Cited by 346Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionEmpathy and Medical Education

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors

Open access
Luberto, Christina M., Shinday, Nina, Song, Rhayun, Philpotts, Lisa L., Park, Elyse R., Fricchione, Gregory L., Yeh, Gloria Y.·2018·Mindfulness

Abstract

Increased attention has focused on methods to increase empathy, compassion, and pro-social behavior. Meditation practices have traditionally been used to cultivate pro-social outcomes, and recently investigations have sought to evaluate their efficacy for these outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of meditation for pro-social emotions and behavior. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases (inception-April 2016) using the search terms: mindfulness, meditation, mind-body therapies, tai chi, yoga, MBSR, MBCT, empathy, compassion, love, altruism, sympathy, or kindness. Randomized controlled trials in any population were included (26 studies with 1,714 subjects). Most were conducted among healthy adults (n=11) using compassion or loving kindness meditation (n=18) over 8-12weeks (n=12) in a group format (n=17). Most control groups were wait-list or no-treatment (n=15). Outcome measures included self-reported emotions (e.g., composite scores, validated measures) and observed behavioral outcomes (e.g., helping behavior in real-world and simulated settings). Many studies showed a low risk of bias. Results demonstrated small to medium effects of meditation on self-reported (SMD = .40, p < .001) and observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001) and suggest psychosocial and neurophysiological mechanisms of action. Subgroup analyses also supported small to medium effects of meditation even when compared to active control groups. Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation can improve positive pro-social emotions and behaviors.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that meditation interventions produced small-to-medium improvements in empathy, compassion, and prosocial behaviors across 26 randomized controlled trials. Effects were significant for both self-reported and observable prosocial outcomes, including when compared with active controls.

Key findings

  • Across 26 RCTs with 1,714 subjects, 22 of 26 studies (85%) showed significantly greater improvement in at least one prosocial outcome following meditation versus control.
  • Meta-analysis found a small-to-medium effect on self-reported outcomes (SMD = .40, p < .001; 95% CI = .28–.52) and on observable outcomes (SMD = .45, p < .001; 95% CI = .28–.61).
  • Effects were similar for active controls (self-reported SMD = .43, p < .001; observable SMD = .48, p < .001) and inactive controls (self-reported SMD = .39, p < .001; observable SMD = .41, p < .001).
  • Risk of bias was low in 11 studies, medium in 12, and high in 3; outcomes did not clearly differ by risk of bias.

Methods

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of meditation-based interventions assessing quantitative prosocial emotions or behaviors; searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through April 2016 yielded 26 included studies.
  • Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane guidelines across eight domains; meta-analysis used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0 and standardized mean differences (SMD).
  • Fixed-effects models were used given homogeneity (self-reported: I² = .00, Q = 3.94, p = .49; observable: I² = .00, Q = 1.82, p = .96), with subgroup analyses by active versus inactive control and publication bias assessed by funnel plot and fail-safe N.

Limitations

  • The paper states limitations including heterogeneity in the interventions and exclusion of non-English studies, which may bias results and limit generalizability.
  • The paper notes samples were all non-clinical and primarily female and White, with half not reporting racial composition, so greater sample diversity is needed.
  • Evident from the text: most studies measured outcomes shortly after intervention, only 4 included longer-term follow-up, and there was variability among meditation interventions despite meta-analytic homogeneity.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-017-0841-8

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

21 of 93 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tended to focus on one specific type of meditation practice, negative emotions, or self-focused positive emotions.

    “Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have tended to focus on one specific type of meditation practice (e.g., mindfulness or LKM; Galante et al., 2014; Zeng et al., 2015;), negative emotions (Hofmann et al., 2010), or self-focused positive emotions (e.g., Zeng et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Galante et al., 2014 source
    • cites Zeng et al., 2015 source

      The Abstract identifies this as a systematic review and meta-analysis of loving-kindness meditation, supporting its use as an example of a review focused on one type of practice. But the Introduction says it examines other-focused as well as self-focused positive emotions, so it does not support describing its focus as self-focused positive emotions alone. The negative-emotions clause cites a different source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hofmann et al., 2010 source
  • Findingown data

    All 7 low-risk studies that measured observable prosocial outcomes reported improvements following meditation.

