The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Mother‐Infant Reciprocity
Abstract
By three weeks of age, the human neonate demonstrates behaviours which are quite different with an object and with a human interactant. He also demonstrates an expectancy for interaction with his caregiver which has clearly defined limits, as demonstrated behaviourally. In microanalysis of videotape, we saw regularly a set of interactive behaviours which were demonstrable in optimal face-to-face interaction between infants and their mothers. All parts of the infant's body move in smooth circular patterns as he attends to her. His face-to-face attention to her is rhythmic with approach-withdrawal cycling of extremities. The attention phase and build-up to her cues are followed by turning away and a recovery phase in a rhythm of attention-non-attention which seems to define a cyclical homeostatic curve of attention, averaging several cycles per minute. When she violates his expectancy for rhythmic interaction by presenting a still, unresponsive face to him, he becomes visibly concerned, his movements become jerky, he averts his face, then attempts to draw her into interaction. When repeated attempts fail, he finally withdraws into an attitude of helplessness, face averted, body curled up and motionless. If she returns to her usual interactive responses, he comes alive after an initial puzzled period, and returns to his rhythmic cyclical behaviour which has previously characterized their ongoing face-to-face interaction. This attentional cycling may be diagnostic of optimal mother-infant interactions and seems not to be present in more disturbed interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of the infant on its caregiver
Lewis, M., & Rosenblum, L. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,428
Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.183.4120.99 · Cited by 724
The Goal and Structure of Mother-Infant Play
Stern, D. N. (1974) · Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0002-7138(09)61348-0 · Cited by 195
Visual Regard of Moving and Stationary Faces in Early Infancy.
Carpenter, G. C. (1974) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · Cited by 55
Cited by
The Infant's Response to Entrapment between Contradictory Messages in Face-to-Face Interaction
Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978) · Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0002-7138(09)62273-1 · Cited by 1,880
Self-citationMurray, L., Fiori-Cowley, A., Hooper, R., & Cooper, P. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01871.x · Cited by 1,311
Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social–emotional development
Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383 · Cited by 1,191
The Impact of Postnatal Depression on Infant Development
Murray, L. (1992) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00890.x · Cited by 1,089
Why Synchrony Matters during Mother-Child Interactions: A Systematic Review
Leclère, C., Viaux, S., Avril, M., Achard, C., Chetouani, M., Missonnier, S., & Cohen, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113571 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Brazelton, T. B., Tronick, E., Adamson, L., Als, H., & Wise, S.
- Venue
- Novartis Foundation Symposia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-01
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 137-154
- ISSN
- 1528-2511 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-4657
- OpenAlex
- W1540848855
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 4
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Mother‐Infant Reciprocity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470720158.ch9
- The paper
- Brazelton, T. B., Tronick, E., Adamson, L., Als, H., & Wise, S. (1975). Early Mother‐Infant Reciprocity. Novartis Foundation Symposia. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470720158.ch9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.