditation for people with aphasia
Panda, S., Whitworth, A., Hersh, D., & Biedermann, B. (2021) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2020.1819956 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Navarrete, J., Herrero, R., Soler, J., Domínguez-Clavé, E., Baños, R., & Cebolla, A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252089 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Hong, M., Liang, D., Lu, T., & Liu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213089 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Garland, E. L., & Jinpa, T. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104494 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Chungnam National University (KR)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Luberto, Christina M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2017-10-23
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 708-724
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- PMC
- PMC6081743
- OpenAlex
- W2765401153
- Semantic Scholar
- 03cd16d64030a6c930697b5ca619585fceb9cd7c
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2T32AT000051-6)
- National Cancer Institute (1K24CA197382)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- meditation, empathy, compassion, prosocial behavior, loving-kindness meditation, altruism, helping behavior, group meditation, positive emotions, compassion-focused therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review