    “There were 7 low-risk studies that measured observable pro-social outcomes and all of them reported improvements following meditation (Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014; Kemeny et al., 2012; Mascaro, Riling, Negi, & Raison, 2013; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Schonert-Reichl et al., 2015; Weng et al., 2013; Weng, Fox, Hessenthaler, Stodola, & Davidson, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kang, Gray, & Dovidio, 2014 source
    • cites Kemeny et al., 2012 source
    • cites Mascaro, Riling, Negi, & Raison, 2013 source

      The Empathic accuracy results report that more meditation participants improved on the observable RMET task than controls. But the Introduction distinguishes empathic accuracy from prosocial behavior, and the Discussion calls for future assessment of how practitioners relate to others in everyday life. This study supports an improvement in measured empathic accuracy, not an observed improvement in prosocial behavior. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Improvements in empathy were correlated with increased activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).

    “Mascaro et al. (2013) found that improvements in empathy were correlated with increased activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mascaro et al., 2013 source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    One way meditation practice can lead to improvements in prosocial emotions is by improving individuals' own socio-emotional well-being.

    “Consistent with the larger literature demonstrating that meditation interventions improve self-focused emotions (Hofmann et al. al., 2010; Kirby et al., 2016), these results suggest that one way meditation practice can lead to improvements in pro-social emotions is by improving individuals’ own socio-emotional well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hofmann et al. al., 2010 source
    • cites Kirby et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
  • Findingcitation

    Meditation was associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex.

    “Meditation was also associated with altered activation in areas of the prefrontal cortex (Mascaro, Darcher, Negi, & Raison, 2015; Weng et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mascaro, Darcher, Negi, & Raison, 2015 source
    • cites Weng et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 34
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meditation-based interventions improve stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and emotion regulation across a range of psychiatric and medical populations.

    “The results of several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions suggest that these treatments significantly improve stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, and emotion regulation across a range of psychiatric and medical populations (Bohlmeijer, Prenger, Taal, & Cuijpers, 2010; Eberth & Sedlmeier, 2012; Gotink et al., 2015; Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010; Kh”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bohlmeijer, Prenger, Taal, & Cuijpers, 2010 source
    • cites Eberth & Sedlmeier, 2012 source
    • cites Gotink et al., 2015 source

      The Discussion’s summary of main results (page not available) reports significant improvements in depression, anxiety, stress, and quality of life after MBSR or MBCT in patients with medical conditions and psychological disorders. The cited paper does not report a significant improvement in emotion regulation as an outcome; its Results instead mention increased metacognitive awareness of negative thoughts and feelings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LKM improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect.

    “a recent meta-analysis found that LKM indeed improves depression, mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive affect (Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Galante, Galante, Bekkers, & Gallacher, 2014 source

      The Abstract and Conclusions report reduced depression and increased mindfulness, compassion, and self-compassion versus passive controls, plus increased positive emotions versus progressive relaxation. But these are findings for kindness-based meditation as a group of practices, not specifically for LKM; the citing sentence also omits the differing comparators. The Effects of the intervention section reports mixed or nonsignificant results against some active controls. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In studies with follow-up assessments, one found maintained gains at 5-months post-intervention and the other found no significant improvements post-intervention or at follow-up.

    “In studies with follow-up assessments, one found maintained gains at 5-months post-intervention (Kemeny et al., 2012) and the other found no significant improvements post-intervention or at follow-up (Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kemeny et al., 2012 source
    • cites Poehlmann-Tynan et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Empathy and compassion are related but distinct prosocial emotions that consist of cognitive and affective components and can be learned with practice.

    “Although there are varying definitions of empathy and compassion, they are often considered related but distinct pro-social emotions that consist of cognitive and affective components and can be learned with practice (Bibeau, Dionne, & Leblanc, 2016; Goetz, Keltner, & Simon-Thomas, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bibeau, Dionne, & Leblanc, 2016 source
    • cites Goetz, Keltner, & Simon-Thomas, 2010 source

      The Critical Summary of Alternatives (page unavailable) distinguishes compassion from empathic distress and describes compassion as involving appraisals and feelings. It also says loving-kindness meditation may cultivate a lasting disposition toward compassion. These passages do not establish that empathy itself can be learned with practice or that both empathy and compassion have the claimed cognitive and affective components. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Oxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is associated with greater pro-social behaviors.

