Cited by 19Academic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyEmbodied and Extended CognitionChild and Animal Learning Development

From Direct Perception to the Primacy of Action: A Closer Look at James Gibson's Ecological Approach to Psychology

Costall, Alan·2004·Theories of Infant Development

Abstract

This chapter contains section titled: Introduction The “Early Gibson” The “Later Gibson” Implications for Research and Theory in Infancy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470752180.ch3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costall, A.
Corresponding author
Costall, Alan
Venue
Theories of Infant Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Pages
70-89
OpenAlex
W1510855880
Cited by
19
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
James Gibson, direct perception, action, infancy, perceptual development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review