Cited by 13Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsInfant Development and Preterm Care

Neuroscience Perspectives on Infant Development

Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff‐Smith, Annette·2004·Theories of Infant Development

Abstract

This chapter contains section titled: Biology and Cognitive Development Human Brain Development Interactive Specialization Atypical Development and Interactive Specialization Conclusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470752180.ch5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. H., & Karmiloff‐Smith, A.
Venue
Theories of Infant Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Pages
121-141
OpenAlex
W1591130691
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
infant development, human brain development, atypical development, cognitive development, brain development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review