    “Oxytocin plays a role in both relaxation and secure attachment physiology and is also associated with greater pro-social behaviors (e.g., improved face expression recognition, enhanced encoding of positive social memories; Isgett, Algoe, Boulton, Way, & Fredrickson, 2016; Mascaro et al, 2015; Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Isgett, Algoe, Boulton, Way, & Fredrickson, 2016 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes oxytocin as implicated in sociality, and the Discussion (page unavailable) links it to altruistic behavior, attention to positive faces, and constructive behavior during couple conflict. Those passages support the broad social-behavior association, but they do not establish a role in relaxation or secure-attachment physiology, improved facial-expression recognition, or enhanced encoding of positive social memories. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mascaro et al, 2015 source

      The Neuromodulatory Backdrop section links oxytocin to prosocial behaviors and to vagal activity and reduced sympathetic responses to stress, which supports the prosocial and relaxation-related parts of the claim. It does not discuss secure attachment physiology or the specific examples of facial-expression recognition and positive social-memory encoding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports higher oxytocin levels in securely attached mothers after interacting with their infants and suggests a role in attachment and social behavior. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes improved facial-expression recognition, social memory, and trust in trials of intranasal oxytocin. Our copy does not establish a role for oxytocin in relaxation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Emotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes.

    “and emotion regulation is thought to play a role in the effects of LKM on pro-social outcomes (Mascaro et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mascaro et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individuals must be able to tolerate the distress they feel in response to another's suffering in order to effectively enact helping behaviors.

    “Theoretical conceptualizations of compassion emphasize that individuals must be able to tolerate the distress they feel in response to another’s suffering in order to effectively enact helping behaviors (Strauss et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Strauss et al., 2016 source

      Section 1.1 describes distress tolerance as a component of several conceptualizations of compassion and says overwhelming personal distress may hinder the ability to help. The claim’s categorical “must” is stronger than the review’s qualified account. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Empathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior.

    “Empathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source
    • cites Singer & Klimecki, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Compassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes.

    “while compassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes (e.g., Klimecki et al., 2014; Singer & Klimecki, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2014 source

      The Introduction says compassion is concern for others’ suffering associated with motivation to help, and describes it as a promising way to strengthen personal resources. The Discussion reports increased positive affect after compassion training. However, the paper characterizes sharing others’ painful feelings as empathy, which it distinguishes from compassion; it does not support the parenthetical definition of compassion as affect-sharing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Singer & Klimecki, 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other previous studies have found some differences in emotional outcomes across meditation types.

    “other previous studies have found some differences in emotional outcomes across meditation types (Zeng et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A total of 18 studies provided sufficient data on self-reported outcomes for meta-analysis, allowing 19 comparisons.

    “A total of 18 studies provided sufficient data on self-reported outcomes for meta-analysis. These studies allowed for 19 comparisons because one study used two control groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Most studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations.

    “Most studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations using a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Greater meditation compliance led to decreased anxiety, which led to greater empathy.

    “Shapiro et al. (1998) found that greater meditation compliance led to decreased anxiety, which led to greater empathy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shapiro et al., 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A total of 11 studies provided sufficient data on observable outcomes for meta-analysis with 12 comparisons available.

    “A total of 11 studies provided sufficient data on observable outcomes for meta-analysis with 12 comparisons available (see Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Studies showed lower risk of bias in selective reporting (24 low risk) but higher risk in baseline imbalance (4 high risk), participant blinding, incomplete outcome data, and differential attrition (3 high risk each).

    “In general, studies showed lower risk of bias in terms of selective reporting of outcome measures (24 low risk), but higher risk of bias in terms of baseline imbalance (4 high risk), participant blinding, incomplete outcome data, and differential attrition (3 high risk each; see Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Most studies used a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).

    “Most studies (n = 22) were conducted in non-clinical adult populations using a primarily LKM or CM intervention (n = 10) or both mindfulness and LKM combined (n = 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Increases in mindfulness and self-compassion, and decreases in stress, were significantly correlated with increases in empathy.

    “One study also found that increases in mindfulness and self-compassion, and decreases in stress, were significantly correlated with increases in empathy (Wallmark et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wallmark et al., 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Eleven studies showed a low risk of bias, 12 showed a medium risk, and 3 showed high risk.

    “Eleven studies showed a low risk of bias, 12 showed a medium risk, and 3 showed high risk (Tables 1 and 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The literature search yielded 479 results, and after exclusions, 26 studies met eligibility criteria.

    “Our search yielded 479 results. After excluding duplicates (n = 282), unpublished manuscripts (n = 18), non-RCTs (n = 52), non-meditation interventions (n = 18), and studies that did not quantitatively measure pro-social outcomes (n = 43) or only measured self-focused compassion (n = 40), there were 26 studies that met our eligibility criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Loving kindness meditation led to improvements in positive emotions, which led to improvements in social connectedness, which led to improvements in vagal tone.

    “Kok et al. (2013) tested more complex structural models and found that loving kindness meditation led to improvements in positive emotions, which led to improvements in social connectedness, which led to improvements in vagal tone.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kok et al., 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Almost all (7 out of 8) studies examined the relationship between amount of home practice/meditation adherence and prosocial outcomes; 5 found greater meditation practice correlated with greater prosocial outcomes and 2 found no significant correlation.

    “Almost all (7 out of 8) examined the relationship between amount of home practice/meditation adherence and pro-social outcomes: 5 found that greater meditation practice was correlated with greater pro-social outcomes (Jazaieri et al., 2013; Keefe, 1979; Rosenberg et al., 2015; Velásquez et al., 2015; Wallmark et al., 2013) and 2 found no significant correlation (Kemeny et la., 2012; Mascaro et al.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jazaieri et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Keefe, 1979 source
    • cites Rosenberg et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Effects for observable outcomes were somewhat stronger and more consistent than results for self-reported outcomes, though both showed significant improvements in the meta-analysis.

    “Effects for observable outcomes (e.g., real-world helping behavior, facial expressions) were somewhat stronger and more consistent than results for self-reported outcomes, though both showed significant improvements in the meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Meta-analysis results indicated that meditation training had a small-medium and significant effect on both subjective and objective prosocial outcomes, similar across studies with active and inactive control groups.

    “Meta-analysis results indicated that meditation training had a small-medium and significant effect on both subjective and objective pro-social outcomes, which was similar across studies with active and inactive control groups if not slightly higher among those with active controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many studies were low-risk, with only 3 studies showing a high risk of bias and no clear differences in outcomes based on risk of bias.

    “Many studies were low-risk, with only 3 studies showing a high risk of bias and there were no clear differences in outcomes based on risk of bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.

    “Two independent reviewers (CML and NS) assessed risk of bias for each included study according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins & Green, 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Heterogeneity of included studies was examined using the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model.

    “We examined heterogeneity of the included studies based on the i-squared statistic and Q test to determine a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model according to the results (i-squared < 40% for fixed effects; Higgins & Green, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins & Green, 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Engaging in prosocial behavior is associated with greater happiness, psychological well-being, indices of physiological health, better physical functioning, better interpersonal relationships, and decreased morbidity in medical populations.

    “Indeed, a large body of research demonstrates that engaging in pro-social behavior is associated with greater happiness and psychological well-being, indices of physiological health (e.g., increased heart rate variability, immune function, telomere length, genetic expression), better physical functioning, better interpersonal relationships, and decreased morbidity in medical populations (Dunn, Akn”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dunn, Aknin, & Norton, 2008 source
    • cites Hoge et al., 2013 source
    • cites Ironson, 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Greater empathy leads to greater compassion, and greater compassion leads to greater prosocial behavior.

    “Research supports the idea that greater empathy leads to greater compassion, and greater compassion leads to greater pro-social behavior (Lim & DeSteno, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lim & DeSteno, 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    For studies that included two control groups, two comparisons were conducted and the total N was divided by 2 to avoid over-estimation.

    “For studies that included two control groups, we conducted two comparisons and divided the total N by 2 to avoid over-estimation of the study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Authors did not contact authors to obtain missing data in order to prevent bias introduced by selective responding of authors.

    “We did not contact authors to obtain missing data in order to prevent bias introduced by selective responding of authors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Compassion meditation promotes prosocial outcomes in psychotherapists.

    “A narrative review also suggested that compassion meditation promotes pro-social outcomes in psychotherapists (Bibeau et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bibeau et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot and the fail-safe N.

    “Publication bias was also assessed by funnel plot and the fail-safe N.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    One reviewer extracted data for meta-analysis and a second independent reviewer verified the results, with no discrepancies noted.

    “One reviewer (CML) extracted data for meta-analysis and a second independent reviewer (RS) verified the results, with no discrepancies noted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Two independent reviewers extracted data from each study and discussed results to ensure agreement, with discrepancies resolved through discussion with the senior author.

    “Two independent reviewers (CML and NS) extracted data from each study and discussed results to ensure agreement. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with the senior author (GY).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Improving these pro-social outcomes has the potential to promote important societal changes needed today.

    “Improving these pro-social outcomes has the potential to promote important societal changes needed today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Potential emotional mechanisms include an increased sense of social-emotional connectedness with others, increased positive affect, decreased stress and negative affect, and greater trait mindfulness and self-compassion.

    “Potential emotional mechanisms include an increased sense of social-emotional connectedness with others (Ashar et al., 2016; Kok et al., 2013), increased positive affect (Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kok et al., 2013), decreased stress and negative affect (Kang et al., 2014; Oman et al., 2010; Shapiro et al., 1998), and greater trait mindfulness and self-compassion (Wallmark et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ashar et al., 2016 source
    • cites Kok et al., 2013 source
    • cites Hutcherson et al., 2008 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    In the current systematic review, limitations include heterogeneity in the interventions.

    “limitations include heterogeneity in the interventions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These results advance the scientific understanding of meditation for health outcomes.

    “Nonetheless, these results advance the scientific understanding of meditation for health outcomes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Samples were primarily female and White.

    “primarily female and White”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The role of oxytocin in social behavior is complex and not necessarily pro-social, depending on individual difference characteristics (e.g., gender, psychopathology).

    “Recent theories highlight that the role of oxytocin in social behavior is complex and not necessarily pro-social, depending on individual difference characteristics (e.g., gender, psychopathology; Shamay-Tsoory & Abu-Akel, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shamay-Tsoory & Abu-Akel, 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These mechanisms are consistent with research demonstrating that mindfulness-based interventions increase trait mindfulness, as trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others' suffering.

    “These mechanisms are also consistent with research demonstrating that mindfulness-based interventions increase trait mindfulness (Quaglia, Braun, Freeman, McDaniel, & Brown, 2016), as trait mindfulness is likely to promote real-time awareness of others’ suffering”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Quaglia, Braun, Freeman, McDaniel, & Brown, 2016 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Some studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on prosocial outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals' own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in prosocial outcomes.

    “Some studies directly tested self-focused emotional mechanisms as mediators of meditation training on pro-social outcomes and found significant indirect effects, suggesting that meditation leads to improvements in individuals own socio-emotional functioning and, thereby, improvements in pro-social outcomes (Ashar et al., 2016; Hutcherson et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2014; Kok et al., 2013; Shapiro”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ashar et al., 2016 source
    • cites Hutcherson et al., 2008 source
    • cites Kang et al., 2014 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These limitations may have biased the results and limits generalizability.

    “which may have biased the results and limits generalizability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Distress tolerance is a well-established risk factor for emotional disorders that influences emotion regulation strategies (i.e., low levels of distress tolerance motivate maladaptive avoidance).

    “Distress tolerance, an individual difference variable defined as the ability to withstand negative affective states (Simons & Gaher, 2005), is a well-established risk factor for emotional disorders that influences emotion regulation strategies (i.e., low levels of distress tolerance motivate maladaptive avoidance).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simons & Gaher, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some research suggests empathy and compassion may have different utility for the person giving versus receiving help, particularly when empathizing with another's suffering.

    “It is also worth noting that some research suggests empathy and compassion may have different utility for the person giving versus receiving help, particularly when empathizing with another’s suffering.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Many studies used active control groups and objective behavioral outcomes.

    “Many studies used active control groups and objective behavioral outcomes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The same physiological processes that characterize the relaxation response occur in the context of secure attachment and mother-child dyads, which provide a foundation for compassion.

    “The same physiological processes that characterize the relaxation response have been shown to occur in the context of secure attachment and mother-child dyads, which provide a foundation for compassion (Fricchione, 2011; Hill-Soderlund et al, 2008; Mikulincer, Shaver, Gillath, & Nitzberg, 2005; Oosterman, De Schipper, Fisher, Dozier, & Schuengel, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fricchione, 2011 source
    • cites Hill-Soderlund et al, 2008 source
    • cites Mikulincer, Shaver, Gillath, & Nitzberg, 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Meditation interventions, particularly mindfulness meditation, significantly increase distress tolerance and improve emotion regulation.

    “Meditation interventions, particularly mindfulness meditation, have been shown to significantly increase distress tolerance and improve emotion regulation (Lotan, Tanay, & Bernstein, 2013; Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lotan, Tanay, & Bernstein, 2013 source
    • cites Chambers, Gullone, & Allen, 2009 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Meditation interventions (e.g., MBSR, MBCT) could provide additional benefits beyond reduced emotional distress.

    “Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation interventions (e.g., MBSR, MBCT) could provide additional benefits beyond reduced emotional distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
49 of 49
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The outcome measures used across included studies validly capture empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.

    “Outcome measures included self-reported emotions (e.g., composite scores, validated measures) and observed behavioral outcomes (e.g., helping behavior in real-world and simulated settings).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The included studies' samples and interventions are sufficiently representative to generalize the pooled effects to broader populations.

    “Clinicians and meditation teachers should be aware that meditation can improve positive pro-social emotions and behaviors.”
    “The results of the current systematic review support the efficacy of meditation-based interventions for increasing empathy, compassion, and pro-social behaviors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms identified in the included studies are causal mechanisms by which meditation improves prosocial outcomes.

    “and suggest psychosocial and neurophysiological mechanisms of action.”
    “Results of several studies suggest potential mechanisms by which meditation can improve pro-social outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Brief mobile-phone meditation practice (two weeks, 20 minutes daily) has shown significant pro-social benefits.

    “as even two weeks of 20 minutes daily practice via mobile phone applications have shown significant pro-social benefits.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses involving hundreds of RCTs suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning.

    “Meta-analyses involving hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that meditation training can decrease psychological symptoms (eg, depression, anxiety, stress) and increase aspects of well-being and positive functioning (eg, meaning in life, compassion, prosocial behavior) [6-15].”

    From Testing the efficacy of a multicomponent, self-guided, smartphone-based meditation app: Three-armed randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction reports that other meta-analyses found improvements in stress, anxiety, and depression; the Discussion reports this paper’s finding of improved compassion and prosocial behavior. This review included 26 RCTs, not hundreds, and the passages do not establish an effect on meaning in life. The claim is therefore supported for several outcomes but not in all its specifics. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness meditation can modulate intersubjective and self-other representations and promote positive social behaviors such as compassion, empathy, and altruism.

    “Several studies reported that mindfulness meditation can modulate intersubjective and self–other representations [102,103,104] while promoting positive social behaviors, such as compassion, empathy, and altruism [105].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124344

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2019-04-12 (notice 10.1371/journal.pone.0215608), not before this paper was published (2017-10-23).

    Cited work 10.1371/journal.pone.0124344 · retracted 2019-04-12 · notice 10.1371/journal.pone.0215608 · this paper published 2017-10-23

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3.0 [computer software]. Englewood: Biostat.
  2. Sears, R. W., Tirch, D. D., & Denton, R. B. (2011). Mindfulness in clinical practice. New York: Professional Resource Exchange.
  3. Wallace, B. A. (1999). Boundless heart: cultivation of the four immeasurables. Boston: Snow Lion Publications.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luberto, C. M., Shinday, N., Song, R., Philpotts, L. L., Park, E. R., Fricchione, G. L., & Yeh, G. Y.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Luberto, Christina M.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
708-724
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2765401153
Cited by
346
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2T32AT000051-6)
  • National Cancer Institute (1K24CA197382)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
meditation, empathy, compassion, prosocial behavior, loving-kindness meditation, altruism, helping behavior, group meditation, positive emotions, compassion-focused therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review